avery💞🔢

$GOOGL looking good today, market should hold near highs for quite some time, dependent on middle-eastern affairs and supply chains settling down. REMINDER: Make sure you're using a VPN! If you don't know why, just ask Grok or another AI. 3 months free: refer-nordvpn.com/tXPXrFErDVx

@TikTokSupport my Live was suspended for "nudity" — a guest showed a post-surgical scar from a cardiac implant (ICD). No nudity. Guest's account was already reinstated by TikTok for the same content. Appeal button is broken. Need a human review. DMs open.

8th of March celebration = Happy International Women’s Day! 💐💐💐 👉 A special and rare Maverick-esque chart: Women in the S&P 500 Leadership trending up with 8.2% of the S&P 500 companies having female CEOs. Also women now hold 33% of board seats, compared to 25% five years ago — a tipping point that may lead to more female CEOs appointments in the future 👉 Warren Buffett, recall the mighty legend's on women’s careers, contribution & role in the workforce: “Start with the fact that our country’s progress since 1776 has been mind-blowing, like nothing the world has ever seen. Our secret sauce has been a political and economic system that unleashes human potential to an extraordinary degree. As a result Americans today enjoy an abundance of goods and services that no one could have dreamed of just a few centuries ago. But that’s not the half of it – or, rather, it’s just about the half of it. USA has forged this success while utilizing, in large part, only half of the country’s talent. For most of our history, women – whatever their abilities – have been relegated to the sidelines. Only in recent years have we begun to correct that problem. When I look at what we have accomplished using half our talent for a couple of centuries, and now I think of doubling the talent that is effectively employed or at least has the chance to be it makes me very optimistic about this country”. N.B. with Warren Buffett passing the torch to Greg Abel after a mighty 6 decade tenure, I am working now on a Maverick Special 2nd report dedicated to Buffett and Berkshire. ✍️ Warren Buffett's Cash Pile, Legacy & More ... Stash Away Baby! The Berkshire Hathaway Report #2 Free to subscribe = free to get! With respect, Mav Maverick chart & wish with a Buffett note for the select group of women in finance (please tag others in case I missed some, thx!) 👇👇👇 @DiMartinoBooth @averygrrl @AnnaEconomist @AyeshaTariq @callieabost @GunjanJS @sonalibasak @_kitrees @alexandraandnyc @SamanthaLaDuc @nancy__davis @JoTrader4 @CompoundinGirl @mommavestor @JessicaMenton @juliaccarreon @netcapgirl @PerceptivTrader @RhondaHMaylett @Optiongirl @wealthconcepts2 @jablamsky @rlygoodbizideas @VickiBryanBondA @tapusieta @katieeperry @ruth_sheridan_ @madaboutmarkets @MHalftermeyer @EllieFVogel

Oil surges to near $120/bl now, unprecedented

@Mr_Westinghaus Right, and I wonder how those countries ended up with underdeveloped capital markets and poor governance. Totally random.

Bangladeshi and the Congo don’t have deep, liquid stock markets with currencies that are tradable in the international market. Country focused ETFs are indexed based— which means they have strict rules to follow. It can take decades of good government and even better corporate governance to have good enough capital markets to be trackable by an index.

Facts: Qatar has a population of 2.6m people. Qatar's ETF is $QAT. Kuwait has a population of 4.2m. Their ETF is $KWT. Bangladesh has 172m people, The Congo has 102m. That's two country-specific ETFs for 6,800,000 people. Zero ETFs for the latter 274,000,000. I wonder why?

oil surges above $90 last weekly move of this magnitude was in march 2020 #CL_F

Private capital-backed insurers are heavily investing in their own parent companies' assets — a major conflict of interest. Security Benefit, Everly, Global Atlantic (KKR) lead the pack. When your insurer and your asset manager are the same firm, who's really watching the risk?

After the Supreme Court struck down his "liberation day" tariffs, Trump responded with a new 15% flat-rate tariff on all trading partners — sending gold up, stocks down, and the dollar lower. Uncertainty is back, and markets are feeling it.

@AdamArob Cheers, Adam, hope you're well!

@averygrrl Nice to see ya Avery. Been a while!

Tech stocks are cannibalizing themselves as AI tools disrupt the very software companies that were supposed to benefit from them. Bitcoin has crashed 50% from its peak—shorted it from $119k and rode it down to $65k. The "rising tide lifts all boats" era is officially over.

@ravi_chander Thanks Ravi, hope you’ve been well!

@averygrrl Welcome back. Succinct summary of the markets.

@JoelWebbon This is fucking crazy, man. Some people suck ass.

The average Christian woman on social media is retarded. I don’t mean to be rude, but this is a lesson for the general public that is simply too valuable to pass up. First, I will truthfully and plainly answer the woman’s question, without apology: I am AGAINST interracial marriage. That is to say, I believe interracial marriage “generally” goes against God’s normative design for humanity, nations, and cultures. Now, allow me to demonstrate why the question is so stupid by providing a line of actual good questioning that would have produced far more clarity, beginning with the woman’s vague and ambiguous question: 1) Are you for or against interracial marriage? 2) If against, do you believe interracial marriage is a sin? 3) If a sin, do you believe the act of entering an interracial marriage is a one-time sin, or does it place the individuals in a state of ongoing and continual sin? 4) If a sin, do you believe interracial marriage should be categorized as a crime? 5) If a crime, what penalty do you believe is justified for the civil magistrate to inflict upon the “criminal”? In other words, there is a million miles of distance between being “against interracial marriage” and “capital punishment being the just penalty for those who enter into an interracial marriage”. The majority of Christian Nationalists that I have partnered with would answer “yes” to the first question, but “no” to all the following questions (I, personally, fall into this category; believe it or not, @NickJFuentes also falls into this category, and has said so many times publicly). Some of the Christian Nationalists that I have partnered with would answer “yes” to the first two questions, but “no” to all the following questions. In regards to answering “yes” to the second question, these individuals would say that the act of entering into an interracial marriage is a one-time sin, but does not place the individuals into a state of ongoing and continual sin (I, personally, disagree with these individuals, but I am not ashamed to call them my brothers; I believe they are wrong in this specific position, but there is no legitimate witness from either Scripture or 2,000 years of church history that would condemn their position as a heresy, and therefore, the individuals who hold such a position should be accepted as brothers in Christ). Thank you for attending my brief lecture in how to think reasonably as a Christian, and why women (even Christian women) are generally incapable of doing so. This is why I make no apology in consistently saying that women should log off of social media and devote their attention to baking pies - apple, preferably. God bless.

if anyone needs a solid VPN, here's a discount link for the next 5 people who want to grab it refer-nordvpn.com/XPYcyguRQoE

The House isn't getting anything done Most unproductive year; comparable to 2020 when they weren't there

@egr_investor Arbitrage should always be about liquidity/financing; anything "guaranteed" should see instant funding and/or competitive bidding that should bring it closer to $1b total return for a new buy-in.

If you could guarantee a $2B return but had to pay $1B in interest, would you reject it because “that’s a lot of interest” and a bank profits? Net: +$1B. Make decisions on NPV and total payoff, not vibes. #Investing #PersonalFinance #Finance

i nominate tsinghua university as AI powerhouse of the world for 2026 if not them, some other subsidized chinese provider that's not drowning their LLM in care ethics and sensitivity training

@yishan Your AI investment thesis should probably include China.

My AI investment thesis is that every AI application startup is likely to be crushed by rapid expansion of the foundational model providers. App functionality will be added to the foundational models' offerings, because the big players aren't slow incumbents (it is wrong to apply the analogy of "fast startup, slow incumbent" here), they are just big. Far more so than with any other prior new technology, there is a massive and fast-moving wave that obsoletes every new app almost as fast as it can be invented. There is almost no time to build a company and scale it. There are two ways AI application startup founders can make money: - Make a flash-in-the-pan app that generates a ton of cash and bank the cash (my estimate is that you have about 12-18 months cashflow generation) - Make a good enough app that you get acquired by one of the big players for sufficient equity The situation is highly unstable - we don't know if it's going to crash or go to the moon but both scenarios make it very unlikely that any AI application startup will independently become a generational supercompany (baseline odds are low to begin with). The best odds are finding an application niche in a highly specialized field with extremely unique and specific data barriers, ideally ones relating to real atoms (hardware or world-related) data and not software/finance.

@LowAlphaHighVol @FiscalDaddy @Maverick_Equity Public discussion is exactly what puts downward pressure on those fees. We won't move the needle here; but "take as much as you can" only works downstream from optics and uptake.

@FiscalDaddy @Maverick_Equity @averygrrl In that sense you are right and ofc this all says more about TSLA shareholders than Musk

Never ever have I thought I will make this crazy chart: $1,000,000,000,000 Elon Musk's compensation package, BUT related targets so that it can happen! 👉 $8.5 trillion market capitalisation = not a low bar ;)) (highest ever by a big margin) — from $1.4 now! 👉 20 million cars delivered 👉 1 million Robo-Taxis working 👉 1 million humanoid robots deployed Let these ones sink in also: 👉 Musk will get $1tn for lifting the market cap by $7.1tn = 14%/year performance fee = way lower than many investment funds, and no base fee = that is actually quite cheap! Super Solid Skin In The Game (SS-SITG): reputational, legacy, financial & inspirational for so many! Why are some criticising the pay package? It is their own shareholders who said YES for the pay = they can do whatever they want with with their own company & money! FYI maybe you like it also: @elonmusk @BobgonzaleBob @CliffordAsness @agnostoxxx @darioperkins @Citrini7 @howardlindzon @MebFaber @InvestmentTalkk @TorrasLuis @JarmoFriman @prospero_ai @victaurs @litcapital @TSOH_Investing @qcapital2020 @arny_trezzi @Globalflows @evfcfaddict @MrFamilyOffice @HayekAndKeynes @compound248 @lord_fed @Biohazard3737 @TexasOncologist @alifarhat79 @SamanthaLaDuc @IrnestKaplan @JSeyff @Geiger_Capital @conksresearch @andrewrsorkin @EricBalchunas @BurggrabenH @MichaelAArouet @rohanpaul_ai @realroseceline @i_Drohi @averygrrl @GreekAnalyst @mommavestor @unusual_whales P.S. I did tens of thousandths of charts so far: stocks, bonds, macro, commodities, asset management, investor relations, investment banking, strategy, lending, leasing, risk management, management accounting, Bonus-KPIs ... charts for bank CEOs that were meeting to discuss with Christine Lagarde ... you name it ... but this one is truly quite special :)) Let that sink in ... & ... bring the sink if you wish 😉!

@LowAlphaHighVol @Maverick_Equity 🤣🤣🤣

@Maverick_Equity @averygrrl I will alert founders and CEOs everywhere that their equity stake in the business is no longer sufficient motivation or skin in the game. They must also take a performance fee. Cause hedge funds do it, and it’s totally conflict free.