Dan Wilson

1.6K posts

Dan Wilson

Dan Wilson

@theP3Leader

Retired Soldier. Firmly Independent. Still a believer in the oath I took to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

San Diego, CA 가입일 Mart 2010
440 팔로잉256 팔로워
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@SaltWater651 @SecArmy @infantrydort Thanks for your reasoned response, Mark, and for your service to our nation. I still feel strongly that our military must remain apolitical and think we have to call out anyone who encourages more division.
English
7
0
5
298
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@theP3Leader @SecArmy I didn't know the politics of those I served with because we didn't discuss it, it was the mission that mattered. That said the world has changed since then, nothing is apolitical any longer, and @infantrydort is not wrong.
English
1
0
18
341
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
This is an active duty military officer working in the Pentagon pushing hate against “leftists”, i.e., Democrats. The Army I served in had Soldiers of every political persuasion and no one cared. I thought we’re supposed to be apolitical. @SecArmy, you’re okay with this?
InfantryDort@infantrydort

There is no such thing as coexistence in a scenario where people want to murder you. The side that is the least tolerant of the other, wins. Every time. Intolerance is the mindset of the victor. Therefore the leftist ideologue will win in this scenario, barring some renewed resolve. You see the signs every day. >Their “politicians” dog whistle for murder and jail >Their “media” dog whistles for murder and jail >Their “protestors” will scream DEATH TO TYRANTS at you while you’re fleeing an active assassination attempt against you You forget, we all seem to forget, that THIS ideology during the Spanish Civil War in 1936, caused people to dig up the bodies of dead nuns for very public desecration. You can’t comprehend the level of hate that it takes to do something like that. None of us can. But they can. So they will win, because we tolerate it. And tolerance is a poisonous virtue when intolerance is pointing a gun at your head. Tolerance is a noble thing among the civilized. Against the butcher, it is only a prettier name for death. When violence enters the room, tolerance becomes surrender. We get what we tolerate. And we tolerate everything.

English
213
12
157
46.7K
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@infantrydort As an O who surely understands MDMP, and also as someone who undoubtedly is hoping to leverage his current job into a BN CMD, let’s run a drill, shall we? Your CDR’s Intent started with, “There is no such thing as coexistence”. Let’s hear your key tasks and desired end state.
English
0
0
4
34
InfantryDort
InfantryDort@infantrydort·
Yea guys idk what to tell you. But I’m taking sides here. I don’t like when people I care about and/or admire are hunted down by ideologically driven murderers. So yes, I’m going to come out against that. Emphatically. This shouldn’t be controversial but apparently it is.
GIF
InfantryDort@infantrydort

There is no such thing as coexistence in a scenario where people want to murder you. The side that is the least tolerant of the other, wins. Every time. Intolerance is the mindset of the victor. Therefore the leftist ideologue will win in this scenario, barring some renewed resolve. You see the signs every day. >Their “politicians” dog whistle for murder and jail >Their “media” dog whistles for murder and jail >Their “protestors” will scream DEATH TO TYRANTS at you while you’re fleeing an active assassination attempt against you You forget, we all seem to forget, that THIS ideology during the Spanish Civil War in 1936, caused people to dig up the bodies of dead nuns for very public desecration. You can’t comprehend the level of hate that it takes to do something like that. None of us can. But they can. So they will win, because we tolerate it. And tolerance is a poisonous virtue when intolerance is pointing a gun at your head. Tolerance is a noble thing among the civilized. Against the butcher, it is only a prettier name for death. When violence enters the room, tolerance becomes surrender. We get what we tolerate. And we tolerate everything.

English
31
251
2K
25.5K
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@infantrydort Instead of insults, let’s chat, Adam. You generalized a fairly large percentage of our population (THEIR media, THEIR politicians, remember?) and said some pretty inflammatory things. I think that was wrong. If @SecArmy says otherwise, I’ll stand down. Go ask him. I’ll wait.
English
0
0
2
20
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@realerikjanthes @SecArmy Wow, you’re making this hard. Let me try this one more time and then I’m going to move on with my day. Which conservative Soldiers should I have stood up for?
English
2
0
2
92
Erik J. Anthes 🇺🇸
Erik J. Anthes 🇺🇸@realerikjanthes·
@theP3Leader @SecArmy You're doing that academic thing where you play stupid when you get called out for virtue signaling nonsense. We aren't playing that anymore.
English
1
0
7
98
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@realerikjanthes @SecArmy Wait, who exactly is the coward? I asked you which specific cases I should comment on. That was a question, not a non answer. I’m still here. What are we talking about?
English
3
0
8
308
Erik J. Anthes 🇺🇸
Erik J. Anthes 🇺🇸@realerikjanthes·
@theP3Leader @SecArmy If you don't know what I'm talking about, you're unqualified to be speaking for anyone besides yourself. Literal nothing answer. Coward.
English
4
0
25
290
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@realerikjanthes @SecArmy What conservative Soldiers are we talking about? Happy to share my views on specific cases, and have always prided myself on standing up for Soldiers regardless of the way they vote.
English
3
0
10
637
Erik J. Anthes 🇺🇸
Erik J. Anthes 🇺🇸@realerikjanthes·
@theP3Leader @SecArmy Its weird you didn't step up when the conservative Soldiers were persecuted. Why didn't you stand up for them when they needed this "stoicism" you think you're displaying here? Rings hollow to me.
English
1
0
59
649
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@infantrydort As a 26 Army veteran and one of the 47% (and growing) of Americans who vote as Independents, I can objectively state that you are a traitor to the Constitution you swore an oath to defend, and to the Soldiers of all political persuasions you’re supposed to lead.
English
2
0
11
239
InfantryDort
InfantryDort@infantrydort·
There is no such thing as coexistence in a scenario where people want to murder you. The side that is the least tolerant of the other, wins. Every time. Intolerance is the mindset of the victor. Therefore the leftist ideologue will win in this scenario, barring some renewed resolve. You see the signs every day. >Their “politicians” dog whistle for murder and jail >Their “media” dog whistles for murder and jail >Their “protestors” will scream DEATH TO TYRANTS at you while you’re fleeing an active assassination attempt against you You forget, we all seem to forget, that THIS ideology during the Spanish Civil War in 1936, caused people to dig up the bodies of dead nuns for very public desecration. You can’t comprehend the level of hate that it takes to do something like that. None of us can. But they can. So they will win, because we tolerate it. And tolerance is a poisonous virtue when intolerance is pointing a gun at your head. Tolerance is a noble thing among the civilized. Against the butcher, it is only a prettier name for death. When violence enters the room, tolerance becomes surrender. We get what we tolerate. And we tolerate everything.
ThePersistence@ScottPresler

How do we coexist with people that want to murder us?

English
199
1.3K
4.9K
139.9K
Rapid Response 47
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47·
.@VP: "I think this is a major, historic moment. We're going to extend the ceasefire for three weeks, that’s already in place between Israel and Lebanon. Of course, it would have happened without the President’s direct engagement."
English
98
543
3.6K
155.8K
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@BradDuplessis Amen. In my 22 years of commissioned service, I had one boss that really counseled me. One. That feedback helped me tremendously, and I always tried to give honest developmental feedback to my suborninates at least 2x a year which rarely involved a 4856 unless I saw a problem.
English
0
0
1
43
Brad Duplessis
Brad Duplessis@BradDuplessis·
Too many people don’t know how to write to the board. Many more don’t understand what their rater’s and senior rater’s words mean. Some raters and SRs hide behind this instead of having tough conversations. Leaders are paid to build the next army.
The Buddy CSM@TheBuddyCSM

“Promote ahead of peers” is not the strongest language for an NCOER. “Promote now” or “Already excelling at the level of a [next rank]” is the way to communicate to the board that homeboy/homegirl is a baller.

English
11
1
53
4.1K
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@MourningWife @infantrydort Still waiting for you to say a single coherent statement. But even though I can’t find the relevance, I have to ask if you really think that using ceasefires as way to rearm and reposition is unique to Muslims? You might want to study a little more history…
English
1
0
0
14
MorningSun
MorningSun@MourningWife·
@theP3Leader @infantrydort It appears to be gymnastics by those that have not been paying attention to diplomacy for 45 years. Since the late 20th century I've seen Muslims use ceasefire as a pause to rearm and reposition. Trump has his own primary objectives. Not hard to fathom.
English
1
0
0
21
InfantryDort
InfantryDort@infantrydort·
That’s a lot of words to give credit for the rescue to anyone but the executive. You don’t get to say “this took decades” when it goes right and then pretend no one is responsible when it goes wrong. That’s not how this works. Yeah, the force is built over time. Everyone knows that. SOCOM, CSAR, joint integration. None of that showed up overnight. Thousands of people built it. Fine. But that’s not what wins or loses operations. Because we just watched the same force run Afghanistan. And it didn’t look like some clean, inevitable success story. It collapsed faster than expected. We gave up Bagram early. We waited too long to move on NEO. Everything got funneled into one airfield in a collapsing capital. And 13 Americans died at Abbey Gate. So what changed? Not the force. The decisions. That’s the part people like you seem to blur out because it’s uncomfortable. There’s a difference between having capability and knowing how to use it. You can build the best force on earth and still screw it up if you drag timelines, ignore indicators, restrict options, or wait too long to act. And you can take that same force and succeed when decisions are actually aligned with reality. That difference doesn’t come from “decades.” It comes from leadership. The President sets the boundaries. The Secretary drives how it gets executed. Risk, timing, sequencing, that all lives up at their level. They don’t build the force. But they absolutely decide how it’s used. So you can’t have it both ways Greer. You can’t say “this success belongs to decades of effort” and then turn around and act like “failures just… happen” No. Same force. Different decisions. Different outcomes. That’s the truth. And pretending otherwise isn’t some noble, unifying take, it’s just avoiding who owns the result.
The Operational Alchemist@jameskgreer77

1/11 Thoughts on the successful rescue of the two downed airman in Iran:  First, so incredibly thankful that the mission was accomplished without American loss of life. Second, couldn’t care less about the loss of aircraft on the ground. Military equipment and systems are expected to be lost at some point. But the US military is built around people and saving the lives of the people is worth any amount of equipment.

English
52
359
1.7K
38.4K
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@MourningWife @infantrydort First, no one is saying that Biden is blameless, but your verbal gymnastics to excuse Trump for the ridiculous agreement he made with the Taliban while excluding the Afghan government from the talks are laughable. Next you’re going to tell me it’s all Trump 5D chess…
English
1
0
0
15
MorningSun
MorningSun@MourningWife·
@theP3Leader @infantrydort Trump knew they wouldn't meet the goals or timelines. Having them meant there was some movement forward. Pushing them was the whole point. Biden decided to pull out and blame Trump. There was no draw down. They didn't bring Americans home first. Nope he gave the Taliban a list.
English
2
0
0
20
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@MourningWife @infantrydort I guess “compressed” is a relative term, but I would still argue that in this case the timeline was compressed. But my opinion doesn’t matter. We should ask the Afghan government, who were excluded from both the negotiations and the milestones, what they think.
English
1
0
0
6
MorningSun
MorningSun@MourningWife·
@theP3Leader @infantrydort The plan was never compressed. The plan had a time line and goals but never was set to automatic. (A must be done for B to happen. etc) Biden chose to withdraw w/o using any of the goals being met first. Not even goals set for our own withdrawal were followed.
English
1
0
2
46
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@infantrydort Wow, that’s a big mouthful of false equivalence. Comparing one CSAR operation going after one person to the complex problem of withdrawing from Afghanistan is just dumb. The Bin Laden raid would be a better comparison. Who was “the executive” then?
English
6
1
4
375
Dan Wilson 리트윗함
Brad Duplessis
Brad Duplessis@BradDuplessis·
You may see this false equivalence a lot in the coming days. It’s misleading. The 197 officers were not all GOs/FOs — many were O4/O6 — fired for misconduct ranging from sexual harassment, domestic violence, mishandling $…Hardly the “purge” noted by some. All the services deal with this. When I was at the Army Review Board Agency, the service always had a few dozen officers being considered for separation (administrative or administrative in lieu of court martial) and reduction in grade. Obama did fire several GOs: - McKiernan for being ineffective in Afghanistan. Secretary Gates advised POTUS to get a fresh look in what POTUS called the good war during his ‘08 campaign - Mattis over policy disagreements - McChrystal forced his hand w/the Rolling Stone fiasco - Flynn at DIA Public was aware of reasons for all ⬆️. Same is not true of today. For a department that touts its transparency, there has been nothing of the kind. Further, the secretary’s no more walking on eggshells initiative appears to be in name only. Whether you agree with the Apache flyby incident or not, a SECDEF reaching down to tell a DIV Commander what they can and cannot investigate does not inspire trust or underwrite risk, especially in combat where we expect them to lead while exercising sound judgment and initiative. Hard to square the lethality / warfighter focus with the shit-canning of George, Hodne, Pat Work…
Brad Duplessis tweet media
English
8
58
260
12K
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@DaveIst3D @CallMeCookie I did see how they treated their children, and it was exactly how we treat ours. Loving and caring Could there have been aberrations? Sure, but how many thousands of stories of Americans who have molested their own children or relatives have we seen? No culture is perfect.
English
1
0
0
30
Dave (On-On)
Dave (On-On)@DaveIst3D·
@CallMeCookie I’m sure you saw how they treated women and children? Broad strokes easily encompasses this
English
3
0
5
456
Wombat Medic
Wombat Medic@CallMeCookie·
I did tailgate medicine in Afghanistan. I trained Afghans. I got shot at by Afghans. They exist as the rest of the world does, good folks and bad. To paint the entirety of these people with a broad brush speaks to Dort's incredibly fucked world view and demonstrates why he is riding a desk for the rest of his career.
InfantryDort@infantrydort

Jack you’re not the moral authority on what an Afghan is @McCainJack . You keep highlighting virtuous examples of them. Cool. You’re highlighting Afghan pilots who had higher IQ and can therefore understand terms like honor and right/wrong. I was an advisor to these people. The rank and file. So when I call these people barbarians, I fucking mean it with every fiber of my being. You assume too much. And you’re talking with way too much authority and shaming others for their JUSTIFIED views on these people. You simp for less than 1% of Afghans who are justifiably good people and smart. Then you extrapolate it to include the whole country. I’m here to tell you that you don’t speak for us, especially the average Infantryman who suffered in the dirt and dust with these “people” 12-15 months at a time. Stop belittling others or I’ll happily belittle you.

English
30
20
374
21.5K
Dan Wilson
Dan Wilson@theP3Leader·
@DaveIst3D @CallMeCookie Anyone that says they saw how Afghans treated women is full of shit. I spent two years living among Afghans every day, eating in their compounds and offices, and never once saw a woman. Afghan custom is to keep their women separate from all other men except relatives.
English
0
0
0
24