electron emitter

14.7K posts

electron emitter banner
electron emitter

electron emitter

@noworkfunction

moderate anti-hedonist

midwest Se unió Haziran 2009
637 Siguiendo449 Seguidores
Tweet fijado
electron emitter
electron emitter@noworkfunction·
@tomieinlove agi is impossible because the universe can't generate the amount of smugness needed if the rationalists were right
English
4
5
121
4.6K
Uubzu v4
Uubzu v4@uubzu·
@ArtemisConsort I feel the same weight, but with a slightly different value system: my primary responsibility is not to be right, but to be effective I only care that the good guys win. History can judge me for my bad takes if it wants, as long as we win
English
3
0
42
469
Hunter Ash
Hunter Ash@ArtemisConsort·
[trigger warning: sincerity] I know I’m not that big of an account, but I have gotten a surprising number of comments and DMs from people telling me how much they appreciate my writing, how I’m their favorite follow, etc. There are a nontrivial number of people who weight my takes when considering what opinion they should have on the issues of the day. I take this seriously, even at my small scale. I want to increase the net amount of correctness in the world. More followers and more influence means more responsibility, means I’m more likely to pause, to shelve a dubiously accurate or exaggerated post, to avoid commenting on the issue of the day when it’s hottest because I don’t think I know enough yet. It seems like a lot of people, many with far larger profiles than me, don’t think this way. Their audiences are not people who have put trust in them and to whom they have a responsibility. They’re cash cows to be milked. These people either don’t think about or don’t care about the collateral damage they’re doing along the way. They’re happy to destroy $100 worth of the cultural commons for every $1 they pocket. I don’t really have a punchline, but this is an escalating problem. The bill will come due, and sadly those most responsible for the degeneration of the discourse probably won’t be the ones paying it.
English
60
21
775
18.3K
claude shannon
claude shannon@catpoopburglar·
@WallStreetApes oh man, if only all of this information could have been known in exacting detail before purchasing the loan
English
1
0
24
471
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
American logs into her federal student aid account so we can see her actual loans and payments - She took out a $49,548.74 loan - She’s made 120 payments, paying $25,558.36 - Her current balance is $50,121.33 So after paying $25,558.36, she now owes more than she took out “It's all such a scam”
English
3.2K
2.8K
8.7K
826.1K
sydney
sydney@demiurgently·
sorry i couldnt come to ur party i have a barnacle on me :-(
sydney tweet media
English
18
4
698
9.6K
Overeducated Gibbon
Overeducated Gibbon@MostlyMonkey·
> Invent an infinite energy glitch > Give it to your former enemies > They decide to stop using it and buy power from geopolitical rivals > Won't help you help them keep the power flowing What did they mean by this?
Overeducated Gibbon tweet mediaOvereducated Gibbon tweet media
English
8
32
1K
20.1K
Leah Libresco Sargeant
Leah Libresco Sargeant@LeahLibresco·
Begging people to remember you can have *friends* "For these moms, non-monogamy seems to offer more than just a way to reclaim their libido. Could it also be the secret to raising kids without completely resenting one’s husband?" thecut.com/article/non-mo…
English
12
19
208
73.4K
a_over.ing
a_over.ing@s__s_e_a·
@noworkfunction @MostlyMonkey That’s cheaper than almost every other country in the world, with the exceptions basically consisting of petrostates and countries that subsidize gas for home use
English
1
0
3
9
electron emitter
electron emitter@noworkfunction·
@roon not sure which part is you, but 5.4 is soooooo good I wasn't happy with 5.2 and I got scared when I saw 5.1 was being taken down but you fixed a bunch of the persistent annoying quirks and the quality/accuracy of the responses are noticeably better
English
0
0
1
14
the Rich
the Rich@Duderichy·
friendly reminder swedens taxes are so high they’re past the lafer curve point they’re explicitly destructive to the economy
Fredrik Hjelm@FredrikHjelm4

Sweden: we are a high-tax socialist country, everyone contributes, we take care of each other The income tax story is real. Starts at 30%, hits 55% at the top, add employer social fees at 31.4% and you're north of 65% fully loaded on senior salaries Also Sweden: >inheritance tax abolished 2004 >gift tax abolished 2004 >wealth tax abolished 2007 >property tax capped at $900/year regardless of what your home is worth >no tax on unrealized gains >borrow against your holdco personally and live on the loan tax free >capital gains at 20-30%, only when you actually take money out >ISK accounts (think Roth IRA but works for unlisted assets too, no capital gains tax on the inside) I spent years believing the story. Running a company and making some money changed it The big families didn't build dynasties despite the tax system. They built it, across Social Democrat and centre-right governments alike, because the rules never changed when the party did I ran the California comparison. Top income is similar pain, roughly 50% combined. But California taxes capital gains as ordinary income, around 37% combined. Federal estate tax hits 40% above $14M. Sweden is more capital-friendly than California in almost every category that matters for building generational wealth The story Sweden tells about itself is not the real story. It punishes labor and protects capital, same as everywhere else. Just with better parental leave so nobody complains Look, the low capital taxes are actually good policy. Abolishing inheritance tax brought capital back and the data supports it. But the gap between how labor and capital get taxed is hard to justify on fairness grounds. A flatter, more harmonized rate between the two would be simpler and more honest It would also save the country billions of hours in admin overhead, for individuals navigating the rules and for the civil services enforcing them Why not just do a flat level across? Seems easier

English
8
1
105
5.6K
electron emitter
electron emitter@noworkfunction·
ratioed the "former White House economic advisor"
electron emitter tweet media
English
0
0
5
36
the Rich
the Rich@Duderichy·
I think my health insurance accidentally reimbursed me uhhhh like 10x what they were supposed to $210,000...
the Rich tweet media
English
38
5
2.4K
125K
electron emitter
electron emitter@noworkfunction·
@EconTodd @cremieuxrecueil easier to convince buyers that it costs more simply because of tariffs information asymmetry plus, if everything else went up they could still be the cheapest option so if you want cheap wine you just pay it
English
0
0
37
780
Todd Buchholz
Todd Buchholz@EconTodd·
@cremieuxrecueil If retailers can get away with jacking up prices 20%, why didn't they do that all along, before tariffs?
English
16
0
22
4.8K
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
This was neat: Researchers traced a tariff on $5 European wines into the U.S. to see who paid it. The tariff itself was $1.19, producers paid $0.26 and importers took a $0.44 cut, but retailers used the tariff as an excuse to add a $1.10 margin. The price went up $1.59 (~32%):
Crémieux tweet media
English
111
762
5K
238K