StrategyBSV

StrategyBSV has acquired 8,178 BSV for ~$194,000 at ~$23.725 per bitcoin and has achieved BSV Yield of 100.1% YTD 2025. As of 11/16/2025, we hodl 1,108,178 $BSV acquired for ~$25 million at ~$23 per bitcoin. $BSVC $BSVS $BSVW

@ClioBitcoinBank @CsTominaga @bergealex4 Satoshi disagrees

@CsTominaga @bergealex4 Offchain transactions.

@bergealex4 Dumb squared How?

@TopShooter35289 @Arthur_van_Pelt @DrBitcoinPod @Twentynothing00 @adam3us It doesn't take Artie long to start playing the man instead of playing the ball, does it.

@Arthur_van_Pelt @DrBitcoinPod @Twentynothing00 @adam3us Did they pull @adam3us because Blockstream does bad things at Epstein island?

Just in. 😎 David Watts is Craig Wright his wife Ramona's previous husband. CC @DrBitcoinPod @Twentynothing00

@BHatooor13304 @Arthur_van_Pelt @EricChennells @GavinMehl @ScammersCartel No one ever said it's playing there loser. It is being shopped to distributors at the festival.

Calvin Ayre's shitty movie is not listed for this year's Cannes film festival. @Arthur_van_Pelt @EricChennells @GavinMehl @ScammersCartel festival-cannes.com/en/press/press…

@satoshireveal You asking Arthur this tells me you won't get an honest answer

Let's follow your logic of the "pure fabrication" scenario to its conclusion. One week before facing an investigation where he would failed to convince the Australian tax office that he actually controlled hundreds of thousands of Bitcoins, Craig Wright reaches out to Louis Kleiman. He writes to this old man, unsolicited, and tells him an elaborate story about his son's central role in the invention of Bitcoin and his control over hundreds of thousands of coins. To achieve what, exactly? Why would Craig Wright wrote to Dave's father for the first time when having to prove control of these Bitcoins unless he knew at least part of that control might have been in this person's hands? Now consider the broader timeline. In February 2011, just two months after Satoshi Nakamoto's final public activity, Dave Kleiman incorporated W&K Info Defense Research LLC in Florida. This company was registered before the general public knew or cared who Satoshi was. This was before the Silk Road, before the price made the coins worth anything significant, before any tax scheme could have been conceived, because there was nothing yet to scheme about. Our question to you is the following: Who, in February 2011, incorporates a company to hold cryptographic intellectual property (later valued in court at over 100 million dollars) and manage assets related to Bitcoin? Someone who was closer to its origins than a “pure fabrication” would suggest.

@tuftythecat @currentseas Like your pal Artie?

@currentseas Maybe he's just confused. It wouldn't be the first time. It's unfortunately common for people with a combination of low IQ and high confidence.

Mr Justice Mellor did not say that evidence post-2016 was excluded from consideration, nor did he rule that pre-2016 descriptions of Bitcoin must be disregarded or that only post-2016 characterizations were permitted. In the main judgment in Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Wright ([2024] EWHC 1198 (Ch)), handed down on 20 May 2024 following the trial on the identity issue (whether Dr Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto and created Bitcoin), the court thoroughly examined evidence spanning the full relevant period. This included: 🔸Pre-2008/2009 materials (e.g., precursors to Bitcoin concepts, the White Paper published in October 2008, early source code, and the Genesis Block in January 2009); 🔸Wright's claimed pre-2016 documents and "Reliance Documents" purporting to show his early involvement; 🔸2016 events, such as the private "proof sessions" (demonstrations of alleged access to early Bitcoin keys) and the public "Big Reveal" in May 2016 when Wright first asserted he was Satoshi; 🔸Post-2016 materials, including later code changes, witness evidence, expert forensic analysis of documents, and Dr Wright's own statements or actions. The judgment assessed all this evidence on the balance of probabilities. It did not impose any blanket exclusion or cut-off based on 2016 (or any other date) for descriptions, definitions, or characterizations of Bitcoin, the Bitcoin system, the White Paper, or related concepts. Instead, Mellor J focused on the reliability of the evidence. Key points from the judgment relevant to evidence handling: 🔸Many of Dr Wright's documents claimed to be from pre-2008/2009 (or otherwise early) were found to contain anachronisms (e.g., references to technical features or terms introduced years later, such as certain code functions from 2013–2014, "UTXO" concepts solidified post-2012/2013, "Bitcoin Core" terminology from 2014, or software/fonts not available until 2010–2012 or later). These made the documents unreliable or forged, so they were given no weight as proof of early authorship or involvement. 🔸 Forensic experts identified metadata manipulations, backdating, and other indicators of forgery in numerous documents relied upon by Wright (often created or altered in 2016 or much later, including some in 2023). The court found forgeries "on a grand scale" and excluded reliance on those tainted documents. 🔸 Reliable contemporaneous or independently verifiable evidence (including from the actual early Bitcoin period and expert technical analysis) was prioritized. The White Paper itself was determined to have been produced in OpenOffice 2.4 (consistent with 2008), not in the LaTeX setups Wright later claimed. The overall conclusion was that the evidence was "overwhelming" that Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto, did not author the White Paper, and did not create the Bitcoin system. His supporting evidence was deemed fabricated or of "very dubious relevance," while COPA's case (including from developers and technical experts) was accepted. The court did not "edit" or sideline history by excluding pre-2016 material in favour of a "curated present." It admitted and weighed evidence across timelines but discounted Wright's submissions where they were unreliable, forged, or anachronistic. The 2016 date features prominently mainly because that is when Wright first publicly claimed to be Satoshi (after earlier media speculation) and conducted the disputed proof sessions—events the court scrutinized as part of the broader factual matrix, not as a dividing line for what could be considered. No part of the published judgment (main reasons judgment or subsequent relief/contempt proceedings) contains anything that could be described as excluding any description of Bitcoin prior to 2016 from consideration. The proceedings focused on the identity/authorship issue and related IP claims, with extensive technical and documentary analysis of Bitcoin's actual early history and development. x.com/CsTominaga/sta…

@movethenoise @BullRushClub You were saying? deadline.com/2026/04/gal-ga…

@BullRushClub BSV clowns.

🚨 HOLLYWOOD JUST WENT ALL-IN ON BSV – THIS IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING🚨 $90 MILLION budget. Casey Affleck playing Craig Wright. Director of Bourne Identity & Edge of Tomorrow – Doug Liman. Pete Davidson + Wonder Woman actress in the cast. Killing Satoshi – a full-blown Hollywood conspiracy thriller about the attacks on Wright and the fight for the real Bitcoin.This is NOT another YouTube doc. This is an A-list blockbuster with real stars. 2026 premiere. 💥 Get ready – crypto is walking the red carpet now.Who’s already hyped AF? RT if you feel this is going to be massive. 🔥 #KillingSatoshi #BSV #BitcoinSV #CaseyAffleck #DougLiman #SatoshiNakamoto #HollywoodCrypto #CryptoMovie #BitcoinMovie #SatoshiVision #RealBitcoin #CryptoThriller #HollywoodBlockbuster #CryptoConspiracy #BitcoinStory

@jan_siba @adam3us @spectator

@adam3us @spectator Calling Mr Adam Back "obscure" is imho insulting. Whether he invented BTC it or not :-)

@adam3us @spectator Adam not Andy, if you can correct.

@spectator Back not Black, if you can correct.

@stevethurmond @Kate_L_Mosso You’re a troll so your opinion is irrelevant.

@Kate_L_Mosso The block should tell you everything you need to know about BSV 🤷‍♂️.

@Arthur_van_Pelt @_Eph91_ Who elected you to decide that?

@_Eph91_ There's no KYC needed to determine spam. Basically, spam is everything that is not defined as a legit, native Bitcoin financial transaction. Most of these data spam transactions have several certain earmarks based on which they can be rejected.

The Knotzis fight data spam from all angles. 1. fees 2. block size limit 3. mempool policy filters 4. tighter consensus rules 5. fix flaws & repair abuse floodgates The Core fans stopped at 2 in 2017, and allowed the blockchain to grow from 1% spam in 2016 to 40% spam in 2026.

@CaminaDrummer4 @Arthur_van_Pelt @LiliH65289916 @hodlonaut @adam3us @lopp @LukeDashjr That’s an insult to CSW lumping him in with Andy

@Arthur_van_Pelt @LiliH65289916 @hodlonaut @adam3us @lopp @LukeDashjr This is all indicative of classic narcissism. Craig Wright and Andy Back both are narcissists.

Missed this from some days back. Adam really really doesn’t like that I am investigating and shining a light on what’s been going on in Core. According to him it is lies and «fomenting torrents of hate”. He is trying to make me stop reporting by claiming I am responsible for people getting death threats and implying that I will get sued. All of this from documenting events with public record material. Fucking wild. «what you are actually doing is misrepresenting things, impugning others reputations with lies» «not everyone has the stomach for the torrent of hate you're fomenting» «people will get death threats from what you're doing» «also say you succeed in fomenting hate, social media mob bullying people» «what you're actually doing is the analog of, but worse quality than tabloid hit pieces that get sued retract and then pay the person compensation»

@hodlonaut I guess you should ask CZ to delist BTC now

@jcbstwsk @BullRushClub x.com/agerhanssen/st…

@BullRushClub Is there literally any proof that this has anything to do with BSV or CSW

Bitcoin is *A GIANT PONZI SCHEME*. No kidding, mate! 😂 Now tell us, Boris, who is in charge of this *GIANT PONZI*? Who's the central mastermind? What are the fake guarantees, what are the promised returns? Dude, one is built on deception. The other is built on code and rules.

@JensLito @hodlonaut I'm more excited about this Hollywood BSV movie x.com/Daniel__Street…

Look at this trailer. I'm making a documentary about @hodlonaut. One schoolteacher's tweets sparked a global movement and exposed a fraud. We are all Satoshi. Except one. Help me tell this story: bitcoinsnakk.no/cat

@bsvsimp At least BSV has the capability to do more unlike BTC and BCH

BSV is doing 1 tps 😭😭😭

@tuftythecat @artiefanbelt @Arthur_van_Pelt Whose patents are you challenging?

@artiefanbelt @Arthur_van_Pelt Nice try Kurt. Craig doesn’t own any patents.

There has been some news on the Faketoshi02 and 03 opposition appeal cases, which were filed over a year ago. The appeals have been given numbers T 41/25 and T 357/25 and the composition of the Board has been decided. Next step should be either a summons to oral proceedings or a preliminary opinion, or maybe both. This may take a few more months though.

@Arthur_van_Pelt @BradLeFebre @paybis @BSVCasey @AIBC_World @SiGMAworld_ Because it was filmed in 2019

@BradLeFebre @paybis @BSVCasey @AIBC_World @SiGMAworld_ Maybe you didn't notice my comment back then, highlighting another date flaw in the footer of the website? x.com/i/status/18362…

We brought home Best Crypto Payment Provider 2026 🏆 from the @AIBC_World Eurasia Awards and told the full story to Ace Alliance Read the full piece from @SiGMAworld_ Dubai🔗 acealliance.com/news/paybis-fo…

Today 1 person realized BSV is Bitcoin Next week 10 people a day will realize BSV is Bitcoin Next month 100 people a day will realize BSV is Bitcoin Next year 1000 people a day will realize BSV is Bitcoin

@Arthur_van_Pelt @MrHodl @BitMEXResearch

@MrHodl Indeed. I was also surprised by the sheer level of cluelessness of @BitMEXResearch. Glad you noticed too.

These people are legit clueless.