Doc

13.6K posts

Doc banner
Doc

Doc

@DocTooch

A little medicine, weather, and crypto. Lots of opinion.

Se unió Aralık 2010
1.1K Siguiendo788 Seguidores
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
Thanks for the reply back and UHI makes sense in that aspect. I just feel for those that are starting from so little, those that are overwhelmed, and of course those that don’t realize what’s coming. It’s a hard transition for me and I’ve been very lucky and are better off than most, and am trying to keep up as best I can while still paying the bills of capitalism 🤪. Why I appreciate all you do here.
English
0
0
0
1
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
Doc Excellent and honest question, the asymmetry in starting positions today is real and has always been the toughest part of any transition. Universal High Income is the brief Interregnum bridge designed precisely for this. It gives every individual, whether they own property or not, reliable purchasing power to cross the threshold and acquire their first personal AI-directed robotic fabricator system (early units already projecting in the $20-30k range, falling fast). Once that household machine is in place, self-replication, open designs, and near-zero marginal costs from robotics + abundant energy take over. A person without a home today can direct their system to fabricate modular housing components, goods, energy solutions, whatever they need right where they are. Those who start with more assets will accelerate faster at first, no argument. But the physics of this shift changes the entire game: production decentralizes to the family and individual level. The old hierarchies of “who owns the factory or the land” simply lose their gravitational pull because abundance becomes the default state. We don’t solve unequal starting lines by forcing redistribution of yesterday’s scarce assets. We dissolve the relevance of those lines entirely when every home becomes its own micro-abundance engine. I the end you and I will have so much abundance that it would serve no purpose to keep collecting more and more, but to give more. We all are lifted if all are lifted in the abundance economy.
English
2
0
3
45
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
What comes after Universal High Income? In the series-You 5000 Days: Navigating the End of Work as We Know It, we explore this path, from the Interregnum to the new era. This era dissolves all prior political and economic systems. What’s next? readmultiplex.com/2026/04/01/you…
English
33
15
120
82.1K
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
@BrianRoemmele @0xf_c Question for you though — what happens to those that don’t own property or a home to begin with? Or those that currently own much more than others? Not everyone is on the same playing field to start off.
English
2
0
0
53
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
@0xf_c I get the skepticism completely history is littered with “carrots” designed to keep the masses calm while the real game was locked in. But this isn’t about trusting any billionaire (still grinding after nine figures) to voluntarily hand over a slice of their pie to people who protest them. That would indeed be delusion. Universal High Income is not the end state. It’s the brief Interregnum bridge. What actually arrives is something far more radical: personal AI systems and self-replicating robotic fabricators that any household can own and direct. These machines generate massive real value at near-zero marginal cost. That drives organic, physics-based deflation so steep that traditional “income” itself becomes economically meaningless. No central authority needs to “give” anything. Production decentralizes to the family and individual level. The old political and economic hierarchies simply lose their gravitational pull because the physics of computation and robotics make abundance the default state. We don’t dissolve the prior systems through policy or protest. They dissolve themselves when they no longer control the means of production. Creation continues long after “enough” because creation is the deepest human impulse. The same drive that keeps some working after 100 million will still be there when every home runs its own micro-abundance engine.
English
4
3
39
3.1K
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
The doom posting is getting old. Not everyone has access to “building with AI” or has a business that is AI friendly atm. Additionally, I heard about how it can as so importer to get a Mac mini and Claudebot just a few weeks ago, and that since had turned out to be false. I think some people are so terrified of AI that they feel better telling everyone how far ahead they are.
English
0
0
0
81
Codie Sanchez
Codie Sanchez@Codie_Sanchez·
The SINGLE most important interview question in 2026 (regardless of role): “What are you currently building with AI?” If they answer “nothing”? Wish them luck.
English
108
17
309
15.9K
Doc retuiteado
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
Here’s the problem tho — the first businesses to be hurt from white collar layoffs will be these exact types of businesses. People don’t NEED to have their house cleaned by someone else. They can do it themselves. As with almost everything else on the list. These are luxury services for those that have the money to spend on them. If 30-40% of white collar jobs go away, your margins become unsustainable
English
0
0
7
3.7K
Mike Cleans
Mike Cleans@cleanwithmike·
The smartest people I know aren't building AI businesses. They're building boring home service businesses (& using AI to automate them). If you want to get rich in 2026... Here are the 8 best options: 1) Power Washing
English
34
89
605
826.7K
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
@ShardiB2 @SignaTrading I signed up prior to 1000 followers but have yet to get any confirmation email
English
4
0
6
431
Doc retuiteado
Justin Rosenstein
Justin Rosenstein@rosenstein·
The White House wants to let the companies sort it out. We know how that ends. The question is whether we demand democratic governance before AI goes the way of social media. Fortune op-ed: fortune.com/2026/03/29/reg…
English
2
3
47
6.8K
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
@Phillies Three words: team is ass
English
0
0
1
62
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
@Hadley Yea well I’ve heard it from 4 people in 4 days, 2 times better than your sorry ass. Unfollow this late to the party loser
English
0
0
0
477
Hadley Harris
Hadley Harris@Hadley·
I’ve heard from 2 people in the last 2 days that internally Anthropic expects to have AGI in 6-12 months. That’s faster than Dario has stated publicly. Plan your business and personal finances appropriately.
English
357
106
1.9K
763.5K
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
@WIPMiddayShow Time for him to request a contact renegotiation but keep it in house like last time… oh wait 😏
English
0
0
1
72
94WIP Midday Show
94WIP Midday Show@WIPMiddayShow·
Is it too early to be concerned about Bryce Harper?
English
41
2
6
7.2K
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
@stoolpresidente Get a haircut, you look like belong in a circus with whatever it is you got going on
English
0
0
1
170
Dave Portnoy
Dave Portnoy@stoolpresidente·
1 ticket punched. 1 more to go today. Time to buckle up for the hockey game. That’s the Michigan difference! #Goblue
English
96
94
1.5K
203.9K
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
@Jason Thank the masses we have you around to predict the future with such clarity. Perhaps you have some sporting event predictions or stock tips for us as well?
English
0
0
5
344
@jason
@jason@Jason·
Here’s the truth: we’ve already reached AGI — we just haven’t implemented it broadly. Millions of jobs are being lost as we speak. Entire careers will be retired. The rich and powerful investors and founders who implement AGI will get bizarrely rich beyond what makes sense. It will break people's brains on both sides. It’s gonna suck for a lot of our friends and family, who aren’t obsessed with their careers, because things are moving so fast they won’t have even left the starting gate by the time the awards are handed out. We’re gonna have to solve for a lot of second- and third-order effects, some of which will suck (job loss) and some of which will be awesome. AI will create free/cheap energy, free education, cheaper and better food, homes that build themselves and medicine that makes you as healthy as a 30-year-old when you’re 100. … change is hard, but humans are the most adaptable species nature has ever created. We can figure it out.
English
924
375
4.2K
578.8K
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
@elonmusk @pmarca And mental illness will run rampant. Good talk tho
English
0
0
0
10
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
@pmarca Working will be optional in the future
English
3.7K
749
6.8K
1.5M
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
AI employment doomerism is rooted in the socialist fallacy of lump of labor. It is wrong now for the same reason it’s always been wrong. More people really should try to learn about this. The AI will teach you about it if you ask! (Hinton is a socialist. youtube.com/shorts/R-b8RR6…)
YouTube video
YouTube
Stephen Pimentel@StephenPiment

It’s easy to dunk on Geoffrey Hinton for his 2016 declaration that it was “completely obvious” that radiologists would have no jobs within 5 years, while in fact, the number of radiologists has grown. But this prediction was more than a simple mistake. It’s a synedoche for the entire discourse of AI timelines and doom.

English
360
218
2.7K
1.7M
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
@isaborglobal @FoxNews Sue? He possibly would’ve killed the kid. Getting sued would be the least of his worries
English
1
0
1
74
Global isaac
Global isaac@isaborglobal·
@FoxNews This is professionalism coupled with a lot of experience because it won’t be funny if he hit the kid, he might be sue for that
English
1
0
1
3.2K
Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
CLOSE CALL: A skier 'miraculously' avoids colliding with a child while performing a jump stunt on a trail in Durango, Colorado.
English
252
411
7.6K
2M
Doc
Doc@DocTooch·
This is an underlying problem with sports in general — just because someone can hit or throw a ball better than the average person it doesn’t allow them to skirt to the law or worse hurt or kill someone. It’s quite obvious he was on prescription opioids, he admitted he was on medication. Yet some of these jock sniffers are so far up athletes’ asses it’s beyond pathetic. Maybe take it out of your mouth for at least a few seconds in times like this 😏
English
0
0
0
665
Riggs
Riggs@RiggsBarstool·
ZXX
2.3K
209
6.2K
6.6M