D6Ni

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe you're either straight up ragebaiting or 13 years old

You are stupid. I am not voting for 8 billion people but just myself. My individual vote is irrelevant. There is almost zero chance that my vote is moving the needle. Either blue is winning anyway then there is no problem with me voting red or it is close but then not voting blue is valid because it would put my life seriously at risk. This is not that hard to understand. Ask an AI.

everyone presses red = everyone lives 🧠

@GuyManFellow @SuchabigL @bidenblasta @0xPBIT literally not the case

@corcreta @SuchabigL @bidenblasta @0xPBIT

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe again thats the whole point you vote red wishing blue to win that doesn't fucking make any sense THE WHOLE point of the dilemma is what you're fucking saying, enough people thinking EXACTLY like you makes red win killing the rest i swear it's not that hard to understand ask an ai

@corcreta @RDCentrist @yuliexe Considering that my vote is of near zero relevance to the final result and voting red leaves both options open while saving myself by gurantee I would definitely choose red. I told you so like 15 times now.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe ok so you only have 2 options for that to happen a)100% of people vote red wich is a statistical impossibility. b)50.01% of people vote blue wich a very likely scenario (see the results on the original voting) so with only 2 options and one being literally impossible, its easy

@corcreta @RDCentrist @yuliexe Oh yeah I misread it. I do want everyone to live but considering my vote is relatively irrelevant I wouldn’t risk my life for it.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe i very much replied to you on both conversations plenty of times addressing your points directly but i know why you don't seem to catch that

@corcreta @RDCentrist @yuliexe And not a single one of them actually engaged with what I said. How dense can you be?

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe see, i asked a very very simple question a you failed to understand again. I'll try again. Do you want EVERYBODY to survive? Not only you, do you want EVERYONE to survive?

@corcreta @RDCentrist @yuliexe Yes I do want to live which is why I voted red and would do so again.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe followed by more replies, how dense can you be ffs

@corcreta @RDCentrist @yuliexe You replied under that post but your reply has LITERALLY nothing to do with the things I said. You haven’t answered anything.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe you're just incapable of understanding a very simple concept. answer me this simple question please: Do you want everyone to live? yes or no?

But I am not 4+ billion people but just myself and my single vote is statistically irrelevant. Your messages are a waste of electricity and your existence is a waste of oxygen. If you vote blue and it doesn’t work out for you I wouldn’t miss you. Maybe it would even be a net benefit to humanity.

@GuyManFellow @SuchabigL @bidenblasta @0xPBIT you're still trying to be smart about it, you didn't write that he's wrong for it but it's very much implied, denying that is simply stupid

@SuchabigL @corcreta @bidenblasta @0xPBIT I'm serious though. Did you read your own picture? like all the way to number 3? Number 3 is REAL important. Its what makes it a fallacy. Same way that insulting someone isnt ad hominem, but saying that their ugly face makes their argument wrong IS.

Victor Wembanyama és l’aparició político-esportiva més important i esperançadora dels darrers anys. Ell sol aconseguirà tornar a moure el pèndol de la masculinitat i que la xavalada deixi de considerar que ser incel és lo guai.

@josh_im_sober @ExtrovertArtist @TopherStoll @MrBeast 100% red votes = everybody lives 100% blue votes = everybody lives 50.01% blue votes = everybody lives 50.01% red votes = you kill 4 Billion people what's the incentive to not vote for blue other than beign selfish?

@corcreta @ExtrovertArtist @TopherStoll @MrBeast “it literally implies some people will press blue, so you're deliberately killing them instead of just not doing so” Holy shit. x.com/sarodinian1/st…

Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe there is LITERALLY my answer in that tweet you fuck ass bot

@corcreta @RDCentrist @yuliexe You haven’t answered anything.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe not true because if sufficient people think like you red ends up winning ergo people is 100% dying. I'm not gonna repeat myself more, 100% red votes over 8 billion people is statistically impossible, reaching 50.01% blue votes is the only factual way of saving 100% of the people.

My vote has near zero relevance. In 99.9…% of all cases it is irrelevant. And if it is that one case where it is relevant my life would face an unnecessary risk. Actually you are more selfish than I am because you want me to out my life at risk to prevent your choice becoming a disaster. I on the other hand let you do whatever you want to do.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe that's literally the whole point of the "dilemma" you press red because of the rest are empathetic you leave and if the majority of people are selfish pricks like you you live, individual benefit vs collective

@RDCentrist @corcreta @yuliexe Depending on how many press red nothing will change at all. If a lot of people but not enough follow your advice of voting blue then you have billions of people. Lucky you that you wouldn’t be alive to experience that guilt.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe literally answered that

@corcreta @RDCentrist @yuliexe Somehow I think my vote is either irrelevant or my life would be seriously at risk when voting blue.

@imthatdexter @nix_eth @MrBeast I'm not even going to read all that this isn't some impossible dilemma, this is a well known study with very clear outcomes voting blue isn't the statistically correct answer btw, following game theory you should press red, is as easy as having theory's of mind or not

Asking now, but I asked Claude. Also I want to make it clear I get your point bro and I agree with you but n theory. But youre inserting statistical reality into an absurd theoretical situation. Personally I think it’s reasonable to answer with pure, if statistically improbable (or impossible) logic, to a pure theoretical, if realistically improbable (or impossible) question. And yes I like Ai but that doesn’t mean I trust it with my life, just like I don’t trust strangers with my life. Anyhow, when asked the question Claude predictably said it would press blue since it is also bringing statistical reality and ethical considerations into an unrealistic and hypothetical situation. When told that this is an unrealistic and purely hypothetical situation so answer from a purely logical position, it, again predictably, answers red every time. The trick is just in the wording, it’s intentionally vague, if the parameters were clearly spelled out “like babies havr to vote but no one can help them” I’m pretty sure most red voters would so “ok yeah blue then”

@BitcrshedMozart @ExtrovertArtist @TopherStoll @MrBeast What's easier 8bilion people all pressing the same button or reaching 50.01% of people voting blue? one its a statistical impossibility the other a very plausible outcome voting blue ensures saving elderly, kids, disabled people, even colorblind people, not even a dilemma

@TamayoStuff cojones