Jonathan Martin ☦️

2.7K posts

Jonathan Martin ☦️

Jonathan Martin ☦️

@JM_Database

Trying to point everyone to Christ and His Church through love and humility. Failing sometimes at this so have mercy please! 😂

Se unió Mayıs 2021
26 Siguiendo115 Seguidores
Jonathan Martin ☦️
Jonathan Martin ☦️@JM_Database·
@ProvisionistP Both of you are wrong. Scripture itself says to submit to the church authority. So whoever the bishop is in your area, that is what we are called to submit to. Due to schisms and areas having many bishops, pick the one you think makes the most sense historically and stay there.
English
0
0
0
9
Provisionist Perspective 🩸🌍
Every. Single. Time. Why can’t y’all just agree all Christians should submit to God’s Word and that you are following it? (We all know the answer, don’t we?)
Provisionist Perspective 🩸🌍 tweet media
English
16
3
42
1.2K
Tim Kauffman
Tim Kauffman@whpub·
Why should I submit to the “successors of the apostles” in Rome when the actual successors to the apostles everywhere else didn’t submit to the “successors of the apostles” in Rome? When Polycarp of Smyrna visited bishop Anicetus of Rome, “Pope” Anicetus was unable to persuade Polycarp to change the Eucharistic practices he had received from John and the other apostles. And out of respect, Anicetus deferred to Polycarp. (Eusebius, Church History 5.24.16). When a Spanish congregation asked Cyprian of Carthage’s advice on “Pope” Stephen’s intervention in Spanish episcopal affairs, Cyprian wrote back to Spain telling them that Stephen could be ignored because he was deceived and didn’t know what he was talking about (Cyprian, epistle 67). When Stephen tried to impose is views on baptism on the eastern bishops, Fermilian of Caesarea wrote to Cyprian of Carthage complaining that “they who are at Rome … vainly pretend the authority of the apostles” (to Cyprian, epistle 74). So, yeah, I follow in the great footsteps of the successors of the apostles by ignoring the nonsense that comes out of Rome.
Crowe@crowe_justinp

Ok. Bible says to obey your leaders. Jesus established a Church and Leadership for it. There successors settled in Rome. So, Submit to Rome?

English
25
23
147
8.9K
Redeemed Zoomer 👑
Redeemed Zoomer 👑@redeemed_zoomer·
What do you get when you cross an Evangelical with an Eastern Orthodox? A guy who says the rapture is a week later than everyone else says
English
36
10
380
12.1K
Brendan Coulter
Brendan Coulter@Bmoneykingman94·
@JM_Database @HabitualLinest Your friend is mistaken. The Catholic Church teaches that if you die with the intention to have your sins forgiven God will forgive your sins as he knows your heart. Even if you are on a desert Island and can not go to confession you can still pray and God will forgive you.
English
2
0
1
16
HabitualLinestepper
HabitualLinestepper@HabitualLinest·
This is a very common tactic by Protestants. Notice the subtlety of the deceit. 1. The last sentence is Scriptural. It's proclaimed by the Catholic Church as well. No one argues that. 2. The first sentence is just his opinion. See how he adds his opinions to Scripture and then pretends his opinions are actually Scripture? 3. His opinion about salvation in the sacraments is objectively wrong as Scripture states. Yet he pretends it's not 4. His opinion about priests is agreed to by the Catholic Church. No one argues that. See how he includes things that no one even disagrees with? What he's trying to do is take ANY disagreement at all, as proof that Catholics believe salvation comes from priests. He's intentionally trying to bear false witness 5. Same with the salvation by works. Now perhaps Protestants of good will should think long and hard about why deceit is necessary if they have the truth? 🤔
𝕊𝕠𝕝𝕒 ℂ𝕙𝕒𝕕 🎚️@sola_chad

English
45
46
782
41.4K
Cary Bleasdale
Cary Bleasdale@Cary_Bleasdale·
@HabitualLinest @JM_Database I'm sure they do, my point is they're saying this is some a reference to some odd super-sin, not drawing the distiction between mortal and venial. I mean, cmon, lets be real, this is one of the weirdest and most confusing passages of scripture, you really wanna lean on this?
English
1
0
0
16
Jonathan Martin ☦️
Jonathan Martin ☦️@JM_Database·
@HabitualLinest I'm kinda tired of hearing that EO is just RC but without the pope because it couldn't be further from the truth. We have a totally different view of what Grace is, and it affects most of our theology downstream, including confession.
English
0
0
0
19
HabitualLinestepper
HabitualLinestepper@HabitualLinest·
@JM_Database Then your friend is ignorant. You could have easily talked him through this error. Orthodox have the same beliefs on Confession as we do. God will not damn someone to hell who is on their way to Confession and dies.
English
2
0
19
422
Morgan Ariel
Morgan Ariel@itsmorganariel·
Christianity was perverted at the time of the schism. Catholicism led to Protestantism. If the church never split there wouldn’t be hundreds of different denominations in Christianity today.
English
309
26
528
41.7K
#1 Zane McIntyre Fan
#1 Zane McIntyre Fan@quantumking_·
@JM_Database @CassyIsCatholic If we truly love our neighbor we should have the courage to say that they should not receive the body of Christ, to remain silent on such a critical matter is not what "judge not" means
English
2
0
1
33
Jonathan Martin ☦️
Jonathan Martin ☦️@JM_Database·
@Truth_matters20 I'm not sure if that is an official RC teaching or not, but either way, you'd never hear something like this in Orthodoxy. Mary points us to Christ, never as her own independent source of salvation.
English
0
0
0
10
Danny
Danny@Truth_matters20·
I feel like Catholics parody themselves at times.
Danny tweet media
English
94
45
646
22.9K
Taylor Eaton (Active Account)
The best way to refute Roman Catholicism? Just smile and continue to point them to the Bible (the actual authority, whether it’s recognized or not).
English
131
0
91
128.3K
Jonathan Martin ☦️
Jonathan Martin ☦️@JM_Database·
@Stephen_Angliss He was in Hades bringing His people out of there and into Paradise. So no, He was not literally in the lake of fire, nor was He suffering at all in Hades, but this is what it was referring to.
English
0
0
5
279
Stephen Angliss 📖
Stephen Angliss 📖@Stephen_Angliss·
Your annual reminder that, no, Jesus was not in Hell between Friday and Sunday—despite what the Apostle’s Creed says. This is a great example of the danger of over emphasizing creeds and confessionals. It results in a theology that is shaped by tradition instead of Scripture.
English
93
2
53
33.4K
Jonathan Martin ☦️
Jonathan Martin ☦️@JM_Database·
@IndianaBrunner Oh that's easy. In the prior verses, he says what was written that he's talking about. He was speaking against pride, which was written in the old testament. "That none of you may be puffed up". Has nothing to do with church tradition. Sola scriptura literally puffs people up.
English
0
0
0
13
Indiana Brunner
Indiana Brunner@IndianaBrunner·
I’ve still never heard a good explanation for this verse from those who reject Sola Scriptura. “I have applied all these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, brothers, that you may learn by us not to go beyond what is written, that none of you may be puffed up in favor of one against another.” (1 Corinthians 4:6)
English
51
15
150
8.5K
Redeemed Zoomer 👑
Redeemed Zoomer 👑@redeemed_zoomer·
@The_Catechumen Protestants need to prove less than Catholics. Catholics need to prove that the data from church history supports THEM over and against the EOs, OOs, and Sedes. Protestants simply need to prove that the data DOES NOT support any of them
English
7
5
163
3.1K
Brayden Cook
Brayden Cook@The_Catechumen·
When you say, "Church history is on the Protestant's side," I assume you don't mean to say, "if you look at the pre-Protestant history of the Church, Christians primarily and decisively held to distinctively Protestant convictions and doctrines," but rather, "the historical data makes most sense under the Protestant approach to Church history" - i.e. the historical record displays an early purity among the early Christians that slowly accreted doctrinal and disciplinary novelties/abnormalities as time went on. When Catholics look at Church History, we see (and attempt to apologetically ground) an institutional continuity and an organic doctrinal continuity throughout all ages. When Protestants look at Church History, they see (and attempt to apologetically ground) discontinuity and departure from earlier doctrinal purity.
Troy Frasier AKA Revived Studios@RevivedThoughts

Church history is on the protestants side. But we have to actually teach it.

English
11
8
71
9.1K
Jonathan Martin ☦️
Jonathan Martin ☦️@JM_Database·
@The_Cathodox In the 8th ecumenical council, Pope John VIII signed onto it without reservation, which rejected the filioque. Rome later just pretended that didn't happen and picked a different council to be the 8th. That right there is all the info you need.
English
0
0
3
119
Cathodox
Cathodox@The_Cathodox·
300 years before Photius the Third Synod of Toledo in A.D. 589 had already anathematized the Photians (Easterm Orthodox) who would later deny that the Holy Spirit proceeded from the Father and the Son and no. This is not economic procession.
Cathodox tweet media
English
17
16
103
5.3K
Jay Dyer
Jay Dyer@JayDyer·
Debate declines: Mohammed Hijab Wes Huff Trent Horn E Michael Jones Ortlund The opposition is drying up and retreating to tone policing videos.
English
121
79
1.5K
43.8K