Wolfe Weeks

1.2K posts

Wolfe Weeks banner
Wolfe Weeks

Wolfe Weeks

@wolfeweeks

Lab Director & App Developer @premierpitching | Go Royals, Go Chiefs (yes, in that order) | Barry Bonds is the best hitter of all time | #JDF16

St. Louis, MO Bergabung Ocak 2017
497 Mengikuti102 Pengikut
Tweet Disematkan
Wolfe Weeks
Wolfe Weeks@wolfeweeks·
2nd greatest QB of all time? Patrick Mahomes.
English
0
0
0
679
Wolfe Weeks
Wolfe Weeks@wolfeweeks·
@LieslsBurner @GatorDiamondPod @Jacktveltri If you think the proper repercussion for a soft bat toss in the general direction of the pitcher is for the pitcher to target the batter and give him a free base, you shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a ballfield
English
0
0
0
24
Developing Baseball
Developing Baseball@developbaseball·
New Project: Statcast MCP! For all of our friends who love to use AI agents like Claude or love to code on Cursor, this is for you. We built a Statcast MCP that allows users to communicate with the Statcast APIs in plain English. Examples in the README. This allows non technical people to receive interesting insights into deeper baseball analysis. Any questions, please reach out. Try it out: github.com/alex-rimerman/… We are working towards a public Chat Bot type Agent that allows this to be hosted on our website. Stay tuned👀 #Statcast #MCP #Baseball
English
12
16
225
26K
Wolfe Weeks me-retweet
Leo Chenal
Leo Chenal@lchenal54·
Thank you 🙏🏼
Leo Chenal tweet media
English
556
914
14K
336.8K
Wolfe Weeks me-retweet
Trent McDuffie
Trent McDuffie@trent_mcduffie·
All Love KC ❤️
Trent McDuffie tweet media
English
1K
2.4K
28.3K
552.3K
SleeperRoyals
SleeperRoyals@SleeperRoyals·
How are we feeling about this Opening Day Royals rotation projected by @MLB?🫣 (📸: @MLB)
SleeperRoyals tweet media
English
41
12
536
45.4K
Wolfe Weeks
Wolfe Weeks@wolfeweeks·
@DerekHayne56813 @Royals Incredibly high risk considering we love giving these types of guys unreasonable amounts of playing time
English
1
0
0
59
Derek Haynes
Derek Haynes@DerekHayne56813·
@Royals I mean, he did hit 26 bombs in 2023, low risk pickup with upside
English
1
0
0
779
Kansas City Royals
Kansas City Royals@Royals·
We have signed INF Brandon Drury to a minor league contract with an invitation to Major League Spring Training.
English
17
57
378
73.3K
Wolfe Weeks
Wolfe Weeks@wolfeweeks·
@FoolishBB The only slip I've ever placed (~2 months ago)
English
0
0
1
1.5K
Foolish Baseball
Foolish Baseball@FoolishBB·
Started spreadsheeting all the 2025 hitting data for 5 I Like, Foolish 50, etc. I’ve got one question: Carter Jensen!!! Anyone else seeing this??? He had 69 PA last year, but they were 69 of the finest PA ever taken with seemingly no weakness to his game. He’s gonna with RotY.
English
42
9
1.4K
92.7K
Wolfe Weeks
Wolfe Weeks@wolfeweeks·
@dkwillabus @PurpyNFL @golden_beers Good analysis on the ambiguity. To me, I think of it like this: If the defender had stripped the ball at the same moment, but without gaining possession, would most people view it as a fumble or an incomplete pass. My gut tells me the latter, so I lean INT instead of catch.
English
0
0
1
20
Zach Bush
Zach Bush@dkwillabus·
From the link: clearly performs any act common to the game (e.g., extend the ball forward, take an additional step, tuck the ball away and turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent), or he maintains control of the ball long enough to do so. So here's where the NFL gets itself into trouble IMO where "clearly" is subjective and rather than define concrete definitions of football moves they only provide examples. So now you get into the question of can it only be a tuck OR must it be a tuck AND turn upfield. The way it's written makes it impossible for anyone to claim a definitive answer because what's listed are merely examples, not defined requirements. In other words, the rules are written in such a way that just because it says "tucks the ball away and turns up the field" doesn't disqualify "tucks the ball away". The weakness of the language is shown today where you have people saying he clearly caught it and people saying he clearly didn't. It's ridiculous that the NFL probably spends millions of dollars writing these rules and they still aren't defined. The conversation should not be about whether or not the ball came loose after he contacted the ground - it should be about what "clearly performs an act common to the game means" and whether or not the officiating crews ever considered that during the replay analysis. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
English
1
0
1
16
Zach Bush
Zach Bush@dkwillabus·
For starters, the "surviving the ground" thing was eliminated in 2018. I don't know why people are using language to justify a call that's not even in the rulebook. A complete catch is: (A) secure the ball (B) 2 feet or body part down (C) a football move If C is not completed and the receiver contacts the ground and loses control of the ball, it is incomplete. Note that the language is "contacts the ground" and not "after contacting the ground". On the replay, we see Cooks (A) Secure the ball (B) Get 2 feet down (C) Tuck the ball to his body Tucking is - according to the rules - a football move and at that moment he satisfied all conditions of a catch, making him down by contact.
English
1
0
1
65
Wolfe Weeks
Wolfe Weeks@wolfeweeks·
@UnkWerks @mahomesdahgoat I think the reason our offense has gotten noticeably worse since Bieniemy left was because he was NOT a yes man. He had the balls to let Andy know when he was being an idiot.
English
0
0
0
57
UnkWerks
UnkWerks@UnkWerks·
@mahomesdahgoat They want a yes man, or everyone in the league knows Andy is the OC and they don’t want a paycheck and a title just to assist with running meetings and practices…
English
1
0
0
1.5K
🕊️🕊️🕊️
🕊️🕊️🕊️@mahomesdahgoat·
Mike McDaniel unemployed but “Eric Bieniemy” is your top candidate fucking hilarious organization #ChiefsKingdom
Arrowhead Corner@ArrowheadCorner

Sources: The #Chiefs are internally reviewing OC options, with Bears RBs coach Eric Bieniemy currently emerging as the top candidate. Other names aren’t ruled out. Chicago’s playoff outcome tonight could influence the timeline.

English
107
27
572
99.2K
Wolfe Weeks
Wolfe Weeks@wolfeweeks·
@DBach218 @Chris_D_Brewer I'd guess they have some in-house machine learning model that takes ball release metrics, player positioning, and field positioning as inputs right at ball release, and then spits out a number based on that. I'm probably wrong, but 17.8% seems reasonable based on that.
English
1
0
45
953
DBach218
DBach218@DBach218·
@Chris_D_Brewer I just have so many questions about how exactly they arrive at that number. How many things they’re supposedly accounting for. It feels like so many that the number itself is basically worthless
English
6
0
231
16.2K