strager

@LisaFenDragon @jakozloski 'Cus AI is trained on the internet, not people's preferences.

@strager @jakozloski I don't see why not

Self-assessed attractiveness is useless signal. 60% of women and 44% of men on Keeper rate themselves above average. Mathematically impossible. This is why we score photos with a model trained on millions of ratings instead of asking.

@LisaFenDragon @jakozloski I guess I don't understand what you're really asking.

@LisaFenDragon @jakozloski That's all based on looks

@TheGingerBill Wait, you're actually a ginger?

This is pretty damn good!

@KeesJanKan @krichard121212 @HazemMoghni @GillesEGignac > Ok, but that's based on their partners? That's the context.

@krichard121212 @HazemMoghni @GillesEGignac Ok, but that's based on their partners? I guess a (multiple raters) estimate by others will push it upwards.

daily reminder that the correlation between measured intelligence and intelligence as rated by others is ~0.2.

@edodreaming @jakozloski Don't judge a book by its cover.

The dating app industry has the worst product-market fit of any consumer category in tech. Billions in revenue, hundreds of millions of users, declining usage, falling stock prices, and a user base that hates the product and uses it anyway because there's no alternative. The category is held together by the absence of competitors, not the strength of the products.

@LisaFenDragon @jakozloski Photofeeler is all based on looks. You upload a photo. What else would it be based on?

@strager @jakozloski I don't see an option for being rated strictly based on looks Also, I was hoping for an accurate AI program. The ones I've found give me decent scores, but I don't know if I trust them

@SettySLC @bumbadum14 The woman doesn't see the $$$ though.

@bumbadum14 Instead of keeper he should rebrand to GoldDigger

Gee, look at this matchmaking app with a 6-to-1 female to male ratio... I wonder why? Can it be that women get to sign up for free and are matching with guys who have 50k to throw at a matchmaker?

@LisaFenDragon @jakozloski I think you can reasonably use photofeeler.com to compare your different photos. I don't think there's a reliable way to measure absolute attractiveness.

@jakozloski Do you think the various random ones online are any good?

@HSVSphere @theo >paste images

@theo How? Do they disable anything or is your terminfo broken? With identical environments it should work fine, pasting tons of text does work fine for me

Just learned it's literally impossible to paste images into Claude Code over SSH. How do you CLI people live like this??

@ArtemisConsort @johnbutinfosec But n is typically bounded (e.g. to 64 bits)

@johnbutinfosec n is dataset size. To have n unique entries, they must be at least ~log(n) digits each. Operation time is ~linear in number of digits.

My most controversial opinion is that hashing is actually O(log(n)), not O(1).

@byIsaiah @jakozloski I think that's not required. Most things seem to be optional in Keeper.

@jakozloski Went to join and you guys are asking for my SAT score from high school 20 years ago. Get real dude.

Women want to use our site, and men if you *actually* want to settle down, Keeper is the place to come

@garberchov @jakozloski If you didn't sign up for the paid Keeper plan, the pool of candidates is much smaller; only women who have signed up for the paid plan can match you.

@jakozloski I signed up 4 months ago and never got anything lol

@PhotoPlayer_ @femalenatured quant (noun) A person who uses soulless, purely statistical means to determine and/or affect an outcome.

@femalenatured ?

Hey guys I still need a response for this...

@kapilansh_twt @yadavji_codes 3 hours well spent

@yadavji_codes use secrets manager sounds obvious until you spend 3 hours configuring IAM permissionsss

how do teams actually share .env variables securely because the options I see are - Slack DM (terrible) - email (worse) - shared Notion doc (somehow even worse) - 1Password or similar - something I'm missing

@kapilansh_twt Azure Key Vault

@tsoding This doesn't explain the rationale, but maybe you'll see the distinction between void* and void** here.

@tsoding Ptr<Void> can be assigned Ptr<anything> Ptr<Ptr<Void>> cannot be assigned Ptr<anything> (or Ptr<Ptr<anything>>)

This is the part of pure C I never understood. Why isn't void** compatible with int**? void* is compatible with int*, sizeof(void*) == sizeof(int*). So the covariant compatibility of void* across several levels of indirection makes perfect sense to me. Am I missing anything?

@rebeccarightnow @DrCamRx @jakozloski ah, thanks for pointing that out. I didn't squint hard enough.

@strager @DrCamRx @jakozloski The terms he mentions all appear in the top right.

Men's and women's stated preferences in a spouse from Keeper, showing which words skew most by gender, split between wants and don't-wants.