Michael Resanovic

8.1K posts

Michael Resanovic

Michael Resanovic

@M_Resanovic

Akron, OH Bergabung Ağustos 2022
416 Mengikuti221 Pengikut
Michael Resanovic
Michael Resanovic@M_Resanovic·
Rights are subject to regulation. Certainly the authority of the federal government to regulate this one can be called into question, as it lacks a police power. But calling something a right doesn't make it a trump card.
2A History@2aHistory

There are no tech or date limits to Rights. Rights aren't treated like that. If the American people want machineguns banned, the ONLY CONSTITUTIONALLY ALLOWED ANSWER is to ratify an amendment banning private ownership of machineguns. Any doctrine saying otherwise is crazy.

English
22
0
0
1.7K
Michael Resanovic me-retweet
Philip Huff
Philip Huff@Philip_Huff·
@Alexand16730477 Pernicious consequences arising from an interpretation are a sound basis for rejecting it when they are detached from the purpose of the provision and not compelled by the text
English
1
1
1
80
Michael Resanovic
Michael Resanovic@M_Resanovic·
@Philip_Huff It's a sad consequence of both the textualization and nihilization of law and the downfall of decisionalism/intentionalism.
English
0
0
0
8
Philip Huff
Philip Huff@Philip_Huff·
There’s something awry in a legal culture that treats this kind of abuse of the system as having “no impact on the legal analysis.” That’s no more reasonable or lawyerly than ignoring the humanitarian interests on the other side.
Philip Huff tweet media
English
2
1
2
231
Justin Stapley
Justin Stapley@JustinWStapley·
Yeah, there was a time when his populist schtick really was just a schtick, and his governance was very credible and traditionally conservative, but at some point the schtick took over and became more of who he actually was, and his political future has cratered accordingly. He will not be in the 2028 conversation, even if his fortunes are resuscitated somewhat by a Trump admin appointment.
james tweets@james_ptweets1

DeSantis has become an anti vax, anti AI populist. I used to like him a lot but to many unforced errors. I’m sure he is a competent governor but he has used his power to reshape the whole state of Florida. That is not conservative. It’s right wing activism. I’m not going to say anything more on this subject as I don’t see him being a national candidate again but I’ll probably mute and unfollow more of his ardent followers

English
14
0
17
2.8K
Michael Resanovic
Michael Resanovic@M_Resanovic·
@GeraldoRivera Leaving NATO is indeed our right. But deciding to leave NATO is indeed *our* right, not his. As a faithful servant of the nation, he has a duty to sincerely uphold NATO as long as remaining is what we choose.
English
0
0
3
105
Geraldo Rivera
Geraldo Rivera@GeraldoRivera·
President Trump is unraveling NATO, the Alliance that has kept the world safe from malignant Communism since WWII. Slava Ukraini
English
2.1K
496
3.8K
241.4K
Edward Feser
Edward Feser@FeserEdward·
It's not that he doesn't understand it, it's that he couldn't care less, he knows much of his base doesn't care either - even when he casually utters ever more brazen lies like this one - and he's gambling that those who do care lack either the will or the power to do anything about it. Whereas Democratic lawfare and schemes to pack the court entail a dictatorship of the party, GOP acquiescence to Trump's lawfare and contempt for constitutional constraints entail the dictatorship of one man. Both parties are now grave threats to the constitution and the rule of law, each side using the other side's sins to rationalize its own. Each side cynically pretends to be motivated by patriotism, but in reality each side puts partisan advantage above the common good, and hatred of enemies above love of country.
Justin Amash@justinamash

Trump doesn’t understand even the most basic aspects of constitutional law. Here, he says that no other country follows our Constitution (right, it’s the U.S. Constitution) and also that Congress’s voting on war (which is its role under the Constitution) is unconstitutional.

English
18
18
116
8.7K
Michael Resanovic
Michael Resanovic@M_Resanovic·
Too many people refuse to acknowledge that virtue begins with individual decisionmaking- and that it has to be done even if people around you aren't.
Cathy Young 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱@CathyYoung63

Great post from @EggerDC at @BulwarkOnline Morning Shots on redistricting, the SCOTUS decision, & the "Gerrymandering Total War." IMO, ideally, redistricting should be decided by strictly bipartisan/nonpartisan commissions. But good luck with that. thebulwark.com/i/196108574/gi…

English
0
0
0
108
Andy Masley
Andy Masley@AndyMasley·
In my next post I finally speak my truth
Andy Masley tweet media
English
36
13
410
37.2K
Michael Resanovic
Michael Resanovic@M_Resanovic·
@Vedthalegend @dilanesper PAHREEEEACH VED THA LEGEND! You are correct. Westfall, correctly interpreted, does allow state torts where the underlying conduct is unconstitutional.
English
1
0
1
21
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
My guess is SCOTUS is going to be incredibly resistant to stuff like this, and I get it, but at the same time, I am mad at SCOTUS for eviscerating Bivens. If SCOTUS doesn't want states to do this, its majority should admit it was wrong in its Grand Theories and restore Bivens.
Matthew Segal@segalmr

Here is the text of Vermont's new law allowing individuals to sue govt officials, including *federal* officials, for violating U.S. Constitutional rights.

English
13
14
268
27.4K
Michael Resanovic
Michael Resanovic@M_Resanovic·
@ChrisCat1964 @JonathanTurley People who engage in that conduct need to be prosecuted. No doubt about that. We should make sure federal law protects federal agents and their families from harassment.
English
0
0
1
6
Christine Franklin
Christine Franklin@ChrisCat1964·
@M_Resanovic @JonathanTurley Their neighborhoods by “protesting” loudly 24 hrs a day, and some people have named the schools of the children( and probably shown up there 🤷‍♀️)I admit that I don’t have a good opinion about people who do that.. stay out of neighborhoods..
English
1
0
0
13
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
I previously criticized the California law regulating ICE officers as flagrantly unconstitutional. Despite the claims of Gavin Newsom, Tom Steyer, and various liberal pundits, the Ninth Circuit just enjoined the law... cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opin…
English
37
633
4.9K
226.9K
Michael Resanovic me-retweet
Paul Rees. ex Rucksack.
Paul Rees. ex Rucksack.@HannahIamthest1·
A truck loaded with thousands of copies of Roget's Thesaurus spilled its load leaving New York. Witnesses were stunned, startled, aghast, stupefied, confused, shocked, rattled, paralyzed, dazed, bewildered, surprised, dumbfounded, flabbergasted, confounded, astonished, and numbed.
Paul Rees. ex Rucksack. tweet media
English
1.1K
3.6K
19.3K
843.6K
Michael Resanovic
Michael Resanovic@M_Resanovic·
@ChrisCat1964 @JonathanTurley I think all things considered, a general ban on masking - for everyone - would be a good idea. By the way, I really appreciate that we're actually having a conversation. Too little of that happens today, so it's healthy when it does. Thanks.
English
1
0
1
19
Michael Resanovic
Michael Resanovic@M_Resanovic·
@ChrisCat1964 @JonathanTurley Take the possibility of impersonation. If the news says police are asking help identifying a suspect, it's always easier if you can see his face. It would be helpful if people see someone masked to be able to immediately rule out him being a cop.
English
1
0
0
14
Michael Resanovic
Michael Resanovic@M_Resanovic·
@ChrisCat1964 @JonathanTurley I've not heard of that so I'll take your word on it. As long as they aren't detaining, arresting, forcing entry or giving orders - aren't using coercion - they can mask all they want.
English
0
0
0
8
Casey Mattox
Casey Mattox@CaseyMattox_·
@dilanesper It doesn’t even abandon so called qualified immunity for state officials (as a few states have). Lame.
English
3
0
4
674
James Surowiecki
James Surowiecki@JamesSurowiecki·
Do people understand that grand juries hear only the prosecution's side of the case, and that the defense has no chance to present opposing arguments to try to convince the grand jury not to indict?
English
89
19
354
20.9K
Michael Resanovic
Michael Resanovic@M_Resanovic·
@teafortillerman @CheeseBladeAU @ClarenceMaximus There was also the abandonment of clear error as the standard of review (in the Lochner era), selective incorporation (1925) and the rise of the idea that rights are "trumps" and not subject to regulation (the post-Lochner settlement).
English
1
0
1
37
Joe Bingham
Joe Bingham@teafortillerman·
@CheeseBladeAU @ClarenceMaximus It wasn't just Monroe, right, but the combination of Monroe and the mid 20th century court's weekly creation of unforeseeable new constitutional rights?
English
2
0
0
46
Clarence Maximus
Clarence Maximus@ClarenceMaximus·
Can anyone who has read Judge Oldham’s QI article defend his section on English common law. He tries to say that QI has a common law pedigree because *checks notes* there were a couple cases dealing with STATUTORY immunity, where they ended up DENYING immunity. What am I missing?
English
2
0
12
3.6K

Jelajahi

@Alexand16730477 @Philip_Huff @JustinWStapley @neontaster @GeraldoRivera @FeserEdward @willmenzies @fljczk