Direct From Philly 🅁🅅🄽

@RedactedNews @sonia_elijah FREE THE CRYPTO PRISONERS These are not criminals. They are builders, innovators, and advocates for financial freedom. The government is making examples of them to frighten everyone else into compliance. @AaronRDay day2026.com/prisoners

😳 No conviction. No trial. Just 11 months in jail and 6 years of house arrest. Joby's case is what happens when the government decides it doesn't like decentralized currency it can't control. @Sonia_Elijah joins us with the full story.

Fan the Flame. Live Free or Die. @aaronrday for US Senate 2026 day2026.com

S3E8: Your Money, Your Data, Your Blood, All Stolen x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

This is one of the reasons I am running for US Senate. Will discuss on my podcast, The Aaron Day Show, tonight at 6pm ET

@KimDotcom This should be on your radar if not already @AaronRDay x.com/i/status/20296…

Trump is mad. Expect more firings and resignations.

@AaronRDay Too funny!

Lightning Network will be ready in 18 months.

Steady lads, the truth is getting out. Bitcoin maxis are furious. They will claim this is old news. Funny how that works. When I started talking about the relationship between Epstein, MIT, the hijacking of Bitcoin, and all three US CBDC pilots developed between MIT and the Federal Reserve, I was called a conspiracy theorist. Once it was proven, it became "old news." Pick one. It can't be both. The reality is 99.999% of the public has never heard any of this. I have given talks and workshops in 27 states. Outside the crypto Twitter bubble, almost no one knows about the blocksize wars, MIT's role, the US CBDC pilots, or even the fact that Bitcoin was originally used as peer to peer digital cash. The goal was never debating maxis or holding endless X spaces with the same 1,000 people. The goal is educating the general public. That is what terrifies them.

@KimDotcom @EileenDay1098 @User12441141413 x.com/i/status/20195…

@User12441141413 Start here:

Pure panic and desperation. Bitcoin Cash $BCH is the only real Bitcoin. Instant transactions. Nearly no fees. Real use-case. BCH is what Satoshi wanted. Based on the old BTC chain. BTC has been hijacked. There are books about it. Switch to BCH now. Don't listen to this guy.

x.com/AaronRDay/stat… Epstein gave $525K to MIT Digital Currency Initiative that paid Core developers. $500K to Blockstream. Brock Pierce met him on the island in 2011. Tether printed unbacked dollars for 50% of Bitcoin's 2017 rise. Howard Lutnick manages $130B Tether reserves. Bo Hines went from White House to Tether CEO in months. LIVE 6PM ET @tragedyandhope @mattarchy @benswann_ @hrvojepm @petersantilli @dowdedward @FreeRogerVer @FreeTalk @markgoodw_in @walterkirn @TPV_John @TaraBull808 @jimmy_dore @briteresi @tracybeanz @MdBreathe @cjbakermd @weaponizednews @davidthefite @coreycosta123 @DrRandallBock @corbettreport @ianmalcom84 @the__rgs @saucy_xmr @kbeehattie @Manners_ST @blackbeardXMR @TheCryptoKazi

S3E6: Epstein's Secret Bitcoin Hijacking Exposed x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

This article helped crash the market. Fascinating. The Hijacking of Bitcoin brownstone.org/articles/the-h… via @brownstoneinst

@AaronRDay Next your going to suggest I short the Petro Dollar.

More expert Bitcoin maxi analysis.

Here’s my latest article about The Hijacking of Bitcoin with specific reference to Jeffrey Epstein, Brock Pierce, and Howard Lutnick. This is not the huge article on GENIUS/CLARITY which will come later.

@RavenRickGrime1 LOL, MAXIS are sweating as they ponder an answer.

If Kamala Harris was president but Bitcoin was $1 million and you were gay, would it still be worth it?

@AaronRDay Next up... breaking of the 21 million cap. The Epstein is Satoshi narrative and doesn't deserve his early wallets is how they will sell it.

BITCOIN JUST CLOSED BELOW THE 2021 ALL-TIME HIGH AND SHATTERED THE 15-YEAR "OLD ATH BECOMES PERMANENT FLOOR" TREND Bitcoin has now closed below the previous cycle's peak of roughly $69,000 from November 2021. This is the first time in its entire 15-year existence that price has dropped back under the prior cycle's all-time high after breaking above it. The pattern that just died is the single most important piece of the Bitcoin maximalist religion. The story everyone was sold is simple: each four-year halving cycle prints a dramatically higher peak, and once price surpasses the old high, that old high turns into an unbreakable floor forever. You never go back. Ever. Look at the evidence they always showed: - 2013 peak around $1,200 → never revisited after the cycle - 2017 peak around $19,800 → never revisited after the cycle - 2021 peak around $69,000 → supposed to be the new sacred baseline that 2025 never touches again That stair-step forever-upward chart was the psychological bedrock. "Number go up forever" wasn't just a meme, it was treated like immutable law because the previous three cycles respected it perfectly. Newcomers were told waiting for a return to old highs is for suckers, that Bitcoin is different, that the exponential growth staircase is permanent. Now the staircase is broken. Price confirmed a close below $69,000. The trend that held for a decade and a half is gone. The "old ATH becomes permanent support" narrative is officially dead. This is why the space is losing its mind. The entire cope structure of Bitcoin maximalism was built on that pattern continuing indefinitely. When it fails, holders are forced to stare at the possibility that this thing might just be another speculative boom-bust asset instead of the flawless digital gold they were promised. The excuses are already pouring in: "institutions are accumulating quietly," "this is the final capitulation," "supercycle still loading," "it's still early." But the chart doesn't care about the narratives. The sacred trendline just got violated, and the disbelief is real.

@AaronRDay Same game, new players.

BTC is now below $72K. I’m not saying it won’t go up again; however, it is at the point where it will require either the force of the state or duping dumb money through investment advisors to make it pump. IMO, the original “Store of Value” narrative was fake - Tether, likely not fully backed and printed out of thin air in 2017 was found to have driven 50%+ of the price appreciation at that time. In other words, store of value was fake. I will give the maxis credit, they are using PACs, lawyers, and financial institutions to try to pump their bags. It isn’t working. The time for transparency is now.

@AaronRDay Front? I am certain there is at least one BOTTOM in the equation.

Think of how evil the investors are if they have to use Jeffrey Epstein who has to use Brock Pierce as a front.

@AaronRDay Next you will be telling me my signed Hunter Biden paintings were a bad investment.

Imagine waking up and being Saifedean 1/ Be Saifedean Ammous, the self-proclaimed Bitcoin authority. 2/ Be vocally pro-Palestine, speaking often about justice and resistance. 3/ Write a book, The Bitcoin Standard, blending Austrian economics with praise for a version of Bitcoin that has been hijacked, without providing evidence or rigorous analysis. 4/ Discover that Bitcoin was hijacked by Jeffrey Epstein, with likely funding ties to the Rothschild family. 5/ Discover that in the process of hijacking Bitcoin and rendering it useless as peer-to-peer digital cash, Epstein and the Rothschilds also funded all three US CBDC pilots, which directly benefit central banks and the Rothschild banking interests. 6/ Realize that you have become one of the biggest unwitting supporters of the Rothschild banking dynasty and Israel, a state established with significant Rothschild involvement.

I’m glad that Roger Ver has been vindicated. Everyone needs to understand this.

@AaronRDay @brucefenton How dare you, @AaronRDay, for years, END The FED, liberty, cyberpunk manifesto fans have told all their friends & family that the latest version of their publicly transparent, immutable ledger coin was the best freedom money can buy (minus some hash wars). Full Bags = Sold Souls

Yes, he funded the hijacking of Bitcoin and then invested $500K in Blockstream through Joi Ito’s venture fund. Tether printed money out of thin air in 2017 to artificially pump the price to backup the hijacked store of value narrative. Bitcoin is now slow, expensive, digital surveillance gold.

Did Epstein influence Bitcoin core development? Short answer: No. This is not how Bitcoin works. Here’s what happened: Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab…who in turn supported MIT Digital Currency Initiative…which in turn funded Bitcoin developers. These devs used to be funded by The Bitcoin Foundation (which I used to run as volunteer Executive Director) there are many devs and no dev or team had power or control over Bitcoin. Under MIT’s patronage the devs had the same deal they had with us at The Bitcoin Foundation: that they could work on the code and not have direction from the org. More importantly — how Bitcoin works is that *even if* a dev was compromised then the nodes and miners would still have to run that code to make it included in Bitcoin. So for example if I had somehow asked the devs paid by Bitcoin Foundation to “add 1000 coins for Bruce” 1) they wouldn’t have done this / it would have been counter to our agreement 2) no miners would run that code & no nodes would recognize it. It would be a laughing stock and completely rejected. Does this mean code dev is not an attack vector? No. It’s still a risk. Particularly with nation state style actors and very careful efforts to co-opt which are much more sophisticated than “give Bruce coins” or something. This is one reason I’m cautious of Bitcoin core funding - especially from actors who’ve had bad judgment in the past. I think we should be cautious of who does the dev and view it as an attack vector. Bitcoin code is transparent and has lots of eyes on it. So in this case especially there isn’t even a solid accusation, let alone evidence that MIT directed nefarious code changes. If that was an allegation the first question should be: well what code specifically did MIT direct and what proof is there and how was it harmful? I think claims around this would collapse. There’s obviously plenty to criticize about Epstein and MIT working with him — and when it comes to digital assets MIT’s work with Gensler and especially its work on CBDCs is much more suspect than the chance that malicious code was pushed through on Bitcoin. Be cautious but this is a nothing burger