Rich Davis

@ResisttheMS Why does Newsom lie all the time? Here it's implied. They were done before she ever worked at Fox. They were kaput because he's a liar and cheat.

TUNE IN: Gavin Newsom opens up about his ex-wife. "I've got a marriage that starts to sort of fall apart because my wife at the time, Kimberly… ultimately went to work for Fox News in NY… That was not compatible with being First Lady of San Francisco."

@DavidJHarrisJr I am not. She is bizarre and not very bright. But perhaps she is exactly what her voters wanted.

I'm still baffled how she is an actual sitting Member of Congress. Are you?

@nickgillespie You are smarter than this, Nick. How do you know they are nearly fraud free? Absence of prosecution could be absence of resources or interest. It strains credulity to think that with trillions at stake and fraud so easy that fraudsters wouldn't have figured this out.

And yet, without photo ID, our elections have been remarkably fraud-free. This fixation on a non-problem is weird and wasteful.

@BasedMikeLee @JABWT_Dad So forensically audit at random a statistically large population. Or, pick a couple of groups, like prisoners and infant adoptees later deported, and audit them. You are right we don't know. The lack of data allows Democrats to lie and claim we know it doesn't happen.

How do you react when a Senate Democrat says that noncitizen voting in the U.S. is “very, very, very, very, very, very, very rare”? My reaction in a nutshell: They have NO IDEA how common or rare it is because the status quo makes knowing that impossible

@Timwj2005 @JonathanTurley 100%. Carter wasn't held accountable. He was simply reversed. If this were to happen infrequently and relative to new issues then we might be able to accept his legitimacy as a fair judge. But Turley makes the point this isn't the first time.

@JonathanTurley When judges are wrong on this level, why do we allow them to remain judges. In every other field, this level of incompetence would result in termination of employment. Yet we continue to allow them to wield more power than any other politician or office holder in the country.

Here is my column on how the recent victory for free speech out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. It is a story of how this little first-grade girl schooled her principal and a federal judge on the essence of free speech...jonathanturley.org/2026/03/17/how…

@brithume I think the government should refuse to book rooms in any Hilton property whether corporate owned or affiliate owned. Let the market work!

Hilton will have to do more than this to keep this episode from being a public relations disaster for the company and its brands.

@BeersandBasebal @brithume @johnnydollar Because they carry the Hilton name. So one hotel gets to create a PR disaster for all other independently owned Hilton hotels? That's not very smart.

@brithume @johnnydollar Why though? Are ppl really not aware that these are independently owned?

@alti90 @brithume I don't agree with your claims about Brit Hume, but I do agree that Hilton hotels and it's affiliates should be able to do whatever they want. We should be able to refuse to purchase their services. And the government should be able to do a deep dive on their hiring practices.

@brithume Poor Brit continues to show his Faux News idiocy. They are independently owned. Also, you people on the Right celebrated when a baker refused service to a same sex couple. You also cheered when a city clerk refused a marriage license to a same sex couple.

@authorofmystery @JonathanTurley @MarkRMatthews So you think California should continue to spend wildly, despite outcomes which indicate failure, and that Californians ought to expect the wealthy to pay even more so we can have more free stuff, and this makes you "decent"? In what insane universe does that add up to decent?

@JonathanTurley @MarkRMatthews Jonathan, I’m still trying to figure out #WTF happened to you? 😳 I used to think you were a decent American, though frequently wrong, but I no longer believe that! 🤔 Such a travesty! 🤬

As billionaires flee California to avoid a new wealth tax, jonathanturley.org/2025/12/02/wel…, Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna mocked their departure with "I will miss them very much." Indeed, you will as you shrink your tax base rather than cut a bloated budget. Good luck with that...

@Dave_Willford @washingtonpost It just was. It shouldn't be.

@washingtonpost Assault is not protected.

Breaking news: A jury acquitted a D.C. man who was charged with assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent. The one-sided food fight became a slapstick symbol of resistance to President Trump's" summertime takeover of local law enforcement. wapo.st/4oLmxA1

@kdeeig @Sassafrass_84 @number1hklbry We know this is false since the age of 65 was law for decades, and yet the average age of Americans continued to remain fairly stable. I don't know who created that chart and what population they are looking into, but it isn't the US retiree population as a whole.

@Sassafrass_84 @number1hklbry They want us to die before we can get it. This chart shows life expectancy based on when a person stops working. For every year after 55 you keep working your life expectancy goes down.

Who tf do you think you are Rand? This is our money. You dont get to dictate when we should have it. Upping it to 70? What tf is wrong with you? We deserve to enjoy our retirement. In fact, lower the age requirement to 60. It's our money. If there isn't enough money in Social Security, somebody has been sticking their fingers in the pie.

@Sassafrass_84 It isn't going broke because people are dipping into it. It is going broke because it is a faulty design, and was always unstable. People were never expected to live this long, and politicians increased the benefits.

@LangmanVince Yes. I voted to enforce the laws regarding entry into the US.

Is this what you voted for?

@mcuban It is exactly what was then passed. You are too smart to not comprehend the economic realities of the ACA. All our efforts since 1942, except the HMO Act in 73, have had the economic effect of causing prices to rise. We need radical privatization, not greater regimentation.

The ACA, as passed, is far from what it is today. It was passed to help get coverage for people with pre-existing conditions. Which it has done and done well. 15 years ago it was a question of what was the less bad outcome , letting people who are already sick not have access to care, and costing everyone more. Or Letting the sick people suffer and everyone else pays what they were paying. There is a strong argument for compassion over cash. But. That was 15 yrs ago. Now the insurance companies are vertically integrated and far different. What we see today isn’t because of the ACA. It’s because we let the companies grow into behemoths that have more power over our lives than any other companies. They define the healthcare system. Now it’s time to turn the tables. More than half the customers of health insurance companies are private companies. If you want to protest the cost of healthcare , go to your ceo that signs off on doing business with them , and tell that because of the deal they signed with the big insurers and their PBMs , they are fucking over the country. Most of those CEOs self insure. Tell them to switch to direct contracts , wrap around insurance, smaller PBMs that are transparent and Fee for Service this party administrators Your ceo is as responsible for your skyrocketing healthcare costs as the companies he is buying your insurance from

@its_The_Dr Good. CBS as we know it is a willing partner with progressivism. It should be a willing partner in providing basic facts and holding those in power accountable.

Connie Chung says that she fears CBS News as we know it is coming to an end. What do you think?

@RepJeffries How, Sir, can you be this intellectually inert? If the ACA needs more subsidies to prevent people from feeling the consequences of price spikes due to the ACA itself, then the flaw is in the fascist law itself, not in the fight over subsidies to obscure that flaw.

Can Republicans be trusted to fix the healthcare crisis they have created? Hell No.

@Ronxyz00 Obama was behind the greatest political crime in US history doing exactly what he says we are doing now. He was our worst ever president. The damage he did is pervasive and intensive.

@amyklobuchar The subsidies were intended to be short-lived. If the ACA needs continued subsidies to keep individuals from facing the consequences of rising costs due to the ACA then cut the hundreds of billions you want from something else, or raise taxes. Stop stealing from the future.

If Congressional Republicans refuse to extend the health care tax credits more than 600,000 veterans will see their premiums double and more than 260,000 will be priced out entirely. We can’t let that happen. Those who risked their lives to defend our country deserve better.

@ChrisMurphyCT We lost our Constitution nearly 90 years ago when the USSC said you fools in Congress could spend tax money on anything, including local and state government duties. So take your fears of "democracy" being lost and kindly shove them up your ass.

Let’s open our eyes. This isn’t a functioning democracy any longer when - in the middle of a high stakes funding fight - the President illegally suspends federal projects in states run by Democrats as a way to punish the political opposition.

@SenDuckworth Got it. So you're saying that Democrats enacted a bad law that DRAMATICALLY increased health care expenses for most people. And the only way to pretend they didn't is to borrow money from people not yet born to help cover the damage. Do you even HEAR yourself?

With ACA tax credits, a 60-year-old couple making $85,000 pays ~$7,000 for their annual premium. Without ACA tax credits, the same couple could be forced to pay nearly $30,000. I know Republicans only speak "billionaire"—but middle-class families can't afford this.