Just Another Pod Guy

18.4K posts

Just Another Pod Guy banner
Just Another Pod Guy

Just Another Pod Guy

@TMTLongShort

Economic Blitzkrieg. Never said it was a good bet, just a complex bet. Decoupling ™️ Long/Short Tech Investor. Will say retarded shit often. 🫡

🇺🇸 Kardashev Type: 0.1 Inscrit le Şubat 2020
8.8K Abonnements45.5K Abonnés
Tweet épinglé
Just Another Pod Guy
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort·
I’ll spell it out explicitly one last time. Everyone thinks Trump wants balanced trade. He does not. He wants to force allies to stop trading with China. Completely. Zero inbound supply. Because it’s not just because of American jobs. It’s a proactive move to slow down Chinas industrial rise. Everything is downstream of this. Reserve currency status. The ability to address fiscal debt. It’s a crazy risk because China has a vote. It’s a crazy risk because you are forcing Europe to commit seppeku because they have very little leverage or say in the matter. It’s a crazy risk because Xi might bomb the fabs in Taiwan and the world doesn’t get AGI. It’s a crazy risk because China knows how financialized we are and will dump bonds and equities to drive anger towards trump. But it also has benefits if it works. If your allies can’t trade with China there is no near peer competitor to worry about. That has a ton of benefits. Just look at what happened after WW2/USSR collapse when American was the last man standing. Hegemony. Trumps advisors like Miran believe that you can coerce your allies to pay for your security umbrella in the form of buying longer dated treasuries. This removes the overhangs of the debt load while allowing you to pump markets in time for midterms. If Mexico can’t import from China then you solved the fentanyl crisis because they won’t have precursors. More importantly by establishing a tolerance for risk the level of fear you can instill in cartels is an order of magnitude higher. “Shit if they risked WW3 they won’t think twice about droning Sinaloa. “ This same “logic” applies to the Middle East. Now I will repeat for the 100x that this is not advocacy. I’m only telling you guys what the people in power believe. And I’m telling you that what happens next if I’m right will come down to how Xi wants to fight. He can go gloves off or glove on. There are real constraints as I have outlined in prior tweets. But there is a plan and therefore the tolerance for market pain is way way higher than you think. Because first you need Europe to be willing to commit economic seppuku. And they won’t want to (rightly). So Trump will crush them economically until they cry uncle. And then they still won’t want to and he’s going to threaten to defang NATO. And then they still won’t want to and he will withdraw swap lines. Or a lot more likely, he will do it all very forcefully and all at once to maximize leverage. Now you’ll rightly ask… why wasn’t this messaged better? Why have midwits like Lutnik on the team? Because you are attempting to execute a reckless gambit where the big variables are not what the tariffs rates are. Or if you tariff penguins. Or if the person sounds dumb on TV. Non of that matters. What matters is - will Japan capitulate quickly and agree to buy a large amount of treasuries? Will Saudi capitulate quickly with your B2 bombers waiting in Diego Garcia to bomb Iran? Will China invade Taiwan? Many of you think everyone around Trump is retarded. I get it. You hate the guy and everything he stands for. But I will say this until I’m blue in the face. Bessant, and even Miran, have higher IQs than most if not all of you. They thought through the second order effects. Believe me. If I, a dumb TMT L/S bro thought this far ahead, they certainly did too. Which means they warned Trump how risky this was and how deeply irrational it is if you planned to eventually cut a deal with China. Therefore you have to assume Trump heard the risks and said “fuck it we ball” anyways. Economic Blitzkrieg. That’s what we’re seeing. And it’s only the start.
English
560
1.4K
10.2K
2.1M
Pierpoint & Co.
Pierpoint & Co.@pierpoint_cap·
@TMTLongShort Why would the incumbent administration risk the appearance of losing momentum, which could in turn become reflexive? Nonsense
English
1
0
1
102
Just Another Pod Guy
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort·
Schizo idea of the day. If I was attempting decoupling and wanted the Chinese to remain placid and patient I would subtly manipulate betting markets to push the narrative that i would be a lame duck after midterms. Would cost me less than a single Tomahawk too 😉
Just Another Pod Guy tweet media
English
16
5
140
11.5K
Kyle Cooper
Kyle Cooper@KyleCooper78074·
@TMTLongShort What legal notion do you think they could do this under like a covert intelligence state department corroboration that never has to see the light of day till decades later or what under the guise of national security
English
1
0
0
244
Djíkou Tankišto
Djíkou Tankišto@tankishto·
@TMTLongShort If decoupling is a thing - and I currently have more reasons to believe it is than that it isn't - wouldn't the OG CCP assets of this planet, namely the dems, be a priority to be politically wiped off? It should be the domestic priority #1, imo.
English
2
0
5
492
Just Another Pod Guy
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort·
@dkeramidas R sweep > 50% and D house R senate 25% with D sweet sub 20% but obvi I’m miles from cons
English
0
0
8
500
Jim Landa
Jim Landa@dkeramidas·
@TMTLongShort Do you think there’s a scenario that is more likely than D sweep? Not asking for 50%+; just meaningfully more likely than the other 3.
English
5
0
1
636
Just Another Pod Guy
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort·
Wish I knew about this much earlier. Really is miraculous stuff. The flow state aspect by far the most compelling part since starting it ten days ago.
Just Another Pod Guy tweet media
English
24
4
153
15.6K
Just Another Pod Guy
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort·
I think the world of Balaji intellectually and if you were to ask me which four humans do i look up to aspirationally from an intellect standpoint it would be Balaji, Thiel, Andreessen and Ilya. That said I completely disagree with Balaji here because while he (as usual) comes armed with lots of relevant datapoints he is missing the forest from the trees. If you start with the premise that the ask from Canada is to lock out China then you’ll see why the current adversarial approach was the only viable approach. And when you see what the admin is trying to accomplish vs China you can understand why the death of the dollar is far from certain and entirely contingent on how successful the admin is at securing hegemony at the end of all this. (Medium to long term obviously, re the dollar, before @SantiagoAuFund comes for my scalp)
Balaji@balajis

WHO LOST CANADA? It was obvious that China/Canada would happen. Here's how it happened, and what may happen next. (1) First, in early 2025 it looked like Canadian conservative Pierre Poilievre was a straight shot to win Canada. Instead, all the MAGA posts about annexing Canada undercut Pierre, boosted left nationalism, and turned what looked like a sure thing into an epic defeat. The result was Mark Carney: (2) Carney is on the left but is far more intelligent than his predecessor, Justin Trudeau. He's also the former governor of the Bank of Canada, and understands that the G7 (including Canada) is in the midst of sovereign debt crisis. And the Canadian dollar is going the way of the US dollar, which is to say that it's going to zero. Canada needs access to hard goods and will trade natural resources to get that. Hence, China. Carney's Canada may become a sort of North American Russia, trading oil and lumber to China for cars and electronics. (3) Who lost Canada? The fundamental reason this happened is that MAGA ironically doesn't understand its own self-interest. Even the term "America First" is misconceived, because it groups a Blue American like Elizabeth Warren together with a Red American like JD Vance...when in reality the Red American and the Red Canadian (like Pierre Poilievre) have much more in common. All the "joke" posts on annexing Canada managed to needlessly put Red Americans at odds not just with Blue Americans and Blue Canadians, but also with Red Canadians. The Greenland thing will have exactly the same effect, as it'll end up pushing Western Europeans to China. That's actually why most ultranationalist movements fail: they're just so shortsightedly tribal that they're terrible at building coalitions. (4) Anyway, while Carney is the first to be this explicit about aligning with China, expect many other Western leftist leaders (like Newsom and Walz) to line up with China over time. The reason is that while Democrats really did fight Communists from ~2021-2024 over the question of who'd run the world's most powerful state, Democrats lost. All the chip sanctions and isolation tactics that somewhat worked on Russia, and frankly might have worked on almost any other country, just didn't work on China...because China had enough internal economic scale to essentially be their own autarkic civilization, and build whatever they needed. (5) So: the anti-China Biden Democrats have been replaced by the China-curious Newsom Democrats. And now the China-aligned Carney Canadians. With Carney making the first move, you should expect many more blue state Democrats to align with China, particularly those on the West Coast like Newsom. (6) It's simple coalitional math. Democrats are the ingroup, Republicans are the outgroup, and Communists are the fargroup. So, for Democrats: the enemy of their Republican enemy is their friend. And there is much for them to admire in the Chinese political system. After all, Democrats and Communists both built one-party states: (7) Newsom in particular is likely the next shoe to drop, because even in 2023 he was reaching out to Xi. He's also spoken in Xinhua (Chinese state media) about becoming China's "long-term, stable, and strong partner." Newsom posts images of himself shaking Xi's hand, while also posting images of Trump in handcuffs. It's clear which President he's more comfortable with: (8) The California wealth tax is also worth mentioning here. As M. Guimarin correctly pointed out, the net effect of the wealth tax is for blues to drive tech out of the state. That's not an unintended consequence: the purpose of the wealth tax was to either rob or deport the sole remaining political opposition to Democrats in California, namely technologists. (Side note: Democrats are historically much better at mass deportations than Republicans, as they take a whole-of-society approach to it, and persist with it over decades, and do it silently and nonviolently. That's how Republicans were pushed out of university faculties, media companies, and California itself. It was once a dark red state, and now it's deep blue.) (9) Anyway, with the technologists pushed out of California, Newsom's blues can welcome in the Chinese, who won't be subject to the same wealth taxes as they aren't US citizens. (10) There is also an obvious geostrategic aspect to this: Chinese Canada is a bridge across all the blue states, from the West Coast to the Northeast. So as blue states like Minnesota and California engage in more "soft secession", they can all link up with Canada, and get supplied by China. Decades ago, this map was made as a joke. Perhaps it becomes all too real.

English
20
12
177
58K
Just Another Pod Guy retweeté
PsyopAnime
PsyopAnime@PsyopAnime·
damn
English
196
519
3.6K
112K
Ultra-Nationalist Mega Populist Sue
@TMTLongShort I'm ankle deep into an Aussie tungsten miner, been trying to game it out before going knee deep. Will there be an Iranian oil for critical metals (China produces 82% of refined tungsten) deal?
English
1
0
0
209
NearReality
NearReality@AlThingsF1nanc3·
@TMTLongShort Why do you believe China has been so quiet publicly about recent events?
English
1
0
0
118
NearReality
NearReality@AlThingsF1nanc3·
@TMTLongShort Thoughts on China-Taiwan given U.S talks of taking the Strait? Chips for oil, takes iran + future Taiwan risks off the table for The U.S
English
1
0
0
445
Just Another Pod Guy
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort·
Unsanctioning Iranian oil doesn’t mean letting the IRGC collect dollars it means seal team six taking possession of Iranian tankers at sea. I thought that was obvious.
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47

.@SecScottBessent: In the coming days, we may unsanction the Iranian oil that's on the water. It's about 140 million barrels, so depending how you count it, that's 10 days to 2 weeks of supply, that the Iranians had been pushing out, that would have all gone to China. In essence, we'd be using the Iranian barrels against the Iranians to keep the price down for the next 10 or 14 days, as we continue this campaign. So, we have lots of levers.

English
41
68
531
53.2K
Just Another Pod Guy
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort·
Somewhere in the depths of DARPA there is a program that lets you fly a handful of drones equipped with base stations over Tehran and broadcast messages to every cellphone. You don’t need regular people to have Starlink or Internet access when the time comes.
English
3
5
113
6.7K