LIT community member

5.7K posts

LIT community member banner
LIT community member

LIT community member

@0xextractvalue

I own LIT and firmly believe they will retire my bloodline.

Katılım Kasım 2023
7.1K Takip Edilen523 Takipçiler
LIT community member retweetledi
alexander
alexander@wagmiAlexander·
I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist, but the timing of this particular thesis is certainly… interesting.
alexander tweet media
Ansem 🐂🀄️@blknoiz06

bought $PUMP here on the reclaim of old support @ .001675 thesis: making 30-40M a month during bear market for onchain, believe that $SOL will dominate retail activity again this cycle and pump.fun will be most likely beneficiary of this activity if that happens hard for me to believe that they don't see the opportunity in front of them by providing a stimulus package to the trenches w/ the airdrop, especially given historical precedent of how Jito & Jupiter jumpstarted onchain activity in late 2023, if they do airdrop 300M+ then volumes/attention/activity should improve meaningfully regularly competing w/ hyperliquid & polymarket for most profitable crypto protocol also just hard for me to believe that they don't want the token to do well as they own a meaningful amount of it which just started unlocking & their entire business is centered around allowing retail to speculate on tokenization invalidation at lows during unlock selloff around .0014

English
59
45
739
112.1K
Brian Atlas
Brian Atlas@BrianAtlas·
Rest in peace Ellie, she was only 18 :(
Brian Atlas tweet mediaBrian Atlas tweet mediaBrian Atlas tweet mediaBrian Atlas tweet media
English
1.3K
501
23.6K
8.1M
LIT community member
LIT community member@0xextractvalue·
@rektmando Lighter has so much more room to grow. What is it 1/30th the market cap yet pulling 10x it's weight? $lit
English
0
0
2
114
Altcoinist
Altcoinist@Altcoinist·
found the next $wallet
English
30
3
103
15.9K
LIT community member
LIT community member@0xextractvalue·
@Neolawyer1 @AskRobinhood 1. It's a low paid customer service guy. 2. They filter out for projects that use the name and likeness of Robinhood automatically probably.
English
1
0
4
334
alpha
alpha@whisper_alpha·
$Wallet fam 0x0339f5459fc690ac85f1782e15782a151b4a9e1b we have a group chat on X Feel free to join us x.com/i/chat/group_j…
English
5
10
39
2.5K
Rezdu
Rezdu@Rezdu·
@GeckoTerminal $Wallet 0x0339f5459FC690aC85F1782e15782A151b4A9E1b About to run to 10m mc🌕
English
1
1
2
362
LIT community member
LIT community member@0xextractvalue·
@Mark18656269 @thezerokage @whisper_alpha No one knows why exactly RH deployed it. What is verifiable to a near certainty is that they did. $wallet best case is it's actually a Robinhood stealth launch for their ecosystem. Worst case is it's actually a Robinhood stealth launch test coin that will be a huge meme coin.
English
0
0
2
166
Mark
Mark@Mark18656269·
@thezerokage @whisper_alpha Why don’t you analyze why would rh name their token robinhood wallet and make it so obvious for everyone?
English
2
0
0
177
Zero
Zero@thezerokage·
Look at the early price action on $TIBBIR, then compare it to what we’re seeing on $WALLET. At the beginning, $TIBBIR experienced drawdowns of: 84% 60% 83% 77% So far, $WALLET has experienced: 80% 60% We’re currently in the middle of the third major drawdown, which could potentially reach around 80%. The price action is quite similar so far... Let's see how this unfolds
Zero tweet mediaZero tweet media
English
7
11
65
9K
ElonTrades
ElonTrades@ElonTrades·
If what all the on-chain sleuths are saying is correct, $WALLET could pull 50-100x from here.
ElonTrades tweet media
English
54
66
278
59.1K
alpha
alpha@whisper_alpha·
$Wallet 0x0339f5459fc690ac85f1782e15782a151b4a9e1b I made a massive discovery that confirms WALLET is from the Robinhood Team once and for all. im not going to recap all we already discovered but there was a missing piece about the address that was funded on block 34 by what is supposedly a genesis wallet. This same address that funded the $Wallet deployer a few blocks later at block 41. So address 0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649 was funded on block 34 by 0x0829D37dbC25799F7cFf04B5AaCda94e8761a75a i went backwards till block 1 and couldn't find a trace of funding for this last address. I then checked the genesis .json wallets on the robinhood chain website and couldnt find the address in neither. So i went back to the very very beginning of the Robinhood chain deploymennt itself. And what i found is just MASSIVE. The Robinhood Chain Deployer address is 0xc8451c5DE260E7ea1b879e7994967077e71230Ca And this address was 1st funded by 0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649 etherscan.io/tx/0x7982d3d9d… The Robinhood Chain Deployer was funded by the same address that funded our $Wallet Deployer... The vanity address pair wallet funded the Robinhood Chain deployer wallet on Ethereum. So the full picture is now complete: 0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649 │ ─► Funded 0xc8451c5DE260E7... (Robinhood Chain Deployer) │ └─► Deployed the entire Robinhood Chain on Ethereum │ └─► Received ETH from 0x0829D37dbC25799F7cFf04B5AaCda94e8761a75a └─► Funded Paxos Hot Wallet from block 34 └─► Funded $Wallet deployer from block 41 This means 0xF718d37... is a Robinhood core treasury/operations wallet. • Funded the wallet that deployed the entire Robinhood Chain infrastructure on Ethereum • Has a vanity address pair with 0x0829D37... — both generated by the same person/team • Has been sending ETH to Paxos since block 34 This is Robinhood itself. The 0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649 wallet is Robinhood's master operations wallet that funded • Their chain deployment • Their partnership infrastructure with Paxos. • The $Wallet Deployer So now its completely 100% undeniable this is @RobinhoodApp behind all those wallets.
alpha tweet media
alpha@whisper_alpha

$Wallet 0x0339f5459fc690ac85f1782e15782a151b4a9e1b I made another massive discovery... If you still dont believe the funding address of the $Wallet deployer address is not or might not be important Then you are going to like this... So we are digging the robinhood chain... That funding wallet that received funds from block 34 and then fueled the $Wallet Deployer address had a few more transactions (all highly interesting) including one that i will reveal here. It fueled the @Paxos USDG Hot Wallet with ETH... That's a major find. Paxos is one of the most important companies in institutional crypto infrastructure. They are: • Issuer of USDG — the Global Dollar stablecoin used on Robinhood Chain • Custodian for PayPal, Mastercard and other major financial institutions • Regulated trust bank with a national charter $56M hot wallet — this is serious institutional money Here is the Tx robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/tx/0xe6f1ac02d… The fact that this specific hot wallet 0x264bd8291fAE1D75DB2c5F573b07faA6715997B5 was the only recipient of ETH from 0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649 at block 41 is an another indisputable proof that those addresses including the $Wallet deployer address are from the robinhood team themselves and genesis wallets. And follow me because this is where its getting really crazy... The genesis wallet 0x0829D37dbC25799F7cFf04B5AaCda94e8761a75a The wallet that received from genesis 0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649 they share the same middle section dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e8761 with only slight variations at start and end. This is a vanity address pair meaning someone generated these two addresses deliberately to look similar. This is a known technique used by: • Institutional operators who want to visually identify their own wallets • Robinhood's own internal treasury/operations team • A sophisticated entity managing multiple wallets with a vanity generator Those findings are MASSIVE I cant believe we can find it all ourself with a bit of work and we are able to invest in $Wallet at 3M Mc when its most likely going to be trading in the hundreds of millions or even Billions..

English
46
68
275
103.4K
H F K
H F K@hfktrenches·
Am i the only one that thinks ethereum:0x232ce3bd40fcd6f80f3d55a522d03f25df784ee2 goes absolutely ballistic in the next few weeks?
English
10
0
57
2.1K
LIT community member
LIT community member@0xextractvalue·
@amandacassatt @AutismCapital Yes there is always exceptions to the rule. What's the point in pointing that out? It actually does more harm to point it out to the vast majority of people. It's misleading. 20s something breeding makes a better the outcome for kids across a variety of factors.
English
0
0
0
22
Autism Capital 🧩
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapital·
Folks (guys and gals), don't be psyopped by this article. You don't have unlimited time. You need to be moving. Don't put off life. Don't look at Anne Hathaway getting pregnant at 43 and think "Oh, ok I'll be fine." It's a psyop. You'll have massive regret if you squander your youth with hedonism and selfish BS and then try to scramble to have a real life later. Don't be deceived by lies.
Autism Capital 🧩 tweet media
English
557
700
11K
895.6K
amanda.eth
amanda.eth@amandacassatt·
@0xextractvalue @AutismCapital There is huge variance among people in age/vitality. Genetic and lifestyle factors. Plus different priorities in how you want to show up as a parent. No one size fits all, not true even if convenient for X discourse!
English
1
0
1
19
amanda.eth
amanda.eth@amandacassatt·
@AutismCapital Nah, the real psyop is breathlessly demanding that everyone else needs to rush or wait A fertility test can give you a sense of how much time you have. It varies a lot by person. Decide from there whether to try, wait, or explore gamete freezing, surrogacy, adoption 🫶
English
1
0
8
435
sir slurp (hoodie season)
sir slurp (hoodie season)@InspectorSlurp·
@the_boss_crypto some great points made you are right about "inner circle personally deployed" - it's not a fact but a lot is hinting this way. which makes sense if it's an official token because in that case they probably wanted to leave some crumbs for us to find without being legally liable
English
2
0
2
281
sir slurp (hoodie season)
sir slurp (hoodie season)@InspectorSlurp·
$WALLET - everything we know so far no other token sparked as much heated debate over the last days as $wallet that's why I‘ve read all the threads, checked the blockchain, followed the crumbs and spoke to seasoned onchain sleuths so you don't have to this is all we know about $WALLET so far: 1/ the deployer aa33 (0x542718C390Ef1E4bEB46ce2023FfaA627db8aa33) - launched $WALLET on July 10, fee-share only, no team allo - aa33 active ~2yrs; first gas sent June 12 2025 to fresh addr; Vlad tweeted that addr's tx 18 days later for OpenAI stock-token demo - aa33 received funds on RH Chain block 1009 May 15 2026 (pre-public mainnet July 1, no RPC/bridge) -> this indicates early/internal access - aa33 uses Alchemy smart-account stack (RH Chain official infra partner); deployed exactly 1 token ever… which is $wallet - aa33 funded RH docs TSLA test wallet; sent to known Vlad demo wallet pre-leak so far so interesting… but there is more: /2 Robinhood employee ties & the funding paths Richard Reitzfeld - funding path 1: aa33 ← 0x...275d ← 0x...5091 (richiereitz.eth = Richard Reitzfeld, RH Senior iOS Engineer) Seong Lee - funding path 2: aa33 ← c289 ← a405/nomujia (owns seonglee.eth = Seong Seog Lee / @seongboii, RH Head of Product Crypto/Wallet/Onchain) prior link: funded his FriendTech from the same wallet that funded the Vlad test wallet that was used in the video demo - timing: launch same day as crumbs.robinhood.com went live controlled by RH ("we’ve left a trail") 3/ $wallet price coordination yesterday‘s extreme selloff was followed by whale wallet maneuvers that happened in sync and had one purpose - shakeout salad hands and accumulate lower: 0x058f346e53c21e55a6e48893e6af443c45101037 (DeBank: Protocol Definitive / DefinitiveFi) small sell to create panic, then bought back ~4.6M, now ~26M 0x32a1f3b5af48eba238b13be0704e80a14cd10a22 - DCA buys via SigmaSwap (~13+ txs, 0.4-1 ETH each) during dip, now ~7,9M DefinitiveFi clients hold #3 & #4 in $WALLET /4 the fud: there were two main issues that sparked controversy: /4.1 the test demo wallet used by Vlad was later compromised by a mmenomic seed leak and people used this to discredit the whole thesis, BUT: aa33 is not derived from that seed → $WALLET deployer is safe/not compromised by leak; strengthens “Vlad / inner-circle personally deployed” logic. also, all the other traces that to RH employees before the demo wallet got leaked remain true anyway / 4.2 the dexscreener bio had a spelling mistake „robinhodod“ - this is really dumb fud tbh. anybody can update it for a few dollars. irrelevant. TLDR: $WALLET deployer aa33 shows 2yr history with direct and indirect funding ties to RH Senior iOS Eng Richard Reitzfeld & Head of Product Seong Lee (via seonglee.eth + OpenSea NFT/FriendTech links), plus pre-public chain access at very early blick & Vlad demo wallet, the traces are real, despite the demo wallet $wallet is definitely the most exciting crypto hunt in a very long time and could be a megarunner sitting in front of our eyes if the hopium materializes. nothing is confirmed for now, but the blockchain doesn't lie. credit where credit is due make sure to honor the legends that uncovered and shared all the dots for us to connect. these are the real OGs in this case @tradertom1878 @genrih99999 @whisper_alpha @the_boss_crypto @moeno614 @AltcoinMatcha @0xextractvalue @chao_liu_w @ShawnThread @raylin51 @silverennial if you find out more or disagree with anything I wrote here, let's dig into it together - this is supposed to be a big resource for anybody doing their dd
sir slurp (hoodie season) tweet media
English
10
32
94
12.8K
LIT community member retweetledi
我是围棋高手(耐心/alpha)
现在来仔仔细细的说一下为什么 $wallet 是官方部署 首先,这个钱包1为创始人演示地址,他在youtube的演示视频中出现过这个地址 0x42607b2e4fde22e83822d4a86ddac58d847dc289 昨天为什么 $1 从1m爆拉到14m就是因为这个地址在arb链通过跨链操作买入了一笔 $1。 但是这个地址,实际上早就不是创始人掌控,这是钱包助记词must cage satisfy dirt bullet draw away glide since ancient crater hip,任何人都能使用。 并且这个地址昨晚卖出了bsc给他打的代币,甚至还发了一个币,所以说早就不是创始人再用。 然后,为什么他不卖出robinhood链上的币或者发一个币呢,看图二,这个钱包已经被官方拉黑,robinhood链无法进行任何操作,只有其他链能操作 关于 $wallet ,这个代币的部署者钱包0x542718c390ef1e4beb46ce2023ffaa627db8aa33在部署 $wallet 的时候没有买入任何一个代币,所以不存在任何割人的可能性,是单纯用来官方发币测试的,可以认为是创始人钱包或者官方发了一个币。 上述钱包1的资金来源正是 $wallet 部署者钱包,这个钱包并没有任何的私钥助记词泄露。 昨晚本来已经ath到10m,由于 fake $1 被误认为创始人买入,导致了分流,现在只有4.3m,在大家回过神来,理清了整个逻辑后,会有机会冲击ath。
我是围棋高手(耐心/alpha) tweet media我是围棋高手(耐心/alpha) tweet media我是围棋高手(耐心/alpha) tweet media
我是围棋高手(耐心/alpha)@0xweiqigaoshou

明天说一下为什么 $1 是fake, $wallet 是真正real创始人发的,等晚上自然发酵一下

中文
14
10
39
13.1K
LIT community member
LIT community member@0xextractvalue·
@thedude0ne The $wallet deployer sent funds to the compromised Vlad wallet, before the leak. The Wallet deployer was funded by Robinhood employees. Confirmed 2 possibly 3 senior members in it's funding history. It's unlikely that the Wallet deployer was also part of the same seed.
English
0
0
1
36
The Dude
The Dude@thedude0ne·
The wallet 0x42607b2e4fde22e83822d4a86ddac58d847dc289 belongs to Vlad Tenev, CEO and co-founder of Robinhood. He publicly demonstrated it in a live stream and YouTube video where he showed Arbitrum transactions and jokingly mentioned importing wallets on stream. During that same video, the last nine words of the seed phrase were leaked. On July 12, suspicious activity hit the wallet with incoming funds on Arbitrum that were bridged to Robinhood Chain, followed by what looked like meme token purchases. Shortly after, a token was sold for around seventeen thousand dollars, and the proceeds were moved out. The Robinhood Chain sequencer has now blacklisted the address, so no new transactions can go through on that chain, although it may still function elsewhere. Community analysis points to this being a compromise caused by the public seed leak. No official comment has come from Vlad or Robinhood yet. Stay cautious with anything connected to this address, as all details come from public on-chain data. This is all the info I gathered in a short summary. In other words, this wallet belonged to him, but got compromised and is now blacklisted on Robinhood. So essentially, every token sent to this wallet on Robinhood is now burnt 🔥 Most people wanted him to burn tokens and show activity. In the end, the result was similar lol. Let's see how $VLAD and others will perform now. The narrative stays.
English
11
4
20
8.9K
LIT community member
LIT community member@0xextractvalue·
$Wallet deployer sent to the known Vlad wallet before the Vlad wallet was comprised. Why would they blacklist only the Vlad 0x if they knew all accounts from the seed were compromised. Funding links of the $wallet deployed indicate it belongs to a RH employee. Thesis good to go.
English
0
0
0
84
长尼玛
长尼玛@raylin51·
must cage satisfy dirt bullet draw away glide since ancient crater hip 完整的 vlad 测试钱包泄漏的助记词。 从目前来看 $wallet 大概率是没有问题的。0x42607B2E4fde22e83822d4a86ddAc58d847DC289 (后称 0x426)是 vlad 在活动上直播测试泄漏的地址,也就是说这个地址在私钥泄漏前是有他本人掌握,并且已经有一些交易操作(导入时钱包有资金)。 那么逻辑链就变成 0x426 的上游 0x542718C390Ef1E4bEB46ce2023FfaA627db8aa33(后称 0x54) 一定是 vlad 自己。那么 $wallet 又确定是 0x54 部署,只要确定 0x54 没有在这套助记词派生里那么 0x54 大概率不是私钥泄漏,并且由 vlad 亲自部署。 助记词在第一行了,我扫描过 0x54 不在这套助记词了,目前看来可以认为 $wallet 是 vlad 亲自部署。逻辑相比之前更硬,因为 0x426 这个钱包刚刚被确认由 vlad 持有。 P.S. 0x426 被 robinhood sequencer 拉黑了,啥都干不了。别寻思掏池子了
中文
24
9
45
17.4K
𝖉𝖊𝖌𝖊𝖓
𝖉𝖊𝖌𝖊𝖓@ver0x77·
Not touching $ROBIN cause I've been farmed by the dev @AlbertMacGloan on his last coin, just a warning for noobs. 0x742fa2694712b96caa0244ebabff2300955d9d2e
English
7
0
17
6.8K