Mark

29.9K posts

Mark banner
Mark

Mark

@SaltWater651

I'm done talking with morons.

Katılım Temmuz 2022
247 Takip Edilen184 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
You know.. I've really gotten to like "mute".. piss someone off, mute them and they're
GIF
English
0
0
11
280
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@cooneycongress People really need to stop voting soy bois into congress.
English
0
0
0
4
J.P. Cooney
J.P. Cooney@cooneycongress·
I prosecuted the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, and then Donald Trump himself. One week after he took office again, he fired me. Now I’m running for Congress to defend our democracy and restore the rule of law.
English
3.6K
6.5K
21.7K
436.5K
Democrats
Democrats@TheDemocrats·
Shameful
Democrats tweet media
English
208
433
1.2K
23.4K
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@elbh I followed him when he was running because I like adding to "the voice" candidates have. I am still going to wait for evidence.. but he's definitely not who I thought he was.
English
0
0
1
4
Elaine
Elaine@elbh·
I’m pretty sure they share at least *some*!Brain cells. Ha! He’s from my state. Watching him running supported him, but something nagged at me so I didn’t vocally support him. Not in my district so that was easy. But he had what I refer to as the Gaetz vibe..where it just feels like everything comes down to self promotion instead of principle. I had no evidence, nothing tangible…just instinct that said “caution.” And I have to admit I am shocked by how sudden and right that little “feeling” ended up being. It’s not always like that. I’ve been largely wrong on Trump himself. 🤷🏼‍♀️
English
1
0
1
7
Kron
Kron@Kronykal·
Script kiddie has entered a brand new era with AI.
English
24
2
109
2.8K
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@Kronykal @705nce Yes, you have to be very specific.. almost lawyer specific.
English
0
0
0
2
Kron
Kron@Kronykal·
@705nce I’ve found that you have to be very specific with prompts. If you know the direction well enough it will spit out gold. I’ve had good luck with Grok myself. You still hav to massage what it gives you but that’s expected.
English
2
0
3
63
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@elbh I'm wondering if they're related now..
English
1
0
1
6
Elaine
Elaine@elbh·
@SaltWater651 It’s kind a relief to me because if they are that easy to spot, things are easier!
English
1
0
0
6
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@Joeinblack Unfortunately people have lost their funny bone.
English
0
0
0
1
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@Corona3743 Good luck with the revitalization.
English
0
0
0
1
Florida Dad 🇺🇸🐊
Florida Dad 🇺🇸🐊@Corona3743·
From now until Monday morning, I don’t have to think or talk about Megyn Kelly or Iran or Gal Sharpton or any other junk that bully poisons my brain. That’s because today the NCAA March Madness tournament begins. That’s all I care about. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
English
2
1
4
102
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@GovTimWalz He did make an example of you.. He proved that Minneapolis is lost and can never be redeemed.
English
0
0
0
32
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
When @SeansGravy is too scared to debate you and runs to his safe space..
Mark tweet media
English
0
0
0
6
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@elbh I just noticed that this evening and was quite disturbed by it
English
1
0
1
11
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@SeansGravy @Joeinblack Satan is the one who deceives people to believe the lies.. Who is deceiving people Sean? Matthew 7:15
English
1
0
0
6
Peter Schweizer
Peter Schweizer@peterschweizer·
The new head of a major Mexican drug cartel is a U.S. citizen--courtesy of birthright citizenship. Being a U.S. citizen makes it more complicated for law enforcement to target him. wsj.com/world/americas…
English
620
2.4K
4.7K
105.6K
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
@Shadzey1 @Snakeeater36 exactly.. he tried to trade our rights for democrat votes his first term for which I'll never forgive or forget
English
0
0
0
17
Shadz
Shadz@Shadzey1·
@Snakeeater36 I catch hands every time I allude orange man isn’t as about that life as he claimed. Yeah I can agree he ain’t Harris but that doesn’t exempt his whole joint from getting checked when they let some bullshit go
English
11
2
221
1.8K
Sean Gray
Sean Gray@SeansGravy·
@Joeinblack I listened to it. If you cannot see the very intentional framing of us as naive and God weak, you have a plank in your eye padre. Bibi is antichrist, a murderer and a liar. How can you defend him?
English
3
0
1
240
Mark
Mark@SaltWater651·
PASS THE FUCKING ACT
Senator Thom Tillis@SenThomTillis

I am one of the few members of Congress who has actually passed a voter ID law (on a bipartisan basis), which I did as Speaker of the House in North Carolina, and that’s why I proudly co-sponsored the SAVE Act. While I support strengthening mail-in ballot integrity, many states like Utah, Florida, Alaska, and Montana rely on the use of mail-in ballots to conduct their elections, and we should not be completely upending how states already securely conduct their elections. Even if this issue is fixed, the SAVE America Act still will not have the 60 votes required to pass it. While the so-called ‘talking filibuster’ has been floated as an option, there is a reason why previous attempts to utilize it in recent history have failed. A ‘talking filibuster’ would effectively make Chuck Schumer the new Senate Majority Leader, allowing Democrats to block every single Trump judge and executive branch nominee, and allow them to force endless votes on anything they want. Democrats would control the floor of the U.S. Senate until the end of the year. There are only two ways out of a ‘talking filibuster.’ The first is for Democrats to miraculously give up and allow Republicans to pass the bill with a simple majority. That is never going to happen, and anyone who claims it’s even a remote possibility is either completely misinformed or intentionally misleading the American people. The second way is for Republicans to substantially weaken or eliminate the filibuster altogether. I have made it crystal clear that I will never vote to do this. Eliminating the filibuster is a foolish and lazy idea pushed by politicians seeking short-term gain at the expense of causing irreparable long-term harm to our nation. Succeeding in eliminating the filibuster would significantly weaken the minority party, end the need for bipartisan compromise, and allow erratic swings in policy that would transform America for the worse. Those are just the consequences of a best-case outcome. During the last Congress, all of my Democratic colleagues currently serving supported nuking the filibuster to try to pass their own partisan election reform bill. Democrats were dead wrong to try to change the filibuster when they controlled the Senate, and Republicans would be dead wrong to try to change the filibuster now that we control the Senate. The only real path to address the American people’s declining confidence in our elections is for both parties to find common ground on legislation that supports universal adoption of voter ID, proof of citizenship, and other vital election integrity measures.

English
0
0
0
8
Senator Thom Tillis
Senator Thom Tillis@SenThomTillis·
I am one of the few members of Congress who has actually passed a voter ID law (on a bipartisan basis), which I did as Speaker of the House in North Carolina, and that’s why I proudly co-sponsored the SAVE Act. While I support strengthening mail-in ballot integrity, many states like Utah, Florida, Alaska, and Montana rely on the use of mail-in ballots to conduct their elections, and we should not be completely upending how states already securely conduct their elections. Even if this issue is fixed, the SAVE America Act still will not have the 60 votes required to pass it. While the so-called ‘talking filibuster’ has been floated as an option, there is a reason why previous attempts to utilize it in recent history have failed. A ‘talking filibuster’ would effectively make Chuck Schumer the new Senate Majority Leader, allowing Democrats to block every single Trump judge and executive branch nominee, and allow them to force endless votes on anything they want. Democrats would control the floor of the U.S. Senate until the end of the year. There are only two ways out of a ‘talking filibuster.’ The first is for Democrats to miraculously give up and allow Republicans to pass the bill with a simple majority. That is never going to happen, and anyone who claims it’s even a remote possibility is either completely misinformed or intentionally misleading the American people. The second way is for Republicans to substantially weaken or eliminate the filibuster altogether. I have made it crystal clear that I will never vote to do this. Eliminating the filibuster is a foolish and lazy idea pushed by politicians seeking short-term gain at the expense of causing irreparable long-term harm to our nation. Succeeding in eliminating the filibuster would significantly weaken the minority party, end the need for bipartisan compromise, and allow erratic swings in policy that would transform America for the worse. Those are just the consequences of a best-case outcome. During the last Congress, all of my Democratic colleagues currently serving supported nuking the filibuster to try to pass their own partisan election reform bill. Democrats were dead wrong to try to change the filibuster when they controlled the Senate, and Republicans would be dead wrong to try to change the filibuster now that we control the Senate. The only real path to address the American people’s declining confidence in our elections is for both parties to find common ground on legislation that supports universal adoption of voter ID, proof of citizenship, and other vital election integrity measures.
English
1K
58
512
104.6K