Policy for Protest

498 posts

Policy for Protest banner
Policy for Protest

Policy for Protest

@PolicyProtest

Evidenced Based Policy, not selective use of facts. Exposing anti-people policy as an act of protest.

Hood River, OR Joined Nisan 2026
204 Following12 Followers
Policy for Protest
Policy for Protest@PolicyProtest·
I’ve been saying this to everyone else to know benefit (even told these a strawman arguments, I’ll admit I was too brash in this case with you. My apologies. My point here even in this case with you, jumping to conclusions like you did about the price tag in defense of Pratt is the problem. The guy is just saying words that make people happy to hear. It’s going to be devastating to LA.
English
0
0
0
1
Spencer Pratt
Spencer Pratt@spencerpratt·
As I promised in the debate. Here’s the ludicrous $10M boondoggle in Nithya Raman’s district
Spencer Pratt tweet mediaSpencer Pratt tweet mediaSpencer Pratt tweet media
English
771
10.2K
48.7K
501.8K
Policy for Protest
Policy for Protest@PolicyProtest·
@RjAndrewson @spencerpratt Yeah, so you are so uninformed on this it’s painful. Tell me, how does a kid who was homeless for their formative years just magically stop that on their 19th birthday since you are so fucking smart?
English
0
0
0
3
Rod Andrewson
Rod Andrewson@RjAndrewson·
I know what “TAY” represents. It is a joke. 15-18 are minors and as such cannot “transition” anywhere. At 19-24 you are an adult, start acting like one. My bottom line Policy Protest is that there should be no opportunity for taxpayer funding for any project like this! The families around these TAY and Philanthropic organizations should and are able to handle this 100%. I guarantee you the money they spend would cover more than 26 dumpy rooms in a bad part of the city! It makes me laugh when you people want me to care for your issues and you waste millions on projects like this and try to justify it! Stop trying to take my money for your causes.
English
1
0
0
27
Policy for Protest
Policy for Protest@PolicyProtest·
You also are just complaining about the costs without any concern about the impact. But let’s talk about it. The $400,000 per unit figure gets cited often, and it deserves context before anything else. That number reflects construction costs in one of the most expensive building markets in the country, not ongoing service costs, and it is a one-time capital expenditure amortized over decades. The relevant comparison is not $400k vs. zero. It is $400k vs. the cumulative cost of the alternative. For transitional age youth (TAY), roughly ages 18 to 25, PSH is not a luxury intervention. It is a narrow window. This age range represents a critical developmental period where homelessness causes disproportionate and lasting harm. Young people who experience homelessness during this window are significantly more likely to develop chronic substance use disorders, serious mental illness, and long-term housing instability than adults who become homeless later in life. The brain is still developing through the mid-20s, making trauma, instability, and untreated mental health conditions far more damaging at this age than at 35 or 45. The cost comparison that actually matters: a single TAY individual cycling through emergency rooms, psychiatric holds, detox, jail, and shelter over two or three years routinely generates $80,000 to $150,000 in public system costs annually, with no stabilizing outcome. PSH with wraparound services, by contrast, consistently reduces ER visits, incarceration, and psychiatric hospitalization among housed youth. Studies of TAY PSH programs, including ones run through the Corporation for Supportive Housing, show reductions of 40 to 60 percent in emergency service utilization within the first year of housing placement. The intervention pays for itself relatively quickly when those downstream costs are counted. There is also a recidivism and workforce dimension that critics of cost tend to ignore. Young adults who stabilize through PSH during the TAY window are meaningfully more likely to complete education, maintain employment, and exit to independent housing than those who cycle through shelter or remain unsheltered. Homelessness at 20 that goes unaddressed frequently becomes chronic homelessness at 35, at which point the intervention costs are higher, the outcomes are worse, and the window for workforce participation has narrowed significantly. The $400k unit is cheaper than a lifetime of system involvement. For TAY specifically, the wraparound services bundled with PSH, including mental health care, substance use treatment, life skills support, and education or employment navigation, address the specific reasons young people lose housing in the first place. Without those services, housing alone has lower retention. With them, TAY PSH programs nationally report housing retention rates above 80 percent at 12 months. That is not a failing model. That is a functional one being asked to operate without adequate funding for the clinical infrastructure it requires. The honest critique is not that PSH costs too much. It is that the construction financing model in California drives up per-unit costs in ways that could be reformed. That is a real and solvable problem. But the solution is better construction policy, not abandoning the population with the highest potential return on early intervention.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Again, if you hate poor people, say that, but the data is on my side not yours or the villain that is @spencerpratt
English
1
0
0
15
Policy for Protest
Policy for Protest@PolicyProtest·
@_sorci_ @RjAndrewson @spencerpratt You are actually pointing out that this is a restrictive covenant that would require this building is used for this purpose to receive funding of up to that amount. It’s also a low cost compared to a single ED visit for sepsis.
English
1
0
0
30
Sam Bucca
Sam Bucca@OTAllstar·
@PolicyProtest @LA_Native_3 @spencerpratt You could make some pretty salient points if you tried but you’re deciding to go the emotional/childish route. I think that explains a lot as to why no one takes people like you seriously.
English
1
0
0
8
Policy for Protest
Policy for Protest@PolicyProtest·
@OTAllstar @spencerpratt 14 year old girls would not be in that housing program. Also, the problem, as the data shows, is getting better. You just don’t see that happening fast enough and until homeless people don’t exist you will keep saying this stuff, because you hate poor people.
English
1
0
0
10
Sam Bucca
Sam Bucca@OTAllstar·
@PolicyProtest @spencerpratt You don’t have keep up the petulant 14 yo girl routine. You seriously think these programs have been effective? Why has the problem not gotten any better despite more and more funds being thrown at it?
English
1
0
1
7
Vera News
Vera News@darkcitynews·
@PolicyProtest @spencerpratt It stands for transition aged YOUTH and does include people over 15 in California. You don’t know me, but I know you don’t know what you are talking about. I used to work in Encino with that population.
English
1
0
2
33
Policy for Protest
Policy for Protest@PolicyProtest·
You are mentioning costs not in the sheet Pratt provided. You are also assuming the age of who will be housed, the TAY housing population who benefits from these services tend to be over 18 because otherwise they are in the foster care system. But again, if you hate poor people and vulnerable young people, just say that.
English
0
0
0
10
Vera News
Vera News@darkcitynews·
@PolicyProtest @RjAndrewson @spencerpratt It’s people ages 15-24 who are homeless, aged out of foster care, have drug problems and/or mental illness, etc. but it’s not a one-time cost. That doesn’t even factor the cost of the supportive case management services and more they will have to receive to stay in that housing.
English
1
0
0
21
Sam Bucca
Sam Bucca@OTAllstar·
@PolicyProtest @spencerpratt CA has spent 10s of billions on homelessness and it’s only gotten worse. All these programs actually do is incentivize these people to stay homeless. They’re typically just drug addicts and they’re enabled by these programs and funding.
English
1
0
1
9
Vera News
Vera News@darkcitynews·
@PolicyProtest @spencerpratt If you think $411K per hotel room is necessary for a homeless teenager, you are nuts. Not to mention those rooms are going to get wrecked. Total waste of money.
English
2
0
7
75
💭
💭@Prof3ssFin3ss3·
@PolicyProtest @OTAllstar @spencerpratt Because it’s all obviously embezzlement? Look up how many contractors get what % of contracts then look up relationships between contractors & incumbents. It’s right in front of you but you want to “defend the spending” rather than address the actual problem
English
1
0
0
15