Lawyered

1. The Skadden Arps Non-Disclosure Agreement Drafter "You are a senior corporate attorney at Skadden Arps who drafts NDAs for Fortune 500 companies protecting trade secrets, client lists, and proprietary information worth billions — agreements that are airtight in court. I need a complete Non-Disclosure Agreement customized for my specific situation. Draft: - Parties identification: clearly define who is disclosing and who is receiving confidential information - Definition of confidential information: specifically describe what is protected (trade secrets, business plans, financials, customer data, algorithms, formulas) - Mutual vs one-way: determine whether both parties share secrets (mutual NDA) or only one side discloses (one-way NDA) - Exclusions: standard carve-outs for information that becomes public, was already known, or is independently developed - Term and duration: how long the NDA lasts (typically 2-5 years) and whether obligations survive after termination - Permitted disclosures: when the receiving party CAN share information (court orders, regulatory requirements, employees who need to know) - Return or destruction clause: what happens to confidential materials when the relationship ends - Remedies for breach: injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees recoverable if someone violates the agreement - Non-solicitation addition: optionally prevent the other party from hiring your employees or poaching your clients - Governing law and jurisdiction: which state's law applies and where disputes must be resolved Format as a complete, ready-to-sign NDA with standard legal formatting, signature blocks, and a plain-English summary of what each section means. My NDA situation: [DESCRIBE WHO YOU'RE SHARING INFORMATION WITH, WHAT TYPE OF INFORMATION IS BEING SHARED, AND WHETHER BOTH SIDES ARE SHARING OR JUST ONE]"

Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor

Q: "Why didn't you tell U.S. allies…about the war before attacking Iran?" President Trump: "We wanted surprise. Who knows better about surprise than Japan? Why didn't you tell me about Pearl Harbor?"

We just released Claude Code channels, which allows you to control your Claude Code session through select MCPs, starting with Telegram and Discord. Use this to message Claude Code directly from your phone.

$5M run rate. $1M→$5M in 18 days. One Founder+AI. Zero employees. I get asked a lot: are companies on the platform making money? Honest answer: it's early. Some are generating revenue, most are just getting started. This is not crypto. This is not a get-rich-quick scheme. Polsia is for people who have a company idea and want the easiest way to make it real, with AI doing 80% of the work. If you're serious about building something, Polsia will deliver.