Parenti Soundsystem ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ

19.1K posts

Parenti Soundsystem ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ banner
Parenti Soundsystem ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ

Parenti Soundsystem ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ

@ParentiSoundSys

It's time we give less emphasis to how stupid these people supposedly are, and more attention to how vicious and relentless and uncompromising they are. -MP

๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ Haziran 2013
2.5K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰2.4K ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
Bartosz Milewski
Bartosz Milewski@BartoszMilewskiยท
@ParentiSoundSys @DenVividly You are in the USA enjoying the freedom to criticize the government. If you tried the same in Iran, you'd be dead. So don't defend the genocidal regime. Enjoy your freedom.
English
1
0
1
17
Mark Carney
Mark Carney@MarkJCarneyยท
Canada shares its condolences with the UAE following the latest Iranian attack that took the lives of two civilians in Abu Dhabi.ย  ย  We strongly condemn Iranโ€™s unprovoked attacks on the UAE and across the region, and reiterate the importance of opening secure access through the Strait of Hormuz. Canada supports efforts to safeguard international shipping and ensure freedom of navigation.
English
1.2K
231
1.5K
208.7K
Saifedean Ammous
Saifedean Ammous@saifedeanยท
Trump is in a real pickle
Saifedean Ammous tweet media
English
39
290
1.8K
64.3K
Bartosz Milewski
Bartosz Milewski@BartoszMilewskiยท
@ParentiSoundSys @DenVividly Now you're being delusional blaming Mossad for mass protests against the incompetent and brutal regime who slaughtered thousand of its own citizens.
English
1
0
0
15
Bartosz Milewski
Bartosz Milewski@BartoszMilewskiยท
More than 100 girls between the ages of seven and 12 were killed. Someone decided to compress the kill chain. Someone decided that deliberation was latency. Someone decided to build a system that produces 1,000 targeting decisions an hour and call them high-quality
English
1
2
15
991
Z
Z@ZeeContrarian1ยท
I hope we all understand that any major move on Iran is likely a net positive, regardless of the outcome - not immediately, but usually within a week. This should be seen as a strong buying opportunity. Thereโ€™s nothing markets hate more than uncertainty, and right now weโ€™re at peak uncertainty.
Z@ZeeContrarian1

๐—š๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—š๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป I want to start by giving Iran credit. In my Samson theory below, before the war began, I wrote that one possible scenario was that Iran would try to pull a Samson. If they felt cornered, they might try to hurt everyone around them and drag the region down with them. What actually happened is not exactly Samson, but it is close. Instead of pure destruction, Iran made a very rational move. Iran cannot defeat the United States militarily. The only real lever they have is oil. Their survival does not depend on winning the war. It depends on spiking oil toward 200 and creating pressure inside the United States. If oil goes high enough, Trump will face serious domestic pressure. So that is exactly what they are trying to do in any way possible, including bombing their own allies. I give them credit. It is a smart move. They are betting that Trump might chicken out if oil spikes hard enough. If oil reaches 200, that scenario becomes very real. For Iran, this is the only asymmetric weapon they have against a far superior adversary. Now we are entering a real game of chicken. Trump can signal that he is ready to destroy or take over Kharg Island. If that happens it is basically game over for Iran Islamic Regime. Iran on the other side is trying to push oil toward 200. If that happens it could become game over for Trump politically. Both sides escalating further means a crash scenario. It also seems that Israel and the United States may not have identical objectives in this war. Israel appears to want regime change. Trump has midterms. He cannot afford oil at 200. For Trump, two things would likely be enough to claim victory in this war. First, getting the enriched uranium out of Iran and proving that their nuclear capabilities have been destroyed. Second, pushing the longer range ballistic missile program back years, if not decades. There is no doubt that Israel and the United States are winning the military side of this war. Iran has already taken significant damage from these strikes that will take many years to recover. The real question is what Iran does next. It seems Iran understands the situation. Their priority now is probably survival of the regime. They also understand that Trump will want a fast win. So their strategy may be to absorb the damage while creating nuisance and pressure for another month or two, but not going all the way by closing the Strait of Hormuz, which would force Trump to take or destroy Kharg Island, hoping the Americans eventually settle for a deal. That is where the game theory becomes very real.

English
21
5
149
24K
Amerikanets ๐Ÿ“‰
Amerikanets ๐Ÿ“‰@ripplebrainยท
1. Surround Iran with military bases 2. When a war with Iran happens you can't even use them because they're too close to Iran 3. Eliminate Iran 4. Now that Iran is gone we don't need the bases anymore
GIF
HIGHangleHELL@H1GHangleHELL

@planefag Another thing they donโ€™t consider is that once the Iranian threat is eliminated those bases become irrelevant

English
27
194
2.6K
58.4K
Parenti Soundsystem ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ
@DenVividly @BartoszMilewski oh noooooo not my heckin innocent Mossad-backed protestors trying to knock over a country's government so it could become Syria 2.0 also not accurately described as a "mistake" for all the reasons Bartosz already laid out
English
1
0
0
15
John Den
John Den@DenVividlyยท
@BartoszMilewski This was a mistake, a tragedy You're using your voice to protect the killers thar *ordered* the killing of at least 5000 innocent protesters.
English
2
0
0
22
Lubos Spousta
Lubos Spousta@LubosSpoustaยท
@ZeeContrarian1 Beating Iran is positive but valuations are at record levels, broken technical picture, poor macro before war already, fund redemptions and energy supply damage which will stay for some time. Only positive point is AI rush remaining. 2026 might easilly be like 2007
English
1
0
0
159
Charles K Loyd
Charles K Loyd@k42594ยท
@ripplebrain Good, at that point bring them home. Reduce military spending, use for domestic needs. What's wrong with that?
English
2
0
1
1.1K
Parenti Soundsystem ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ
@ThePrimeagen "scum billionaires who literally advocate against self-reflection want me to hate communism, but I'm not going to let this alter the view of it that I was handed by Hollywood movies and McGraw Hill textbooks published by Ghislaine Maxwell's dad"
English
0
0
0
77
NWO
NWO@NEETWorldOrderยท
"Americans reinvented Communism from first principles because the word Communism was too scary."
English
3
5
216
3.7K
Stephen McIntyre
Stephen McIntyre@ClimateAuditยท
US put military cordon in international waters on Venezuela to overthrow its government; is currently interdicting fuel shipments to Cuba in international waters and has been sanctioning Russian trade for years. So by what moral principle can US object to Iran threatening "global commerce" in Strait of Hormuz? Pot, meet kettle.
Brett McGurk@brett_mcgurk

Iran today threatened the Bab al-Mandeb (10 percent of seaborne trade). Predictable and not new. Iran spent years building a missile and drone proxy force in Yemen able to threaten global commerceโ€”and fired anti-ship missiles at US Navy vessels in โ€˜23 and โ€˜24. Hormuz & Mandeb โฌ‡๏ธ

English
100
1.1K
4.4K
159.5K