David Sloane
4.8K posts

David Sloane
@dsloaned
analyzing DNA at @NucleusGenomics | prev. @cambreanHQ (acq’d)




RTÉ has issued a tender with an estimated value of €30 million for the provision of technical support services for the RTÉ Player rte.ie/news/ireland/2…



End Close builds automatic reconciliation for payments companies, replacing manual ops work with AI agents that automatically investigate and resolve every exception. This team previously reconciled $1,000,000,000,000 at Modern Treasury. Congrats on the launch, @SeanBolton and @DavidNewell95! ycombinator.com/launches/PYm-e…





AI will trigger the next Irish housing collapse 24 months tops.


Introducing ChatGPT Health: openai.com/index/introduc…


Everything levied unto Nucleus by @sichuan_mala is false. Worse than false, it appears to be architected by a competitor that has repeatedly published misstatements and inaccuracies. Sichuan is compromised. But it gets worse. I have been informed that @cremieuxrecueil — race “scientist” in chief — has been paid off by the competitor to promote this nonsense against Nucleus. For the independent scientists repeating this libel, I would encourage you to do more diligence on who you are aligning yourself with. Our scientific team will issue a point by point response. Unfortunately, though, this isn’t about science. It’s a concerted attempt to cancel Nucleus on the backs of our successful campaign and efforts to build + advance the industry, which benefits the very people who are attacking us. To the the mob trying to cancel Nucleus: Keep tweeting. Stay mad. We’ll keep building and serving patients. P.S. We won the injunction. Link below.



David, I am sorry now man, but you guys are doing an absolutely terrible job at responding to this blog post & seem to be missing the point here first of all, it is a huge claim to say that every claim made by @sichuan_mala is false with absolutely zero evidence or explanation. show receipts. second of all, you make the claim that that person is paid off by a competitor of yours, again with zero evidence. thirdly, you make the claim that @cremieuxrecueil is paid off by your competitor. this is totally bogus and not true. but most importantly, you guys have made zero points of substance here rather than just insinuating you guys are leaping ahead and others are jealous (which is what this picture is insinuating). man, you are selling a scientific product and someone has made a scientific critique (in good faith, waiting to be corrected and explicitly saying they will make changes if they are proved wrong) and the best you guys can do is accuse them of being "paid off" and reply with memes -- not a great look Look, I want to see startups with a bold vision succeed, but how you communicate with the broader world is so important, especially with a product like yours & how you guys are carrying on in this is honestly pretty lacklustre




Within- and Between-Family Validation of Nine Polygenic Risk Scores Developed in 1.5 Million Individuals: Implications for IVF, Embryo Selection, and Reduction in Lifetime Disease Risk medrxiv.org/cgi/content/sh… #medRxiv

🔺 The Young Power List Ireland 2025: meet the trailblazing young Irish talents making waves across music, sport, film, fashion and more 🔗 Tap the link to see who made the cut — and tell us what you think #Echobox=1761233104" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">thetimes.com/world/ireland-…





