고정된 트윗
The 1960 Democratic Party Southern Strategy: "The Party With A Heart --- The Party Of The People [...] White Supremacy"
English
Daniel Shuster
498 posts
Daniel Shuster 리트윗함
The Secession Crisis: Northern Conciliation and Hardliners: How Northern leaders attempted to address the Secession Crisis and how one leader attempted to bluff the South into submission. open.substack.com/pub/grail/p/th…
English
@DavidKusnet @souljagoyteller Jimmy Carter was a segregationist until an integrationist opportunity arrived, whatever you believe was in his heart is your business. Your description of Wallace seems fair, though he never abandoned being a New Dealer.
English
@ShusterRTS @souljagoyteller Jimmy Carter, who was never a racist but could be an opportunist, and George Wallace, who was a New Deal Democrat & then a racist demagogue & eventually a penitent populist, both evolved.
English
@Aaron_Moatz @JoeMcswag7283 @AfreemanFrancis @build_boost @SandyofCthulhu You didn’t hear that the Democratic Party immediately Redeemed itself, again?
English
In 1980, dems run a former segregationist, launching his campaign on stage with the most prominent segregationists still alive, including George Wallace and John Sparkman. His record with the school board was defying Brown decision and pushing segregation further. At the time of CR64, he stood against LBJ, saying he was instead a “Richard Russell democrat.” He proposed a constitutional amendment banning school busing. He was the last Georgian to win via Roy Harris. He was the deacon and longtime member of a church that refused black members up until it was pushed in the news. Dems did absolutely everything they could to cling onto the segregationist vote.
But Carter was also seen as a complete failure on the economy and foreign policy. He got crushed, 49 states.
English
It wasn’t Republicans standing in front of schools in the 1960s trying to keep out little black girls.
SaltyGoat@SaltyGoat17
Democrats hate it when you bring up how racist they've been... SINCE THEIR PARTY WAS CREATED!!
English
@souljagoyteller Back in the era of normal politics, Jimmy Carter was what we wanted to be. George H W Bush was what we were.
English
@Aaron_Moatz @LiberalDanRadio @BentleyShafer @jmd403 @GrageDustin @JoJoFromJerz Only a hundred years of mythology could compel a thinking person to utter “Reagan used the southern strategy”
English
@LiberalDanRadio @BentleyShafer @jmd403 @GrageDustin @JoJoFromJerz Because the democrats were running Carter, who despite having a segregationist background, had become deeply unpopular due to higher priorities of the economy and national defense
English
English
@ShusterRTS @Aaron_Moatz @TimsMachines @TeamTalaricoHQ @jamestalarico @grok lol. They would be a conservative.
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/progressi…
“progressive” means policies intended to move society forward relative to the current system… which is why the term is inherently relative to the political baseline of a given era.
English
.@JamesTalarico: Are you aware that this bill removes the writings of Frederick Douglass?
Republican: I am
Talarico: Are you aware that this bill removes the writings of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.?
Republican: Yes
Talarico: Yet this bill still includes the writings of Alexis de Tocqueville, and he's not even an American. Could that be because he's a white man?
Republican: N-not exactly…
English
Daniel Shuster 리트윗함
Another important aspect is that history in the leftist religion is as close as they come to eternal salvation. Telling leftists that future generations will see them as backwards is their version of damnation.
Russell@ATLCWorker
English
@Aaron_Moatz @james_mtc @TimsMachines @TeamTalaricoHQ @jamestalarico @grok I wonder what label @james_mtc would give someone who wanted to conserve a once progressive position? It’s gotta be written in the rules somewhere, lol:
James V@james_mtc
@Aaron_Moatz @TimsMachines @TeamTalaricoHQ @jamestalarico At the time... those were "progressive" positions. "Conservative" and "progressive" are relative terms - relative to the current established rules/positions of the day
English
I don’t think you understand my point. Your vague modern view of progressive is to fight for the marginalized (or some other broad self aggrandizing definition), which these Republicans did. But my point is that that was not what the term meant at the time, and all of what is entailed in the modern use of the term makes those Republicans look more conservative than any modern conservative
English
Daniel Shuster 리트윗함
Daniel Shuster 리트윗함
If you say so. Carter's background in the School Board was pushing segregation further. Carter was the last Georgian to be elected via Roy Harris. One of Jimmy's main campaign promises when running for governor was to invite Wallace to the State Capitol. Wallace and Carter were some of the only politicians pushing for a constitutional amendment against busing. Carter utilized Wallace in his '76 campaign, and launched his '80 on stage with him and many of the other biggest segregationists. This was all swept under the rug by Dems that were in lockstep after getting crushed in '72. I realize Carter was a very different kind of figure than Wallace, but my point was that Carter was the next stage of the death of the segregationist movement, both phony planters that became servile
English
Daniel Shuster 리트윗함
I’m still not sure who you mean by “them.” The segregationist movement continued on following Wallace. He, and then people like Carter are really a better indication of what happen to segregationists. One of the defining traits of the planters were that they were phonies, willing to do anything for power. The problem was always the planters, specifically because of their system maintained by the Democratic Party. That system won’t, and can’t come back, and certainly wasn’t transferred somehow to their worst enemies
English
Literally none of this is wrong
End Wokeness@EndWokeness
NYT headline on Khamenei. This is real.
English
Father Coughlin has joined the conversation.
Dr. Dave@drdave1999
When I was a kid, Americans would’ve laughed at FOX News. They’d instantly have rejected anyone stupid enough to take it seriously. It works now because people are less educated. Idiotic fake news stories enthrall imbeciles who don’t know any better because they’re morons.
English
Daniel Shuster 리트윗함
Got a chance to watch this episode, and had some thoughts:
1. Walsh is one of the few on the right that understands both the stakes and narrative nature of how history is presented. Historians will present facts as if unbiased, but if every fact you present paints America in a bad light, you are presenting a narrative (and this is granting too much credit to assume they are even presenting real facts). This doesn’t mean we should think of the subject as relative. There is a best way to present history, and we should always chase it. Think of it like a eulogy of a loved one. There are unlimited facts you could say of your loved one, and you need to decide what to say based on values and priorities. We shouldn’t ignore the negative (and Walsh doesn’t, highlighting some of the legitimately worst sins committed against American Indians), but we need to put things in perspective. We need to unabashedly make the case for America’s greatness in history. Leftism is based on a mountain of lies about the past, and a self-image based on historical mythos, and to confront these narratives is to decapitate the entire movement
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog
This month on Real History we tell the true story of the American Indian. A story that bears no resemblance to the fairy tale “stolen land” myth you learned in school.
English
Daniel Shuster 리트윗함
If you don't understand that history is fundamentally narrative, you don't understand it at all. Did you think we were just listing every fact that happened to every person? Of course, it should be based in facts, but history is all about how you string facts together, deciding what should be emphasized, based on values, and finding the best way to describe events.
Stop deluding yourself with this authority worship
Russell@ATLCWorker
English
@M_Swann777 @souljagoyteller I understand what you’re saying.
English
@ShusterRTS @souljagoyteller No he literally didn’t write it. All of his works were written by Ted Sorensen
English
@M_Swann777 @souljagoyteller Dabbler seems accurate, of course he was just reprinting the conventional wisdom of the ivy league progressive at the time.
English
This is a great lesson for how to live life...as long as you forget that the guy saying it is LITERALLY RICHARD NIXON
Camus@newstart_2024
Richard Nixon in 1968 on 60 Minutes, when asked if he was awed by JFK's money and social grace: “No. I fought my way up all the way… When you've gone through the fires of having to work your way through school, of having to fight campaigns with no money, of having to do it all on your own, you come out a pretty strong man, and you're not in awe of anybody.” In 51 seconds, Richard Nixon delivered one of the most raw, unapologetic lines about self-made grit ever captured on national TV. No excuses. No envy. Just the quiet confidence that comes from building everything yourself. Still hits hard in 2026. What’s the one “fire” in your life that forged the strongest part of who you are today?
English