212 ABDEL 🇲🇦

@E8Andrew Everything was great until that maximum loss limit that is set to initial balance Would rather withdraw every two week and have the static max loss than daily payout with that rule

Would you trade this E8Pro accouunt? Static drawdown No consistency rule Daily payouts starting from day 1 Evaluation rules Profit target: 8% Maximum loss: 8% Daily profit cap: 2% Daily loss: 2.5% (hard breach) Simulation-funded phase 8% maximum loss 2% daily profit cap 2.5% daily loss (hard breach) Daily payouts. You can request 50% of your total profits daily. Once you request your first payout, your maximum loss limit is set to $0 (initial balance level). It remains static forever after a payout request. You can choose a payout share of 80% or 100%. $50k account = $198 $100k account = $398 You can milk this account daily. Let me know what you think.

Some traders are unknowingly addicted to the emotional highs and lows of trading. The rush. The excitement. The constant need to be in a trade. But profitable trading usually looks very different: • patience • structure • repetition • emotional control • fewer but higher-quality setups The market does not reward boredom avoidance. It rewards discipline. Be honest with yourself: Are you building consistency… or chasing dopamine? #tradingpsychology #tradingmindset #tradingmentor #sayyes2jess

@ymuazu71 @fttcceo @Maventrading Yes i heard good things But is it true the spreads are not the best?

@fttcceo I've had 6 payouts with @Maventrading . Never delayed nor denied.

Updated my tier list a bit after gathering more info and adding firms I forgot about🤣 FP - mb daddy soon, doing great so far. MFF & MCF - comeback can be strong. GFT, Maven, Lark - the same category. Waiting for the angry DMs to start rolling in.

@E8Andrew @RilindFx @fundingpips Those ratings are combined with ratings of when you used to have static drawdown And nobody is saying that your conditions are bad But trailing drawdown just sucks Most other legit firms have static drawdown and no weird rules. FTMO, or Amy other firm that is good…

@RilindFx @fundingpips Pips are rated 4.3 on PropfirmMatch ratings, we are rated 4.8. That's difference. But still FP is great firm to trade with too.

Yes, we don’t have a static drawdown. That’s why many traders choose other firms that offer a static drawdown. However, there’s always a trade-off. Other firms have to offset the static drawdown with absurd rules, payout delays, unfair bans, and payout denials. That’s just how it is. You won’t find any of that with us, and the fact is that we’re the firm that pays out the largest payouts. I think you can draw your own conclusions from that.

@UsdNeo @SSJTRADES What made you not take the 50 percent of the leg on the left? Just curious how you filtered it out Thanks

@SSJTRADES Yep

$NQ Katana Model Win - 65pts 🔥

@timpjohansson How about people with pre diabetes or issues like that?

fat? eat sugar weak? eat sugar thin hair? eat sugar brain fog? eat sugar low libido? eat sugar can’t sleep? eat sugar high cortisol? eat sugar unmotivated? eat sugar slow recovery? eat sugar no enthusiasm? eat sugar low metabolism? eat sugar eat more sugar separated from fat.

@AndrewTradesNQ @isaacthequach Funding Ticks closed. Their futures prop

@isaacthequach Sorry, I must have mismatched it with other firm

FUNDINGPIPS EXPOSED ! They BANNED Trailing drawdown on 1-Phasw challenges …

@Jbfuturesz @AmasPFT Are you dumb? You can not only see the % increase I’m balance, which would tell you the account started at 100k But you can also see the total Balance, which you can Substract the PnL from to get 100k

@AmasPFT Why you putting the PNL lol like the balance starts from zero

I backtested my unfilled FVG model in 2023: 155 trades 76% win rate 0.8 RR + $267,328 PnL

@GtradeZ325 @HasnaatAk786 @ZamcoCapital @Maventrading Different instrument and different timeframe

@HasnaatAk786 @ZamcoCapital @Maventrading You sent a different instrument dumbass

Spread is a killer

@0xMehdiBKO @jcactrades @Jacobtradesz T’es encore plus bête que lui ou quoi? Décembre est avant Mars pour toi?

@jcactrades @Jacobtradesz Tu as raison, javais pas fait attention à ça 🤣

Picture on the left I was trading ICT Picture on the right my negative RR model

@Don_le_Baron @ItsTraderLuke 4 losses in a row? Most accounts give you a 8 to 10% drawdown

@ItsTraderLuke 4 verluste in serie account weg. Theorie ist nicht praxis, du weisst es schon oder du wirst es noch merken….

A $50,000 funded account is enough to change your life forever. Risk per trade: 1% ($500) R:R ratio: 1:2 Trades per month: 20 Win rate: 45% Do the math: Loss = -$500 Win = +$1,000 Total trades = 20 Wins = 9 (+$9,000) Losses = 11 (-$5,500) Net profit: $9,000 - $5,500 = $3,500 After 20% profit split = $2,800 That’s $2,800 per month From one account. With a 45% win rate. Without needing to be perfect. $2,800 a month is enough for most people to stop surviving and start breathing.

@jcactrades @Jacobtradesz Are you dumb or something? Did your school teach months backwards?

@Jacobtradesz All loss at March 2025 and all those Green Day’s are Dec 2025? so you switched to a losing model?

@TheAlg0mist A little difficult not to let green trades turn red if they only turned green a little after entry But yeah, solid list 👌

I solemnly swear to: 1). Keep shit simple 2). Take 1:1 or negative RR trades 3). Move my stop loss into profit 4). Be totally fine with $200 days 5). Withdraw prop profit when eligible 6). Never let a green trade turn red 7). Learn to read price action /candles 8). Never quit

@A_Chambalean @speedouFx @fundingpips I know I’m saying the email is not from them

@212AEH @speedouFx @fundingpips Bro ,@fundingpips is a legit firn

Ooops Payout rejected 🙅 Have to do again

@TorBox Gamepass is great so not sure what you’re talking about The “Starter” gamepass is not as good as Premium or Ultimate but it’s something

honestly kinda a good addition but then you have to use Xbox game pass

@A_Chambalean @speedouFx @fundingpips Not funding pips

@speedouFx 🥲🥲🥲🥲 Wish you all the best next time But I think @fundingpips never deny payout without reason

@MichaelTradesnq @dnltrader98 @E8Markets It’s a future account

@dnltrader98 @E8Markets CFDs are shit don’t know why people still patronize them.

🚨 PROP FIRM SCAM EXPOSED 🚨 @E8Markets just banned me with the most ridiculous excuse imaginable: “You’re over-risking and allocating a substantial portion of your drawdown to single trade ideas.” And even if I was doing that, so what? I guess you were perfectly happy while I was blowing accounts and you were collecting your fees. But now that you realizes that Im consistently profitable… you pull this shit. This claim is completely false and directly contradicted by the facts. I have been trading the same five accounts consistently since February 26, 2026, and they already paid me OVER $62,000 across 5-6 successful payouts from those exact same accounts. This wasn’t luck — it was pure consistency. If I was really violating their risk rules, it would have been impossible to trade the same accounts for months, pass their consistency requirements, daily loss limits, and qualify for multiple payouts. The $62k they paid me is undeniable proof that I was fully compliant with every single rule. This is the classic predatory prop firm tactic: They collect your evaluation fees, let you win for a while, pay you some money to build trust… and then systematically ban profitable traders the moment the payouts start hurting their bottom line. E8 Futures doesn’t want consistently profitable traders. They want your money and then close your accounts with fabricated excuses. This is exactly what happens when a company has no real program to move profitable traders to live trading. And I have to wonder… do all those cardboard affiliates who promote E8 Futures everywhere also get banned the second they become profitable? Oh wait — what am I even saying? Most of them aren’t profitable to begin with. And the ones who actually are profitable? It doesn’t suit them to expose this scandal anyway, because they make way more money from affiliate commissions than from trading 😂 TRADERS — this is a clear pattern of deceptive practices targeting successful accounts. If you’re actually good and consistently profitable… they will ban you too. Share this far and wide so no more traders fall into this trap.

@JID77888 @andrew_nfx Of course. With a higher win rate, you can risk more per trade. Goes together

@andrew_nfx Lo malo del RR 1:1 es el tiempo que te lleva pasar una evaluación. Cómo lo resuelves ? Aumentando el riesgo quizás ?

People laugh at 1:1 RR until they see the equity curve Consistent. Smooth. Survivable drawdowns Then they ask how I've held millions in prop firm funding without blowing accounts every month Low RR means higher win-rate, lower drawdowns and you keep funded accounts for longer All you need is 1-3% a month to make serious money from prop firms Stop over-complicating it by trying to get 5R and 10R every trade

@Alokfx_77 @andrew_nfx The edge has to hold up no matter the RR. That’s the definition of an edge

@mishra_nik98853 @andrew_nfx 😂😂😂

@andrew_nfx Nobody is profitable from 1:1 market kills such tradees