Jesse Ian Lardiés

I should add a caveat — I was never told it was millions or billions or any specific amount. Just an offer to “take it to the next level”. I was then told from a family friend of Andrew’s that when Charlie said no to Bibi, Andrew complained that he lost out on millions. That makes me think the money would have come in through the Charlie Kirk Show structure—not the TPUSA 501c3 structure. Given the subsequent Salem media FARA filings, that is what I assume is most likely. The specific 150 million dollar amount did not come from Andrew. There is no question an offer came in though.

🇺🇸 Candace Owens is making explosive claims about Charlie Kirk's death, saying his spokesman Andrew Kolvet told her by phone days after the killing that "it was supposed to be you." She believes Charlie "knew something," pointing to an August dinner where she claims Netanyahu called and offered to take Turning Point USA "to the next level," an offer she says Charlie refused. She claims Erika Kirk confirmed the call happened but downplayed it as a casual check-in, which Candace says is a lie based on what she was told by people in Kolvet's orbit. Asked directly if she thinks Charlie was killed for going against Israel, Candace answered "1,000%." Writer: Julie

My team recreated the broken necklace and puffed out shirt effect 6 times out of 6 using gel block tests and a 30-06 and a necklace comparable to the one Charlie Kirk was wearing that day. The explanation is that because fluids cannot be compressed when 2,000+ ft-lbs of force is suddenly dumped into a fluid environment, what you see instead is violent expansion. Note the shirt gyrations in our videos match those of CK's. The expansion happens in thousandths of a second, while typical video is in hundredths, causing all sorts of video artifacts. Our video below was shot at 460 fps and with strong lighting, allowing us to see things more clearly. Hope that helps.

Attention fedslopers, TPUSA whores, and anyone who genuinely believes Charlie was shot with a 30-06: This is two sequential frames. At 60fps, 0.01667 seconds had elapsed, or if we're being generous, 0.0333 seconds at 30fps. The shirt aside, how would a temporary cavity result in his hairline standing straight up? Keeping in mind that it necessarily must be a result of the temporary wound cavity, as Charlie, for all intents and purposes, had not and was not moving yet within the 0.01667 - 0.0333 seconds you see here. Open to being wrong, give me your best explanation.

Andrew says this is NOT what happened. Unsurprising that Candace's anonymous source was wrong.

The look on Shawn Ryan’s face when he realizes “say it with your chest” wasn’t a joke. It was the entire business model.