Bob

@Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist All the best bud!

@MenForFairness @SensibleFascist It’s hard to have actual discourse with someone who makes claims that are scientifically debunked and drops a “trust me bro”.

Imagine your parents getting you circumcised because some Jewish doctor told them it was “hygienic” only to find out you had the most sensitive and pleasurable spot on your entire body violently mutilated for nothing.

@LilithBlack25 No it’s because men have theirs cut off during circumcision so the prostate is the next best thing.

I'm guessing the lie about male G-spot being in the rear was to encourage homosexuality

@Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist Okie dokie. Getting into ad hominem so good chat bro!

@MenForFairness @SensibleFascist You are wrong, regardless of what irrelevant anecdote you use. Also a penis is not an internal organ, can’t let you live life thinking that. The more you type the smaller I realize your IQ is.

@f_daNWO @emperorsaveme @BuenoForMiami When most of the developed world doesn’t do it, and they implore Americans to just stop, and you find doing that to girls a violation, of course people are frustrated. There’s no reason to do it even if you, yourself, don’t care it was done to you.

@MenForFairness @emperorsaveme @BuenoForMiami Honestly, I didn't know it drove so many people into such a rage. I entered it with an honest opinion born of very little consideration. These nut jobs deserve to be treated like lunatics though, so that is where I ended up 🤣

This makes me so sad. There are men out there who genuinely believe they would voluntarily mutilate their own bodies if their parents hadn’t done it to them. It’s a coping mechanism. It’s hard to accept that your body was damaged by the people who were supposed to protect you.

@Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist Both are internal organs. But sure. Maybe you just know what it’s like having your tongue how it’s supposed to be so you can have an objective opinion on it.

@MenForFairness @SensibleFascist That’s apples and oranges, you can’t seriously think you know more than 94 studies. Please don’t embarrass yourself.

@Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist Doesn’t take a genius to know cutting off 50% of your total penile skin reduces pleasure bud. Why do you believe that study but not the most recent one? Are you gonna answer my question about your tongue being permanently outside your mouth?

@MenForFairness @SensibleFascist But trust, you definitely haven’t researched as much as a peer reviewed journal.

@f_daNWO @emperorsaveme @BuenoForMiami Pro circ people have zero critical thinking skills when it comes to this topic. If men said they’re upset you shame them. If men don’t bring it up in conversation you say no one is upset they’re cut. If the same thing is done to girls you think the opposite. It’s a cope.

@emperorsaveme @BuenoForMiami Lol..You might be insane. 1) 85% of American men are cut. A pretty solid sample size. 2) I don't know anyone that just shrugs off SA. Literally no one. Yet I don't know a single man that cares about circ. Literally no one.

@Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist Ok and you’re totally allowed to believe what you believe. But trust, you definitely haven’t researched as much as me. Question, do you think your ability to taste would be the same if your tongue was permanently outside your mouth?

@MenForFairness @SensibleFascist Keep going bud, you are still wrong.

@Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist Adults who are circumcised have fully developed penises. Where the foreskin has naturally separated and the frenulum is intact. So yes, they may not experience decreased pleasure right away. But over time they do.

@MenForFairness @SensibleFascist You are objectively wrong. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC76…

@Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist This is outdated since the most recent study. This was also concerning adult men who were circumcised. The foreskin is literally fused to the head in infancy until it separates naturally over time. In order to cut a boy, the foreskin has to be torn off the head.

@Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist Do you think it’s better having fingernails or not? The study shows that the most pleasurable part is removed during circumcision and you STILL cannot comprehend that being true even though you’ve never experienced having a full penis.

@MenForFairness @SensibleFascist How is it fucked up? I have no qualms with either my point is one is not objectively better than the other.

@L3407972118571 @Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist Yawn 🙄 What makes you think I’m uncut? Trust me. Uncut guys are not jealous you’re missing part of your dick lol

@Golfing__Jack @MenForFairness @SensibleFascist Isn’t it weird that the only guys worried about other guys dicks are the ones who are uncut? Like you NEVER hear cut guys talking about anybody else’s dick. It’s almost like they’re jealous lol

@Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist You’re saying that men who actually have experience having intact genitals are justifying having intact genitals? Maybe they’re just trying to get through that skinning boys’ penises is fucked up and y’all are unable to comprehend it.

@MenForFairness @SensibleFascist I don’t care if you are hooded or not, I just find it amusing the hooded always feel the need to justify it.

@APArizonaTea @SensibleFascist “I have fingernails so I know they have a function.” “I have no experience actually having a foreskin so it mustn’t have a function.” This is why people say y’all are coping.

@SensibleFascist Unlike the foreskin, nails have an actual function beyond just making us feel slightly better during masturbation.

@SensibleFascist @BanTheSnip Here they all come to justify having less penis than the average man because they don’t actually understand their own anatomy (or lack-thereof). SeX sTiLL fEeLs gReAt! I wOuLd’Nt wAnT to bE mOrE sEnSiTiVe! I’m gLaD I dOn’T hAvE a ChEeSe DiCk!

@s0me0neM @nenealiemeke @nypost They have *what’s left* of their G-Spot.

@MenForFairness @nenealiemeke @nypost Correct. The frenular delta (or triangle) is a composite region that includes the frenulum plus adjacent mucosa and ridged-band tissue. Circumcision often removes or damages those parts which can reduce sensation in the frenular delta, but that doesn’t change the region itself-

The male G-spot revealed - and everyone who guessed it's in the rear was wrong: 'Intensely pleasurable' trib.al/apa2iEK

@Golfing__Jack @SensibleFascist The skinned dicks are always looking to justify having an inside-out penis. Always pretending that foreskin is dirty because they don’t actually understand the anatomy. Very amusing.

@SensibleFascist The uncircumcised are always looking to justify digging sludge out of their dick. This time it’s pretending their sex feels better. Very amusing.

@s0me0neM @nenealiemeke @nypost Yes you’re correct. The frenular delta consists of multiple parts of the foreskin. The frenulum itself is what connects the foreskin to the glans. These parts, including the ridged band, are damaged or completely removed during circumcision.

@MenForFairness @nenealiemeke @nypost “In an obscure region called the frenular delta, a triangular zone located on the underside of the penis where the head meets the shaft” The g-spot is not the frenulum itself, it’s the area where it’s located.

@s0me0neM @nenealiemeke @nypost The frenulum is the g-spot. Yes there are exceptions to the rule but circumcised men either had it fully or partially removed and/or replaced with scar tissue.

@nenealiemeke @MenForFairness @nypost Actually they still have their “g-spot”. Also, a lot of circumcised men STILL HAVE their frenulum.

@ThomasJFarrell7 Not if you’re circumcised. The frenulum is removed.

Well, that’s not a new discovery, at least not to anyone with a penis! dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ar…