strager

@0xSero @loporium That's what The Algorithm is for.

@loporium I don’t have infinite time in this world. I trust the opinion of the aggregate intelligence of humanity

First they removed dislikes from YouTube, now they removed Likes. No more public signal on what matters. Making another braindead prediction, in 12 months we won't see views anymore. In 24 months we won't subscriber counts anymore.

@itslilyszabo @avidseries They think that he's accusing non-Asians of being promiscuous and criminal. They don't understand what he's saying.

@avidseries why are these weirdos all making faces at him? he is saying the most reasonable things

@DanielLockyer What's the X axis?

You should probably enable TLS connection re-use/keepalive in your applications Here's a heatmap of tls.connect latency in a production Node.js app P50 is 400ms, P99 up at 3.9s Fix this and all your external API requests become instantly faster

@losterheider @steipete @gethealthsync Why is this an ad on Twitter? O_o

@nayshins I jest.

@nayshins Right here dude: oreilly.com/library/view/c…

Has anyone documented all the code slop patterns yet? I want to lint for them and banish them to hades.

@ja3k_ You think 3k$/year is trivial?

Idk why gas prices are so culturally salient in america. You could drive an hour a day and it probably comes to less than $3k/year. Is it because they put the price on billboards along the road?

@CustomWetware @nicbarkeragain I prefer two lines for error checks: int rc = vkQueueSubmit(graphicsQueue, 1, &submitInfo, computeFence); assert(rc == VK_SUCCESS);

@nicbarkeragain Usually right but I recently did this: assert(VK_SUCCESS == vkQueueSubmit(graphicsQueue, 1, &submitInfo, computeFence)); and it's much nicer because it speeds up understanding what's going on when you read the code

Programmers: do you have a consistent preference for which side you put the literal on in a comparison? // Right-hand side if (someValue == 1) {} // Left-hand side if (1 == someValue) {}

@neogoose_btw The quoted documentation doesn't say anything about locking. The highlighted part is basically how Linux works as well (if Linux had a separate file mapping objects). I'm confused about your tweet. Are you complaining about FILE_SHARE_WRITE etc?

I don't know I can not handle windows anymore. On this so called OS all the memory mapped files locked at the OS level meaning no one can write there. I am not sure but do microsoft engineers even understand the point of memory mapping or not?

@schteppe "The more mature a team gets, the less work it gets done."

@strager Not sure how to read this to make fun of mature teams… but to be clear, that wasn’t the intention 😅

Using feature branches for development? Keep in mind that the number of active feature branches is used as a metric to determine how mature your team is. Less branches means more mature.

@IterIntellectus That's exactly what Big Fiber would say.

if you read enough fiber research you either start thinking you’re going insane or realize the entire nutrition industry has a financial incentive to keep you buying protein powder instead. you need to eat your fiber and i’m not even trying to be nice about it. 95% of Americans are *deficient* while enough fiber alone reduces all-cause mortality by 30%, colorectal cancer by 26%, and your gut bacteria literally digest your own intestinal lining when you starve them of it. fiber should be a bigger supplement category than protein but since it actually makes you healthier there’s no interest in selling it

@hadilq @JustDeezGuy Throw this at the end (I thought this was obvious): a

@strager @JustDeezGuy I don't know what you are talking about! it's not compiling obviously! 5 | fn mystery<T>(a: T) -> T { | - - expected `T` because of return type play.rust-lang.org/?version=stabl…

I agree both that this satisfies the signature and that it shows why panic! shouldn’t exist (that is, functions should be total). Question: if you remove the panic! does the code still compile?

@schteppe probably both

@schteppe I'm not sure if you're making fun of feature branches or mature teams

@hadilq @JustDeezGuy let _ = std::process::Command::new("rm")...; or std::mem::drop(std::process::Command::new("rm")...);

@strager @JustDeezGuy without changing the signature? I don’t think so, but if you are sure then show me!

In Rust, you can define a struct in crate A, define a trait in crate B, and implement the trait for the struct in either crate A or B (your choice). In Go, you can define a struct in package A, define an interface in package B, and implement the interface for the struct only in package A. Right?

"What other option do we have?" asked few people. As if, Go has not already solved this by allowing structurally typed interfaces.

@oxcrowx but muh edge cases!

@tsoding @boyaviatorr Maybe he means the invention.

@boyaviatorr Whatever you can buy using them? If it's not better than money then why are you trading it for money?

I dare you to name something better than money

@hadilq @JustDeezGuy nah, you can drop the result

@JustDeezGuy you need to change the signature of the function to return Option or Result before removing the panic! then it will compile.

@headinthebox Flickering has not disappeared. I saw it flicker yesterday.

Claude Code's flickering has disappeared, there are some weird artifacts in the input area where things get out of sync, but there is a new annoyance where in many case you cannot copy text from the output (for example when you see it go off the rails and want to past a snippet into the input field to steer it in the right direction). Also it often randomly jumps focus to the start of the chat.