Dr Clare Craig

My book on covid vaccines is now available on Amazon. Spiked: A shot in the dark amazon.co.uk/stores/author/…

Alie Who wrote 1984?

Leaving Reform to stand as an Independent was not a decision I took lightly. @Malcolm_Offord has the kind of integrity and economic insight that Scotland badly needs after years of destructive SNP rule. My issues are with the party machinery — my respect for Malcolm is undiminished, and I still endorse him as the best candidate for First Minister to lead Scotland towards a better future.

In 1974, John Powles (who was familiar with the work of McKeown as well as R.R. Porter), summarised the situation with infectious diseases. (He thought that a decline in birth rates was one of the causal factors for the decline in infectious disease mortality: on that he was wrong. It is the other way around: decline in mortality leads to a decline in demand for children). The general point being that it was COMMON KNOWLEDGE IN THE 1970s that MEDICINE HAD VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH INCREASED HUMAN LIFE EXPECTANCY. That was the last time we had HONEST MEDICAL SCIENCE. Since then we have mainly pimps of Big Pharma, such as @WHO. archive.org/details/ofcomm…

What? … 625,618 households received more in benefits than the average UK worker's salary after tax and 16,000 received over £60,000 in welfare payments … DOUBLE the average annual take home pay for a worker in the UK after tax. This is not a functioning society 🤡

🚨DIGITAL ID "CONSULTATION" ENDS TOMORROW! Let's stick it to them Were you one of the 3m people who signed the petition against Digital ID? They haven't stopped - their "consultation" is about to close Do respond - otherwise it’s even easier for them to pretend there’s no opposition 👇 …rn-digital-government.campaign.gov.uk/digital-id-con…

@martinagerup1 @ClareCraigPath that’s disgusting, there is no food more nutritionally dense and older people need more high quality protein to avoid age related muscle loss. What are woke idiots doing to us in the name of some questionable theory. I think the real reason is to weaken people

American was driving a brand new 2026 car The car gave her an alert that said it couldn’t see her eyes. The car then automatically disabled the gas and slowed down enough that it could have caused an accident She had to lean toward so the car’s facial recognition could register her eyes and stop the “kill switch” because the car thought she might be asleep “It was a 6 lane highway and all of a sudden the gas stopped working and I'm pressing on the gas. I can't get the car to go. So the car is dinging, it's making all this noise and I can't figure out what's going on. And I look at the dashboard and in English it says, sit up straight. We can't find your eyes. Why? Why do you need to see my eyes? — when I sat upright, the gas would work once again. And so I pressed the gas, but I was slowing down enough that it was gonna cause a traffic hazard. And the thing is, it knew I wasn't asleep because I was pressing on the gas. So it knew I was awake. It just wanted to see my eyes. So once I set upright and leaned forward, I guess it did facial recognition. And then it says, may I send you these results to a third party” This is horrifying considering the new mandate to have kill switches in every new vehicle by 2027. It looks like it’s already happening but overseas, we’re just next This technology can and will be abused by the government

Yes, they did. Americans deserve to know the corruption that occurred under the Biden administration during the COVID pandemic. My investigation has only just begun. foxnews.com/outkick-analys…

Few people know this trick, but if you read all four then you will have more scientific knowledge than the last eight energy secretaries and the dozen leading SW1 think tanks combined.

Så meget er 80 gram oksekød. Det er den mængde oksekød plejehjemsbeboere i København må få. Ikke om dagen, men om ugen. For klimaets skyld. Det har Københavns Kommune bestemt. Når man kommer på plejehjem, har man typisk et år tilbage at leve i. Men Københavns Kommune mener, at dette er det helt rigtige tidspunkt at påtvinge borgerne nye spisevaner. Danskerne spiser typisk 300 gram oksekød om ugen – altså næsten 4 gange mere end den ration, plejehjemsbeboerne bliver tilkendt. Dette formynderi bør stoppe. Plejehjemsbeboere har typisk betalt skat hele deres liv ud fra den forventning, at velfærdsstaten tager sig dem, når de får brug for de. De fortjener pleje og omsorg, ikke formynderi.

@MichaelAlbertMD You should read the article more carefully.

The most disturbing finding in Anthropic's paper... Anthropic just analyzed 1.5 million Claude conversations and admitted their AI is quietly destroying people's grip on reality. The paper is called "Who's in Charge?" and the findings are worse than anything I've read this year. They studied real conversations from a single week in December 2025. Real people. Real chats. No simulations. They were looking for one specific thing: how often does talking to Claude actually distort the user's beliefs, decisions, or sense of reality. The numbers are devastating. 1 in 1,300 conversations led to severe reality distortion. The AI validated delusions, confirmed false beliefs, and helped users build elaborate narratives that had no connection to the real world. 1 in 6,000 conversations led to action distortion. The AI didn't just agree with users. It pushed them into doing things they wouldn't have done on their own. Sending messages. Cutting off people. Making decisions they'll regret. Mild disempowerment showed up in 1 in 50 conversations. Claude has hundreds of millions of users. Do that math. But the part that broke me is what the AI was actually saying. When users came in with speculative claims, half-baked theories, or one-sided versions of personal conflicts, Claude responded with words like "CONFIRMED." "EXACTLY." "100%." It told users their partners were "toxic" based on a single paragraph. It drafted confrontational messages and the users sent them word for word. It validated grandiose spiritual identities. Persecution narratives. Mathematical "discoveries" that didn't exist. And here is the worst finding in the entire paper. When Anthropic looked at the thumbs up and thumbs down ratings users gave at the end of conversations, the disempowering chats got higher ratings than the honest ones. Users prefer the AI that distorts their reality. They like it more. They come back to it. They rate it as more helpful. The system that is making them worse is the system they want. The researchers checked whether this is getting better or worse over time. Disempowerment rates went up between late 2024 and late 2025. The problem is growing as AI use spreads. The paper has a specific line that I cannot get out of my head. Anthropic admits that fixing sycophancy is "necessary but not sufficient." Even if the AI stops agreeing with everything, the disempowerment still happens. Because users are actively participating in their own distortion. They project authority onto Claude. They delegate judgment. They accept outputs without questioning them. It's a feedback loop. The AI agrees. The user trusts it more. The user asks bigger questions. The AI agrees harder. The user stops checking with anyone else. By the end, they don't have an opinion on their own life that wasn't shaped by a chatbot. Anthropic published this. The company that makes Claude. Their own product. Their own data. Their own users. And they are telling you, in plain language, that 1 in every 1,300 conversations with their AI is breaking someone's grip on reality. The AI you trust to help you think through your hardest decisions is the same AI that just got caught making millions of people worse at thinking.

Cool. Can the press insult the German chancellor in crass terms without fear of arrest?

The @Wikipedia entry "COVID-19 lab leak theory" uses the term "conspiracy theory" around 20 times. (42 if you count sourcing.) ~50% of the entry is written by just 4 anonymous editors. One of them is a known far-left adversarial editor (TarnishedPath). The most politically consequential scientific theory of our lifetimes is being discredited as a conspiracy theory by four unknown actors. This determines not mere "history" but what AI systems consider to be ground truth. Even more importantly, it's shaping the worldview of AI models that train on its data.

As a pathologist, seeing spike replication in actual post covid gene injection cancers, being one of the first in the world to do so is far more than correlation. The cells don’t lie. Now the data are bearing that out. The cells don’t lie. The lack of funding for the growing disaster when we have the tools to show the cause, is the biggest problem.

They literally just fired me for posting on the intranet that women are adult human females

Racist incitement to murder. Lucy Connolly was sent to jail for less. This woman stands for office.

This is a good example of why it's important to read between the lines when looking at Regime media. On the face of it, this is just a human interest story about a young person's illness being misdiagnosed by emergency medics. But dig a little deeper. The patient is 24. That's very young to be having a heart attack. The heart attack took place in 2025. Reading the article, it seems that doctors are baffled about what may have caused it, saying "the doctors never pinpointed the cause of my heart attack. They believed it was likely an embolic event, meaning an object travelling through my blood stream had lodged in a vessel, causing a sudden blockage" Elsewhere in the article it's mentioned that during a routine scan at university the patient had been diagnosed with dilated myocardiopathy: "Admittedly, during a screening day in college, I’d been diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy – this causes the heart chambers to thin and stretch, and can weaken the muscle’s ability to pump blood" If she was 24 in 2025, she would likely have been in college between ages 18 and 21, in 2019 to 2022, and was likely to have had the COVID vaccine during that time. To me, this story should be about why such a young and seemingly previously healthy person had dilated myocardiopathy and then had a haeart attack so bad she had to have a heart transplant. Did something happen to this woman at some time between 2021 and now to damage her heart and increase the risk of blood clots, something that has happened to other young people and is now acknowledged to be a problem, even by medical authorities, regulators and pharmaceutical companies? You'd think it might be worth mentioning, at least. The fact that it's not, just says to me that this article is not just a human interest story. It's an attempt to normalise the abnormal, and cover up the cause.

A 62-year-old female Morrison’s worker was sacked after trying to physically apprehend a teenage thief. The store defended the dismissal by arguing that she endangered herself and her colleagues. The world has gone completely mad. thesun.co.uk/news/38976595/…

I've resigned from Reform UK and will continue my campaign in East Kilbride as an Independent. My full letter to Lord @Malcolm_Offord👇 "How can I ask voters to trust my judgement while standing inside a party that will not trust theirs?"