Spencer Andrews

8.4K posts

Spencer Andrews

Spencer Andrews

@TruthIsLiberty4

Inverse is the relationship between knowledge and knowing.

United States Joined Mayıs 2021
465 Following102 Followers
Spencer Andrews retweeted
Peter Boghossian
Peter Boghossian@peterboghossian·
Five Socratic-based questions to improve your thinking. 1/2 5. What would it take to change your mind? Be specific. 4. If your best reason for believing that was false, would you still believe? (That's called a "real reason check".)
English
35
131
1K
67.7K
Spencer Andrews
Spencer Andrews@TruthIsLiberty4·
@mcuban @shellypalmer Its diagnostic tools; one must be able to interpret the results in a way that considers the context of the ultimate goal. Then reiterate, never assuming all variables are known.
English
0
0
0
8
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
Great line from @shellypalmer that I’ll paraphrase - AI shouldn’t be a ghostwriter, it should be a sparring partner. Best way to keep your job isn’t to dismiss AI. It’s to engage with it and find where it’s wrong. In order for AI to know it’s wrong, you have to spend a lot of time building context and rules before you use it. Which is something that 99 pct of people have no clue how to do. And unless you are in a tech company, there is the same probability that the boss(es) above you have no clue what I’m talking about. And in business, AI never knows the consequences of its actions. It doesn’t have judgement. That’s left to you If you learn how to get the best out of AI. How to challenge AI , like it was a competitive coworker or consultant, and how to bring judgement and the ability to explain in a manner your peers and bosses understand, you will thrive. If you just regurgitate what AI gives you, you will be fired.
English
73
35
254
47K
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
It is nearly impossible to comprehend what SpaceX has built. The gargantuan scale of the complex and the rockets they produce is unmatched anyplace on this planet. The US is in a tuff place but a much less tuff place because of what they achieve.
English
57
119
926
45.9K
Spencer Andrews retweeted
Chamath Palihapitiya
How much data did we need before we understood the harmful societal effects of smoking and implemented restrictions? Actually, it was a lot. A lot of data was needed because the cigarette companies wanted to milk their golden goose as long as possible. The cost of paying class action lawsuits in the future was far less than the cash they could make in the moment. This is the same incentive today with social media and their app makers. Some parents try to organize their other classroom parents together in a coalition to limit the apps. This seems to work but it’s so few and far between. A broad societal moratorium on social media for people under 16yo diminishes NOTHING and probably helps millions and millions of kids and then these kids as they enter adulthood. It would also help parents. I, personally, have strict social media rules for myself and my kids. And I will keep pushing back on my kids when they ask for instagram because that’s my job as their dad. But having a broad moratorium would make the lives of all parents far simpler and, in hindsight, will be proven as the right public health policy thing to have done.
Jonathan Haidt@JonHaidt

The preponderance of the evidence gets ever more preponderant: here's a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies, in JAMA. Important finding for setting 16 as the age minimum:

English
93
72
698
153.5K
Spencer Andrews
Spencer Andrews@TruthIsLiberty4·
@JeromeAdamsMD So which 'experts' do you trust more? FDA (e.g. PHA experts) or non-PHA experts who are questioning the orthodoxy of government backed science and guidance?
English
0
0
0
25
Jerome Adams
Jerome Adams@JeromeAdamsMD·
Experts are questioning the current HHS push to increase protein in Americans’ diets - especially as colon cancer rates are rising in younger people, with research linking ⬆️ red meat intake to higher risk. Are federal dietary guidelines actually improving public health… or quietly making things worse? 🤔
PBS News@NewsHour

Top nutrition experts question the protein push, saying Americans already consume more protein than they need, and there's no new evidence that people need to drastically ramp up consumption. to.pbs.org/49xi92c

English
16
27
75
7.9K
Spencer Andrews
Spencer Andrews@TruthIsLiberty4·
@NewsHour Aren't the nutrition experts at the FDA that determined this new guidance, "top nutrition experts"? And presumably have access to more nutrition science than anyone else?
English
0
0
0
57
PBS News
PBS News@NewsHour·
Top nutrition experts question the protein push, saying Americans already consume more protein than they need, and there's no new evidence that people need to drastically ramp up consumption. to.pbs.org/49xi92c
English
10
33
124
15K
Spencer Andrews
Spencer Andrews@TruthIsLiberty4·
@JeromeAdamsMD "Many"? Not sure what % you have in mind, but its likely a small, radicalized, very vocal minority.
English
0
0
0
9
Courtney Addison
Courtney Addison@OpulentAura·
@elonmusk Go on Elon… keep pointing those fingers at everyone else but yourself. We see you. The big tech broligarchy is much more dangerous to humanity than ‘woke women’.
English
184
4
82
14.7K
Spencer Andrews retweeted
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
ZXX
3.3K
9.7K
58.5K
22.4M
Spencer Andrews
Spencer Andrews@TruthIsLiberty4·
@mcuban Meanwhile that check and balance IS necessary. Especially now; on top of Dr. Google, people have Dr. AI informing them about ailments they have and procedures they 'need'. Some of it is good info for sure, but the decision requires arbitrage of *some* sort.
English
0
0
0
72
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
This happens all the time. Carrier wise contracto s owned by PE that don't appear to give a shit
Hexidethmal@hexidethmal

@mcuban Lol yep. Thankfully, not a life-threatening injury. Took a bit to get sorted, Short of it was that the insurance company denied care that three different doctors said I needed. But the actual company that denied it wasn’t even my insurance company. Subcontractor/“partner” 🤯

English
16
7
116
113.2K
Spencer Andrews
Spencer Andrews@TruthIsLiberty4·
@BrianRoemmele He's speaking to his employees who carry a disdain for customers that can afford a $9 cup of coffee.
English
0
0
0
6
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
“Starbucks CEO Defends $9 Coffee: 'A Really Affordable Premium Experience'” Premium Experience…
Brian Roemmele tweet media
English
125
8
92
10.2K
Spencer Andrews retweeted
Katy Talento
Katy Talento@KatyTalento·
In 2017, one my first tasks at the White House was to keep Bobby Kennedy far away from the West Wing. Not because President Trump didn't want him there (he'd actually agreed to Bobby's pitch to create a vaccine safety commission). But others (you can guess who) weren't thrilled, and they told me to get rid of him. So I protected the orthodoxy I'd been trained to protect. And it took me years to realize what I had actually done. Tomorrow, I publish the full confession. The 2002 autism moms I ignored. The 2017 vaccine safety commission I killed. The 2021 moment I finally broke. The apology I owed Secretary Kennedy. And what I've done to atone. It's hardest thing I've written. I'm sending it out to my list at 6am. (link to sign up in comments)
Katy Talento tweet media
English
716
4.5K
24.7K
854.6K
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
I have not retracted a single claim I have made about Erika Kirk. Stop with the b.s Twitter trends. I stand by every single statement I have made and have not edited any of my past statements in light of Brian Harpole’s lawsuit. I look forward to the power of subpoena.
English
3.2K
4K
38.5K
1.3M
Spencer Andrews
Spencer Andrews@TruthIsLiberty4·
@SabineVdL At first, "AI Coordinator". Then specialties, e.g. Finance AI Coordinator, HR, Marketing, etc. Until eventually the AI aspect is presumed and it goes back to just Finance Coordinator.
English
0
0
0
9
Sabine VanderLinden
Sabine VanderLinden@SabineVdL·
The job title nobody has yet — but every organization will within 36 months. Agent Boss. Not a prompt engineer. Not an AI specialist. A knowledge worker who commands a portfolio of digital agents, owns the outcomes they produce, and is measured on a metric most companies aren't tracking: the Human-Agent Ratio. SAS Innovate Day 2 made this real. The CI360 announcement revealed a supervisory architecture — one orchestrating agent directing a constellation of specialists. The marketer stays in the loop. The agents execute at a scale no human team could match. Two marketers commanding fifty agents now produce what twenty produced in 2019. This isn't a pilot. It is in production. Underneath the tools, a structural shift is happening. The org chart — built around functional silos — is giving way to a Work Chart: outcome-shaped pods of humans and agents that assemble, execute, and disband. Headcount stops being the unit of capacity. The Human-Agent Ratio takes its place. Frontier Firms making this move today are compounding every quarter. Five moves to start this quarter are in the article. The most important one: name your agent boss before you deploy your first agent. Enjoy today's article: linkedin.com/pulse/agent-bo…
Sabine VanderLinden tweet media
English
4
5
12
59K
Seymour Cup
Seymour Cup@Seymour_Cup·
@mysteriouskat This is only a controversial statement if you think Arab lives have 0 value.
English
3
0
1
103
Katherine Brodsky
Katherine Brodsky@mysteriouskat·
She hosts a podcast called BAD FAITH. Make of that what you will.
Katherine Brodsky tweet media
English
11
15
180
4.1K
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
I had to check to be sure that this was not a hilarious addition to the Babylon Bee. The Democratic city council of Ann Arbor, Michigan, unanimously voted to order the removal of anti-crime signs in order to be more "inclusive"... foxnews.com/politics/liber…
English
822
3.6K
11.1K
202.6K