ℝeallyℝadley

104.5K posts

ℝeallyℝadley banner
ℝeallyℝadley

ℝeallyℝadley

@ReallyRadley

~Right-libertarian, but I like to tweet about sci-fi, fantasy, wordplay, language, and tech. I don't hide my beliefs, but I'm open-minded.

Joined Mart 2017
6.5K Following3.1K Followers
Pinned Tweet
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
Ages come and pass, leaving memories that become legends. Legend fades to myth, and even myth is long forgotten… Thank you, friends.
English
5
1
68
10.1K
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
@DerekDenhamAlan You understand that that is what racial discrimination is, right? Treating people differently based on race? The way to stop discrimination is to stop taking discriminatory acts. Stop the tests, stop the taxes, stop assigning districts based on race.
English
0
0
0
9
Ghostbad
Ghostbad@DerekDenhamAlan·
@ReallyRadley How so? The taxes and literacy tests were applied to all people irrespective of color — again I fail to see how current Republican views of this stuff doesn’t conclude it is racially neutral, since we can’t look at the effects only the “design”.
English
1
0
0
7
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
@DerekDenhamAlan Poll taxes and literacy tests were affirmative government actions designed to advantage one racial group over another. Racial gerrymanders are affirmative govt actions designed to advantage one racial group over another. You just also favor one racial group over another.
English
1
0
0
9
Ghostbad
Ghostbad@DerekDenhamAlan·
@ReallyRadley But poll taxes and literacy tests are race-neutral - everyone has to pay or pass the test. What do you mean that would be discrimination??? Are you saying we can look at the effects of a “race neutral” policy and prove racism? Woah what are you, a liberal?
English
1
0
0
11
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
@DerekDenhamAlan No, that is also discrimination. But having government treat different people differently based on their race is the definition of discrimination.
English
1
0
0
6
Ghostbad
Ghostbad@DerekDenhamAlan·
@ReallyRadley “Preventing poll taxes and literacy tests is discrimination!” What you’d be saying 70 years ago.
English
1
0
0
9
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
I developed the minor skill of writing multiple paragraphs that had the same number of characters in each line (giving a justified look to my USENET posts) for nothing. Nothing topped the emails asking how to activate that setting.
Eric S. Raymond@esrtweet

Wow. I answered a question about green versus amber phosphors in character-cell VDTs (video display terminals) this morning, and it reminded me of something I've mused about before. The way some technologies seem eternal at the time you're used to them, only to disappear with startling speed. The era of character-cell VDTs ran from about 1973 to about 1992. That was the age of the terminal room - ranks of terminals connected to big time-sharing machines. I was there for basically all of it. For some years I was even the maintainer of the Unix master database of terminal capabilities. It seemed like a time that would never end - we thought it was the natural final form of computing. We could barely imagine pixel displays and powerful computers becoming so cheap that everybody could have one to themselves. I mean yes, we knew about wokstations, and about personal microcomputers starting in the late 70s. But if you were in the subculture of the terminal rooms you thought the workstations were impossibly expensive and the personal micros were underpowered toys. And until the 386 first shipped in the late 1980s you weren't wrong. But it happened. Moore's Law had its way. VDTs were replaced by inexpensive PCs driving bit-mapped displays. What's bemusing me now is realizing that it's been longer since the end of the VDT era than the pseudo-eternity of the VDT era itself lasted. Today I have three huge pixel displays on my personal machine that would have seemed like delirious magic in those days. Maybe we don't appreciate that enough.

English
1
0
1
98
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
Joe Abercrombie
Joe Abercrombie@LordGrimdark·
An awesome event with @Powells in Portland alongside the magnificent Brent Weeks, these days capable of a decent Bayaz impression…
Joe Abercrombie tweet media
English
11
4
297
8.3K
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
Kendric Tonn
Kendric Tonn@kendrictonn·
Kendric Tonn tweet media
ZXX
5
17
176
4.1K
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
@Meekeepeeper Wow, you’re really terrible at this. You should request more training from Pooh Bear.
GIF
English
1
0
0
1
Meekee011
Meekee011@Meekeepeeper·
@ReallyRadley What u believe is irrelevant and a result of being bombarded by antichina propaganda for a decade
Meekee011 tweet mediaMeekee011 tweet media
English
1
0
0
19
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
I’ve long wondered how China’s one-child policy was consistent with its population claims, but I’ve recently heard many saying COVID had a much larger than admitted toll on life in China. Anyone have respectable ideas about deaths from COVID in China?
PoIiMath@politicalmath

By a wide margin, the people who say "We need to address what happened during Covid" is on the right and, by a similar margin, the people who say "stop talking about that, no one cares, stop investigating things, nothing happened, I'm not listening, la la la" is on the left

English
1
0
3
106
fox
fox@soft_fox_lad·
@ReallyRadley Thank you! Had to stop tweeting for a while for professional reasons, but I'm back now and doing well :) Hope one you've been well. And omg, that picture!
English
1
0
1
18
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
@Meekeepeeper Maybe so, but I do believe China’s own population figures have been inflated. You can’t have ~1 child/woman for a generation without seeing significant decline.
English
1
0
0
4
Meekee011
Meekee011@Meekeepeeper·
@ReallyRadley It's just American fantasy propaganda...not a single evidence of mass deaths
English
1
0
1
8
ℝeallyℝadley retweeted
Kendric Tonn
Kendric Tonn@kendrictonn·
As always, I am available for commission, the work I post is generally available until it's not, and hey, you can always whack that subscribe button for a lil bit of low-friction art patronage o7
PoIiMath@politicalmath

I'm very much with @GPrime85 on this. If you have too much money, FIND SOME ART YOU LIKE AND FUND IT James Joyce was able to write like he did b/c he had a patron and we are culturally richer because of it Pay for art, you philistines!

English
0
3
40
1K