M SV 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱🇹🇼

1.5K posts

M SV 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱🇹🇼

M SV 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱🇹🇼

@1crzyguyMSV

lover of Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan. FREEDOM!!! And support for those striving for it.

Tennessee, USA Katılım Ekim 2023
322 Takip Edilen211 Takipçiler
Ron Cantor
Ron Cantor@RonSCantor·
Few verses in Paul’s letters get hijacked more often than Romans 9:6: “For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel.” Replacement theologians love this one. To them, it's the smoking gun — proof that Paul quietly redefined “Israel” to mean the Church. The Jewish people, they argue, forfeited their place; the “New Israel” is now anyone who believes in Yeshua, regardless of bloodline. Case closed. The most sophisticated version of the argument comes from N.T. Wright, who has spent thousands of pages — most fully in Paul and the Faithfulness of God — insisting that Paul has “redefined” Israel “around the Messiah.” On Wright’s reading, the true Israel is now the Messianic family of Jew and Gentile together, while ethnic Israel, apart from faith, no longer carries the covenantal weight it once did. Wright resists the label “replacement theology,” and to his credit he is more careful than most. But the destination is functionally the same: Israel as a people, in any meaningful covenantal sense, has been absorbed. It’s a clean argument. It’s also wrong. Let me show you why — and to do that, we just need to do something that’s apparently radical in certain theological circles: read the chapter Paul actually wrote. Start where Paul starts You cannot understand Romans 9:6 without Romans 9:1-5. And what does Paul say there? He tells us he has “great sorrow and unceasing anguish” in his heart. For whom? For his “kinsmen according to the flesh” — Israel. He is so grieved over their unbelief that he says he could wish himself “accursed and cut off from Messiah” for their sake. Then he lists what still belongs to them: “the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the Law, the worship, and the promises… the patriarchs, and from them, according to the flesh, is the Messiah.” Stop and think about that for a second. If Paul believed ethnic Israel had been replaced by the Church: Why is he weeping? Why the anguish? Why list — in the present tense, “to them belong,” not belonged— covenants and promises that supposedly no longer belong to them? You don't grieve over a people God has cast off. You grieve over a people God still loves. WHAT 9:6 ACTUALLY SAYS! Now we are ready for verse 6: “For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel, and not all are children because they are Abraham’s offspring.” Paul is making a distinction within the Jewish people, not replacing them with someone else. He is saying what every Hebrew prophet said before him: physical descent from Abraham does not automatically make you faithful. Throughout the Tanakh (the Hebrew Bible), God always preserved a believing remnant inside the larger nation — Elijah’s seven thousand who had not bowed to Baal, Isaiah’s faithful few. Paul is standing squarely in that prophetic tradition. There is “Israel” — the entire physical nation descended from Jacob. And there is the believing remnant within Israel — Jews who trust the God of their fathers. Both are Israel. The remnant does not replace the rest; it lives inside the rest as a sign of God’s continued faithfulness to His covenant people. In fact, Romans 11 suggests that the faithful remnant intercedes for the unfaithful whole. (see Romans 11:5-6, 16). Now notice what Paul does not say. He does not say, “And so the Gentiles are now the true Israel.” He does not even hint at it here. That reading has to be smuggled into the text from outside, which is why it was over 100 years before anyone began to preach such a thing. PINEAPPLE If I fly to Hawaii, eat a pineapple, and taste flavors I have never experienced in any pineapple anywhere else, I might turn to my wife and say, “I don't think I have ever had pineapple before!” Of course, I have had pineapple. Plenty of times. Nobody listening would accuse me of lying. They would hear the rhetoric. What I am actually saying is: yes, I have had pineapple, but the pineapple here is so much better that it is as if I have never tasted pineapple in my life. That is exactly what Paul is doing in Romans 9:6. He is saying that the truest, deepest, most realized sense of belonging to Israel is having a living relationship with the God of Israel through Yeshua. It is a rhetorical move, not a redefinition. Paul is not erasing ethnic Israel; he is emphasizing what covenantal Israel looks like at its fullest. The trouble is that we tend to flatten the Bible. Taking the biblical narrative literally is good. Treating every single word as literal — and refusing to make room for rhetoric, hyperbole, and literary devices — is not. Everyone uses these tools. Including Yeshua Himself. Do you really think He wants you to poke out your eye? To hate your father and mother? Of course not. That is hyperbole, not instruction. And it is exactly the kind of language Paul is reaching for in Romans 9:6. ROMANS 11 SLAMS THE DOOR If there were any lingering doubt, Paul shuts it down two chapters later: “I ask, then, has God rejected His people? By no means!” (Romans 11:1). And then he says it again, just to make sure no one missed it: “God has not rejected His people whom He foreknew” (11:2). This is two chapters after romans 9:6, so either Paul is contradicting himself or those who are using Romans 9:6 to demonize Israel do not understand Paul. Then comes the olive tree. Gentile believers, Paul says, are wild branches grafted into a cultivated tree whose root is Jewish. The natural branches that were broken off can be — and will be — grafted back in. “And in this way all Israel will be saved” (11:26). That is not replacement. That is not even within shouting distance of replacement. That is restoration. WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT TODAY? This is exactly the point R. Kendall Soulen made so forcefully in The God of Israel and Christian Theology. Soulen showed that even Christian theologies that claim to honor Israel often quietly assume God’s covenant with the Jewish people was merely the prologue to a universal Church that would eventually render it obsolete. He gave that quiet assumption a name — “structural supersessionism” — and argued, rightly, that it cannot survive a serious reading of Paul. The election of Israel, for Soulen, is not a discarded first chapter. It is permanent, irrevocable, and the very framework within which the gospel itself unfolds. Once you see that, the stakes of Romans 9:6 become obvious. If Romans 9:6 means the Church has replaced Israel, then the modern State of Israel is a theological accident. The return of millions of Jews to the land, the rebirth of Hebrew as a living language, the regathering Ezekiel and Isaiah described in detail — all of it would be meaningless, or worse, a deception. Some replacement theologians have actually said exactly that. They interpret the promises of the restoration of Israel, spiritually, so the actual restoration of Israel was just a massive coincidence that God somehow didn’t notice happening. To be clear: this is not about the theology itself being argued. Theologians have wrestled with Romans 9 for two thousand years. That is what theologians do, and there is nothing wrong with the academic debate. What changed after October 7 is that this verse stopped being a seminary discussion point and became a slogan in the mouths of people who do not study Paul, do not love the Bible, and do not care what Soulen or Wright or anyone else thinks. They are quoting Romans 9:6 — six words from a Jewish apostle weeping over his own people — as proof that God has finally rejected the Jews, and that whatever happens to them now is therefore justified. They are not making a theological argument. They are using a Bible verse, out of context, to baptize their antisemitism. And that is exactly why this is so important today. But if Paul means what he says — that God still has a people, that the natural branches will be regrafted, that “all Israel will be saved” — then what we are watching unfold today is precisely what the prophets promised. The Jewish people are returning. The land is bearing fruit. A growing remnant of Israel is recognizing Yeshua as Messiah. The trajectory is unmistakable to anyone willing to see it. Romans 9:6 is not the death certificate of the Jewish people. It is a quiet reminder that even in Israel’s deepest unbelief, God has always preserved a remnant — and through that remnant, He is keeping every single promise He ever made, not the least of which is Romans 11:26, “and in this way all Israel should be saved.” He has not replaced Israel. He is restoring her. —Dr. Ron Cantor Sign up for our emails at roncantor.com, and we will send you a free book on Israel and revival.
Ron Cantor tweet media
English
34
19
66
1.8K
M SV 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱🇹🇼
@Svigel In business, it’s fashionable to bring in a “disrupter” with an MBA to break up the current way of doing things to improve efficiency. Or so goes the theory. I’ve suffered through several rounds of that nonsense in my career. I’ve had to fix their messes more than once.
English
0
0
0
28
Dr. Michael J. Svigel
Theology 101: Too many pastors confuse brutal lambasting with bold leadership.
English
4
3
34
1.8K
yo
yo@gdlikm·
Refusing to encourage or reach out to a 19 year-old girl simply because of her nationality is not exactly the most exemplary behaviour on her part; she may have her reasons, but beyond that, sport brings people together, it does not divide them .
wta@WTA

IT’S MARTA’S MOMENT 🏆💫💃 @marta_kostyuk claims her first WTA 1000 title defeating Andreeva in straights 6-3, 7-5! #MMOPEN

English
1
0
0
51
Susan
Susan@SusanSm69118333·
@TheTennisLetter Love you Mirra, matches such as this will help you grow and keep you reaching for that next goal. Keep your head high and continue working hard for your dream.
English
3
0
1
418
The Tennis Letter
The Tennis Letter@TheTennisLetter·
Mirra 💔💔💔💔💔💔💔
The Tennis Letter tweet media
Español
111
49
1.3K
118.5K
M SV 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱🇹🇼
@wordsofthislife I dunno bout that. I’ve traveled Air Canada and they’ve shown me a Canada I’ve never known (or so they advertise 😄). In all seriousness, I think it’s pretty evident that C is further down the leftist road than the US although we’re working hard to catch up.
English
0
0
1
12
Matt Ferris
Matt Ferris@ferrismattic·
Saw a post from account that started in Jan, 2020. A bit over 212K posts. This is an average of 92 posts a day, nonstop. I don't get it...
English
2
0
5
599
M SV 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱🇹🇼
@Svigel Yes, but the bad new days will give rise to one who can use AI to deceive the world… implying those that have a love of the truth will be in a safe place with their Savior. It’s a trade I’m willing to have.
English
0
0
0
11
Thor Carlskov
Thor Carlskov@ThorCarlskov·
@EnigmaZRU @rshereme Ukraine did not attack Russia. Ukraine did no threaten Russia. On the contrary: Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014 and again in 2022. So yeah, you guys did something wrong.
English
4
0
20
293
Roman Sheremeta 🇺🇸🇺🇦
This is why. When some russian in a hotel asks me why I do not want to talk to him, when some European asks me why I am not "tolerant" – the answer is in this photo. There are thousands of such kids in Ukraine whose parents were killed simply because russians followed their crazy tsar instead of stopping him. The russian army is 2.4 million. Most of them have been to Ukraine. The police is about 1 million. There are also smaller forces – FSB (200 thousand), National Guard (340 thousand) and others. So we are already at more than four million people involved. And then count those who work as subcontractors for the army. Those who work in weapons factories. Count the government and everyone working for it. You get every 10th adult russian working for the war. 30% of russia's budget is spent on it. This is not "Putin's war," this is "every russian's war." So when I meet a russian man in some hotel, I know there is a 10% chance he is directly involved. And the remaining 90% support it – by action or inaction. So how should I treat them? If he wants a conversation, he should start by asking for forgiveness and condemning their army and their regime. In all other cases, I won't even talk to such a person.
Roman Sheremeta 🇺🇸🇺🇦 tweet media
English
978
4.7K
15K
221.1K
Matt Ferris
Matt Ferris@ferrismattic·
I came to Romans 5 this morning, and was once again struck by this. Atonement acquired: “While we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son.” Atonement applied: “Through whom we have now received reconciliation.” Rom 5:10–11.
English
2
1
17
505
M SV 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱🇹🇼
@ferrismattic I agree but am also far removed from YEC. HH had limited toolmaking but was far from IoG material. It isn’t until about 40k ya we see the explosion of creativity that would be a clear indicator. Also, the Persian gulf would be low enough for the GoE to be there.
English
0
0
1
20
Matt Ferris
Matt Ferris@ferrismattic·
In Romans 5, sin and death are realities, they aren't just symbols. So also righteousness and life. These realities are tied to two men: Adam and Christ. IMO, it gets difficult to maintain the theology Paul outlines if Adam is but “Homo heidelbergensis” or the like.
English
1
0
2
257
Dr. Michael J. Svigel
People, just for the record, this is a joke. I’m not really thinking of doing this! :) I’m using truffle oil instead.
Dr. Michael J. Svigel@Svigel

@Grok, how much vegetable oil can I add to my gas tank to supplement gasoline before I completely ruin my engine?

English
5
0
15
1.1K
M SV 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱🇹🇼
@1984_nate Those whose lives are more conformed to Christ leave a positive legacy on the average. Individuals who believe are elect to be glorified. In many (not all or even most) situations there is family opposition to one coming to faith. These are not either/or conditions.
English
0
0
0
11
Nate
Nate@1984_nate·
Can anyone make sense of these two views? One says that God elects families by electing the father (see pasted Tweet in the comments) but another says that Jesus brings a sword and one's enemies would be of his own household. Which is it? Elect families or divided families?
Jon Bowlin@_jonbowlin

@MrTimothyRenfro The only one who can give assurance is the Spirit of Christ. Jesus makes it clear that He came to bring a sword and that one’s enemies would be of his own household. God will do what is just and is free to save whom He wills

English
5
0
9
727
Kate from Kharkiv
Kate from Kharkiv@BohuslavskaKate·
Russian oil burning in Tuapse🔥 Russian oil burning in Perm 🔥 What a day, what a week! 🍻
English
39
204
3.3K
37.3K
REELZ
REELZ@ReelzChannel·
🚨 Deputies in Boone County, Kentucky pursue a suspect accused of abducting a two-month-old baby from Ohio — the chase ends when the vehicle crashes into a church, and the infant is safely recovered. 🙏🚓

 Watch #OPLive every Friday & Saturday at 9ET/6PT on #REELZ and @REELZPlus! #OPNation
English
20
65
551
9K
Nate
Nate@1984_nate·
It’s like faith isn’t ours or something. 🤷‍♂️ Romans 4:9 Is this blessedness only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? We have been saying that Abraham’s faith was credited to him as righteousness. Abrahams faith was his own. Calvinism gets the Bible wrong.
South Tampa@southtampa

@just_keep_read @1984_nate Yes, regeneration precedes faith. If faith preceded regeneration, then it's our work and not God's. The Bible says "many" believe, confess, and repent, but Jesus says "I never knew you."

English
6
1
20
825
Matt Ferris
Matt Ferris@ferrismattic·
“so that the world may believe that you have sent me.” John 17:21 I know the high priestly prayer is a favorite for deterministic viewpoints, but in the fourth gospel belief is the entrance into eternal life, (and world never means “the elect.”)
English
2
0
12
303
Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle
Flying Into Bankruptcy: China’s Airlines Are in Freefall. China’s airlines are bleeding billions despite packed flights. In this video, I reveal the shocking truth behind Air China, China Eastern, and China Southern’s massive losses and why the fuller the flight, the faster they go broke. From collapsing international travel to vicious domestic price wars, these “national champions” are flying straight into financial ruin.
English
53
166
936
677K