Stephen Current

2.3K posts

Stephen Current

Stephen Current

@StephenCurrent4

Se unió Aralık 2021
311 Siguiendo25 Seguidores
Stephen Current
Stephen Current@StephenCurrent4·
@yogagirl516 @GSpellchecker I bought a half rack for squats and bench, the room I have my equipment in isn’t very big. Adjustable free weights so you don’t need a ton of them. There are other small pieces of equipment you can buy for pull-ups and rows. Really the only thing I can’t fit is a treadmill
English
1
0
1
28
Stephen Knight 🎙️
Stephen Knight 🎙️@GSpellchecker·
My gym workout would take about 40 mins instead of an hour and half if I didn't have to factor in people sat around on equipment playing on their phone. This post was brought to you by violent middle-aged rage
English
111
26
634
56.6K
Matthew Lutz
Matthew Lutz@MattLutzPhi·
Analytic philosophers are like "Enough with all this obscurantist nonsense about the great chain of being. I study the recursivity and reflexivity of the grounding relation."
English
26
113
1.2K
64.6K
Movez
Movez@0xMovez·
This 8 minute video by Nassim Taleb will show you how a 70-year-old formula used by quants separates top traders from bankrupt ones Bookmark & watch it. It will change the way you trade forever. Then read the post below
Movez@0xMovez

The best Polymarket quant bot for copy-trading with 99.3% win rate. backtested on 72M Polymarket trades, his strategy printed +$820K across 28,000 predictions bot doesn’t gamble. It uses math, statistics & strict sizing rules to target high-probability edge how the algo works: 1. Mispricing formula from 72M trades, one pattern stands out: traders overpay for cheap contracts in the (0.1¢-50¢) range. most of the real edge shows up in (80¢-99¢) contracts, which is where the bot does most of its trading. • formula: δ = actual win rate - implied probability bot applies this to every trade to find the edge. // 2. Expected value calculation EV tells you whether a trade is worth taking, independent of what happens on any single bet. • formula: EV = (P win × Payout) - (P lose × Cost) bot calculates it to understand if the trade is worth the risk. // 3. Kelly Criterion sizing most powerful position sizing formulas ever used in gambling, trading, and prediction markets. It tells the bot what percentage of the portfolio to allocate to each position for long-term growth. • formula: f* = (p * b - q) / b Mispricing found → EV calculated → Kelly sizing applied → enter trade. profile: polymarket.com/0x751a2b86cab5… start copy-trading the bot with as little as $10 using Ares: t.me/AresProTrading… other Quant formulas behind its algo revealed in the article below ↓

English
57
649
5K
733.8K
_s.a.m.e.m.e.m.e_
_s.a.m.e.m.e.m.e_@st_louis_stan·
Something to keep in mind with the endless "smart kid" discourse - and IQ of 120 is about 10% of the gen pop (around 15% of the white/asian pop), and 120 is a common cutoff for "gifted" in schools. Then you think about the type of person who posts in this part of twitter - where you need strong literacy, have interest in abstract arguments/news/philosophy/geopolitics- and you're dealing with a group that almost certainly has a higher percentage of 120 IQs and above than the typical population (both left and right wing people). So yeah, it does stand to reason that this section of X would indeed have a higher than typical proportion of "gifted" level boys
English
59
40
1.5K
46.7K
Stephen D. Hebert
Stephen D. Hebert@HebertD26819·
This is metaphysics we're talking about, as in it's beyond the physical, as in supernatural. A lot of people don't even think it exists, let alone have a standard for measuring it. There is one, but it's not like it's an accepted way of even thinking. We can't even conceptualize what it would mean for there not to be a God because that implies no action you could take would be good, as in life sustaining, let alone if there was a start or an end to this law of metaphysics. We couldn't even manipulate it if we wanted to because it's beyond the physical layer of reality. When you come up with a device that makes it so that smoking crack for 30 years lands you without any consequences and into a satisfied life of personal fulfillment, please, let me know.
English
1
0
2
370
Stephen Current
Stephen Current@StephenCurrent4·
@cdcole55 Carmen and Jurko is really the only sports talk in Chicago I can stand
English
0
0
1
300
Michael Scarn
Michael Scarn@cdcole55·
You can’t listen to 670 the Score unless a guest is on. Truly unlistenable hosts and content
English
107
13
551
50.3K
Oku
Oku@oku_yungx·
I need a nonchalant response to “I hate you”
English
24.7K
2.1K
43.1K
4.1M
creekseeker
creekseeker@mudscryer·
It’s really awful being 143 IQ and such a total failure in life. I got my PhD in biology thinking I was going to help save the world but no one has hired me for a permanent position in over a year and a half of searching. I thought proof of my high IQ was supposed to land me a job
English
613
31
871
103.5K
Stephen Current
Stephen Current@StephenCurrent4·
@hollowearthterf @razibkhan Schools used to have dedicated BD (behavior disorder) classes and just put them all in there so they could be disruptive together. Not sure if they still do it
English
1
0
21
3.2K
RFH🦎👁‍🗨🪐🌘 ⬛️ (Doctor)
Lower income/lower IQ boys are actually just a massive problem in class, highly disruptive, often aggressive towards other kids, can completely ruin the environment, and historically weren’t educated for a reason. It’s not the teacher’s fault, they just need to be removed
doomer@uncledoomer

i think the reason bright, energetic young men butt heads with schoolteachers, overwhelmingly women, is teachers simply have no theory of mind for male students, or arent willing to find the patience necessary to teach boys, whose learning styles are significantly higher variance

English
170
160
2.5K
205K
RGW-TF
RGW-TF@RGW_TF93·
@justalexoki Think of all the stuff that exists. There's a lot of things aren't there? What are the odds of one of those things just NOT existing? I dunno, but seems unlikely. Now multiply those odds by the number of things. And you realize the odds of NOTHING existing at all is crazy low.
English
1
0
1
263
taoki
taoki@justalexoki·
actually why is there something rather than nothing
English
426
32
783
79K
Stephen Current
Stephen Current@StephenCurrent4·
@jockowillink Someone had to pay for all those free bullets and weapons the Seals get to train with
English
0
0
1
353
Jocko Willink
Jocko Willink@jockowillink·
Happy government-sanctioned theft day!
Jocko Willink tweet media
English
190
835
8.7K
174.4K
Covfefe Anon
Covfefe Anon@CovfefeAnon·
Mike Vrabel is at the top of his profession, a fairly recently retired pro athlete in an ultra competitive sport playing one of the most competitive positions The most important aspect of this story? He should be doing a lot better than *this* Hoeflation is out of control
Covfefe Anon tweet media
Game 7@game7__

Let's go over Dianna Russini's history. This story isn't just about what happened with Mike Vrabel. In 2015, shortly after she joined ESPN, Jessica McCloughan, the wife of Redskins GM Scot McCloughan, publicly accused Russini of having an inappropriate relationship with her husband. The tweets were vulgar and specific. At the time, ESPN defended Russini and called her "an excellent reporter who should never have to be subjected to such vulgar comments." McCloughan later publicly apologized and called her own comments "unfounded and inappropriate." Today, the head coach of the New England Patriots was just photographed holding hands with one of the biggest NFL reporters in the country at a luxury resort in Arizona. Both are married. Both say it was innocent. Here's why it matters regardless: Page Six published photos of Mike Vrabel and Dianna Russini at the Ambiente Resort in Sedona on March 28. Holding hands. Hugging. Sitting together in a hot tub. Having breakfast on the hotel patio. Vrabel has been married to Jennifer Vrabel since 1999. They met at Ohio State. Two sons. Russini has been married to Kevin Goldschmidt, a Shake Shack executive, since 2020. Vrabel told Page Six: "These photos show a completely innocent interaction and any suggestion otherwise is laughable." Russini told Page Six: "The photos don't represent the group of six people who were hanging out during the day. Like most journalists in the NFL, reporters interact with sources away from stadiums and other venues." The Athletic's executive editor backed Russini, calling the photos "misleading and lack essential context." Even if you take all of that at face value, there's still a problem. Russini is a senior NFL insider for The Athletic, which is owned by The New York Times. She covers the entire league. Coaching hires, front office moves, player contracts, team transactions. She's been one of the most prominent NFL reporters in the country since joining ESPN in 2015. She left ESPN for The Athletic in August 2023. Vrabel was hired as the Patriots head coach on January 12, 2025. Before that, he coached the Titans for six seasons from 2018 to 2023 before being fired in January 2024. Won NFL Coach of the Year in 2021. Made the AFC Championship Game in 2019. Three-time Super Bowl champion as a player with the Patriots. A reporter who covers the NFL was photographed holding hands with a head coach at a luxury resort. That's a conflict of interest question. Not a gossip question. A journalism question. The 2015 allegation was retracted by the person who made it. That matters. But it also exists on the public record, and it resurfaced the moment the Vrabel photos hit the internet today. The question isn't what happened in Sedona. Only the people who were there know that. The question is whether a reporter can objectively cover a league that includes a head coach she was photographed vacationing with. That question doesn't require proof of a relationship. It only requires the appearance of one. Both are married. Both say it was innocent. The photos are public. And the NFL world is watching.

English
52
35
1K
70.3K
Stephen Current
Stephen Current@StephenCurrent4·
@quartzmorrigan Don’t let the other commenters make you think you did something wrong. People are awful 🫡 fuck em
English
0
0
0
558