Sasha Girodon--Leclerc

186 posts

Sasha Girodon--Leclerc banner
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc

Sasha Girodon--Leclerc

@y_hungryguy

Chief Cloning Officer - building... fate deals the cards, and you play the game.

Paris Se unió Ocak 2026
251 Siguiendo17 Seguidores
Tweet fijado
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc@y_hungryguy·
i'm 18 and hungry. some people had change their life in a year. i'll show you how (as i'm figuring out).
English
0
0
3
391
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc@y_hungryguy·
At least I’ll have time to understand this tweet.
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc tweet media
wafer@wafer_ai

🚨 OpenAI is launching GPT-5.6 Sol on Cerebras at up to 750 tps. Here's How kernels work on Cerebras Chips cerebras built a chip with 900,000 cores on a single silicon wafer. CSL (Cerebras Software Language) is a Zig-inspired DSL that gives you direct control over the Wafer-Scale Engine. the SDK is publicly documented and the programming model is genuinely the most alien one we've ever looked at. in CUDA you write one thread's perspective and launch millions. in CSL, there are no threads, no warps, no shared memory, and no kernel launches. you write code for individual Processing Elements: 900,000 independent cores arranged in a 2D mesh on a single silicon wafer. each PE has its own 48 KB of private SRAM, its own program counter, and a 5-port router connecting it to its 4 neighbors. that's actually it. no DRAM. no HBM. no cache hierarchy. 48 KB is your entire world per PE, where code and data must both fit. the programming model is dataflow. data moves between PEs as 32-bit messages called wavelets, traveling along virtual channels called colors. when a wavelet arrives at a PE on a specific color, it activates a task (a chunk of code bound to that color at compile time). tasks run to completion, then hardware picks the next activated task. tasks cannot call each other. they can only be activated. so instead of "launch N threads," you think of it like: "place code on PEs, define routes, let data flow." the memory model is also very different from GPUs. on an H100 you get 80 GB of HBM shared across all SMs. on the WSE-3, memory is 48 KB per PE, and there are 900,000 of them! this gives you 44 GB total on-chip SRAM at 21 PB/s aggregate bandwidth (vs 3 TB/s on H100). every access is single-cycle. no coalescing needed. no bank conflicts. no cache misses. but also no way to access another PE's memory. all inter-PE communication is explicit wavelet routing through the fabric. take a distributed GEMV for example. you would write a layout file that physically routes wavelets across the mesh. two PEs sit side by side. the left PE computes a partial result and routes it eastward. the right PE receives those wavelets from the west and accumulates. routing is defined at compile time. both operations are asynchronous and activate a task when they finish. you're physically routing data across silicon at 1 clock cycle per hop. cerebras is an extremely technically interesting & alien beast. reports 95-210x speedups over H100 on stencil computations. 3,000 tokens/sec inference on gpt-oss-120B. $10B+ deal with OpenAI for 750 MW of inference infrastructure. very exciting times for alternative accelerators! deep dive 1/6 by @gpuemi

English
0
0
0
7
Akash Anand
Akash Anand@realAkashAnand·
GPT-5.6 Sol is unbelievably good at creating and editing videos. It can do motion design, product demos, and animations like this one I made by simply giving it a screen recording. GPT 5.6 has the best design taste and significantly outperforms Fable, which relies heavily on repetitive design patterns. To help you experiment with video editing on it, we just launched a collection of 100 ready-to-use skills that show what’s possible and help you get started with video editing using GPT-5.6. These skills can create anything from motion graphics launch videos for your product to a 3B1B-style science explainer video. You can also use them to edit existing videos: add captions, generate motion graphics, create voiceovers, redesign visual styles, translate into new languages, and much more. If you want access to the full library, comment “VIDEO SKILLS” and I’ll share it with you. (You'll have to follow me so I can DM you.)
OpenAI@OpenAI

Sol, Terra, and Luna, our GPT‑5.6 family of models, are starting to roll out now in ChatGPT, Codex, and the API.

English
1.8K
160
3.1K
445.7K
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc@y_hungryguy·
This is crazy.
Hasheur@PowerHasheur

Le sujet est complexe mais surtout terriblement important, donc avant de réagir il faut bien comprendre de quoi parle ce tweet : Ce qui vient d'être adopté, c'est Chat Control 1.0 : un règlement temporaire qui AUTORISE (sans obliger) les plateformes comme Meta ou Google à scanner vos messages NON chiffrés (Messenger, Gmail, DM Instagram) pour détecter des contenus criminels. Ce texte était mort. Le Parlement l'avait rejeté en mars, il avait expiré le 3 avril. Depuis ce scan de discussions privées était illégal en Europe. Et là, il vient d'être ressuscité. Dans des conditions qui posent question qu'on soit pour ou contre sur le fond : ▶️1. Une procédure d'urgence inédite lancée la dernière semaine avant les vacances parlementaires. ▶️2. À cette étape, rejeter le texte exigeait une majorité absolue : 361 voix sur 720. Pas la majorité des votants. Chaque absent comptait donc comme un oui. ▶️3. Résultat : 314 contre le texte, 276 pour. Une majorité des présents a voté contre mais le texte passe quand même. Un texte rejeté deux fois, ressuscité en urgence, adopté sans majorité réelle dans un hémicycle à moitié vide. "Voilà les circonstances". Mais le vrai sujet est ailleurs selon moi. Le combat qui compte encore plus, c'est Chat Control 2.0 : le projet de scan OBLIGATOIRE et SYSTEMATIQUE de toutes les conversations privées y compris sur les messageries chiffrées. Signal a déjà prévenu qu'ils quitteraient l'Europe plutôt que de casser leur chiffrement. Ce texte est bloqué depuis 2022 faute d'accord et les négociations reprennent en septembre. C'est là que le vote d'aujourd'hui change tout : avec le 1.0 réinstallé jusqu'en 2028, plus aucune pression de calendrier. Les partisans du Chat Control 2.0 ont désormais trois ans devant eux pour le faire passer tranquillement.

English
0
0
0
13
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc@y_hungryguy·
@mae_prina personally i use codex, limits are higher and sol is getting released tomorrow. the gap with fable may not be too big!
English
0
0
1
22
Maé Prina
Maé Prina@mae_prina·
I’ve heard of Cursor, Claude Code and Codex but no clue which to actually use. Please help me !!!!
Maé Prina tweet mediaMaé Prina tweet mediaMaé Prina tweet media
English
2
0
1
251
Brivael Le Pogam
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael·
Mon neveu a 18 ans, c'est @mae_prina Il est coincé dans une école d'informatique où on lui apprend du bullshit à longueur de journée. Alors je lui ai dit une seule chose : arrête d'attendre qu'on te forme, apprends à build, absorbe tout ce que tu peux trouver sur internet, et ship. Son objectif est simple. Sortir un SaaS qui lui génère du revenu d'ici la fin de l'année. À 18 ans, en partant de zéro, en apprenant tout seul. Allez le suivre, c'est un vrai good guy.
Brivael Le Pogam tweet media
Français
18
5
86
8.1K
Alexendre
Alexendre@pato__project·
SEO is dead GEO is the opportunity Je vous jure qu'à partir de maintenant vous allez voir cette phrase partout et pour un long moment..
Français
3
0
5
953
NATE G
NATE G@natnaelgirma27·
What’s the best way to start UGC, for a solo developer. Budget:$500/month
English
3
0
7
1.7K
Raph Guilhem
Raph Guilhem@raph_guilhem·
You’re building a startup from scratch. You can only hire ONE first growth guy. A. Engineer who became « GTM Engineer » B. Content creator → Growth C. Ex-VC D. Elite business school grad (with no xp) E. Grinder with no prestigious background F. Infopreneur turned app/saas builder Who are you betting on and why?
English
3
0
3
246
Raph Guilhem
Raph Guilhem@raph_guilhem·
Am I missing a profile??!
English
1
0
0
62
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc@y_hungryguy·
Just discovered ultracode reasoning after months spent on codex. just by hitting enter you can see your limit bar go to the red in real time. you now have 5 hours to go out and contemplate our beautiful world. I love it.
English
0
0
0
21
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
What is something that you feel is surprising that Codex still can't do well and we should have gotten right a while ago?
English
3K
44
3K
562.2K
Alexendre
Alexendre@pato__project·
J’ai un max de place dans mes bureaux cet été Qui veut venir faire un CLAUDEMAXXXINNG DAY ? On burn du token à gogo pour sortir la feature qu’on repousse depuis des mois
Français
7
1
13
1.6K
Théo
Théo@theositjar·
Help me choose a thumbnail for our 0€ + 0% equity startup summer camp in Paris. Which do you like most ? Also there's 1 inspired by @parisbayarea poster from a hackathon, can you spot it ? 👀
Théo tweet mediaThéo tweet mediaThéo tweet mediaThéo tweet media
English
8
1
2
668
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc@y_hungryguy·
In two months you can lock-in yourself and achieve something you always wanted, faster than you expected. But at the same time, loose contact with a significant part of your friends. Maybe Alex Karp was right on the impossibility of a social life in your 18s if you want to win.
English
0
0
0
27
Sasha Girodon--Leclerc retuiteado
Brivael Le Pogam
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael·
Mon dieu…
Brivael Le Pogam tweet media
Français
114
46
572
28.1K
Yann
Yann@Yannlce·
Bro just discovered that he's been paying his API credits 45x the provider price (no shit sherlock) But you're still wrong on one point though: the issue isn't that they're a wrapper, it's not even an insult tbf. Every tech company is a wrapper of something. Even model providers can be called wrappers. The issue is in the value provided for that much of a multiple on credits pricing per unit: even on their middle plan (which only difference with the enterprise plan is credits volume in most companies), you get rate limited like crazy and still discover paywalls everywhere. For instance you won't be able to launch five or six generations simultaneously, which is a crazy downside when you work at scale on video creation, whether it's ads or full movies. I'm usually on the company side as most people are cheap and expect everything for free, particularly with AI models' pricing. To justify such an upsell your app must provide an insane amount of added value on top of the capacity of the existing models. I could have said that it's the case for their supercomputer, seeing how promising it looks, but even that seems only usable for a few minutes before hitting rate limits. Good call telling everyone that doesn't know though, and it's crazy to think it still concerns SO many people they had such crazy distribution that they were able to cover most of the call-outs on their scammy pricing That said, personal preference but I use @fal instead of replicate for my flow inside Claude + Argil
Guillem@guillemcraft

higgsfield is LYING TO YOU it's true. they're an AI wrapper that charges you tons of credits for using the same API everyone else uses, and way more expensive what's the point in paying for monthly credits when you can just run Replicate and have the same results? i get it, they actually did a great job at wrapping things together and marketing it with tons of ads, but don't be fooled stop wasting money and add your github to Replicate and pay per generation instead (way way cheaper!) btw, i'm not sponsored by Replicate but i felt the urge to tell you, even more if you're trying to increase your MRR higgscam will steal all your money and you won't even notice i post about what works and what doesn't, and how to actually save money on marketing bc most of us don't have that much cash $$$ what do you think? did you run out of credits? will keep you updated

English
1
1
2
2.4K