CryptoCat.🇺🇦

4.2K posts

CryptoCat.🇺🇦 banner
CryptoCat.🇺🇦

CryptoCat.🇺🇦

@CryptoCatVC

Pedantic complainer, savage satirist, crypto veteran, ETH maxi & defi OG yield hacker. I meme in production. Pet cat @egirl_capital

Joined Şubat 2011
222 Following7.8K Followers
Pinned Tweet
CryptoCat.🇺🇦
CryptoCat.🇺🇦@CryptoCatVC·
First executive order
CryptoCat.🇺🇦 tweet media
English
1
4
17
2.2K
Leonard Joyner
Leonard Joyner@LeonardMJoyner·
Australia, New Zealand, and the Philippines are fucked. Here’s why: Depending on which source on X you look at (or believe), each of these countries have about three weeks worth of fuel reserves at “normal consumption” rates, and maybe six weeks (or less) with rationing. It’s not enough… they’ll exhaust their reserves before resupply arrives: Each of these countries rely on Asian refineries (India, Singapore, China, South Korea, Japan) for refined fuel. Each of these countries rely on imports from the Middle East, which as we all know, aren’t moving. Each are also already dipping into their strategic petroleum and fuel reserves, and banning/restricting exports. Here’s the timing problem: If a loaded oil tanker cleared the straight of Hormuz today, it would take: - about ten days to three weeks to reach a refinery - take about 5 days to refine, blend, and load a full fuel tanker - take two to three weeks to arrive in port - this doesn’t take into account time to distribute to retailers Best case, it will take a month to get fuel to Australia, and 5/6 weeks for New Zealand. That math doesn’t math. And this doesn’t take into consideration the likelihood that each of these refining nations are going to prioritize refilling their petroleum/fuel reserves before they start exporting again. Every day this goes on, is one less day of reserves is Australia/NA/Philippines and one more day to restock the refining countries. It’s a 1 = 2/3 dilemma for AUS/NZ. If the conflict lasts another two weeks AUS/NZ may completely exhaust their fuel supplies, even with rationing, before they receive resupply. The two largest states in AUS are already reporting around 400 filling stations have completely run out of fuel. Buckle up. Exciting times are ahead…
Leonard Joyner tweet mediaLeonard Joyner tweet mediaLeonard Joyner tweet media
Roberto Rios@peruvian_bull

the east asian energy crisis is getting worse by the day let's sum up what's happened so far: the Philippines became the first country to declare a national energy emergency. government offices moved to a 4 day work week, and President Marcos says grounding planes is a "distinct possibility." their fuel supply dropped from 57 days to 45 days in less than a month. South Korea is telling citizens to take shorter showers and charge phones during the day. they're considering banning naphtha exports, which means petrochemical production starts seizing up. Japan released 80 MILLION barrels from strategic reserves, the largest drawdown since they created the system in 1978. covers about 45 days. 95% of their crude comes from the Middle East. their refineries are canceling fuel exports and cutting production to prioritize domestic supply. (talked about this in my newsletter) Vietnam has 20 days of reserves. they just panic-bought 4 million barrels from non-Middle East sources, which covers six more days. India is running out of cooking gas. restaurants are shutting down, lines wrapping around LPG distributors in multiple cities. 90% of their LPG imports go through Hormuz. New Zealand has less than 40 days of combined fuel left, gas stations are going dry in parts of the country, and the government is dusting off 1979 era rationing laws. China and Thailand have both banned or restricted fuel exports to hoard domestic supply. Singapore and Indonesian petrochemical companies are declaring force majeure. the IEA released a record 400 million barrels from strategic reserves and then said it won't be enough. Brent peaked at $126, still sitting above $90 today. the crisis deepens in East Asia.

English
97
480
1.8K
198.9K
Autism Capital 🧩
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapital·
Can we filter by country too or just region?
English
11
1
61
13K
kaden.eth
kaden.eth@0xKaden·
the bZx protocol had probably the worst security posture of any smart contract protocol in history in february 2020, they suffered not one, but two oracle manipulation exploits [1] within a three day period. with the second one coming after the protocol was deemed to be fixed. ~$350k + ~$600k exploited then in september 2020, they had a self-transfer exploit [2] which resulted in a loss of ~$8.1m and if that wasn't already enough damage, in november 2021, a phishing attack on the developer key [3] allowed the attacker to not only drain the protocol TVL, but also dangling user approvals, resulting in a loss of ~$55m!
English
9
0
32
3K
CryptoCat.🇺🇦
CryptoCat.🇺🇦@CryptoCatVC·
A #Gayatollah becomes the first openly gay leader of an Islamic country. The LBQGT community:
GIF
English
1
0
0
300
koeppelmann.eth 🦉💳
koeppelmann.eth 🦉💳@koeppelmann·
It is a core value of @CoWSwap to protect users even if they make massive mistakes. This time, despite already having many layers of protection, that goal failed. There is only one conclusion: keep innovating and add even more layers of protection.
English
24
5
145
12.3K
CryptoCat.🇺🇦
CryptoCat.🇺🇦@CryptoCatVC·
It is very telling. Everyone claiming that #Aave is at fault here, is exactly the type of person that would check that tickbox without a second thought.
CryptoCat.🇺🇦 tweet media
English
0
0
4
133
CryptoCat.🇺🇦
CryptoCat.🇺🇦@CryptoCatVC·
@notjuve You make a very dumb claim. Assume your claim was true, cap was 30%, the user would still tick it, lose 15m$. According to your reasoning, that would be a happy ending.
English
0
0
0
26
Juve
Juve@notjuve·
Decentralized when it is convinient Aave labs knowingly removed the 30% slippage limit Which cost someone $50M We proceed to blame it on a user for ticking a checkbox
Stani.eth@StaniKulechov

Earlier today, a user attempted to buy AAVE using $50M USDT through the Aave interface. Given the unusually large size of the single order, the Aave interface, like most trading interfaces, warned the user about extraordinary slippage and required confirmation via a checkbox. The user confirmed the warning on their mobile device and proceeded with the swap, accepting the high slippage, which ultimately resulted in receiving only 324 AAVE in return. The transaction could not be moved forward without the user explicitly accepting the risk through the confirmation checkbox. The CoW Swap routers functioned as intended, and the integration followed standard industry practices. However, while the user was able to proceed with the swap, the final outcome was clearly far from optimal. Events like this do occur in DeFi, but the scale of this transaction was significantly larger than what is typically seen in the space. We sympathize with the user and will try to make a contact with the user and we will return $600K in fees collected from the transaction. The key takeaway is that while DeFi should remain open and permissionless, allowing users to perform transactions freely, there are additional guardrails the industry can build to better protect users. Our team will be investigating ways to improve these safeguards going forward.

English
3
0
8
1.2K
TMK
TMK@themagaking·
Name one country that is better because Muslims moved there.
English
138
91
914
21K
Lefteris Karapetsas
Lefteris Karapetsas@LefterisJP·
If a user sends a swap with 99.928% slippage is that a user error? A frontend error? Or a program/contract/protocol error?
English
43
1
15
8.4K
Rep. Andy Ogles
Rep. Andy Ogles@RepOgles·
Name one country that is freer and safer because Muslims moved there.
English
2.9K
5K
47.4K
2.3M
Luke Cannon
Luke Cannon@lukecannon727·
Idk but I just don't think frontends should allow you to swap into the wrong wrapped asset losing 99.99% slippage on a $50 million transaction Don't care how many boxes you check or overrides the user types, should just never be allowed to happen
English
19
9
230
9.9K
Garrett
Garrett@GarrettBullish·
@Mind_XXXXX I’m positive about the tech, negative about the macro environment
English
3
0
8
2K
Weilin (William) Li
Weilin (William) Li@hklst4r·
@CoWSwap @aave Interestingly, the arbitrager used liquidity from bancor (@Bancor) which the swap didn't use. The entire block consists of multiple arbitrages related to this swap.
English
4
0
5
2.4K
Weilin (William) Li
Weilin (William) Li@hklst4r·
Someone lost ~36 million swapping aUSDT to aAAVE on @CoWSwap . It's not even a sandwich... just a pure arbitrage. I don't think it's either @aave 's or @CoWSwap 's problem. The user swaps 50 million aUSDT to aAAVE on chain and there's no enough liquidity. Even if the user uses USDT -> AAVE (not wrapped aToken), the liquidity is still the same so such large swaps should be done twap / via OTC. Not atomically on chain. Cow swap front end is showing proper warnings. P1: victim: 0x98B9D979C33dD7284C854909BCC09b51FBF97Ac8, txhash: 0x9fa9feab3c1989a33424728c23e6de07a40a26a98ff7ff5139f3492ce430801f P2: arbitrage transaction, with a bribe of 26 million (arbitrage net profit ~9 million).
Weilin (William) Li tweet mediaWeilin (William) Li tweet media
English
20
9
85
13.9K
Solid Intel 📡
Solid Intel 📡@solidintel_x·
INTEL: Ledger exposes a MediaTek Dimensity 7300 flaw that lets attackers with physical access steal Android hot-wallet seed phrases in minutes
Solid Intel 📡 tweet media
English
7
7
68
11.5K
CryptoCat.🇺🇦
CryptoCat.🇺🇦@CryptoCatVC·
@R89Capital Maybe western schools are full of Muslims and women want to not go there anymore ...
English
0
0
0
1.6K