@DrHistoryBrad Maybe do a little bit of research before you type. All these states have either already gerrymandered, can't gerrymander, have a divided legislature, or are Vermont with only 1 district....
English
Kenneth Misher
6.2K posts
Looking at you, California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, North Carolina, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont.
NewsWire@NewsWire_US
Florida House Passes New Congressional Map, Eliminating Four Democratic-Held Seats
English
@ZFlawles1s Holy copium. The map has legally been struck down in court it cannot be used lmao 🤣
English
people have already voted. theres no way in hell the courts let this fly
VoteHub@VoteHub
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) plans to suspend House primaries, giving lawmakers time to redraw the congressional map in response to the Callais ruling.
English
@_daneiel_ Ridingbuilder needs an update with 2025 election data!
English
People talk about Canada joining the US sometimes, but a less discussed topic in that is: what would Canada's congressional districts look like? I loaded up ridingbuilder and assigned the districts by province and gave it my best shot! Maps below ⬇️ 1/?
English
@ZacharyDonnini Notice how not even Dem plants l like votehub are trying to pretend the old 5th was fair anymore
English
Okay, I'll throw my hat in the ring in the fair Florida map discourse.
Using results applied to the these lines:
2024 Pres: 21 🔴 - 7 🔵
2022 Gov: 22 🔴 - 6 🔵
2020 Pres: 15 🔴 - 13 🔵
2018 AG: 18 🔴 - 10 🔵
English
@JoeNC05 Lying about what voters are actually voting on in the ballot language is definitely illegal
English
@JoeNC05 @TheOnlyLazarus You're forgetting about the ballot language question
English
@TheOnlyLazarus The map itself is 100% legal, the court does not contest that. There is a question about whether they passed the amendment too close to the 2025 election, that's the only legal standing the opposition has. Gerrymandering is legal in Virginia
English
@ferald_gord The only reason they had referendums was because they legally HAD to. If they could've just done it they 100% would have.
English
i think there, is, actually, a big ethical difference in how dem states are giving voters the choice to gerrymander while red states don’t. i think that distinction is pretty noteworthy!
Micah Erfan@micah_erfan
Floridians are overwhelmingly against this mid-cycle gerrymander. But that doesn't matter, because unlike in California and Virginia, Republicans aren't asking the people for their consent.
English
@davidslosttt Exactly. COI is such a subjective term it just means whatever the user wants it to mean. That's why we shouldn't use COI as a map drawing benchmark
English
@MisherKenneth the earmuff district only impacted Safe D seats (there's an argument it was a racial gerrymander but it wasn't a partisan one)
I think the argument about FL-5 is true but you can also make that argument about literally any district on this new map
English
@davidslosttt The whole justification for the earmuff district was "COI". Same with the old FL05, a district so ugly that it needed to connect 2 cities 4 hours from each other because of a "COI". People in Tallahassee are not in the same community as people in Jacksonville regardless of race.
English
@MisherKenneth @baseballot Did you criticize the gerrymandering in Texas done without a ballot measure? Did you criticize Ohio’s ballot language for their anti gerrymandering initiative?
English
This is a nonsensical reason to draw a new map. Reapportionment ≠ redistricting. Florida’s new map will have 28 seats, same as the old one.
Hannah Knowles@KnowlesHannah
DeSantis is eyeing a redrawn House map that “addresses his concerns about Florida being undercounted in the Census" and could result in 1-3 new GOP seats, per a person familiar. Many R's in FL hope it's just one seat, another says, amid worries about diluting other districts.
English
@sarobertsonca This argument is so stupid, people in BR-C could have voted against Pierre if they wanted to. What exactly wasn't fair about it. By the logic that floor crossing is ok because you elect the MP not the party then an mp resigning is also the will of the voters.
English
Andrew Scheer: "Conservatives respect the results of elections ... Conservatives respect the will of the voters at the ballot box."
(except in the ridings of Carleton and Battle River—Crowfoot)
English
@PoliticalMuffy 1. That right was not taken away by this referendum it didn't exist in the first place. 2. The amendment threshold was not created just for this.
English
42.83% of voters can take away 100% of the right to choose from 57.17% of the voters.
Cernovich@Cernovich
51% of voters can take away 100% of the rights of 49% of the voters. Democracy.
English
@CincinnatiDem24 1. Trump won her district. 2. She was elected twice so she can vote however she wants. 3. You couldn't beat her on a fair map so you cheated
English
Common sense balanced representation as she votes with Trump 100% of the time
Jen Kiggans@JenKiggans
My statement on last night’s election results:
English
@SaucesInArizona @PpollingNumbers Segregation in Mississippi also would've passed a referendum in 1960, does that make it ok? Obviously not
English
@PpollingNumbers Republicans hate when it’s the will of the people and not just a governors signature lol
English
News - Virginia judge blocks redistricting referendum as unconstitutional, halts certification; appeal expected.
AG Jay Jones says he will appeal.
English
@ElectionCenter_ They weren't "countering" anything they would have done it either way. Stop pretending that Democrats don't gerrymander!
English
Classic leaving out North Carolina turning their 7-7 map into a 10-4 map in 2024, which New York was countering.
Guy Benson@guypbenson
Indeed, the “Texas started it” premise is incorrect (plus CA already answered). NY Dems went before TX (see below), to say nothing of the wild existing Dem gerrymanders in places like IL & MD. And to say nothing of admitted 2020 Census miscounts robbing red states of 6-10 seats.
English
@BachmannRudi It's not, redistricting should all be based on compactness and nothing else
English
Can conservatives from the US explain to me why the VA gerrymander (which was approved by voters) is not OK, while the one in TX and others in the South are? Please make a serious, good-faith effort. No German random posters please.
PS: I think all gerrymandering is bad.
English
@xuanez1 @JoshuaRush Yes I will, right now. It's not hard
English
@MisherKenneth @JoshuaRush Utah and Ohio Republicans tried/trying the same thing, but you won't condemn that
English
btw Texans did not get to vote on our gerrymandered maps
CJ Pearson@Cjpearson
It's still just completely insane that Democrats were allowed to write a ballot question that says "restore fairness" and have the result create this lobster-like monstrosity of a congressional district.
English