MJ

@_PeteSmith_ Safety?

My Board for 39 for the Browns? 1. Chase Bisontis, G Texas A&M 2. TJ Parker, DE Clemson 3. D'Angelo Ponds, CB Indiana

@SamMonsonNFL So many ads, rewatched in background during work and was on ads every time I looked

Broadcasts were a shitshow with the new timing.

@SportsBoyTony 2OA, and with the media cycle, maybe even 1.

So where would Dante Moore have gone last night?!

@CodySuek Bisontis, EMW, Boston and Ponds would all be great. Can Bisontis play C?

#Dawgpound Some prospects that could be in play at pick 39: ▪️ E. McNeil-Warren (S) ▪️ T. Stukes (S) ▪️ D. Boston (WR) ▪️ D. Ponds (CB) ▪️ C. Bisontis (G) ▪️ C. Howell (EDGE) ▪️ T. Parker (EDGE) ▪️ Z. Young (EDGE) ▪️ C. Allen (LB)

@mikerenner_ I see Fano and Concepcion high = man of ball knowledge

My final Top-150 draft board:

@AdamSchefter Pregnon or Emmanuel McNeil-Warren would be great. Would be fine moving up ahead of the Giants (2 x 5th or 1 x 4th) to get EMW.

Best available players heading into Friday’s rounds 2 and 3: 🏈WR Denzel Boston 🏈Edge Zion Young 🏈LB CJ Allen 🏈CB Jermod McCoy 🏈CB Avieon Terrell 🏈S Emmanuel McNeil-Warren 🏈CB Colton Hood 🏈DT Kayden McDonald 🏈Edge Cashius Howell 🏈Edge TJ Parker 🏈G Emmanuel Pregnon 🏈LB Jake Golday 🏈DT Christen Miller

@SamMonsonNFL @PickPoolApp Tyson's up to 5 is a crazy jump, but he was WR1 for a lot in January.

I have come from the future with the correct top 10 of the draft. Have a better mock draft? Submit your mock at @PickPoolApp, enter for free for a chance to compete with me for some cash.

@SamMonsonNFL Hue Jackson

Honestly not sure I could think of a less-qualified person to temporarily take the position of Head Coach than a guy who has TWO of the worst Head Coach stints in league history on his resume. Like he's proven - TWICE - that almost literally anybody else will probably do better

McDaniels would see the limited time frame as a challenge to see how fast he could drive the thing off a cliff this time.

@EhmTEhf @wearetherace Track evolution makes solo qualifying unfair. Even within a Q1, Q2, Q3 session, being on track, at the right time, is key. See Mexico 2023.

TBH I wish F1 would do this, in qualifying you need free space. I have always said. Indy had it right when at the Indy 500 every car got 3 laps to qualify SOLO on the track by themselves. The same should be done at other F1 tracks but at the Nordschliffe its the only way to enforce the rules as the track is so long. Every F1 race qualifying should be warm up lap, hot lap cool down lap. That's it 3 laps to set your best time. SOLO just you on the track, you set a poor time, no excuses. No do overs. You could have 1 qualifying session, instead of 3 this would streamline the process exponentially. Make it the same length as qualifying like the old days. 1 day to qualify. one run, that's it. its only 22 cars, 3 laps is about 3 mins on each big track, you could adjust it for Monaco, and the redbull ring which are about a minute a lap. so like you get 5 mins to qualify, 3 laps. That's it. Instead of the parking lot tracks have become lately.

Lucas Auer and Max Verstappen have been handed a three-place grid penalty for causing a collision in qualifying for Saturday’s four-hour NLS4 race at the Nordschleife 👀

@BostonConnr My exact reaction

Wow these looks way different

@F1BigData Any idea which team benefit from less deployment. I’d assume Ferrari and non Merc teams as Merc seem to have excellent harvesting.

The FIA ​​wants to reduce the maximum power of the MGU-K, currently at 350 kW, to a point that could reach 200 kW, but some teams, and especially Liberty Media, would be against it The latter arguing that it would go in a technological and commercial direction contrary to the message that Formula 1 wants to convey 📰 @Auto_Racer_it

@SamMonsonNFL Beautiful

Not half way home yet, but getting there

@MattFontana83 All great in a bubble, but who are these teams jumping up to get? Tate (Saints) or Stiles (Bucs) prob aren't realistically worth giving up future assets if those were the picks. Has any team ever traded back twice in the first round? Would love a 27 1st somehow.

What if the #Browns trade back... 3 times For a 1 and a 2 next year, I'm in

@Danelerc Such a dog of a car the SF23

Can’t believe we won’t have these electrifying moments of pushing the absolute limits of the car anymore

@Motorsport_IT Are you not missing the part where the Steel Zimmerman engine had to be scraped and a modified 2025 was employed? Surely that is a greater reason for the deficit, losing a year of development...

#F1 | #Ferrari: le scelte di compromesso sulla PU sono ripagate dall'aerodinamica? it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-fer…

@Nachez98 There was a report Ferrari wanted 66-33 ICE-Electrical split, I don't see why that would have changed...

❌ TODOS los pilotos de la parrilla se quejan de la normativa, no les gusta, solo que algunos no pueden criticarlo en público ⚠️ Mercedes y Ferrari están presionando para que no se cambie ABSOLUTAMENTE NADA de la actual normativa 📰 Carlos Miquel en MARCA

@the_zb_ @bferguson4 @single_sig_onpa 💯. That and the Ferrari's showing some good wheel-to-wheel is saving the start of the season.

@flatlemonade @bferguson4 @single_sig_onpa If Ferrari don’t have a start line advantage, this would be a bigger disaster than it already is.

Watching these cars from 130R to the last chicane… no bueno. 🤦🏻‍♂️ This has to get fixed, I refuse to believe that this is somehow an acceptable norm for Formula 1. 🙅🏻‍♂️

@the_zb_ @bferguson4 @single_sig_onpa Genuinely wonder what people would think if Ferrari weren't mega on starts. The first two races would have been a procession.

@bferguson4 @single_sig_onpa Trading places due to a battery is not even entertaining.

@the_zb_ it is shocking, antithesis of F1. They need to increase fuel flow rate and decrease the electical power. I am fine with slower laptime but not this artificial algo driven F1

@PolePositionist Earliest PU update will be Race 12/13. They just need to hold on, until then. The best scenario for Ferrari would actually be McL surpassing Merc over the coming races. Worst case McL become 2nd forces and lowering the points Ferrari can secure before an updated PU.

I think it’s very clear that if Ferrari actually, properly, wants to challenge for wins and podiums consistently they need a better PU. They think they’ll get an upgrade opportunity (ADUO), and they badly need it. The less we say about the PU regs, the better.