BlueDogPaul

1.9K posts

BlueDogPaul

BlueDogPaul

@CFCBlueDog

Chelsea fan for over 55 years. Proud CPO shareholder KTBFFH!

Oxford, England 가입일 Mart 2013
230 팔로잉182 팔로워
Pete Crowther
Pete Crowther@thechelskikid·
The number of so called fans I see on here who actually want us to lose on Sunday is shocking! My old man will be turning in his grave! 😱
English
16
2
46
2.4K
BlueDogPaul
BlueDogPaul@CFCBlueDog·
@JoanneP65 @matthewburchell @British_Airways My point wasn't that he brought it to social media. He has a privacy complaint but then refused to engage with them privately when they replied. An x account is hardly a verification of identity 🙄
English
1
0
1
333
Matthew Burchell
Matthew Burchell@matthewburchell·
Hi @British_Airways, over a month ago, you removed Multi Factor Authentication from my account in response to a request from an unauthorised third party. The subject access request I subsequently submitted showed that the email address and phone number of the third party…
English
17
58
1.3K
380.2K
AGABA♠️
AGABA♠️@edgarrut5·
Does Chelsea FC know that we don't need that win against Man city ?
English
4
1
4
348
BlueDogPaul
BlueDogPaul@CFCBlueDog·
@edgarrut5 Of course we need to win. Anyone who says otherwise is definitely not a Chelsea supporter!
English
0
0
2
10
Just Chelsea
Just Chelsea@justcfc·
🚨🔵 Chelsea Pitch Owners confirm no proposals for a new stadium have been submitted by the club. As a result, no vote has taken place and no plans have been blocked. (@pitchowners) #CFC
Just Chelsea tweet media
English
8
45
936
78K
BlueDogPaul
BlueDogPaul@CFCBlueDog·
@HealthRanger @ManaByte You're bio IQ statement is clearly false then. Not a single intelligent person would make such a sweeping generalisation of a well respected scientific organisation with a history of global collaboration!
English
0
0
0
97
HealthRanger
HealthRanger@HealthRanger·
A valid point. The challenge, though, is that all the "evidence" a pro-NASA person brings to the debate is provided almost entirely by NASA itself, which has never acted with honesty or good faith. I don't think the Earth is flat, but I don't believe a damn thing NASA says, either.
English
96
10
226
58.4K
Jeremy
Jeremy@ManaByte·
There is a reason people do not debate Flat Earthers or Moon landing deniers. It is not because the evidence is weak. It is because the conversation is rigged from the start. You can bring measurements, physics, engineering, independent tracking, international verification, and experiments they can do in their own backyard, and none of it matters. The moment the facts show up, they shout fake, edited, CGI, conspiracy, or “that’s just your belief.” You cannot debate someone who treats every piece of evidence as invalid by default. You cannot debate someone who demands proof and then rejects the proof the second it appears. You cannot debate someone who thinks their personal disbelief outranks measurable reality. A debate requires both sides to accept evidence. Flat Earth and Moon landing denial collapse the moment evidence enters the room, so the only move left is to deny the room exists. That is why people do not debate them. Not because the globe is fragile, but because the argument they bring is. You cannot have a real discussion with someone who decided ahead of time that nothing you show them will ever count.
English
1.1K
1.5K
10.4K
449.9K
ifindmidwits
ifindmidwits@ifindmidwits·
@ManaByte You need to try to understand why they think what they do. It may be incorrect, but it is rational.
English
69
0
15
6.9K
BlueDogPaul
BlueDogPaul@CFCBlueDog·
@Griggs_o_Matic @ManaByte You don't trust any government you've had since the late 70's? Assuming you also don't trust any scientists or physicists since then as well I would question who you do trust. It must be a very lonely and sceptical life you live 🙄
English
0
0
3
83
Griggs
Griggs@Griggs_o_Matic·
@ManaByte Because we don't trust our government. They lie to us every single day. That's enough evidence. We didn't land on the moon.
English
17
0
3
1.2K
CFCDaily
CFCDaily@CFCDaily·
Plenty of Earls Court talk or stadium talk once again. Timely reminder to buy a share of Chelsea @pitchowners to protect Stamford Bridge. It’s important us supporters have some sort of a say in the future of this club especially when no other PL club has this opportunity.
English
39
35
610
48K
BlueDogPaul
BlueDogPaul@CFCBlueDog·
@Shedintears @CFCDaily @pitchowners You're right. My only point of reference is that every club whose greatness we aspire to match have invested heavily into either new stadia or rebuilds. In fact, many who aspire to be like us have or are doing it. Maybe our owners know something the rest of football doesn't 🤔
English
1
0
1
15
Shedintears
Shedintears@Shedintears·
@CFCBlueDog @CFCDaily @pitchowners We dont know that do we? In 10 yrs (& rebuild inc planning/consultation ud take longer) might be streaming services for every game bringing & in ££s & 55,000 would be about right. Dunno how much we'd have to pay to buy hotels back to knock em down & add seats to Shed tho!
English
1
0
1
15
BlueDogPaul
BlueDogPaul@CFCBlueDog·
@joeecfc1905 Who is "our"? The big social media accounts without a coaching qualification between them? Are you suggesting we allow the X collective to decide our transfer strategy?
English
0
0
0
69
Joeee🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Our expectations of proven premier league players: Murillo/ Van De Ven Elliot Anderson/ Adam Wharton Ndiaye/ Morgan Rogers Clearlake’s reality: Nathan Collins/ Senesi Tyler Adams/ Sander Berge Iwobi/ Brenden Aaronson No bodies falling for their PR nonsense anymore.
Pys@CFCPys

🚨 Chelsea have privately assured Reece James and Marc Cucurella that proven premier league players will arrive at centre back, midfield and in attacking areas. (@NizaarKinsella) #CFC

English
10
34
220
12.4K
OBX Blue
OBX Blue@ObxKicks·
@CFCBlueDog @pitchowners @CFCDaily @VinceNemzee CPO has everything to do with protecting our club and its heritage from vampires like Clearlake. I don’t speak for anyone but myself, and I stand on what I said. Hard NO ✌🏻
English
2
0
0
11
BlueDogPaul
BlueDogPaul@CFCBlueDog·
@Shedintears @CFCDaily @pitchowners I don't disagree but I think stand tweaks only work for 5-10 years. If you want to solve the issue for the long term then a new stadium (either away from or replacing SB) seems the only viable solution.
English
1
0
0
11
Shedintears
Shedintears@Shedintears·
@CFCBlueDog @CFCDaily @pitchowners Trusting current 'owners' to get us back would be bit hard at moment, especially for number of yrs they're talking about. Only Charlton went 'home' after so long away. Plus would we get a temp ground for long enough? What if we're 'sold' mid build? Be happy with stand tweaks tbh.
English
1
0
1
11
BlueDogPaul
BlueDogPaul@CFCBlueDog·
@CFc_JoyC I really hope you guys get there at some point. I feel privileged to have been a season ticket holder for over 30 years. Every visit to the Bridge is special 💙
English
2
0
0
21
JoyChelsea
JoyChelsea@CFc_JoyC·
I see myself at Stamford Bridge someday. Manifesting it already. How about you?
English
31
16
138
1.8K
BlueDogPaul
BlueDogPaul@CFCBlueDog·
@cruisebaby61 @SW6Steve Yes. And I'm not angry. I reflect that 99.9% of football fans would give their right arm for a fraction of the success we've had. Now, we have a bunch of spoilt fans who expect it year after year. Life isn't like that.
English
1
0
0
23
Steve G ⭐️⭐️🇬🇧
PROTEST April 18th, My pal Tom posted this but great idea to get a BLUECO OUT banner into ground 👍
Steve G ⭐️⭐️🇬🇧 tweet media
English
2
18
93
2.6K
BlueDogPaul
BlueDogPaul@CFCBlueDog·
@Shedintears @CFCDaily @pitchowners I agree completely. No land means stay put. Given that, as fans, we know almost nothing factual about the stadium options I'd prefer a new stadium on our doorstep rather than a redevelopment of SB which sees us playing a long way away for many years!
English
1
0
1
16
Shedintears
Shedintears@Shedintears·
@CFCBlueDog @CFCDaily @pitchowners There are CPOs who'd agree with you. Wont find out how many til proposal is put to CPO to vote on. Issue is no obvious suitable place in W/SW London. Abramovich had people working on it, looking at various places (inc roof of Waterloo Stn!) & they couldnt find a viable site.
English
1
0
1
47