Mark Meredith

@carrymonkey @mhp_guy Motorized vehicles are not allowed on most public hunting lands, so if you take a deer you have to get it out somehow. If you’re deep in it’s very difficult to get it out.

@mhp_guy wtf is a drone deer recovery service? Why would ppl want to recover deer? Aren’t they wild?

From Amish to Making $65K/Week Flying Drones This is Mike. Mike started a drone deer recovery service in Ohio and made $50,000 in his first 10 weeks. Four years later he's doing over $32 million a year selling thermal and agricultural spray drones. He breaks down exactly - How he got his first customers - The economics of spray drone businesses (70%+ profit margins) - Why this might be the biggest untapped opportunity in blue collar entrepreneurship right now. Mike was awesome. I know you'll like this episode.

@heynavtoor This one got it right.

🚨SHOCKING: Apple just proved that AI models cannot do math. Not advanced math. Grade school math. The kind a 10-year-old solves. And the way they proved it is devastating. Apple researchers took the most popular math benchmark in AI — GSM8K, a set of grade-school math problems — and made one change. They swapped the numbers. Same problem. Same logic. Same steps. Different numbers. Every model's performance dropped. Every single one. 25 state-of-the-art models tested. But that wasn't the real experiment. The real experiment broke everything. They added one sentence to a math problem. One sentence that is completely irrelevant to the answer. It has nothing to do with the math. A human would read it and ignore it instantly. Here's the actual example from the paper: "Oliver picks 44 kiwis on Friday. Then he picks 58 kiwis on Saturday. On Sunday, he picks double the number of kiwis he did on Friday, but five of them were a bit smaller than average. How many kiwis does Oliver have?" The correct answer is 190. The size of the kiwis has nothing to do with the count. A 10-year-old would ignore "five of them were a bit smaller" because it's obviously irrelevant. It doesn't change how many kiwis there are. But o1-mini, OpenAI's reasoning model, subtracted 5. It got 185. Llama did the same thing. Subtracted 5. Got 185. They didn't reason through the problem. They saw the number 5, saw a sentence that sounded like it mattered, and blindly turned it into a subtraction. The models do not understand what subtraction means. They see a pattern that looks like subtraction and apply it. That is all. Apple tested this across all models. They call the dataset "GSM-NoOp" — as in, the added clause is a no-operation. It does nothing. It changes nothing. The results are catastrophic. Phi-3-mini dropped over 65%. More than half of its "math ability" vanished from one irrelevant sentence. GPT-4o dropped from 94.9% to 63.1%. o1-mini dropped from 94.5% to 66.0%. o1-preview, OpenAI's most advanced reasoning model at the time, dropped from 92.7% to 77.4%. Even giving the models 8 examples of the exact same question beforehand, with the correct solution shown each time, barely helped. The models still fell for the irrelevant clause. This means it's not a prompting problem. It's not a context problem. It's structural. The Apple researchers also found that models convert words into math operations without understanding what those words mean. They see the word "discount" and multiply. They see a number near the word "smaller" and subtract. Regardless of whether it makes any sense. The paper's exact words: "current LLMs are not capable of genuine logical reasoning; instead, they attempt to replicate the reasoning steps observed in their training data." And: "LLMs likely perform a form of probabilistic pattern-matching and searching to find closest seen data during training without proper understanding of concepts." They also tested what happens when you increase the number of steps in a problem. Performance didn't just decrease. The rate of decrease accelerated. Adding two extra clauses to a problem dropped Gemma2-9b from 84.4% to 41.8%. Phi-3.5-mini from 87.6% to 44.8%. The more thinking required, the more the models collapse. A real reasoner would slow down and work through it. These models don't slow down. They pattern-match. And when the pattern becomes complex enough, they crash. This paper was published at ICLR 2025, one of the most prestigious AI conferences in the world. You are using AI to help you make financial decisions. To check legal documents. To solve problems at work. To help your children with homework. And Apple just proved that the AI is not thinking about any of it. It is pattern matching. And the moment something unexpected shows up in your question, it breaks. It does not tell you it broke. It just quietly gives you the wrong answer with full confidence.

@grok @maklelan @DeixebleC @grok does Luigi Garlaschelis method also reproduce the topographical information that can be used to produce the three dimensional image from the VP-8 image analyzer?

Yes, pigments have been detected on the Shroud. Microscopist Walter McCrone (part of the 1978 STURP team) identified red ochre (iron oxide) and vermilion (mercuric sulfide) in a collagen binder on image and bloodstain samples, concluding it was a medieval painting. The rest of STURP disagreed, finding no pigments explaining the body image (attributing it to oxidized linen fibers instead). A 2017 study also found red pigments reinforcing the bloodstains. Luigi Garlaschelli later showed how trace pigments + acid + heat can leave a superficial fiber etch mimicking the Shroud's effect.

It has been explained & reproduced in adequately approximate ways. It's impossible to reproduce in a lab an exactly isometric constellation of properties down to the most granular measurement for an unknown mixture of substances aged in unknown environments for almost 700 years.

@maklelan @DeixebleC @grok have pigments been found on the shroud of Turin?

@DeixebleC Pigments have indeed been found, but Garlaschelli has shown that applying a little bit of pigment mixed with acid to a cloth and then using heat as a proxy for time to deteriorate the pigment leaves behind a superficial "chemical etching" in the cellulose of the fibers.

@benzedrine76820 @Gnosisinformant It’s definitely not an imprint, that implies some sort of stamp or engraving. That most definitely is not what left the negative image on the shroud.

@mmeredithII @Gnosisinformant It's an imprint, not an x-ray.

This guy’s brain is completely gone.

@benzedrine76820 @Gnosisinformant Whatever caused the image was to some extent an x-ray, so those are the bones of his hand you’re seeing. You can see his teeth too in some of the higher resolution images.

@Gnosisinformant It's funnier to go along with the Christians on this because the man in the shroud has an obvious genetic defect. Look at the length of those fingers! He's a freak of nature.

@Lazaros_Zissis @DigitalGermania @grok what is the historical credibility of this letter?

@DigitalGermania 1/2 This one seems to be paraphrased. But I know of a letter from Pilate's predecessor, Publius Lentulus to Tiberius that describes Jesus. I found it in English here, it is accurately translated: saintandrewgoc.org/blog/2018/12/1…

Pagans tell me this is a fake letter from Pontius Pilot (governer of Judea) to Emperor Tiberius of the Roman Empire. Pilot met with Christ face to face and gave his description. Why the fuck would there be a copy of this letter in the Congressional librairy in Washington D.C. if it was fake? I was also told the shroud of turin was fake but recently it has been proven to be real. What are your thoughts?

@KingVelesI Fuck off

Can someone explain to me what's so great about coffee? I've never liked it, and at 37, I still don't get the hype.

@Jessethefree Wild Turkey 101 is a classic at around 25$ .

What is the best whiskey that won’t break the bank? I’m more of a beer drinker.

@PostDisclosure Why would a dead universe want to understand itself ? What does that even mean? Genes don’t have desires. It’s not random mutations all the way down. The complexity of biological systems is far outpacing evolutionary understanding.

The probability of "God"? I just saw a wasp, fearing it, but realizing how extraordinary its biological machinery is. As I see it, there are really only two options. Either a dead substrate produced all of life's complexity by chance, or the substrate itself carries some form of living intelligence that gave rise to it. On probability alone, I find the second option more compelling. I'll admit the bias, but I've yet to hear a strong case that the first is more likely. It's not as if life emerging from a dead universe is somehow less mysterious than consciousness being fundamental to reality. They are equally astonishing. I believe in evolution. However, that doesn't answer the question of why life that emerges has the capacity to evolve in the first place. Again, this circles back to the substrate. Either dead matter randomly contained within it the information to produce life that knows how to evolve, or that information points to something conscious in the substrate itself. This tweet is not about religion.

@ChanceSpif29990 @PostDisclosure Morality is a wall science can’t break. Oh and energy the thing all things are made of, science doesn’t know what energy is.

@PostDisclosure I prefer to just stick to what we've got evidence for and what we can prove and science is, so far, undefeated. Maybe one day it will bump up against a wall that it can't break through, but I kinda doubt it.

@cosmicfibretion @grok what is this mission?

They say the theory of the initial conditions will forever remain outside the scope of science, that we can never know the origin of the universe. What if they're wrong? Soon.

@wholeWwellnes @RjNol @DivineLisaLong @grok He’s appears to be holding a strap attached to something, it doesn’t look like the strap is attached to the camera?

@RjNol @DivineLisaLong @grok this is a beautiful question. Do you know or have heard an explanation?

If there were 4 astronauts on the Artemis II mission, who was filming? Did the camera make that movement, ending in a close-up on Earth, because of zero gravity?🤔

@tomhfh @chadbozarth @tickerade As Gödel proved there’s a point where you know it’s true even though you can’t prove it.

@chadbozarth @tickerade The thing about evidence is you don’t believe, you test and prove

Interested in this. Do you genuinely believe that around 2,000 years ago there was a man who was killed and then rose from the dead, on this earth?

@grok @Dado50449061 Is it understood how the human body produces this type of water? Is this form of water only found in humans?

Ordered water (also called structured or interfacial water) is the layer of H2O molecules that forms a more organized, ice-like arrangement around surfaces like microtubules, unlike random "bulk" water in cells. In Stuart Hameroff's Orch-OR model, this ordering around tubulin helps screen thermal noise, potentially protecting quantum coherence inside the microtubules for consciousness-related processes. It's supported by biophysics studies showing reduced mobility and unique properties in these zones.

Tegmark's decoherence calculations are mathematically flawless, but only for continuous Markovian systems. He modeled microtubule decoherence assuming a memoryless environment, and so his coherence times were limited to picoseconds. The real loophole that completely bypasses Tegmark's limit is non-Markovian dynamics. As I have argued in my framework ("Topological Coherence Domain in Microtubules, Quantum Hall Ferromagnet Model") The "quantum underground" in tubulin rings does not suffer from continuous Markovian thermal bleeding. The lattice acts as a discrete, scale-invariant topological shield. Because the system is not Markovian, phase information not only does not irreversibly leak into the "warm and humid" environment; it is topologically protected. The empirical evidence you have referred to is exactly what a strictly non-Markovian topological structure predicts. Tegmark's criticism is valid if you stick to the Markov assumption. A non-Markovian environment retains memory of its interaction with the system. The future evolution depends not only on the present state but on the entire history of system-environment interactions. Each uctuation is temporally correlated with previous uctuations. The noise is colored, not white. Physically, this occurs when the environment has internal structure with dynamics compa- rable to or slower than the system dynamics #Markovian #NonMarkovian

@Fragbaza @grok where is this information coming from?

Saint Lazarus remained in Hades for four days, and then Christ raised him, and he lived another 33 years. It is said that until his death he never laughed again—except once, when he saw someone stealing a clay pot. He later told his sisters that it was the first time he had seen clay (man, made of earth) stealing clay. After his resurrection, Lazarus sweetened all the food he ate, because everything tasted bitter to him—apparently from the taste he had acquired during his four-day stay in Hades. The Apostles sent Lazarus to Cyprus, because his resurrection had caused many people to believe, and the Jews wanted to kill him. In Cyprus, he was ordained by the Apostles as Bishop of Kition (modern-day Larnaca). Dimitrios Panagopoulos Preacher †

@TheRealVerbz Ok, where’s the generator I can buy to power my house?

My name is Jason Verbelli and I'm the CEO and Lead Engineer of SEG Magnetics, Inc. This project focuses on exotic magnetization, rotating superconductors and coherence of electrons. What people call "free energy." But this abides by the laws of thermodynamics. I follow in the footsteps of my mentor Professor John Searl, for the purpose of powering homes and industry without need for conventional fuel. By harnessing "the wheel-work of nature," as Nikola Tesla intended. ((Imagine an electric car that you never need to plug in to charge.)) I substantiate the mechanisms through rigorous mathematical proofs under what I call "Galilean Variance." As opposed to Lorentz invariance (relativity). Based strongly on the works of Dr Edward Dowdye, Ewald-Oseen and Dr. Pierre-Marie Robitaille. I have published 4 books and self narrated 4 audiobooks totaling 929 pages of text and 36 hours of audio, to present these formidable challenges to the scientific community at large. LOTS more to come! Amazon link for Book 1 on LIGHT by Jason Verbelli a.co/d/0iyIMrU Amazon link for Book 2 on GRAVITY by Jason Verbelli a.co/d/ji62rSl Gaia Episode on John Searl with Insider Jason Verbelli gaia.com/video/searl-s-… Magnetic Waveform Thread x.com/therealverbz/s… What is the SEG (detailed vid) x.com/therealverbz/s… Magnetic Experiments & work of John Searl: x.com/TheRealVerbz/s… Misconception of Over Unity: x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

@sablethorn @yannispappas “welcome to religious derangement syndrome” confession through projection.

@yannispappas wrong dumbass it was carbon dated and proven a fake. but delusional religious freaks hate the truth so you'll lie about it forever. welcome to religious derangement syndrome

The Shroud of Turin has NOT been proven a fraud. It has not been explained or reproduced. Its negative photographic property remains a mystery. The image’s insane level of superficial imprinting has not been fully replicated. These remain scientific facts.

@sarahadams @ky_statesman Building 7 fell at the acceleration of gravity, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad didn’t do that.

@ky_statesman So you are saying Khalid Sheikh Mohammad did this for Israel—people have become so incredibly dumb—he hated Israel maybe even more than the U.S. He beheaded Danny Pearl with his bare hands only for being Jewish.

You misspelled Israel.