shawn

10.7K posts

shawn

shawn

@2024apelection

Katılım Kasım 2017
49 Takip Edilen43 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
shawn
shawn@2024apelection·
కూటమి గెలిచినప్పుడు ఇక వాళ్ళు జగన్ స్టార్ట్ చేసినవన్నీ కంప్లీట్ చేసి, క్రెడిట్ అంతా దొబ్బేసి, వాళ్ల మీడియా మానేజ్మెంట్మ తో పెర్మనెంట్ గా గవర్నమెంట్ లో ఉంటారు , లోకేష్ కి ఇలా లైన్ క్లియర్ అని అనుకున్నాం. హమ్మయ్య జగన్ చేసిన దాంట్లో ఒక్కటి కూడా కంటిన్యూ చేయట్లేదు
GIF
తెలుగు
0
0
2
936
shawn
shawn@2024apelection·
@TarakTweetss All these news in last 1 year in south India. North India we need not even mention.
English
0
0
0
203
Tarak Tweets 🚩
Tarak Tweets 🚩@TarakTweetss·
Temple ki Ranivvaru anedi Oka Past lo Mi Thata Muthata la nati kalamlo jarigevi Ippudu ala levu Kadaa Nenu Oka Shedul Caste vadi HINDUVU Vadine Nannu Ippati varaku GUDI Lopalaki Vellaku ani aapaledu Enduku Veltunava ani adagaledu.
KD@karthi_okkadu

Temples loki ranivvaru .. Caste discrimination chupistharu .. Poni vere religion loki convert aithe, ippudu reservation kuda tisesthunaru Em desham raa babu thu 🙏🏻 Malli daniki meeru elevation tweets

Eesti
40
287
1.3K
36.9K
shawn
shawn@2024apelection·
@BapuBommaSpeaks love marriage between brahmin girl and dalit boy will be fully supported by you ah?
English
0
0
0
19
Baapu Bomma
Baapu Bomma@BapuBommaSpeaks·
ఒక పక్క ఈ అరేంజ్డ్ మ్యారేజ్ పోవాలి, ఆడ పిల్లలు వాళ్ల ఇష్టం పడిన వాళ్ళని పెళ్లి చేసుకోవాలి అని మేము పోరాడుతుంటే తల్లిదండ్రుల పొలిటికల్ ఒపీనియన్ కోసం ఆడ పిల్లల పెళ్లి చేయాలా? దానికి ఆడపిల్ల యిష్టం అక్కర్లేదా? తు ఏం బతుకులు ? కుక్క బతుకుతోంది నువు బతుకుతున్నావు. ఆడపిల్లలు అంటే ఆటబొమ్మలు అనుకున్నావ పిచ్చ కుక్క.
Pratyusha@PratyushaOBC

@peacefulll_soul హిందూ దళితుల మీద నీ ప్రేమను చూస్తుంటే కంట నీరు ఆగటం లేదు బాపన ఆంటీ. నీ కూతురికి దళిత కుర్రాడితో పెళ్ళి చేసి, వారి పట్ల నీ ప్రేమ నిజమేనని, నక్కజిత్తుల నాటకం కాదని నిరూపించు ఆంటీ. 🥹

తెలుగు
7
15
103
9K
Damn.
Damn.@Theonenameddamn·
Brahmins are the most hated caste for no reason at all. Period.
English
320
186
1.2K
101K
shawn
shawn@2024apelection·
@KCRBRS @Icarus_punk21 so christians shoudl be treated as no caste ? in india all people are assigned caste irrespective of religion . in this caste rhey are assigned BC
English
0
0
0
2
Korutla Chaitanya 🇮🇳 🚩
ఆ వంకతోనే గదా మతం మార్చుకొని వెళ్ళిపోయింది, మళ్ళీ మా హిందూ కుల సర్టిఫికెట్లు ఎందుకురా @Icarus_punk21 ఎర్రి🌸!!
Punk@Icarus_punk21

@KCRBRS Undhi. Caste discrimination chestundi hindus ey.

తెలుగు
1
7
51
649
shawn
shawn@2024apelection·
@YugiBandreddy @pvssarma talk to real people. instead of drawing logic from theories, like SC judges. The Karemchedu massacre victims (caste based atrocity) are mostly Chrsitian converts. Recent funeral procession denies in East govt also Chrsitian convert.
English
0
0
0
11
Yugandhar Bandreddy
Yugandhar Bandreddy@YugiBandreddy·
@pvssarma How can you claim oppression in Hindu based system then change religion and keep being oppressed.
English
1
0
6
830
PVS Sarma - పి వి ఎస్ శర్మ - પી વી એસ શર્મા
Reservations as per constitution is based on castes. Not religions. Though Supreme Court upheld Telangana HC decision but the decision is fundamentally flawed. This is to keep away some of the Scheduled Castes from Hindu dharma. A person cannot choose his caste. It’s not by choice. Constitution gives freedom to practice any religion.
English
25
26
114
6.7K
shawn
shawn@2024apelection·
@DesiKing_ so you want to merge pakustan bangladesh and afganistan to india now?
English
0
0
0
65
Telangana Maata
Telangana Maata@TelanganaMaata·
Suspended IPS officer PV Sunil Kumar TC says he is BC-C (Christian). How did he become SC in UPSC exam? Who issued SC certificate to him? Is this fraud on constitution of India? @DoPTGoI must investigate the matter. Let truth come out! @KRaghuRaju
Telangana Maata tweet mediaTelangana Maata tweet media
English
21
568
1K
13.9K
shawn
shawn@2024apelection·
@Profdilipmandal @RahulGandhi is you are saying SC converts to christianity should change the caste, by what logic do you support SC status to buddhists? there id no caste in buddhism as well
English
0
0
0
111
Dilip Mandal
Dilip Mandal@Profdilipmandal·
Congress is committing harakiri. This is nothing but political suicide, a death wish. Dalits will punish the congress for this treachery. This is peak minority appeasement. @RahulGandhi
Randeep Singh Surjewala@rssurjewala

Yesterday’s Supreme Court judgement on denying ‘SC Status’ to Christians, Muslims and other minorities has caused deep consternation, disquiet and fear amongst the poor in minority communities. The determination of ‘Status as SCs’ (even as Backward Classes) on conversion has been a sensitive issue impacting large number of poor, underprivileged and those seeking to end the societal prejudice. The issue can not be examined or opined upon on simpliciter interpretation of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. Certain Fundamental issues must be addressed and answered -: 1. The issue of grant of/continuing ‘Status of SC’ on conversion is pending before a 3 Judges Bench of Supreme Court since 21/1/2011. (Centre, Public Interest Litigation V/S Union of India, Write Petition 180 of 2004) Then, how can a 2 Judges Bench of Supreme Court decide the issue, without reference to larger bench? 2. Why did the Modi Govt not bring this to the notice of the Supreme Court Bench regarding issue being under adjudication before a 3 Judges bench? Was it done deliberately by the Government? Why did Modi Govt not apprise the Supreme Court that the Supreme Court has framed specific issue of examining SC Status for converts on 21/1/2011? (See the Court Order below) Why did the Modi Govt not inform the Supreme Court that under directions of the Court, a Commission headed by Former Chief Justice of India, J. Balakrishnan has been constituted in the Year 2022 to examine this very issue and the Commission is yet to submit its report ? Then, how can the issue be pre-decided ? Is this not sheer dishonesty and deliberate misleading of Court by the Government? 3. Is it correct to say (as is being said by some in Govt) that the case in Supreme Court related to applicability of SC Prevention of Atrocities Act and not reservation? Such an argument is dishonest, bordering on stupidity. Can a person be Scheduled Caste for purposes of ‘reservation’ and a ‘non Scheduled Caste’ for purposes of SC Atrocities Act? Will this compartmentalisation sustain? 4. Does the prejudice of BJP Govt emanate out of its stated political position of denying benefits of all reservation to minorities ? 5. Is the prejudice of Modi Govt guided by the previous conduct of BJP, when it bitterly opposed in the Parliament in the year 1996 a move to include convert Christian Scheduled Castes in the category of SC’s or when it rejected J. Ranganath Misra’s report in the Year 2022, which had recommended SC benefits for Christian and Muslim SC’s too ? 6. Once those Hindus, who converted to Sikhism or Buddhism continue to be recognised as SC’s, a simple question then arises if it is fair to deny equal treatment to Christians or other Minorities? 7. Is the ‘determinant’ of ‘social & cultural backwardness’ “religion” or something more in order to qualify for the protection under Articles 15 & 16 of the Constitution ? Does ‘conversion’ alone take away all the symptoms of ‘generational social stigma & prejudice’ associated with being a Scheduled Caste ? In effect and reality, Is there no disadvantage or stigma or prejudice or inequality suffered in practice by those poor and disadvantaged SC’s, who converted to Christianity or Islam or other faiths ? Are these the tests that should be examined, considered and determined (both based on empirical data and Constitutional touchstone) before denying the benefits to convert SC’s ? 8. Is this a prelude to denying all reservation benefits (as SC or BC) to the Minorities in the country? THE PRIME MINISTER & THE GOVT MUST COME FORWARD AND ANSWER !

English
8
66
158
6K
shawn retweetledi
Randeep Singh Surjewala
Randeep Singh Surjewala@rssurjewala·
Yesterday’s Supreme Court judgement on denying ‘SC Status’ to Christians, Muslims and other minorities has caused deep consternation, disquiet and fear amongst the poor in minority communities. The determination of ‘Status as SCs’ (even as Backward Classes) on conversion has been a sensitive issue impacting large number of poor, underprivileged and those seeking to end the societal prejudice. The issue can not be examined or opined upon on simpliciter interpretation of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. Certain Fundamental issues must be addressed and answered -: 1. The issue of grant of/continuing ‘Status of SC’ on conversion is pending before a 3 Judges Bench of Supreme Court since 21/1/2011. (Centre, Public Interest Litigation V/S Union of India, Write Petition 180 of 2004) Then, how can a 2 Judges Bench of Supreme Court decide the issue, without reference to larger bench? 2. Why did the Modi Govt not bring this to the notice of the Supreme Court Bench regarding issue being under adjudication before a 3 Judges bench? Was it done deliberately by the Government? Why did Modi Govt not apprise the Supreme Court that the Supreme Court has framed specific issue of examining SC Status for converts on 21/1/2011? (See the Court Order below) Why did the Modi Govt not inform the Supreme Court that under directions of the Court, a Commission headed by Former Chief Justice of India, J. Balakrishnan has been constituted in the Year 2022 to examine this very issue and the Commission is yet to submit its report ? Then, how can the issue be pre-decided ? Is this not sheer dishonesty and deliberate misleading of Court by the Government? 3. Is it correct to say (as is being said by some in Govt) that the case in Supreme Court related to applicability of SC Prevention of Atrocities Act and not reservation? Such an argument is dishonest, bordering on stupidity. Can a person be Scheduled Caste for purposes of ‘reservation’ and a ‘non Scheduled Caste’ for purposes of SC Atrocities Act? Will this compartmentalisation sustain? 4. Does the prejudice of BJP Govt emanate out of its stated political position of denying benefits of all reservation to minorities ? 5. Is the prejudice of Modi Govt guided by the previous conduct of BJP, when it bitterly opposed in the Parliament in the year 1996 a move to include convert Christian Scheduled Castes in the category of SC’s or when it rejected J. Ranganath Misra’s report in the Year 2022, which had recommended SC benefits for Christian and Muslim SC’s too ? 6. Once those Hindus, who converted to Sikhism or Buddhism continue to be recognised as SC’s, a simple question then arises if it is fair to deny equal treatment to Christians or other Minorities? 7. Is the ‘determinant’ of ‘social & cultural backwardness’ “religion” or something more in order to qualify for the protection under Articles 15 & 16 of the Constitution ? Does ‘conversion’ alone take away all the symptoms of ‘generational social stigma & prejudice’ associated with being a Scheduled Caste ? In effect and reality, Is there no disadvantage or stigma or prejudice or inequality suffered in practice by those poor and disadvantaged SC’s, who converted to Christianity or Islam or other faiths ? Are these the tests that should be examined, considered and determined (both based on empirical data and Constitutional touchstone) before denying the benefits to convert SC’s ? 8. Is this a prelude to denying all reservation benefits (as SC or BC) to the Minorities in the country? THE PRIME MINISTER & THE GOVT MUST COME FORWARD AND ANSWER !
Randeep Singh Surjewala tweet mediaRandeep Singh Surjewala tweet mediaRandeep Singh Surjewala tweet media
English
25
74
149
27.4K
shawn
shawn@2024apelection·
@manonmission257 @BeastOfYSRCP @ncbn if you think promising SC status to dalit christians is vote grabber, then you are wrong. on ground no SC cares about this
English
0
0
0
3
𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐓 𝕩
𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐓 𝕩@BeastOfYSRCP·
చంద్రబాబుకు సుప్రీమ్ కోర్టు షాక్! క్రైస్తవ మతంలోకి మారితే ఎస్సీ హోదా రద్దు అని క్లారిటీ! హిందూ, సిక్కు, బౌద్ధులకు మాత్రమే రిజర్వేషన్లు వర్తిస్తాయని తేల్చింది. ఇక ఎన్నికల సమయంలో @ncbn “క్రిస్టియన్లకు ఎస్సీ హోదా ఇస్తాం” అన్న హామీ ఏంటి? 🤔
తెలుగు
10
223
809
34.1K
shawn retweetledi
COMMON MAN
COMMON MAN@nazir28·
SC లకు మాత్రమే ఉండాలా? మిగతా కుల ప్రస్తావనలు, కుల భావనలు వీటి మీదే నడిచే రాజకీయ పార్టీలు వనభోజనాలు, సంఘాలు ఉన్నంత వరకు ఈ జాడ్యం ఎక్కడికీ పోదు... ఏదో కోర్టుల్లో కూడా ఎవరికి తోచిన తీరున వారు తీర్పులు ఇవ్వడాలు అది చట్టం అయి కూర్చోవడాలు పైకి కనపడే అంత సాదా సీదాగా జరగవు మాస్టారు... ఈ దేశం ఒక ప్రణాళిక ప్రకారం ముందుకు పోతోంది... ఎవరూ ఏమీ చెయ్యలేము... మేరా భారత్ మహాన్! అని బిగ్గరగా అరచి నిట్టూర్చడమే తప్ప అణగారిన వర్గాలకు మరో దారి లేదు... జై శ్రీరామ్! జై భీమ్!! జై Judiciary!!! జై జై జ్ఞానేశ్ జీ🙏🏻
Venkat - Vizag@DEndOfBeginning

@aikyathavijay So ipudu dhalapathi garu supreme court neee prasnisthunaru .. desam bagupadakudadhu .. kulalu mathalu udayam lechina degara nunchi iveeee ... Siggu undali ..

తెలుగు
0
3
16
748
shawn
shawn@2024apelection·
@deadpool4andhra not they abuse as both dalit and and rice bag, gorre etc without consequences.
English
1
0
4
171
deadpool
deadpool@deadpool4andhra·
Epఅంత తగిలారు ఈరోజు నాకు🥲ఎంత ఏడుపు రా ఒక SC కులం వాళ్ళకి మత స్వేచ్ఛ ఉండాలి అంటే! క్రిస్టియన్ లోకి వెళ్తే ఎస్సీ/ఎస్టీ ఆక్ట్ ఉండదు వీళ్లని కులం పేరుతో తొట్టొచ్చు ఏం పీకలేరు అనే ఒక దుర్బుద్ధి తో మత స్వేచ్ఛ రాకూడదు అని చూస్తున్నారు!మతం కాదు ఆ స్వేచ్ఛ ఇవ్వకపోవడం ఇక్కడ కుల వివక్ష !
తెలుగు
9
15
77
2.1K
shawn
shawn@2024apelection·
@BapuBommaSpeaks first of all no one is calling you guys saar dont elevate your self so much idiots
English
0
0
0
362
Baapu Bomma
Baapu Bomma@BapuBommaSpeaks·
We converted because of caste saar.. we don't want caste saaar.. Okay.. remove your caste.. no no.. we want caste even after conversion saaar..
English
28
879
4.8K
44.2K
Vijayasai Reddy V
Vijayasai Reddy V@VSReddy_MP·
Welcoming the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s ruling that Scheduled Caste status cannot extend to individuals upon conversion to religions other than Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism, as per the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. The Court has reiterated that this bar is absolute. A significant judgment with far-reaching implications. #SupremeCourt #Conversion
English
19
116
844
24.3K