Paul D

1.7K posts

Paul D banner
Paul D

Paul D

@PDiTO

building @pdimension

London, UK • Osaka, JP Bergabung Ocak 2009
151 Mengikuti1.9K Pengikut
Paul D
Paul D@PDiTO·
@felixrieseberg Any way to target existing code sessions directly from dispatch or will it always spin up a new session?
English
0
0
0
175
Felix Rieseberg
Felix Rieseberg@felixrieseberg·
By popular demand, Dispatch can now launch Claude Code sessions. Ask it to build, make, or improve something! To use it, update your Claude desktop app and make sure you have Code enabled.
Felix Rieseberg tweet media
English
167
132
2.4K
202.2K
Paul D
Paul D@PDiTO·
Convex @convex is an absolute game changer for people spinning up a bunch of AI prototypes with a backend requirement. Free tier is unbelievably generous too. Migrating everything over. (h/t @theo for the recommendation)
English
2
4
25
3.3K
Paul D
Paul D@PDiTO·
@danshipper How tf! I have 6 terminals and my claw running on fast mode and can’t get close right now.
English
0
0
1
279
Dan Shipper 📧
Dan Shipper 📧@danshipper·
1 day into my codex weekly billing period lol i am SLINGING code right now
Dan Shipper 📧 tweet media
English
12
2
60
12.1K
Paul D
Paul D@PDiTO·
Great product from @danshipper and the @every team here, working in what might be the most interesting space in software right now. The “death of SaaS” and rise of purely agent-driven workflows are in vogue, but the real design space might be in the middle, where humans and agents collaborate together in their preferred interface. We've seen this in coding, now the net is widening.
Dan Shipper 📧@danshipper

BREAKING: Proof—a new product from @every It’s a live collaborative document editor where humans and AI agents work together in the same doc. It's fast, free, and open source—available now at proofeditor.ai. It’s built from the ground up for the kinds of documents agents are increasingly writing: bug reports, PRDs, implementation plans, research briefs, copy audits, strategy docs, memos, and proposals. Why Proof? When everyone on your team is working with agents, there's suddenly a ton of AI-generated text flying around—planning docs, strategy memos, session recaps. But the current process for collaborating and iterating on agent-generated writing is…weirdly primitive. It mostly takes place in Markdown files on your laptop, which makes it reminiscent of document editing in 1999. Proof lets you leave .md files behind. What makes Proof different? - Proof is agent-native: Anything you can do in Proof, your agent can do just as easily. - Proof tracks provenance: A colored rail on the left side of every document tracks who wrote what. Green means human, Purple means AI. - Proof is login-free and open source: This is because we want Proof to be your agent's favorite document editor. Check it out now, for free—no login required: proofeditor.ai

English
0
0
0
94
Paul D
Paul D@PDiTO·
@thsottiaux Codex gui support for vertical columns, so I can see multiple threads at once.
English
0
0
0
82
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
With GPT-5.4 out. What should Codex ship or improve next?
English
1.1K
17
1.2K
112K
Paul D
Paul D@PDiTO·
@FPLFocal Breaking 100 point barrier first time this season (BB)
Paul D tweet media
English
0
0
7
612
FPL Focal
FPL Focal@FPLFocal·
SEND YOUR SCORES BELOW! Looking for some of the best and worst from last gameweek for tomorrow's video 👇
English
183
1
150
40.6K
Paul D me-retweet
Joe Weisenthal
Joe Weisenthal@TheStalwart·
Is gold approaching a halving or something?
English
96
79
1.9K
164.2K
Paul D me-retweet
Aradtski
Aradtski@aradtski·
i don’t get this robotics narrative at all. these companies are given tens of billions just to create… attractive waiters and maids? seriously, explain the vision to me. the developed world already automated basically all physical labor and called it the industrial revolution, the cost to produce anything these days is in design, materials, and energy, while physical labor is mostly a minor sliver of costs. the only valuable, in-demand labor left is in construction, but we already know how to automate that, it’s a regulation problem not a technical one. i’m thinking the modern robotics hype is just a collective nerd-gasm that we can finally make decently realistic humanoids, before everyone realizes Oh robots are best designed for each individual task, Oh we already have that we just call them Machines. the counterpoint of course is Westworld. maybe humanoid robots are indeed the most valuable form of machines not for a any productivity boost but for the entertainment that all of us would be able to afford, following the actual productivity boost to be caused by AI automating the only valuable labor we haven’t automated yet in the 19th and 20th century; information and coordination work, aka “brain work”.
English
4
2
29
2.3K
Paul D
Paul D@PDiTO·
@FPL_Harry As a British guy living in Japan, it’s great to watch the evolution of someone’s else experience playing FPL in this time zone in real time! 😂
English
0
0
4
1.5K
Harry
Harry@FPL_Harry·
Oh foden was hooked at half time! 😧
English
15
1
268
67.6K
Paul D me-retweet
maaria
maaria@maariabajwa·
My read on the bill was v different so can someone smarter help me understand... + the bill doesn't ban tokenized equities, just regulates them like securities. Limits what you can do on-chain bc of AML/KYC rules but that seems pretty normal, no? + there does seem to be some grey area around DeFi, but if you're a non-decentralized app that follows basic operating rules like treasury sanctions you should be ok and don't need AML/KYC on all your users. I expect this to get more clarity over time and litigated through real-world implementation + Leaves it to the SEC to determine what is a security, but then regulation goes to the CFTC. I don't think this erodes the CFTC's authority... + The bill allows for rewards on deposits, but doesn't call it yield because that would open up a can of worms related to banking laws. From a technical standpoint, yield on USDC and other stablecoins operates more as "rewards" on USD deposits elsewhere, so I don't see what the issue is with this language since it defacto provides users return on holdings Would love some help understanding the crux of these issues, as they are very important! @brian_armstrong @SenatorTimScott @SenLummis @NeerajKA
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong

After reviewing the Senate Banking draft text over the last 48hrs, Coinbase unfortunately can’t support the bill as written. There are too many issues, including: - A defacto ban on tokenized equities - DeFi prohibitions, giving the government unlimited access to your financial records and removing your right to privacy - Erosion of the CFTC’s authority, stifling innovation and making it subservient to the SEC - Draft amendments that would kill rewards on stablecoins, allowing banks to ban their competition We appreciate all the hard work by members of the Senate to reach a bi-partisan outcome, but this version would be materially worse than the current status quo. We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill. Hopefully we can all get to a better draft. We'll keep fighting for all Americans and for economic freedom. Crypto needs to be treated on a level playing field with the rest of financial services so we can build this industry in a safe and trusted way in America.

English
3
2
6
833
Paul D
Paul D@PDiTO·
@gabemulley Doesn’t work in other Chrome based browsers like arc - when other extensions do.
English
0
0
1
228
Andy
Andy@LetsTalk_FPL·
That's lovely footwork from Wirtz 1-1
English
12
1
179
46.2K
FPL Focal
FPL Focal@FPLFocal·
Salah benching today and non-free hitters to claw back some dignity
English
46
3
637
102.4K
Paul D
Paul D@PDiTO·
The original iPhone feels like a toy… I don’t remember it being so tiny.
Paul D tweet media
English
0
0
1
108
Base Posting
Base Posting@baseposting·
there's one more thing to share but first i need your help with something since you’re the only ones who can read this please drop a short reply here to show that you were early so i have a list of everyone. i will lock replies to this post when i go off private thanks
English
1.2K
42
1.5K
91.9K
Rob Moore
Rob Moore@robprogressive·
£7 for a pack of butter £6 for a loaf of sourdough bread £8 for a pack of Salmon £21 on just three items of food… To make a f*cking sandwich This is the state of the U.K. & it’s WAY out of control
English
4.3K
1.9K
13.2K
7.3M
Paul D me-retweet
Steve Krouse
Steve Krouse@stevekrouse·
If you think you CAN'T learn something, you're right If you think you CAN learn something, you're also right
English
3
1
13
2.2K