MindSpoken

@elonmusk We need a UK Government to enable this.

Tesla FSD

@ClarkeMicah @Yodoswaginz 100% agree light beyond 9pm is irritating.

.@yodoswaginz. You don't leave the house much, do you? In Manchester, on June 21, if we didn't falsify the clocks, sunset would take place at 8,46 PM (lighting up time half an hour later). Light until 9.00 PM seems to me to be plenty of daylight. What is it that you claim to do which requires daylight till 10.00 PM?

@MattWallace888 You think the death to America crowd would not have done that? It's imperative we remove all bad actors now. Before they have the power to do real damage.

The war in Iran is way worse than they are telling you. If you support it, I promise you will change your mind after reading this post. In the modern world, nuclear weapons are no longer what we have to worry most about. It is chemical and biological weapons. Iran can easily develop weapons that are WAY WORSE than nukes. Now, though, instead of having an enemy by proxy that may or may not get nukes, we have a mortal enemy that will almost certainly develop/obtain way scarier weapons. Instead of worrying about a tiny chance of them using nukes against us one day, we instead have to worry about a much higher chance of them using AI to create a highly deadly virus that targets us genetically. We have to worry about a much higher chance of them deploying an unstoppable chemical weapon in our air or water, likely using the sleeper agents that pathetic politicians on both sides let into our country. That said, I don't want to scare you too much. Fortunately, a major escalation like that probably* still won’t happen because Iran knows that they would be destroyed in return. The point is that after all of this, we have to worry more about it, not less! I estimate there was approximately a 1% chance of the worst case scenario before the war. Now, it is closer to 10%, the Straight of Hormuz is blocked, hundreds of billions are being wasted, demonic politicians are rising in the polls, and the chances of sleeper cell attacks have risen dramatically. Think about what that means for our children and the future of our country. Think about all of the innocent lives already lost. It is so disgusting that almost every major media outlet is running 24/7 propaganda for the war. They are owned by the same people who profit from the military industrial complex. The same people who frequented Epstein island. The war in Iran is arguably the worst foreign policy decision in modern U.S. history. Please, President Trump, fix what you can and condemn the people who convinced you to do this before it is too late.

@jaykaymcg @RiazRohani @siaxares @Starlink You're in the US safely being a dickhead and this genuine Iranian fighting for his land in Iran. Shame on you. Disgusting doesn't cover it.

@RiazRohani @siaxares @Starlink ha ha

I’m a dissident in Iran, connecting right now via @Starlink during the #DigitalBlackOutIran‌. The vast majority of Iranians vehemently oppose this regime. Thousands of us have already died proving it. Most of those martyrs had active online accounts. Look up their names. You’ll see they all stood for a free Iran and the return of Pahlavi. Our most common slogans say it all: "Long live the King" and "This is the final battle — Pahlavi will return." Right now, the Iranian people are staying in their homes because @realDonaldTrump , @netanyahu , and @PahlaviReza himself asked us to until the bombings stop. We are waiting. We know the price of freedom will be high. But the price of letting this regime survive is far higher. We have accepted the cost — this war. The regime’s time is over. #KingRezaPahlavi‌ForIran #IranRevolution2026‌

@gkisokay What advantages does this have over just running hermes?

Best OpenClaw advice I can give: Don't run it alone. Give it a Hermes supervisor. I was losing too many hours debugging OpenClaw instead of creating with it. Make Hermes monitor the system, catch problems, and propose fixes to OpenClaw. Here's the setup: - Hermes runs inside my Discord with OpenClaw - monitors logs, research, and errors - audits the workspace 3x/day - catches drift, failures, bugs - proposes fixes - pulls OpenClaw in for critical verification - executes once the plan is verified This is how you reclaim your time with OpenClaw to create at full throttle. You create the feedback loop to fix, verify, and execute. The image below is a small example of it in action. If enough people care, I’ll write the full setup.

@heynavtoor @CeeMacBee It's just 26 characters (for english) in a variety of orders. Obviously an llm can do that. It doesn't need to store anything, it creates as is desired or prompted. Make this make sense.

🚨BREAKING: Every book you have ever read. Every novel that has ever been published. It is sitting inside ChatGPT right now. Word for word. Up to 90% of it. And OpenAI told a judge that was impossible. Researchers at Stony Brook University and Columbia Law School just proved it. They fine tuned GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and DeepSeek V3.1 on a simple task: expand a plot summary into full text. A normal use case. The kind of thing a writing assistant is built for. No hacking. No jailbreaking. No tricks. The models started reciting copyrighted books from memory. Not paraphrasing. Not summarizing. Entire pages reproduced verbatim. Single unbroken spans exceeding 460 words. Up to 85 to 90% of entire copyrighted novels. Word for word. Then it got worse. The researchers fine tuned the models on the works of only one author. Haruki Murakami. Just his novels. Nothing else. It unlocked verbatim recall of books from over 30 completely unrelated authors. One author's books opened the vault to everyone else's. The memorization was already inside the model the whole time. The fine tuning just removed the lock. Your book might be in there right now. You would never know it unless someone looked. Every safety measure the companies rely on failed. RLHF failed. System prompts failed. Output filters failed. The exact protections these companies cite in courtroom defenses did not stop a single page from being extracted. Then the researchers compared the three models. GPT-4o. Gemini. DeepSeek. Three different companies. Three different countries. They all memorized the same books in the same regions. The correlation was 0.90 or higher. That means they all trained on the same stolen data. The paper names the sources directly: LibGen and Books3. Over 190,000 copyrighted books obtained from pirated websites. Right now, authors and publishers have dozens of active lawsuits against OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta. These companies have argued in court that their models learn patterns. Not copies. That no book is stored inside the weights. This paper says that is a lie. The books are still inside. And researchers just pulled them out.

@ClarkeMicah Some concepts are fixed though, school start time. Sports clubs. Work start. no one wants it dark at 9am unless you suggest you move the normal notional morning start to 10AM. I think I have a better idea...

‘Dark winter evenings depress me’, say the clock-fiddlers. How dim can you get? They remind me of the old woman who, in the days of the USSR, lived on the frontier between the Soviet Union and Poland. When the boundary rectification commission came by, they told her ‘Your house is exactly on the new revised border. We really don’t mind whether you stay in Poland or the USSR, so it’s up to you.’ She thought for a moment and said ‘I’d rather be in Poland’. When they asked her why, she said : ‘I can’t stand those long Russian winters’. Look , dear. The evenings *are* dark in winter. Fiddling with the clocks does not alter that.

@DaveShapi How are you incorporating the improved AI at each stage contributing to helping us get better?

Everyone is freaking out about the exponentially rising costs of frontier models, and if we look at the math, it's pretty grim. We're definitely going to "hit a wall" in the next few years BUT ONLY if nothing changes. That's the bad news. The good news is extremely good: FIRST - We have a lot more juice we can squeeze out of the data we already have. Human brains learn way more with way less. That just means we need better training schemes, loss functions, and algorithms. This will get 2 to 4 OOMs (orders of magnitude) more efficiency. SECOND - We can make compute orders of magnitude more efficient, namely with stuff like thermodynamic computing. That can get us 6 or 7 more OOMs. It also means that compute and energy won't be bottlenecks. However, we should fully expect the "we're hitting a wall!" people to be crowing for a while over data like this. But the physics and math are unambiguous: we are no where near the ceiling. Yes, it may require a few paradigm changes but those paradigm shifts are already being explored. The global loss function of humanity is "more intelligence per joule" so it doesn't matter what hardware or software gets us there. We will continue to gain efficiency at converting watts into thoughts. At current rates, we should expect the cost of training frontier models (under the current paradigm) to become prohibitively expensive later this year or perhaps 2027. 2028 at the absolute latest.

@artsPMP @BrianRoemmele The government and they already have it. Digital ID

@BrianRoemmele I've asked you before, Brian - who is going to run with the business model to digitally certify "human-made" content, which will command premium prices in the coming economy? What do you suppose the Polymarket odds are on that coming very soon? 🤔

Eddie Dalton was AI and many of us knew it. In about 4 months the watermarks will be gone with more open source local AI music models. I have been saying this for over 3 decades, now we are here. We allowed music to be ripped and remixed and this is the end result.

@Go_Crene @jeffreytucker Define 'right' because it doesn't seem to mean what it normally does in your sentence.

@jeffreytucker the guy who predicted pandemics, funded vaccine infrastructure, and warned about climate risk is now the villain for being right early. the timeline punishes early calls in finance and in public health the same way.

The crashing and burning of Bill Gates is one of the more spectacular turns of our age. It's hard to believe. This guy was not only the global warming guru but probably the top Covid lockdown and vaccine pundit who made bank on the whole operation. Now he is a poster child of overclass arrogance, pretense, decadence, and corruption. Amazing.

@jeffreytucker @RossDyerTV There is potentially a lot worst things unmentioned too.

@daniel_mac8 It's starting to like the harness is more important than the model.

These ultra geniuses beat Sonnet 4.5 performance on LiveCodeBench with Qwen3-14B, a single RTX 5060 and a great harness.

@therealmissjo @chris_kratovil So just really bad then 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@chris_kratovil Boris could have been a fantastic PM. He could have been up there with Churchill, someone he, himself, idolises. Sadly, he gave in to the panic mongers during Covid and was wanted to be liked so badly he also caved on immigration and net zero nonsense.

It’s not every day that one gets to listen to a former British Prime Minister recite from memory the opening passages of The Iliad in Ancient Greek, with no notes, in response to a random question from an undergraduate—and all while wearing what appear to be Thomas The Tank Engine socks. But today was one such day. My thanks to my good friend Brad LaMorgese for the opportunity to see the colorful and comic Boris Johnson speak tonight at the University of Dallas.

Here’s what no one in the AI conversation is saying: This isn’t just a technological shift. It’s a *spiritual* one. For the first time in human history, the machines can handle the survival work. Which means humans are being pushed — forced, really — back toward their *actual* purpose. Creation. Connection. Consciousness. The ones fighting AI are fighting their own liberation. The ones embracing it? They’re becoming more human than ever.

@AlexFinn That's not how markets work. It's the most expensive and least good it is ever going to get.

“Intelligence too cheap to meter” Ya right. Dumb intelligence will be too cheap to meter. The super intelligence that gives you an actual edge in the economic battlefield will only get more and more expensive

Drop what you're doing and read this post Anthropic is about to release the most powerful AI model ever created. Claude Mythos It's so powerful they consider it a danger to cybersecurity everywhere It will also be significantly more expensive than Opus I don't know your financial situation, but I do know this: we are entering the era of humanity where having money is going to give you signficantly more power than those without money Those without money will not be able to create nearly the same economic value as those that already have money because they won't have access to this kind of super intelligence, widening the gaps even further This is where the concept of a permanent underclass comes from If you want to keep up in this economic race you have to be willing to do 1 of 2 things: 1. Spend the money necessary to use this intelligence to create value 2. Procure the money you need to use this intelligence to create value The people who go out and immediately use this model to create business, products, and services will experience unmatched wealth Both the scariest and most exciting time ever

@sudoingX Is that setup totally open source and local? That's exactly what I'm trying to setup. I'll take a look at that, cheers 🍻

to all of you saying local models aren't there yet because some corporate salesman on an openai paycheck told you so. you're running their bloated tools and blaming the model. the model is fine. the bloated harness is the problem. i've tested literally every harness out there and i have the facts and receipts on my timeline and DM. openclaw is 120K+ lines of typescript bloat backed by corporate, mining your thinking while you pay for the privilege. switch to hermes agent and watch the same model become usable. don't take my word for it. just try. i have DMs from people who made the switch and their "broken" model started working instantly. same hardware, same model, different harness. if you're using hermes agent and someone near you is still on openclaw, help them get away from the bloat. they're frustrated at every step, burning tokens doing completely nothing, paying subscriptions to think on someone else's server. buy a single GPU from ebay. compile llama.cpp. install hermes. replace your openai subscriptions and think free. once you think free you start seeing light. you deserve better cognitive tools than bloat that harvests you.

@Rainmaker1973 Plug

Thoughts?

@naveenpmt @disclosetv Why would it want to destroy digital environments?

Anthropic just found the "Nuclear Option" of AI, and they’re terrified to turn it on. The Fortune leak of Claude Mythos confirms that we’ve hit the "Cyber-Singularity." This isn't a chatbot; it’s a digital infiltrator that Anthropic believes can discover Zero-Days and orchestrate 98% of a hacking campaign without a human in the loop. The fact that they are calling it "unprecedented risk" suggests that Mythos can effectively "vibe hack" itself, bypassing the very safeguards that define Anthropic’s brand. If this model leaks or is distilled by rivals (like the 24,000-account campaign from Feb 2026), the current global cybersecurity infrastructure becomes a legacy system overnight. We aren't fighting hackers anymore; we're fighting "Silicon Intelligence" that moves at 1000x the speed of a SOC analyst.

JUST IN - Leaked documents from Anthropic show that a new generation of super-strong models, "Claude Mythos," is already in testing with Anthropic believing it "poses unprecedented cybersecurity risks." — Fortune

@CF_Farrow That's a lot of words to say i think in racist terms.

On Snape being black. As a Harry Potter purist, I do find the casting of a black Snape in the new TV series jarring. Rowling clearly wrote Snape as a white man, and for many of us Alan Rickman’s portrayal is now inseparable from the character. That is simply the version so many readers and viewers carry in their heads. But Snape is no longer the mytery he was in 1997. His backstory is now so well known that most viewers are no longer being asked to distrust him in the way readers once were. We are in on the secret long before Harry is. So while some argue that making Snape black changes the dynamic, because he becomes the character we are initially invited to mistrust, I am not sure it is that simple. Could it make James Potter look worse, by adding an unspoken racial dimension to his treatment of Snape? Perhaps. But Harry Potter is now part of the cultural furniture. Almost nobody will come to this series with no prior knowledge at all. The books are global canon. James was always a slightly unsympathetic character, but the racial element inevitably makes him seem worse, and Snape’s later actions nobler. It is also obvious that Harry himself is not racist. If anything, the only attitudes resembling racism in Rowling’s world are those expressed by Snape, the Death Eaters, and the blood-purity fanatics of Slytherin. In that sense, the casting adds an extra layer of irony. I can also see the argument for it creatively. Paapa Essiedu has the chance to reinvent Snape in a way a white actor probably could not, because any white actor would inevitably have been measured against Rickman from the outset. He deserves to be judged on his performance, not subjected to abuse or threats. Back in the 1990s, and even when the original films came out, society did not seem so obsessed with reading everything through the lens of race. It is sadly critical race theory and wokeness that have helped bring a new and uglier racial consciousness to the fore. That said, it could not be clearer from the books that Rowling rejects blood purity and ethnic prejudice. And maybe, if this new adaptation makes people think differently about the story, and engages them in a new way, that is not entirely a bad thing. At that point, of course, we are in Roland Barthes territory: once a story passes into culture, people will read meanings into it that go far beyond what its author originally intended. Anyway. I’m keeping an open mind.

@DanielsonB92 @RapidResponse47 @POTUS @FoxNews Are you serious? In Iran.

@RapidResponse47 @POTUS Why the f*ck does that matter? @FoxNews

"Did the CIA tell you that Ayatollah Jr. is gay?" @POTUS: "They did say that... I think a lot of people are saying that — which puts him off to a bad start in that particular country."