SQA

I bucked all advice from my friends (and resisted my conservative bias) and decided to fully trust the Times journalists. As they left my home they asked that I not talk to any other outlets and I insisted then and repeatedly over the following weeks that I would keep my word and only share this story with them. But then the weeks dragged on. They kept coming back to us saying the editors needed more. I needed to go on the record (okay). We need more screenshots (okay). I met every bench mark they set, eager to provide more sources or evidence as needed. After the story went up I began to ask them … wait, where are the stories from the other women? Where are their accusations of sexual assault? Why am I the focus? Why are there 11 paragraphs dedicated to detailing my work history (more than has been published about Graham’s by far)? Why does it say “nobody could corroborate” when I offered them sources that COULD corroborate? Why did they include an out of context quote from a friend joking “do not call Graham” after I called off my wedding? (Because she knew I would never). Where were the screenshots they’d said they would use? Or the mention that I’d supported local democrats and that most of my family (and husband) are liberal? The editors said it was too much, they explained. The Times also failed to include any mention that I DID confide in multiple friends through the years that Graham had been abusive — long before he was running for office. Those friends confirm they told the Times so. It dawned on me that this really was a set up all along. The journalists I trusted who convinced me to share a story I never wanted to tell methodically delayed and twisted this into a gift to the Platner campaign. Violating the trust of his victims. Shattering the trust I placed in them with the most vulnerable story of my life. And at the end of my call with them I reluctantly accepted their insistence that this was still a powerful story and that I had done a brave thing. And I thanked them for all the hard work they had put into it. Still fawning after all these years.

Tomb Raider: Legacy of Atlantis is another game that uses AI to accelerate development. They used AI-generated assets refined by human artists for the final product. Personally, I'm all for it, and maybe that's why Lara Croft here doesn't look like the typical woke DEI mannish foid because AI understands the difference between ugly and beauty. After all, pretty much every AI generator uses negative prompts like "ugly, old, transexual," etc., so that every AI-generated face comes out looking pretty, representing the gender it's supposed to. AI doesn't have an HR department or activist consultants. It reflects what humans actually find beautiful in the training set and is distilled by the trainers for better aesthetics. So yeah, it naturally pushes toward traditional beauty standards. More of this is gonna come, and more games are gonna be made with even more involvement by AI. That means less budget, fewer DEI hires, and probably fewer Karens and foids wrecking our games into disgusting, ugly slop like GoW: Laufey has turned into. Many recent excellent games have AI involvement, with Crimson Desert, Expedition 33, and many others, and I hope this trend continues.

5⃣UNITE THE RIGHT F-37, a member of the leadership chat for the Charlottesville rally in 2017, made racist posts under an SPLC employee's supervision and arranged transport for others to attend the rally. SPLC paid this person $300K. 🧵9/20

Asmongold Says He Would Too & Doesn't Understand Why People Would Have Moral Problems with This After Reacting to YouTuber Jesse Ridgway and His Wife Revealing They Had an Abortion After Learning Their Unborn Baby Had Down Syndrome 😬👀 “I don't even think about this. To me, it's such an obvious decision. I can't even comprehend why a person would have moral problems with this. What if it's your kid? Of course I'd do it”

How would you feel? 👀

WTF timeline are we on. Someone called me the MAGA whisperer and I’ll gladly take the title. Left, right, D or R we all want the same things. We’re being divided on purpose by the Epstein Elite Oligarch class because as long as we’re at each other’s throats, they get fat and rich off of our misery. The second we figure out we agree on more than we disagree, they’re done. Love your neighbor. Be yourself. Radical honesty. No fucks given, no fucks taken. Everything else is just noise. (But still fuck Jake “Brick Tamland” Tapper on any time line)

Just after escaping Tatooine in A New Hope, Han Solo expresses strong disbelief in The Force, Jedi, and all their stuff as voodoo and witchcraft. Thanks to the Prequels trying to shoehorn as many characters in, everyone there except Luke has had a personal experience with the Jedi. Including Han's First Mate & Business partner, Chewie, who evidently had been flying with him for years and never passed that info on.

This is partly why Supergirl will fail at Box Office. Dudes (a demographic it needs to rely on) hating on it in pure ignorance. Chuds like these in the comments and their Culture War Hate Networks feeding them. Apparently Supergirl is not allowed to have past "Trauma" cuz it triggers these absolute muppets who've never read a Supergirl comic in their life. Unlike Superman, Kara actually watched her entire planet die FIRST HAND. Not only that but her city broke off and she survived on that piece for years watching people she loved slowly and voilently die around her. But that cant be something "traumatic" from her past and fuck her up a bit, because internet "anti-woke" tough guys think the using the word "Trauma" is super woke cuz it has to do with millennials, and "therapy" and "feminism"?! Fuck right off you dumb fucks. If you are one of these people break out from your fucking echo chamber you absolute lemmings. The collective IQ in this thread makes me so fucking sad. Ill never understand why these dudes dont want these types of stories told. Why does it trigger them like this? The fuck. 🤦‍♂️

STATE OF PLAY show might have leaked, take this with a huge grain of salt!!