Jacob Bradley

@MaxBlumenthal So isn’t this admitting that the sanctions we had on Iran hurt US even before this war?

The sanctions on Iran are so effective that we must lift the sanctions to harm Iran Then we will steal the unsanctioned oil from China

@RomeinAmerica @ComicDaveSmith Oh, they both know. They just have ulterior motives from all the evidence.

@ComicDaveSmith This is why Ben Shapiro is stupid. He doesn’t know the concept of blowback. I’m afraid neither does Gad.

Exactly! I’ve never claimed that the Islamic world is peaceful. The US isn’t peaceful, neither is Israel nor much of the Muslim world. The point is that when you start slaughtering people’s children, you’re likely to deal with more blowback terrorist attacks. No one wants to take on that argument because it’s pretty undeniable.

@ObviousRises So the police were racist then for assuming? Why weren’t they immediately arrested for being offensive racists?

UK Police arrive at a man's house to arrest him for his Xbox 360 gamertag for muh RACISM and "hate speech" against Asians (the man's username was ChingChongChinaman) the UK police promptly dropped the case once they realized the man himself was Chinese.

@EInsides @mcimac38 @rgoodlaw Thanks for proving my point. It’s a club and we ain’t in it with them. youtube.com/shorts/LeL-xSC…

@Jakebrad9 @mcimac38 @rgoodlaw It absolutely would be better and nowhere near the level of FUBAR that right now is. Dems a have their own issues but they pale on magnitude to the issues presented by the right in 2026.

"Top Trump officials acknowledged to lawmakers during recent classified briefings that they did not plan for the possibility of Iran closing the strait in response to strikes." cnn.com/2026/03/12/pol…

@SallyMayweather 5-1 he still doesn’t.

10-1 Trump didn’t know what the Strait of Hormuz was until last week

@RozaMichal @rgoodlaw “Perhaps.”

@rgoodlaw Meanwhile, Scott Bessent:

@mcimac38 @rgoodlaw While I agree with this, it only bothers me because the people that agree with this think that if they had voted for the Democrat option, things would be better and wouldn’t be exactly the same level of FUBAR.

@rgoodlaw This is literally, true.

@elonmusk I mean, the war in Iran is already doing a pretty good job. I don’t think they need any help at this point.

Literally true

@sircalebhammer Yes, dissolve the UN AND the board of “peace.”

NEW DOCUMENTARY- lots of things are going on in the world right now, but one thing most people aren't following is Trump's new Board of Peace. Many say it's freedom, many say Trump is trying to destroy the UN. I looked into the facts and made this piece: youtube.com/watch?v=iDNyhE…

@BenjaminNorton Correct, BUT if they had to vote for it they would not be able to play both sides and say “Oh, I DIDN’T support the war. It was evils Trump!” If they vote for it, we can use it to hold them accountable and vote them out at least.

This is why it is stupid, and a fake criticism, to say that a war waged by a US president is bad only because it wasn't approved by Congress. Congress is full of warmongering imperialists who will happily approve the president's war of aggression. Nevertheless, Democratic politicians often use this talking point ("the war must be approved by Congress") as a fake form of opposition, to deceive people into believing they are against Trump's war, when in reality they support it. Most Democratic Party leaders support this imperialist war on Iran, just as they supported the imperialist wars on Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, etc. Trump's war of aggression is illegal not because of domestic US laws, which the rest of the world doesn't care about, but rather because of INTERNATIONAL LAW, which strictly forbids wars of aggression against sovereign states.

@PerryALPHA Indiscriminately? Didn’t they bomb a school at the very beginning in Iran?

Here is a map showing all the missiles Iran has indiscriminately fired at Israel

@LibertyLockPod Isn’t that Randy Fine’s district already?

I'm convinced Netenyahu could announce he's seizing South Florida and the only response from congress would be to send him ten billion dollars

@_Investinq Please keep in mind one piece of info. The inflation RATE has come down, not inflation. So while they tour the inflation is down, it means that it’s not increasing as fast, not that there’s no more inflation.

The US government ERASED its own hunger report. Not because hunger is falling. Because it's surging. Here's what they don't want you to see. Grocery prices in America are up 30% since January 2020. Beef and veal, up 59%, Coffee: up 50%. Eggs: up 36%. Chicken: up 33%. Bread: up 33%. These aren't even luxury items, these are the basics. But here's the part nobody's talking about. Overall inflation peaked in June 2022 and it came down. Food prices didn't. They just stayed up there. Locked in and permanent. That's not inflation anymore. The old prices are never coming back. The average American family now spends $270 a week on groceries. In 2020 it was $120. That's $1,080 a month just to eat at home. Restaurant prices? Even worse. Up 35% since the pandemic. Waffle House nearly doubled its menu. Independent restaurants are closing in waves. Now look at who's getting crushed. 47.9 million Americans are food insecure. 1 in 7 households can't reliably put food on the table. The highest rate in nearly a decade. 14.1 million children live in homes that don't have enough food. That number went up last year, not down Food banks are seeing 30 to 50 percent surges in demand. One in West Virginia reported an 1,800% increase in families showing up. Lines not seen since the worst of COVID. And here's where it gets darker. Congress just cut $186 billion from SNAP, food stamps. 2.4 million people are projected to lose benefits. Average monthly assistance drops by $100 per household. Then the USDA quietly announced it would stop publishing its annual hunger report. The one tool the government had to track how many Americans can't afford to eat. They're not solving the crisis. They're hiding the scoreboard. Meanwhile, beef prices are forecast to rise another 5.5% this year. The US cattle herd is at a 64 year low. Coffee futures have exploded 300% since 2020. Tariffs could add another 2-3% to grocery bills. This is the biggest affordability crisis in a generation. It's on every receipt, at every checkout line, in every kitchen in America and it's accelerating. Bookmark this. Share it. Because the people in charge are hoping you stop paying attention.

@SeminoleScout7 @bumbadum14 It depends on how long they think it will last. If they think it’s a year or two, some companies might eat it short term (or some of it) before changing prices. In the long run, no one’s losing margin for artificial costs that needs to make money.

@bumbadum14 Yes. None of these people live in the real world. Tariffs are absorbed by three entities: The importer, the exporter, and the consumer. Without full context, nobody knows how much each party will bear.

When the tariff chicken game happened last April my boss and I were glued to the phone talking to factories in China. Every day the number was changing so we were on Wechat, emailing, and on the phone negotiating prices. I won't lie, it was an incredibly stressful week, I didn't know if I'd keep my job. When the change was from 30% to 50% (consumer electronics) they told us they would drop their prices to compensate for the import duty. When it went from 50% to 80% they told us they would drop their prices to compensate for the import duty. When it went to 125% the factory said that we could buy the product, discounted, from their Indonesia facility. People like Billy have never worked in the real world, they don't understand that the factory cities of Dongguan are viewed as geopolitical assets by the Chinese government. He doesn't understand how it works over there, that the Chinese government was going to subsudize the factories to drop prices to maintain their geopolitical position as the manufacturing monopoly. But even then, IF PRICES WENT UP, they would never go up commensurate with the tariff. The reason why? NO COMPANY IS LEAVING 10-30% MARGIN ON THE TABLE THEN SUDDENLY CHANGING THEIR MIND BECUASE OF A TARIFF. If the price went up for a product it's because a multi-billion dollar organization, which is actively paying MILLIONS for consumer research, was given a graph, and on that graph the point moved for price maximization when weighed against price and consumer pool. But Billy doesn't know anything, he thinks that normal every day Americans pay for tariffs when in reality it's a corporate tax, and it's the most effective and best corporate tax that exists. This is why economists oppose it by the way. All the hallowed economists that hate tariffs have been clamoring about corporate taxes, pushing UCG, and everything else under the sun. The reason being that it doesn't disturb the national order, it doesn't do anything, and there are loop holes to avoid paying those taxes. But this doesn't apply to tariffs. Tariffs are the most effective way to tax large corporations that also incentivize pro-America business practices. That's why status-quo enjoying, no-nothing morons in the neoliberal hellspace hate them.

@TruthFairy131 The people pushing this blatantly unconstitutional law are committing treason. There’s no way around this, this is not an opinion. You can boycott or say negative things about anyone. They should be held accountable for the treason they are committing.

🔥 BREAKING 🔥 The Israel Lobby & Jewish Organisations have pushed the Ohio Government to remove Americans FIRST AMENDMENT & make it illegal to criticise Israel or Jews. Ohio, U.S is proposing 20 YEARS in prison & fines of up to $1 MILLION for Americans who boycott or speak out against the Jews. SB 87 expands Ohio’s ethnic intimidation statute by enhancing criminal penalties based on ‘perceived’ motive tied to race, religion, or national origin, including in contexts involving peaceful protest, political expression, and assembly. SB 87 would also codify the overbroad and widely criticized International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism into Ohio law, raising serious concerns that criticism of a foreign government, specifically Israel and its policies, could be mischaracterized as evidence of discriminatory intent. Civil liberties advocates have repeatedly cautioned that the IHRA definition has been weaponized across the country to suppress lawful speech and activism. If you want to know who rules over you, look at who you can’t criticise.

@lone_rides Yeah, it’s crazy that the Republicans are losing to that when all they had to do was NOT protect pedophiles and actually deport illegals and we wouldn’t have to worry about the Democrats winning in 2026.

To recap the Democrat 2026 platform so far: - America is stolen land and we can’t have borders - if we don’t have borders, everyone is allowed to come here - if anyone is here, they’re allowed to access taxpayer funded services - because we shouldn’t have borders, we shouldn’t enforce immigration laws - America must be subjected to tariffs but cannot impose tariffs - Muslims can take over public spaces to pray but conservative groups cannot have high school or college clubs - you aren’t smart enough to homeschool your kids so you must send them to public schools where they won’t learn to read, do arithmetic, or think critically - the Department of Education is sacred - but kids will be taken out side to protest and shown sexually explicit materials - biological males can be women - women are a protected class and need special treatment, including trans women - you’re not paying enough in taxes - voting is a constitutional right and should have no requirements - gun ownership is a constitutional right that should be abolished, but until then should be highly restrictive and limited - women are smarter than men and that’s why so many of them get more college degrees than men - women are incapable of obtaining a valid ID to vote - law enforcement officers are going to be held accountable for enforcing the law - former military officers cannot be held accountable for violating the rules - going after political opponents, even if they broke the law, is illegal - as soon as Democrats are in power, they will go after their political opponents - using laws to prosecute ICE protesters is wrong - using laws to prosecute pro-life nuns is correct - uncovering fraud in NGOs, government agencies, welfare is wrong - wealth tax for “rich” people - there shouldn’t be billionaires - owning 4 homes doesn’t mean someone is rich - Republicans are racists - it’s okay to say racist things to black and brown Republicans and law enforcement - the Trump admin is covering up for pedophiles - the Biden admin couldn’t do anything with the Epstein files - we shouldn’t spend any money on detention centers for ICE - we should spend more money of government programs without fixing the fraud (see above) - Abolish ICE - Abolish the police - criminals aren’t bad, just misunderstood* - *unless they’re white, Right, or Christian - trans people are the real victims of trans killing people - it’s okay to vote “not guilty” if the defendant agrees with your politics or has your skin color - it’s okay to release violent criminals back on the streets if they’ve been arrested multiple times - it’s okay to hit law enforcement with your vehicle as long as you say “I’m not mad at you” first - understand that Jesus said “love everybody, welcome the stranger” but ignore everything else Jesus and the Bible said And that’s just off the top of my head. I’m sure I missed a few.

@MaxBlumenthal Sounds like a good reason to negotiate and NOT get in a regime change war against Iran to me.

YNet: Israel is unable to deter Iran's ballistic missile arsenal and is pushing the US military to attack to prevent further erosion of its qualitative edge Americans were always told Israel could defend itself if gifted enough tools, but now Tel Aviv pleads helplessness

@Glenn_Diesen We’re about a week from the “We did it and it’s a good thing” stage.

So the US knew that Ukraine would destroy Nord Stream 3 months before the attack happened? So why did our politicians and their stenographers in the media insist that Russia was behind the attack? Why did NATO use the attack to justify militarising the Baltic Sea and escalating the proxy war in Ukraine? Is this an admission that our governments are dishonest warmongers manipulating their own public? Also, it seems highly unlikely that the US did not participate in this attack and were unable to prevent it.

@ComicDaveSmith But the stock market is great! So why are you worried about child sex trafficking? Sheesh, priorities man.

Pam Bondi is so full of shit. What a disgrace.

@j_fishback @RealSpikeCohen he’s stealing your thing.

The Florida Waffle House Tour Dates dropping soon! 🧇