๐šŒ๐š›๐šข๐š™๐š๐šŽ๐šŒ๐š

5.4K posts

๐šŒ๐š›๐šข๐š™๐š๐šŽ๐šŒ๐š banner
๐šŒ๐š›๐šข๐š™๐š๐šŽ๐šŒ๐š

๐šŒ๐š›๐šข๐š™๐š๐šŽ๐šŒ๐š

@thecryptect

แด…แดษดโ€™แด› แด›ส€แดœ๊œฑแด› แด›สœแด‡ ษดแด€ส€ส€แด€แด›ษชแด แด‡

Bergabung Kasฤฑm 2009
121 Mengikuti347 Pengikut
Killa
Killa@KillaXBTยท
Sell me all your $SOL below $76 an f*ck off.
Killa tweet media
English
99
68
998
66.8K
Fan Tokensโ„ข
Fan Tokensโ„ข@FanTokensยท
Expanding the Fan Tokenโ„ข ecosystem to millions. $PSG and $AFC Fan Tokensโ„ข are officially live on @solana.
Fan Tokensโ„ข tweet media
English
29
24
123
27.7K
Killa
Killa@KillaXBTยท
$BTC Based on the 180 day realized price, we likely havenโ€™t spent enough time in the red yet. Historically, bear markets tend to involve prolonged periods of losses, with more investors remaining underwater for extended stretches. So, if history continues to rhyme, thereโ€™s a strong possibility we keep ranging for at least a few more months.
Killa tweet media
English
61
35
608
43K
Solana
Solana@solanaยท
if you could build anything on solana today, what would it be?
English
913
326
1.2K
101.5K
curb
curb@CryptoCurbยท
JUST IN: $SOL ETF'S HAD $15,600,000 NET INFLOWS LAST WEEK! INSTITUTIONS ARE ACCUMULATING SOLANA #SOLANA โšก๏ธ
curb tweet media
English
28
26
263
8.3K
Solana Sensei
Solana Sensei@SolanaSenseiยท
Who needs CEXs when Solana exists In March 2026, the average trade on Solana's Prop AMMs cost 0.72 bps in fees. Binance's cheapest tier for big institutions is 2.57 bps. Regular retail users? 10.57 bps. You're literally paying less to trade onchain than on the world's biggest crypto exchange. Prop AMMs pull live price data from offchain sources to quote you fairer prices in real time and in Q1 2026, over half of all Solana DEX volume ran through Prop AMMs that's up from 45% just last quarter. Whatever you want on solana, you can get for wayyy less. TLDR: Trade on Solana.
Solana Sensei tweet media
English
64
12
166
9.2K
Crypto with Haris โ‚ฟ
Crypto with Haris โ‚ฟ@Crypto__Harisยท
Can $SOL still hit $100 from here? ๐Ÿ‘€ Honestly, I still donโ€™t see any reason to panic right now. In my previous update, I already mentioned that $SOL could dip toward the 84$ area before recovering again, and the market followed that move almost perfectly, even sweeping a little lower near 81.5$ before bouncing. Now buyers are finally stepping in again, and green candles are slowly returning around this support zone ๐Ÿ“ˆ Personally, I still think this is just another shakeout to scare retail traders before the next bigger move starts. Big players usually create fear right before strong upside momentum returns. For now, patience is the key. Watch the price action carefully and donโ€™t let emotions control your decisions here.
Crypto with Haris โ‚ฟ tweet media
English
96
42
201
6.9K
Shem Horne
Shem Horne@Shem_Infiniteยท
Ok what the heck is this!? Seriously!!๐Ÿ˜‚ I am freaking out right now. For real. New video from the UFO Files Part 2:
English
1.9K
1.1K
9.7K
649.8K
Drift Foundation
Drift Foundation@DriftFDNยท
Vote for DIP-10: Treatment of Remaining Asset in Borrow Lend is currently live.
Drift Foundation tweet media
English
41
8
59
27.1K
Michael Saylor
Michael Saylor@saylorยท
Let me recap the Q&A. $MSTR
English
717
614
5.4K
969.9K
Drift
Drift@DriftProtocolยท
Update: Insurance Fund depositors will be able to withdraw their Insurance Fund stake when the protocol goes live. Driftโ€™s documentation and code demonstrates that the Insurance Fund exists to maintain protocol solvency in the event of bankruptcies. Given that the protocol was paused before losses resolved through the ordinary liquidation or bankruptcy paths, the Insurance Fund was and remains unaffected by the exploit. Users will be able to withdraw their Insurance Fund stake when the protocol goes live. Any protocol-owned Insurance Fund assets will be allocated to support a healthy relaunch for all users. Relevant program addresses will be publicly disclosed so the community can track how protocol-owned capital is deployed.
English
59
15
138
47.9K
Dlw16734
Dlw16734@DSjomin80041ยท
@DriftProtocol you do not have the right to convert the landing account into a usdt, this is not mentioned out in the loan terms, give people assets that are not affected by hacking, otherwise they will face lawsuits about the theft of people's money.
English
6
0
6
642
The White Whale
The White Whale@WhiteWhaleLabsยท
Itโ€™s time for a lawsuit. I know that will be unpopular. I know people will immediately scream that lawsuits are bad for crypto, bad for innovation, bad for DeFi, bad for builders, etc. But at some point we have to be honest about what is actually happening here. Every few days another protocol gets exploited. Another group of users gets drained. Another team posts the same sterile apology. Another โ€œfull postmortem coming soonโ€ And somehow the operators just get away with negligence. No real consequences, no accountability. No real answer for why the thing they built, marketed, controlled, upgraded, and profited from failed the people who trusted it. They hide behind one word. DeFi. As if saying โ€œdecentralizedโ€ is enough make them blameless. It isnโ€™t. A protocol is not decentralized just because it may be permissionless. The legal standard is much simpler. The 2026 SEC March 17th interpretive release says a system is "decentralized" if it "functions and operates autonomously with no person, entity, or group of persons or entities having operational, economic, or voting control of the crypto system." In other words, the protocol continues to function even if all team members disappear tomorrow. Because if there is a real team making real decisions, managing real infrastructure, collecting real revenue, and asking real people to trust them with real money, then they do not get to claim they are โ€œdecentralizedโ€ when trouble strikes. Too many protocols operate like companies when they are raising money, marketing the product, chasing TVL, negotiating partnerships, collecting fees, and controlling upgrades. Then the second something breaks, suddenly they are just humble contributors to an unstoppable autonomous protocol. No. You do not get the control of an operator, the upside of a business, and the legal responsibility of a DeFi protocol. If something is truly autonomous, truly permissionless, truly outside the control of any identifiable group, then fine. That is a different conversation. But most of what gets called DeFi today is not that. It is a small group of people with admin keys, revenue, influence, and control, hiding behind the banner of decentralization. And the space keeps letting them get away with it because CT has the memory of a goldfish. That cycle only ends when consequences exist that will scare operators into better behavior. So yes, I think it is time for a lawsuit. ๐Ÿซก From the depths โ€” The White Whale ๐Ÿ‹
English
59
27
283
30K
Ash Crypto
Ash Crypto@AshCryptoยท
$USDT.D just got rejected at its trendline resistance. USDT market cap is sitting around $190 BILLION. If $USDT.D starts to decline, BILLIONS in sidelined liquidity will flow into $BTC and alts.
Ash Crypto tweet media
English
244
314
1.3K
60.9K
Dovy๐Ÿ”Œ
Dovy๐Ÿ”Œ@DovySimuMMAยท
That time Arman Tsarukyan ran up on Bobby Green with 5 guys and Bobby wasnโ€™t even scared ๐Ÿ˜‚
English
192
228
9.4K
713K