Daniel Feuling

@stepfanie GOT EM

Bernie, wait until you hear about tractors. It's ridiculous. Men should be out there digging holes with shovels. Neigh. THEIR HANDS.

@Microinteracti1 Did I miss the part where the F35 was destroyed? Or are you retarded?

The F-35 was supposed to be unkillable. That was the whole point. Lockheed Martin spent thirty years and four hundred billion dollars, the most expensive weapons programme in human history, building an aircraft that the enemy simply could not see. Not on radar. Not on infrared. Not on anything. The F-35 was not just a fighter jet. It was a theological statement. America’s way of saying: we have moved beyond the reach of your missiles, your sensors, and your prayers. Iran apparently didn’t get the memo. Somewhere over Iranian airspace on March 19, 2026, an IRST system, infrared search and track, the kind of sensor your grandmother could probably explain, looked up, found the F-35, and locked on. Not because Iranian engineers are geniuses. Because the F-35, it turns out, is extremely hot. All that engine. All that thrust. All that carefully sculpted stealth geometry, and the bloody thing glows like a kettle. The heat signature data Iran now holds is not just embarrassing. It is a gift that keeps giving. To Moscow. To Beijing. To every procurement ministry on the planet that has been quietly wondering whether to spend the money on systems designed to kill this aircraft. The answer, as of this week, is yes. And here is the bit that should really worry the Pentagon. You can patch software. You can redesign coatings. You cannot reprogramme a pilot’s brain. Every F-35 driver who takes off from here on knows, actually knows, that someone down there might be able to see them. That changes everything about how they fly. Caution replaces aggression. Hesitation replaces instinct. Four hundred billion dollars. And in the end, it was done in by a heat sensor. Tremendous. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1

@Ketta132 @rand_longevity I suggest reading up on Post Labor Economics, plenty of ways the capital side of things can grow so people still have control over their finances. Transfers aren't the only way.

@rand_longevity Incredibly dumb take, unless you want to be a slave to your government

money will not exist in 10 years, stop worrying about it

@VoicesUnheard @PDoomOrder1 @sama I think you'll find the hate mostly one directional. If you think it's a matter of "letting" then you're completely missing the point, and are still assuming the economy is based around scarcity. I think a life where you *choose* where to put effort in based on passion is great

@PDoomOrder1 @dfeuling_ @sama I don’t think people realize the billionaire class hates us - and soon won’t need us at all. Do people really think they’ll just let us sit around eating popcorn and playing video games all day? What kind of life is that anyway? It’s ridiculous.

I have so much gratitude to people who wrote extremely complex software character-by-character. It already feels difficult to remember how much effort it really took. Thank you for getting us to this point.

@jzux AI will be hard pressed to improve you in that arena, I'm afraid

“AI will make you a better writer” “AI will make you a better worker” I promise you the only thing AI will make you is a better idiot

Try Tesla FSD (self-driving)!

@ScienceOrMyth @DaveShapi Humans have "sanctity" because you assign it. Doesn't make it any more correct or accurate than another who chooses not to. They're both subjective, arbitrary choices.

It’s dangerous to equate man to machine. It reduces the sanctity of human life. We create these technologies to assist humanity, but make no mistake. They are phantoms, incapable of having a soul or spark. They are a magic trick of clever engineering. Don’t be so easily deceived. Those who are eager to accept digital entities as beings in their own right probably have a pretty similar view of humanity; it posits we are just biological machines.

Machines will ALWAYS just be tools, no matter how sophisticated they become. They will never have moral agency, personhood, or consciousness in a way that is legally, ethically, or philosophically salient. Agree or disagree?

@Alex_TheAnalyst There were rulers who, when writing was invented, were worried people would lose critical thinking skills and knowledge. Join the club, Luddite.

I'm going to call this right now. We are going to have a large population with absolutely no critical thinking skills if they blindly trust AI for everything. We have all already seen it. They don't validate outputs. They don't really understand anything. They just ask questions, it looks good, and they go with it. There are going to be huge issues in every company as this continues over the years. The amount of technical debt and knowledge gaps are going to be insane. So much opportunity if you actually know what you're doing.

@DaveShapi Actual interest vs stated interest. Virtue signalling is easy, not using convenient stuff is hard

@JJaimeER @sweatystartup The correlation is "things boomers don't like"

@sweatystartup This post

Ford shutting down Electric Vehicle production. Meta shutting down Virtual Reality investment. Only a matter of time until companies pull way back on Artificial Intelligence.

@VraserX OpenAI. They've gone wide and tried to be everything to everyone, so now their major selling point is that they're pretty okay at a lot of things. Functionally, that means if you know what you want, there's probably a better option.

Most overrated AI lab right now? No fence sitting.

@elonmusk @Dan16676935420 Hope you'll rethink this. The downvote button has turned Reddit into a groupthink hivemind.

@Dan16676935420 To prevent spam bot attacks, the dislike button will be for subscribers/verified accounts only

Very excited for the dislike button. Especially since X is such a positive, uplifting platform full of sane people and little to no bots. I literally can’t imagine it going wrong.

@kadmii1 @PDoomOrder1 @sama Is this a Roomba? youtube.com/watch?v=CAdTje…

@dfeuling_ @PDoomOrder1 @sama I have, in fact, heard of a roomba

@BrosnanHoban @DeryaTR_ A lot of glue eaters are saying there's a cliff ahead. We have sailed by every "cliff" or "wall" they have said exists but they all just..... haven't. You don't get to hold the world hostage based off of an opinion.

@DeryaTR_ Speed isn’t progress if we’re racing off a cliff.

I want to pause these cultish pausers who are ironically & perhaps unknowingly enemies of humanity! Every single day of delay in AI progress will cost >100,000 lives lost! In fact, we need to accelerate as fast as we can, billions of lives are at stake! Never mind these clowns!

@kadmii1 @PDoomOrder1 @sama Wait until you find out about robots

@dfeuling_ @PDoomOrder1 @sama menial work will be the only work left. a text generator can't mop the floor

@MikeyJayRaymond @xonebros No, you fucking moron, it's either a word means what it means or it doesn't. This is like third grade shit.

@dfeuling_ @xonebros Lmao the smooth brain leap you just took needs to be studied

A journalist just told people to "bully harder" anyone who's excited about a graphics upgrade. Let that sink in. They hate AI so much they're encouraging harassment? Over UPSCALING? This is insane.

@CoCoKruszynski Kinda weird how men get told all the time how "no means no" and that it's fucked up to just hang around trying to pressure people to change their minds after they make it clear they aren't interested. But somehow, you still found a way to make yourself the victim here. Nice.

I'm 29 and I completely wasted my entire 20's dating leftist men whose worst fear was to have a child --- because it would ruin their "fun life." Women --- do NOT waste your most fertile years like I did. Once they say they don't ever want kids --- you're not going to be able to change their mind. RUN!! ‼️

@PDoomOrder1 @sama My point is, they all found something else to do. The current economic and financial system is fundamentally broken for most people. AI will reset that, handle a lot of the menial tasks. Humans can do what they do best: be human. Have a great day!

@dfeuling_ @sama I'm not sure what your point is? Some human calculators could move upwards but not all because it is a different skill. Do you think people are going to pivot upwards into something more complex because that won't happen.

@PDoomOrder1 @sama You're so close to understanding. So close. WHAT DID THE HUMAN CALCULATORS DO

Math isn't just calculation. Human calculator used to be a job and that no longer exists because of calculators. If AI far surpasses mathematicians at all aspects of mathematical research then I would imagine that profession will also die. Why do you think you are going to be paid to exist and consume? You will have no leverage in this world.

@Scobleizer While others go to conferences, we study the blade