Sleemo
14.2K posts




The Covid Inquiry Vaccines report is due 16 April. Tomorrow we’ll start a series of posts exposing our evidence to the Inquiry which they ignored and buried because it was full of inconvenient facts. But first, here’s what one of the Vaccine-Injured groups had to say about CENSORSHIP at the Inquiry’s Public Hearings into the Covid vaccines: - when giving evidence, they were shut down if they started to mention inconvenient facts - they were only allowed to cross-examine Witnesses if the Inquiry pre-approved their questions; many were disallowed. They were not allowed to cross-examine the AstraZeneca witness at all - so-called expert witnesses were allowed to get away with misleading, questionable or downright false claims. - contrary evidence was ignored WATCH vimeo.com/1054744885?fl=… Other short videos here : peoplesvaccineinquiry.co.uk/press-conferen… and here @pvi_2024" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@pvi_2024
The collective conclusion is that the Module 4 Public Hearings were framed to perpetuate the myth that the Covid vaccines were a resounding success. Here are our full Witness Statements to the Inquiry which it ignored and buried : peoplesvaccineinquiry.co.uk/statements/ @covidinquiryuk @mhragovuk @DHSCgovuk @_aussie17 @1MikeFairclough @A1an_M @AaronKheriatyMD @Abridgen @ake2306 @alanvibe @ashTFE @bell00david @beverleyturner @carlheneghan @CarolinePover @CartlandDavid @ChildrensHD @ClareCraigPath @danastingregory @danny__kruger @danwootton @DebiEvansMatron @DocAhmadMalik @JuliaHB1 @Docs4PatientsUK @DrAseemMalhotra @DrBuckland @DrJBhattacharya @DrJohnB2 @Drs4CovidEthics @DrTeckKhong @EpochTimes @EstherMcVey1 @FreeWCH @GarySidley @GBNews @hicksyalex @Honest_Midwife @ianmcdermottLSO @JabinjuriesGL @JAHockett76 @james_freeman__ @jengleruk @JMCDelingpole @JohnBoweActor @Johnincarlisle @lakaruppropet1 @lawrie_dr @LD_Sceptics




Never normalize this as natural.





KMI Panel votes are in. Bournemouth v Man United: ✅ Amad Diallo no penalty decision correct on-field and with VAR. 5:0 no VAR intervention ✅ Other pens Everton v Chelsea: ❌ Chelsea should have got a late on-field pen at Everton, not for VAR 👇 bbc.co.uk/sport/football…


🚨 The Premier League’s Key Match Incidents (KMI) Panel has ruled that both the referee and VAR were correct not to award a penalty to Amad against Bournemouth. #MUFC It was noted that “while Truffert ran a risk, the contact made was not impactful and therefore fell below the high threshold for a foul.” [@DaleJohnsonBBC] Make it make sense! 🤬












