0xbbjoker

@MacroCRG up and down

big move coming for BTC… the direction? up source? the quantsack

@FirstSquawk since when is this such a big thing?

AI GUARDRAILS STRIPPED FROM META AND GOOGLE MODELS IN MINUTES - FT

@AskYoshik the point is that you’ll always have a buyer if you have best model

@0xbbjoker What's the point? I'm talking about AI output cost oer million token

The AI pricing war is about to get very ugly for closed-source AI companies. DeepSeek V4 Pro: $0.87 Grok 4.3: $2.50 GLM 1.5: $3.08 Qwen 3.7 Max: $7.50 Opus 4.7: $25 GPT-5.5: $30 And people still think these margins survive long term? Open source models are getting intelligent, cheaper, faster, and enterprises care way more about cost than benchmarks. This is exactly why I keep saying the AI math feels weird. The tech is real. The current economics around it? not so sure.

@MRehan_5 it depends which harness you use but generally opus

As a vibe coder, which AI model u think is most capable of building frontend and backend both ? - Claude opus 4.7 - gpt 5.5 - Gemini 3.5 flash

@MarcusSchuler yea pretty obvious west can’t match this

DeepSeek just made its 75% discount permanent. Output tokens now locked at $0.87/M—34.5x cheaper than GPT-5.5. The gap runs on Huawei chips. Western labs can't match this math without implicator.ai/deepseek-just-…

@usr_bin_roygbiv using droid?

I type /model and stop using claude

@CACandChill both, composer replaced tasks that I give to gpt fast, while planning + review I leave that for gpt xhigh

GPT-5.5 vs Composer 2.5 For coding, reasoning, and vibes. Which one wins for you?

@borker @blader yea pro is absolutely another level especially for planning

@blader Use GPT-5.5 pro here and it will change your life.

protip: adding a adversarial subagent review gate to my plans has been a HUGE unlock to make /goal runs higher quality, and longer running. prompt: "update this plan: before marking a task as done, validate the task with an adversarial subagent review"

@BHolmesDev @mattpocockuk extremely good skill btw try grill-me-with-docs it aligns your language so nicely for gpt.5.5

Claude Opus gets the vibe of what you asked. GPT 5.5 takes exactly what you said at face value, sometimes to a fault. This interpretation of @mattpocockuk's /handoff skill made me chuckle

@eashish93 yea same here, I nuked one of my max plans and bought cursor composer 2.5 is super fast

Every single time gpt 5.5 solve the hard problems in just one pass while opus struggling and ask a lot of questions and even hallucinate a lot. But still I'm subscribed to $100 opus plan and $20 codex plan - just for only reason which is UI. Hope gpt 5.6 solve the frontend UI.

@jnardiello yea my tasks are running so long but still a lot better performance then any other model

Did they nerf gpt-5.5? Seems like so to me. Slow and not particularly smart.

@Tradermayne I hope he is just farming engagement here.

Obscure Shitcoin

@based16z just short so our bag can run higher

Quick update on HYPE: We were initially positioned to reload sub-$17 to get ready for next cycle. But the framework has now materially changed. From a game theory perspective, the magnitude of the upside deviation should ultimately be mirrored by the magnitude of the downside reversion. In other words, the more reflexive and overextended the move becomes on the way up, the higher the probability of a violent overshoot to the downside. Our base case now is that HYPE cannot just revisit the $17-20 range anymore at this stage sadly, it will ultimately overextend well below $10 before establishing a true long-term cycle low. More importantly, the entire structure has now shifted. The $17-20 region is no longer looking like the optimal reload zone for the next expansion phase. Instead, there’s an increasing probability that this range ultimately becomes the distribution ceiling of the next cycle itself. We’ve seen this exact reflexive pattern play out before, EOS during the post-2018 unwind, LINK after its macro euphoric expansion. What once looked like “value accumulation” eventually became lower-high exit liquidity in the following cycle. Very interesting. So essentially, remove your HYPE orders around $17. That level is too obvious now after the expansion, which means you will get front-run by the market before any meaningful reversal materializes. We will keep you posted once HYPE forms a new bottom sub $10 (probably around $7-8) We will find the bottom together, and there should be a nice long to do, until the relief back to $17-20. Not guaranted that HYPE bounces back to $20, but highly highly likely This sould be an easy 2-2.5x at least And with leverage, we could probably pull a 10x Please be patient, we will revert in a few months For now, short only

@Tradermayne this is what you can call slop

All these UFO videos just look like my eye floaters.

Is anyone else keeping a close eye on @NEARProtocol ?

@bubbleboi what a chad

Leopold is a genius and he’s playing us all like fools. He knew his 13-F would be tracked like a hawk and retail would front run it. So what does he do? He sells everything and flips bearish the day he needs to report…. Then he waits for the perfect time. Drop it right before market open and *kaboom* 💥 he orchestrates a market crash in exactly the securities he wants to buy as retail copy trades him. Now he gets to short the market this morning and make a killing and buy back his positions cheaper. It’s. So. Peak.

All you only need is an Auto wallet to access the best stocks in the world no kyc no broker no friction natural language-based execution there's beauty in simplicity

@zerohedge who is right here @loraclexyz or @blknoiz06

CEREBRAS SHARES INDICATED TO OPEN AT $400, IPO PRICE $185

@hooeem how is this better / diff then obisidan wiki?