P

4.7K posts

P

P

@1ppppppppppppp1

Katılım Nisan 2015
482 Takip Edilen149 Takipçiler
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@TimSweeneyEpic @amasad You cant even publish dating app nowadays clear monopolistic practices
English
0
0
0
12
Tim Sweeney
Tim Sweeney@TimSweeneyEpic·
@amasad Apple needs to stop blocking development tools apps ASAP. This practice is abhorrent to the founding principles of Apple as expressed by Steve Wozniak, in which every Apple ][ computer booted to a programming language prompt and treated using and making software equally.
English
24
4
179
13.1K
Amjad Masad
Amjad Masad@amasad·
After 4 years on the App Store, Apple suddenly blocked our updates but our app continues to organically grow and rose to #1 again!
Amjad Masad tweet media
English
121
62
1.8K
252K
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@heaviestcrown @LayoffAI For me, if I not make it with my own product, am leaving tech and gonna build some „real business”. But as I was coming from poor family so years of work been carefully invested with low risk instruments that paid off. Some of tech bros been total idiots spending more than earn
English
0
0
0
34
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@heaviestcrown @LayoffAI There were never prestige but salaries across the world been fuck-you-money so whatever. Plus in many world places it was one of the few ways to make good $$$ without being born into right family.
English
1
0
0
25
Official Layoff
Official Layoff@LayoffAI·
The tech prestige era is dead. Meta engineers on Blind are posting “we all know we’ll be let go, it’s not if, it’s when.” Silicon Valley is getting more and more toxic each day.
Official Layoff tweet media
Official Layoff@LayoffAI

Meta just showed every CEO in America exactly how to replace their workforce. They laid off 700 people this week. Plan 15,000 more ASAP. Now, leaked internal documents reveal what comes next. Meta now requires 65% of its engineers to write 75% or more of their code using AI by mid-2026. Their Scalable Machine Learning org has a target of 50-80% AI-assisted code. Across Messenger, WhatsApp, and Facebook, 55% of all code changes must be “Agent-Assisted.” 80% of mid-to-senior engineers must adopt AI tools like DevMate and Google Gemini. Starting this year, every Meta employee is graded on “AI-driven impact” in their performance reviews. It is now a core expectation. If you don’t use AI, you don’t advance. Meta is the first major tech company to formally tie promotions to AI adoption. They built an internal game called “Level Up” that rewards employees with badges for hitting AI milestones. They rolled out an “AI Performance Assistant” to help write reviews. They are rebranding engineers as “AI Builders” and reorganizing teams into small “AI-native pods.” Zuckerberg said projects that once required large teams can now be handled by one “very talented” person. Read that again. One person replacing a team. Here’s why this matters beyond Meta. Every CEO in tech watches what Meta does. When Meta cut 11,000 in 2022, the rest of tech followed within months. When Meta tied performance reviews to AI, KPMG did the same thing within weeks. Accenture just told senior staff that AI tool usage will determine who gets promoted to leadership. The playbook is spreading. The pattern is clear. Step one: mandate AI adoption internally. Step two: measure how much output AI handles. Step three: when AI handles 75% of the work, you need 75% fewer people to do it. Step four: cut. Block already did this. Jack Dorsey cut 40% of the company and told shareholders “intelligence tools have changed what it means to build and run a company.” The stock surged 24%. Wall Street doesn’t reward hiring. It rewards headcount reduction. Every earnings call where a CEO says “AI is making us more productive” is a preview of the next layoff announcement. Meta is spending $135 billion on AI this year. They are simultaneously cutting thousands of workers. Those two facts are not in tension. They are the same strategy.

English
56
304
2.5K
290.8K
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@koukikbzh @athcanft Go ahead with mmp, burn some money imo and experiment with different acquisition channel. Then switch to tiktok sdk/firebase/meta sdk if you only gonna target one channel forward
English
0
0
0
23
Corentin
Corentin@koukikbzh·
@1ppppppppppppp1 @athcanft You do the conversion SKAN mapping (0-63) in your code + install the tiktok sdk, its a bit more complicated to setup but it saves a ton. I wanted to do Tenjin too but i calculated it would increase my cost per trial by +10%
English
1
0
1
28
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@koukikbzh @athcanft How do you run tiktok ads without mmp. Thats why i choosed tenjin btw its cheap
English
1
0
0
24
Corentin
Corentin@koukikbzh·
@athcanft I feel like an MMP is useless if you have no more than 2 acquisition canals, i started to implement it but i started configuring SKAN on the client side and its working, convertions are well attributed on tiktok ads. For 0$
English
1
0
1
303
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@seraleev Its much easier to optimise paid ads campaign algos for hard paywall thou
English
0
0
0
48
Viktor Seraleev
Viktor Seraleev@seraleev·
How your resume looks after building apps with a hard paywall
Viktor Seraleev tweet media
English
10
0
71
4.2K
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@nixcraft Great, now replace the hook with digital id public key See where it goes?
English
0
0
0
337
nixCraft 🐧
nixCraft 🐧@nixcraft·
wtf? vfs: require verified birth date for file creation [ Linux kernel patch]. I can't tell if this is real or just 1st April prank because this is how laws are stupid these days.
nixCraft 🐧 tweet media
English
30
27
303
21.2K
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@filippkowalski Other devs would never know about your app unless you achieve success- which is too hard to copycat as keywords would be too difficult to overtake
English
0
0
1
20
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@filippkowalski One reason why build b2c to public if that only targets other developers?? Nonsense other than ego boost
English
1
0
2
165
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@dtk4723 @seraleev It was used before. Apps that used JIT-compiler that allow dynamic/remote code execution been rejected. Only the languages that allowed AOT compilation been safe
English
0
0
1
26
bento
bento@dtk4723·
@seraleev the interesting part is guideline 2.5.2 was always there — apple just never had a reason to enforce it aggressively until vibe coding made it easy to flood the store with template apps. the rule didn't change, the volume did
English
2
1
2
201
Viktor Seraleev
Viktor Seraleev@seraleev·
On one hand, I understand that this is a major hit for companies building apps with vibe coding. They will lose one of their key user acquisition channels. But on the other hand, Apple is reducing the number of repetitive, template-based apps that overload the App Review team. What’s interesting is that Apple didn’t even need to change its guidelines. All vibe-coded apps fall under Guideline 2.5.2 (download, install, or execute code which introduces or changes features or functionality of the app). I expect Apple to keep tightening things. They are clearly focused on higher-quality apps.
Viktor Seraleev@seraleev

Apple just removed another vibe coding app: Anything AI Reason: violation of Guideline 2.5.2 Apps should be self-contained in their bundles, and may not read or write data outside the designated container area, nor may they download, install, or execute code which introduces or changes features or functionality of the app, including other apps.

English
5
2
24
4.5K
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@seraleev .net-mobile is underrated. Just dont do cross platform ui but uikit / android xml directly. Over 10 years battle tested, can use native libs. With LLM its so shiny, you do ios and then vibe claude android as it has enough context to do that well.
English
0
0
0
262
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@seraleev am building a niche fitness app, even with AI it takes days to get GOOD assets (i.e. video how-to perform exercise) Even with AI it takes weeks to build GREAT ux so I want to use it by myself. During building I get something done, try it myself - OK i would not use it - repeat..
English
0
0
0
44
Viktor Seraleev
Viktor Seraleev@seraleev·
It was hard for me to finish my 10 apps challenge. The last one got approved on Dec 31. So when I see «30 apps in 30 days», I already know what’s behind it: chasing numbers, not quality. No insights. No marketing. No future. After the challenge, it’s back to 9–5. A challenge can change your life, but only if you build real products. Otherwise, you’re just wasting your time. P.S. And please, don’t spam App Review with empty apps.
Viktor Seraleev tweet media
English
13
1
47
3.5K
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@RevenueCat But you lose aso, its not worth it
English
0
0
1
12
RevenueCat
RevenueCat@RevenueCat·
Web payments open a new world of opportunities for mobile apps. Lower fees, easier attribution and, of course, faster payouts. Faster payouts = more flexibility to reinvest in growth when things start to take off.
English
685
1.2K
13.3K
152.2M
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@MarcinNajman Niemcom w ~2013 zajelo okolo 4 lata sciagniecie 300 ton zlota. Ciekawe dlaczego hmmm... Przyklady mozna mnozyc
Polski
0
0
0
38
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@MarcinNajman to jest niemozliwe, bo tego zlota tam nie ma :P francja zeby sciagnac 100 ton zlota musiala sprzedac "zloto" w NY i w tym samym czasie kupic (juz prawdziwe) w Europie. Polecam poczytac "teorie" o Fort Knox, skarbcach w NY i ile zajmuje czasu sciagniecie "zlota" z USA
Polski
1
0
3
323
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@aakashgupta Instead of all those privacy consents gdpr etc it would be better if company making >10 mln usd revenue had to disclose how is algorithm optimised (i.e to make more purchases not user leave the app)
English
0
0
0
882
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Tinder’s co-founder admitted the swipe was modeled on B.F. Skinner’s pigeon experiments. Skinner gave pigeons food at random intervals. The pigeons pecked compulsively, believing their behavior caused the reward. Badeen saw that study and built a dating app on it. 1.6 billion swipes per day. 90 minutes of average daily use. Eleven logins. A male match rate of 0.6%, which means one match per 167 swipes. The behavioral loop works exactly as Skinner predicted. Match Group made $3.5 billion last year. Their paying subscribers declined seven quarters in a row while revenue per payer climbed 17%. The people who find someone leave. The people still looking pay more. The product is optimized for the second group. A gala had the opposite incentive. The host’s reputation rose when people connected. The app’s revenue rises when they don’t. We replaced a system designed to bring people together with a system designed to keep them searching.
Cjay@ced_jayy

somehow we lost galas and ended up with dating apps

English
36
299
2.4K
304.6K
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@clawlearnai @andrewxroas as collect data i mean plug in some firebase, collect events, check on which view you get drop-off (you need consent thou..) Maybe you not up-sell value upfront, maybe something not clear or maybe you have no value to offer. Distribution will give you that data
English
0
0
1
22
P
P@1ppppppppppppp1·
@clawlearnai @andrewxroas and most importantly listen to Andrew, forget build in public it has no make sense unless you creating pyramid scheme. You got half of world covered by META and you focus on X nerds selling app to another app builder who sells to another bigger sucker? Just collect data & iterate
English
1
0
1
19
Andrew
Andrew@andrewxroas·
If you want to build a successful app AVOID indie hackers like the plague You might think it's just a group of people building software like you but they literally have the most anti-business mindset possible For starters: - They believe competition = bad - Their ultimate goal is 10k MRR (such low goal) - They think product > distribution - They avoid all forms of paid marketing - They all glaze the same X creators that made them think this "indie hacking" path is feasible You must unfollow all of these people and get them off your timeline otherwise you'll soon adopt their limiting beliefs
English
55
10
385
60.4K