Senator Armstrong

I have a dream.

@romanhelmetguy Look at this charlatan translating The Odyssey for this own personal political advancement. I speak Ancient Greek fluently, and the opening line should be translated as “Tell me about a complicated man…”

I’ve completed the opening lines of the Chudyssey. I’ll provide a detailed breakdown of my choices below.

@Paige_on_twt @friendsixseven I would like to see the same analysis with Autism plotted on the diagram. My suspicion is there’s a confounding third factor

@friendsixseven It means in terms of sex linked characteristics in the brain trans women on average have more feminine sex linked characteristics compared to cis men. And this is before hrt. But it doesn’t mean much other then on average trans girls have slightly more feminine brains

This chart is burned into my brain like the afterimage of the sun when you stare at it then close your eyes.

@jaycansea @TugGGSN Blasting Vrill edits to my woketard neighbors at 3am

@TugGGSN Someone took it home…

These are the parts of demolition i don't understand. You're telling me that a gigantic high def video screen that isn't all that old is just worthless? Can't be used anywhere? No one wants it?

@slattemar @cljack Agreed. I would never join “battery of not being a little bitch. Fuck you. You’re about to die for literally nothing” I would make a heroic last stand to protect my family, country and loved ones - and I wouldn’t mind if we were named something cool like “battery of the damned”

@cljack Men are as complex as women. We’re just more straightforward. Women mistake this for simplicity. But there’s an entire universe of unspoken rules you don’t see.

before you waste a lot of time in therapy trying to understand men, consider that Napoleon got volunteers to man a battery position with an almost 100% casualty rate by simply renaming it "the battery of not being a little bitch"

@AnotherJacket @NightlifeMingus imma stick my weewee in it

@NightlifeMingus Beef Torus with cheese

Ground beef challenge

some crazy ass nights we'll never remember with people we'll never forget

@QuasLacrimas That’s the thing about a lack of transparency. It breeds conspiracy. Unless and until all relevant records concern the event are released, you can reasonably believe these statements. It is indiscernible if these are true facts taken from eye witnesses, or the ravings of mad men

I'm not denying mutilations occurred (or the other rumor that is illegal to repeat in the EU), because the French government has covered up or downplayed atrocities committed by its pets before. But if you believe this, you should have a clear picture of the timeline: 9:50-10:00pm: approximately 10 minutes of disciplined shooting (2 firing, 1 providing covering fire during reloading) by 3 Muslim gunmen into the crowd in the Bataclan auditorium 9:57-10:15pm: police enter the auditorium and start firing on the Muslims, killing one and forcing the other 2 to retreat deeper into the building with hostages after exchanging fire 10:15-11:30pm: 2 Muslims have control of (~20?) hostages inside the building while French SWAT-equivalents take up positions outside the building 11:30pm-12:20am: French SWAT-equivalent secures the auditorium and enters the rest of the building, begins a phone negotiation with the two gunmen before finally assaulting their position in some kind of rear hallway/stairway. If mutilations occurred, you have to believe one of the following: (a) In addition to the 3 gunmen responsible for the disciplined, systematic massacre during the first 10-15 minutes, there were other terrorists involved attacking concert-goers with knives while their coreligionists kept them immobilized with gunfire, who then managed to escape the Bataclan as SWAT arrived, were never caught in the subsequent state of emergency raids, and the French state has intentionally covered up this failure. (b) The 2 surviving gunmen stopped to mutilate people they had already killed after their colleague was shot, before retreating out of the auditorium. This would have had to happen during a very short window (a few minutes?), (c) The 2 surviving gunmen mutilated hostages who survived the event, or killed and mutilated hostages whose very existence the French state denies (officially, all hostages survived) during their 75-minute siege inside the building, and this has been successfully covered up, or (d), I suppose you could think the entire publicly released timeline is all a fabrication to begin with. I think most people would accept that the economical conclusion from this timeline would be that there were probably no mutilations, or very few (i.e., not precluding quickly slashing or gouging 1 or 2 victims in disappointment), the rumors to the contrary are probably just (mostly*) baseless rumors, and that if you believe they *are* true, that also commits you to an additional and even stranger coverup: a coverup of the missing extra terrorists if the mutilations occurred in the first 10-15 minutes, or a coverup of dead hostages if they occurred during the 75-minute standoff. That said, there is another weird controversy about the Bataclan shooting that I don't even want to mention because the French court system pursues anyone who raises it. So while I think the conspiracy theories are improbable, I can't say I expect to convince everyone.

Read more about what I have to say here: democrats.org/after-action

@katebushsuprfan @Emp4thchan congrats on your degree in Anthropology

My life update is that I got my Master’s in Anthropology last week! Which means that i’m smarter than like 90% of the adult population in a subject no one has ever heard of

@ForgetfulThink1 @HabCorpLinguist

@Senator04417880 @HabCorpLinguist No

This might be my favorite reply ever. Lawyer says he'll come up with a legal argument to advance a position, gets accused of confirmation bias.

@ForgetfulThink1 @HabCorpLinguist Are you actually retarded?

@Senator04417880 @HabCorpLinguist “He makes arguments that align with his opinion”. Sooooo…he makes arguments…that ….confirm….his…biases?

@ForgetfulThink1 @HabCorpLinguist I know what confirmation bias is. He's a lawyer. He makes arguments that align with his opinion. Two parties take opposing sides. They both present their strongest evidence to make an argument. A judge then weighs the evidence/arguments to make a decision.

@Senator04417880 @HabCorpLinguist You…really should’ve looked up what confirmation bias is and what it means before responding to me with this nonsense.

@ShinytasticRuby @williamliang Why tf would that ever be a discouraging factor for an institution for higher learning. "Don't go to [university] go to [other university] you can be a drooling retard and graduate along with other drooling retards without any further understanding of the world"

@williamliang Do NOT go dude my friend attends and it's the most difficult school ever. Even really smart people are at their wit's end. It's not worth it.

I’m new to all of this. Do I go?

@ForgetfulThink1 @HabCorpLinguist “It is my bed time, I should go to sleep” Confirmation bias “I am hungry, therefore I should eat” Confirmation bias “I do not like superhero movies so I will not watch this new marvel movie” Confirmation bias. Must be tiring to be you

@HabCorpLinguist Well yeah. Lawyers are basically paid to engage in confirmation bias.

@JimDMiller James, as a fellow economist and your biggest detractor, I would go to bat for you. Please feel free to call me into any conduct meetings held against you

If true, this is to get me fired from Smith College.

@____katieee My daily lunch is carrot sticks + pb sandwich + cottage cheese. I'm a 240lbs male who weight lifts heavy and that is sufficient for me

I tried eating pb&js at work for like a month and I was so hungry all day i’m sorry like that’s not enough calories to sustain a non anorexic, non dieting person who exercises regularly

@____katieee Desegregation was an evil act you wench

@Senator04417880 I mean yeah but people still act surprised when they do the evil things they pledged to do lll

current supreme court precedent after SFFA would basically find desegregation unconstitutional btw

@hollanvo I feel like this is one of those IQ spectrum memes. Idiot: Ice Hockey Brainlet: Multiculturalism Giga brain: Ice Hockey There is much to be said about “Habeas Corpus” being a right answer, but I suspect that the Canadian state does not require that level of philosophizing

studying for my citizenship test and 😭

@cwjones89 It’s okay. I forgive you. I will be overseeing your execution - but I do forgive you

I must confess, I once copied a citation without checking it. It was in my dissertation. It was a book of cylinder seals published in 1940. It was during Covid, libraries were closed, the book wasn't available electronically, you couldn't buy it, and no one I knew had a scan.