RaisingWildFire

@JillianMichaels Your both idiots

Trump’s strategic moves around the world—from Venezuela to Greenland, Panama, and Iran—are all part of a broader effort to blunt China’s rise. China’s control over energy, supply chains, and critical resources presents a danger most Americans still don’t fully grasp. Jillian Michaels and Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna explain why confronting this threat must remain a top priority for the United States.

@ComicDaveSmith @TheFP @KonstantinKisin Agreed! Big of Konstantin to be honest about what he’s seeing. Rare indeed. Keep up the good shit Dave.

Well, not exactly but I give @KonstantinKisin a lot of credit for this. I’ve seen very few guys who supported the “12 day war” explicitly on the ground that it was just a one off with no US deaths, no regional disasters or big price tag, express skepticism about this. It’s stunning how few, actually. I’m not lookin to collect “I told you so’s”. I think it’s very important that people hear this, especially on that platform

“The things that people are saying about the rationale for this conflict are not true,” says @KonstantinKisin. “I do not believe that Iran was about to pose a threat to the United States… Currently, as I sit here, I don't understand the strategy… I am seriously concerned this will drag on... I’m struggling to see how this ends well at this point.”

@shadowcrewtroll @balajis No we’re just treating it as bullshit because it is

@balajis You are ignoring the cost of letting Iran acquire a nuclear weapon. You act as if that is no biggie.

I'm going to make some obvious points. (1) Blowing up all the oil infrastructure in the Middle East is an insane idea, and may well result in a global economic crash and humanitarian crisis unrivaled in the lives of those now living. We're talking about the price of everything everywhere rising, from food to gas, at a moment when inflation was already high. All of that will be laid at the feet of the authors of this war. (2) The antebellum status quo of Feb 27, 2026 was just not that bad, but we're unlikely to return to it. Expect indefinite, long-term, ongoing disruptions to everything out of the Middle East. (3) Also assume tech financing crashes for the indefinite future. The genius plan to get the Gulf states caught in the crossfire has incinerated much of the funding for LPs, for datacenters, and for IPOs. Anyone in tech who supported this war may soon learn the meaning of "force majeure" as funding gets yanked. (4) Many capital allocators will instead be allocating much further down Maslow's hierarchy of needs, towards useful basic things like food and energy. (5) It's fortunate that all those progressives yelled about the "climate crisis." Yes, their reasoning about timelines was wrong, and much of the money was wasted in graft, but the result was right: we all need energy independence from the Middle East, pronto. It's also fortunate that Elon and China autistically took climate seriously. Now they're going to need to ship a billion solar panels, electric vehicles, batteries, nuclear power plants, and the like to get everyone off oil, immediately. (6) It's not just an oil and gas problem, of course. It's also a fertilizer problem, and a chemical precursor problem. Maybe some new sources will come online at the new prices, but it takes time to dial stuff up, particularly at this scale, so shortages are almost a certainty. That said, China has actually scaled up coal-to-chemicals[a,c] (C2C), and there's also something more sci-fi called Power-to-X[b] which turns arbitrary power + water + air into hydrocarbons. But all of that will need to get accelerated. I have a background in chemical engineering so may start funding things in this area. (7) Ultimately, this war is going to result in tremendous blame for anyone associated with it. It's a no-win scenario to blow up this much infrastructure for so many people. Simply not worth it for whatever objective they thought they were going to attain. But unless you're actually in a position to stop the madness, the pragmatic thing to do is: scramble to mitigate the fallout to yourself, your business, and your people. [a]: reuters.com/business/energ… [b]: alfalaval.com/industries/ene… [c]: reuters.com/sustainability…

@joeroganhq Someone tell Adam he’s an idiot

Adam Carolla: "If Kamala Harris was in charge right now, Iran would have a nuclear device and the border would be wide open... So shut the f*ck up. You don't know what the f*ck you're talking about! You're dumb!"

@JasonJournoDC @DailyCaller Lmfaoooooooooooo Corolla is an unhinged lunatic. This is retarded

🚨NEW: Adam Carolla *NUKES* left-wing Trump critics🚨 "If Kamala Harris was in charge right now, Iran would have a nuclear device and the border would be wide open ... So SHUT THE F*CK UP! SHUT UP! You don't know what the f*ck you're talking about! You're DUMB!" @DailyCaller

@joeroganhq lol so Joe says there was no primary in 2016?

Joe Rogan: "The Democrats saying anything is a threat to democracy is wild when they haven't had a primary since 2012."

@the_jefferymead Yes Jeff, you are the wise one for believing bombing population centers and killing school children will liberate people. It’s never happened in the history of mankind, but it certainly will this time. Keep bombing the Iranians into freed9’! They’ll love us one day

These people are insufferable self right virtue signaling idiots. They’re silent when Iran slaughters its own unarmed civilians but loud when we do something about the murderous oppressive regime lol.

OMG You will never see this on FOX News or CNN : Rahma Zein exposes how Israeli soldiers murdered a Palestinian family in the West Bank, stripped the surviving children, and punched a 12-year-old boy in the face when he asked why they killed his parents.

@mtracey @DecampDave God damn delusional, you are

@DecampDave Trump’s interests often converge with those of Israel. What is so difficult to comprehend about this?

Trump also said Israel requested that the U.S. keep troops in Syria

@scotthortonshow @Osint613 I’d like to see how a prolonged war of choice with Iran polled before Donnie did it. Would it crack 50% among his base 12 months ago?

@Osint613 When you exclude almost everyone who opposes it from the count, the percentage is higher! Wow. Impressive.

CNN reports overwhelming support among Trump’s core base for the Iran campaign. “MAGA GOP...look at this! Nearly 9 in 10, 89% approve!” “Just 9% disapprove of it. This is tremendously popular among the Republican base.”

@PBDsPodcast “Everything else them has done with the economy” LOL like what? Tariffs being the largest single price hike in US history? The worst jobs numbers on record? Inflation? Gas prices? What the fuck are you talking about. Pathetic

Because of Israel/Iran, people just disregard everything else Trump has done with the economy, the border, family values, etc. "Forget about every single issue that Trump won on. Your number one priority is, 'Oh, I don't know, we're owned by Israel.' That to me is the problem."

@WalshFreedom Shut the fuck uppppppp with these tired talking points no one buys this kindergarten ass shit

If all of Israel’s enemies in the region laid down their arms tomorrow, there’d be peace tomorrow. If Israel laid down her arms tomorrow, there’d be no Israel tomorrow. This has been the case since 1947-48.

@willchamberlain You’re a dipshit. What does the congress say about POTUE ability to take military action? IMMINENT THREAT. What has the POTUS said? There was an “imminent threat” posed by Iran. False.

Going through this letter in detail: "Iran posed no imminent threat to the United States." Neither did ISIS. And yet you applaud their defeat later on in your letter. Just because an adversary isn't an "imminent threat" doesn't mean you should wait until that threat is "imminent" and much more costly to deal with, if their trajectory is headed that way. "I support the values and the foreign policies you campaigned on in 2016, 2020, and 2024, which you enacted in your first term." Those include repeated commitments to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. "In your first administration, you understood better than any modern President how to decisively apply military power without getting us drawn into never-ending wars. You demonstrated this by killing Qasam Solamani and by defeating ISIS." Then why aren't you giving him the benefit of the doubt? We're less than three weeks in to Epic Fury. It took quite a bit longer than that for President Trump to finish off ISIS. "Early in this administration, high-ranking Israeli officials and influential members of the American media deployed a misinformation campaign that wholly undermined your America First platform and sowed pro-war sentiments to encourage a war with Iran." Source? I noticed a misinformation campaign going the other direction - from people like Tucker who suggested 20,000 Americans would almost certainly die if we knocked out the Iranian nuclear facilities last June. "This echo chamber was used to deceive you into believing that Iran posed an imminent threat to the United States." THIS is the part that''s just incredibly patronizing. Trump has six years of experience being President, He has access to the best assessments made by his intelligence community and his military. Suggesting he fell victim to an external influence operation instead of going with the advice of his appointed senior advisors is patronizing and insulting. "This was a lie and is the same tactic the Israelis used to draw us into the disastrous Iraq War." THAT is false. The record is clear that the Israeli government cautioned against American entry into Iraq. Netanyahu giving supportive testimony in Congress while he was a private citizen (after the decision to invade had been made) does not contradict that. "As a veteran who deployed to combat 11 times and as a Gold Star husband who lost by beloved wife Shannon in a war manufactured by Israel..." We're all sorry for your loss. But even if you are right about Israel encouraging us to invade Iraq (which you are not, as discussed), how are you still blaming them for America's continued presence in Iraq seventeen years later? None of this is remotely persuasive, Joe, and it's deeply insulting to the President who endorsed your Congressional campaigns and entrusted you with an important National Security position. That said, your conscience is your conscience, and given that these are your beliefs, it is indeed best that you no longer serve in the administration.

@WalshFreedom Haha Joe you are such a god damn idiot. It is political suicide to still support Israel. You clown.

The Democratic Party has become increasingly an anti-Israel party. Not only is that position wrong on substance, it’s political suicide to be an anti-Israel political party in this country.

@SethDillon Seth you are the woke one. “Anybody who is sick of watching American tax dollars going to horrific, pointless and counterproductive wars must hate Jews!!!” is the epitome of using your identity to shield yourself from legitimate criticism. Shut up

This is woke moral reasoning: 1. For the oppressed, all things are permitted. 2. Islamists are oppressed; we intentionally murder their children. 3. Therefore, all things are permitted for Islamists. He might say, "I'm just explaining it, not justifying it." But framing the United States as the real terror group that targeted innocents first is meant to suggest that any response is really just self-defense . . . that is, a justified reaction.

@PBDsPodcast lol you guys are so pathetic. Donald got us into a war we can’t win on our own and now it’s other countries faults for not joining in?

Other Countries Need to Help Out and Handle Their Own Mess “The Middle Eastern Gulf states, they need to step the hell up… You can’t always rely on the United States or Israel to take care of your mess.”

@ClayTravis @nypost Hey Clay what was the briefing on the girls school we blew up last week? What’s they say

President Trump was briefed by US intelligence that they believe Iran’s new leader is gay and his dad was nervous about him taking over for that reason per @nypost: x.com/stevennelson10…

@ChrisCuomo Someone should remind Chris Dave ended his career lmao

Amazing how 9/11 and the design of extreme islamism is just ignored for clicks

@romanhelmetguy Explanation is not endorsement dingleberry. You people are dumb as rocks

‘Based’ libertarian comic Dave Smith is now implying that terrorist attacks against American civilians are justified.