2020 Ventures
1.6K posts


BREAKING: SpaceX is coming to Solana
preSPAX, powered by @joinrepublic, launches April 18 on @Bitget IPO Prime

Bitget@bitget
Introducing IPO Prime, your fastest gateway to global unicorn companies before they hit IPO. preSPAX token sale will be launched at Bitget IPO Prime, powered by @joinrepublic. How to join: 🔹For VIPs: Exclusive airdrops (Apr 13-19) 🔹For all: Launch sale (Apr 18-21) Get in here: bitget.com/activity-hub/s… #BitgetpreSPAX
English

@peterschroederr @USDC Why is USDC total supply declining? Any theories? This from USDC tracker u turned us onto.

English

@FabianoSolana @solana And pre-stocks. $OPENAI $ANTHROPIC $XAI $KALSHI
English


The candy in the consumer vending machine are assets. Desirable assets most people couldn’t easily buy or productively use in past - US dollars, Tesla stock, Open AI equity, digital art, Meme lottery tickets. Stablecoins is first and best example, opening up dollars to the world & enabling better ways to grow and transfer them for everyone. Tokenized stocks are likely next. Everyone will be able to buy Tesla soon. Tokenized private stocks to follow. SpaceX or OpenAI anyone? There are of course a whole range of institutional use cases for smart contracts, but that’s a different vending machine. At root, for the regular Joe, it is about cool assets and ability to enjoy and appreciate them.
English

@KyleSamani @AlanaDLevin And leading public ticker with a car name. BMNR/ETH must be horse & buggy.
English

@AlanaDLevin This was not the life arc I forecasted as a child
English

@matthuang “We’ll start with a permissioned validator”… 1 para later, “As the world adopts crypto, we think there is a risk that they adopt permissioned systems.”
English

On Tempo, permissionlessness, L1 vs L2
Tempo will be a permissionless chain. On day 1, anyone will be able to deploy a token, and anyone will be able to transact on the chain. Some projects think that attracting real-world usage and serious institutions requires giving up on base layer neutrality. We do not think that, and that's not how we're building Tempo.
The plan for Tempo is to have permissionless validation and permissionless smart contract deployment as well as permissionless usage: just like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, etc. We’ll start with a permissioned validator set to get going and decentralize further from there.
We’re building in features to make it easy for entities interacting with the blockchain (like asset issuers, money transmitters, etc.) to comply with their relevant obligations, but the base layer will remain neutral. This is a principle we feel incredibly strongly about (see: paradigm.xyz/2022/09/base-l…).
As many parts of the mainstream world look to adopt crypto, we think there is a risk that they adopt permissioned systems. Our goal with Tempo is to help onboard them onto crypto rails that solve specific payments needs while still being truly permissionless.
—
Why L1 rather than an Ethereum L2?
At Paradigm, we are heavily invested, both intellectually and literally, in the Ethereum ecosystem. We will continue to help it scale, and invest in and support companies building on Ethereum. We are also extremely excited about single-sequencer L2s for many use cases, including trading.
But building a network for global payments will require bringing together thousands of partners that may not trust us, or Stripe, or anyone as a platform. We think a decentralized validator set—for the chain itself—is a necessary requirement for those partners, and to ensure that the chain is unquestionably neutral in the long run.
From an operational perspective, we feel urgency to build for the demand that’s coming and want fewer dependencies, including on the rate of Ethereum L1 progress. With Tempo, we tried to remove all crypto tribalism and alignment games from our thinking and just focus on building the right product for crypto payments.
At a technical level, we are prioritizing attributes like fast finality (L2s are generally only as final as the underlying L1), multiple validators (vs. single sequencer), and custom transaction lanes and gas pricing. Some of these are technically possible for an L2, but could be complex, slow to implement, and/or introduce many external dependencies. Tempo is stablecoin-focused, so interoperability through native issuance is more relevant to us than the native bridge to Ethereum that L2s have.
We aren’t Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Tempo maximalists. We’re maximalists for permissionless crypto. We want Ethereum L1 to scale, and we want L2s to thrive. We love Bitcoin as a monetary asset. We find substance in Solana, Hyperliquid, and many other ecosystems. We want to ensure real-world payment flows happen on crypto rails, and that’s why we’re building Tempo.
English

@StaniKulechov When I hold Aave tokens, am I a shareholder of the revenues it generates at all?
English

@PeterLBrandt Seems inversely correlated but not predictive. At peaks especially, would think BTC market action leads & USDT follows. People sell BTC for USDT.
English

Brilliant. Now we need to see if it is predictive.
𝙲𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚗 𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚜 𝙲𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚝𝚘 🪙@ColinTCrypto
🔵 Watch This Chart Before You Take Profits! Tether Dominance $BTC Top Signal
English

@ColinTCrypto Might be more informative to combine USDT & USDC stablecoin dominance in inverted measure, which would eliminate any possible shifts occurring across the two most dominant stables.
English

@jerallaire Best line of interview: “there have been moments where I want to pull my hair out.”
English

How Circle’s Allaire Kept the Faith $CRCL semafor.com/article/08/15/…
English

Winston Artory Group Enhancing Art Collection Thru Tokenization observer.com/2025/08/winsto…
English

@PeterLBrandt Close! Madison Square Park. Interesting note, the large Elm tree in background is over 200 yrs old & one of only a few east coast Elms that survived Dutch Elm Disease on east coast (due to being protected by buildings around the park).
English















