α1 ✞

@PopPunkOnChain Incredible integrity from the North Korean to be fair

@R89Capital .

$1000

@VentureCoinist @blknoiz06 Chad behaviour

@blknoiz06 a collection of his quote tweets is the most sold & widely distributed book in human history (the bible)

jesus would've been an elite poster

@AvidCommentator NUKE IT, PROPADEE TO ZERO

Nah mate....

@elonmusk Check out the pre ipo price on @HyperliquidX

Pretty good progress

@0xMerp @Hank_xbt Silver mate

ignore 99% of coins, including BTC be long some basket of perp dex/privacy/TCG meta be long computes via equities be long veblen goods that walk the line between functional art/status symbols own land these seem like the only things worth owning

@0xDigitalLaw @LindsayxLin

@LindsayxLin HLs in shambles on X and it’s vile lol

hilarious disconnect b/w CT and CFTC perp guidance CT: "Hyperliquid is LEGAL!!!!" CFTC perp guidance: "Commission Regulation 40.3 affirmative approval is the new standard for perps. Probably not suitable for all asset classes, including equity securities and ag products."

@KyleSamani @defi_monk Try to read and think! (SBF chain investor)

Next level deeper Hyperliquid is just binance 2.0 without a marketing team and has made 1000s of technical decisions that work well in a centralized setting and won’t work at all in a permissionless decentralized one. And now they’re many steps behind And also no real American company will ever work them now Try to read and think!

Anybody with half a brain can understand that competition and regulatory uncertainty are risks. It’s about weighing what happens if those risks are addressed and mitigated.

@frizzaud @based16z Well done mate

@369slim @based16z Was down 600k in January, Finally green.

Guy who loses $400k on a hyperliquid perps account instead of buying the coin

@spongubobuuuu @bubbleboi Jizzat

@bubbleboi If youre white you might not be able to properly comprehend it, its good that you're trying tho

I’ve been reading the Vedas a lot recently, and what’s stood out is how it doubles as an encyclopedia as well as a religious text. Astronomy, medicine, mathematics, metallurgy, linguistics, are all woven through hymns and rituals as one body of knowledge. Simply calling it “religious” forces it into a Western category that didn’t have the apparatus to recognize what it actually was. It’s closer to a tradition of formalized epistemology in which metaphysics, observation, and language form one continuous inquiry, which as a result led Indian civilization to develop along a fundamentally different path because of it. You can see the effect most clearly in the sciences. Around 600 BCE, the Vedic record describes a surgical procedure that matches modern rhinoplasty and is still foundational to reconstructive surgery today. Centuries before Western Europe stopped treating eclipses as supernatural, Indian scholars had calculated the circumference of the earth within 0.2% and explained eclipses as shadows. Centuries before Plato and Aristotle rejected atomism, the Vedic tradition already held that matter is composed of indivisible particles combining into binary and triatomic compounds, transformable by heat. The first formal rules for zero and negative arithmetic appear in the Vedas, along with infinite-series derivations of π, sine, and cosine centuries before Newton and Leibniz. The interesting question is how did they get so much right, so early? My best guess is language. The Vedic tradition is unique compared to other oral traditions as it demanded letter-perfect oral transmission across generations. Around 500 BCE, scholars composed a generative grammar of Sanskrit called Panini so rigorous it anticipates Backus-Naur form, the notation that defines programming languages today, by 2,500 years. Sanskrit is recursive, rule-based, and built to minimize ambiguity. It reads more like mathematics than English. When you think in a language built like that, the precision of the language becomes the precision of your reasoning. The West didn’t formalize this until much later. Kant argued our categories of understanding shape what we can know, Wittgenstein wrote that the limits of language are the limits of one’s world, and Kripke showed that naming doesn’t just describe things, it constitutes what they mean and how we can reason about them. All three touch the same insight which is that thought is downstream of language. The Vedic tradition operated on that insight thousands of years earlier. To the point that they built a whole language first and used it to think clearly about everything else after. I find that all really fascinating.

@CL207 Imagine watching @mk4_lul fat finger the gold short and using that as signal

on hyperliquid - "many institutional clients watch the price discovery over the weekend, whether they admit or not" maybe the retarded opinions we express over the weekends have way more volume than it should get

@BrunoRonam @KookCapitalLLC Yeah ventuals is trash

@KookCapitalLLC “Very safe”

the ice statement on hype pays some respect but the real message they sent is that pre-ipo trading is a risk and they specifically cited spcx + leverage its a sneak diss when spcx ipo happens and it turns out tradexyz had it priced to perfection tradfi scrambles $hype 200+

@citrini Crypto

I really have to get better at buying whatever the President of the United States says to buy.

@based16z @iamgingertrash New Zealand

@iamgingertrash Yes, although I wouldn’t say it’s trendy yet x.com/based16z/statu…

@dschamis @B33Fbanks @solana You should check the on chain unique holder count 👀

Only 400K! @solana has 3.8mm. Shows you how much more room there is to run.

@ThinkingUSD Good ol' wildy

Almost all of the most successful people in the online casino business came from Runescape. Lesson in there.

@based16z @tradexyz 👀

@Silverbark3 Back to 30s soon

$AG - 30 minute. Updated. Flag breakout in my opinion. Next is horizontal about 20.25. should knock it out today. This will gain momentum. Quickly. Not advice.

@GrantCardone @Crypto_McKenna Hyperliquid

I’m selling all my botcoin.

@qhxj28ny94 @Pat_Stedman @AJA_Cortes Are you for real? The west has fallen

@Pat_Stedman @AJA_Cortes Yeah.. when you can point at a feminist boomer liberal as “doing it right” something is definitely wrong.

I know far too many men who'd like to have big families but their women won't have more than 1 kid. Even 2 kids is a big ask, it's "so overwhelming" for them. If they do have a second one they tend to hate their husband for it. Before you ask, it's not really about resources or even help. That would be understandable, and could be reframed as a timing issue. But they usually have help from in-laws or nannies / daycare. It's also not about the man's laziness - these guys are very involved husbands and fathers. It's basically just "too much" for these women emotionally to be moms, period. If they even take the plunge, they tap out at one. We talk a lot on here about men being weak, and how they don't live up to their forefathers' courage. I obviously agree with this. There is a clear effeminacy and hopelessness among your average guy that didn't exist in prior generations. Living in their shadows, we look pathetic. But honestly, the women are in many ways even more embarrassing. Just try putting them up against their grandmothers and great grandmothers. It's humiliating. They have never had it easier... and yet somehow they have never struggled more. In other words, they are weak. I understand the frustration many guys have, because besides sex I don't even know what many of them contribute anymore. Life with these women revolves entirely about their incessant, negative feelings. They are not dependable and can't seem to carry any societal burdens. I hate the gender war slop, and I know all women aren't like this. There are a lot of amazing women and wives out there (including my own). But it's gotten to a point where societal norms seem to exist entirely to cater to women's feelings. And we wonder why things are falling apart. Women are free to make the choices they want, and I don't think we should ever change that. But we should not be praising women who are unwilling or incapable of living for anything besides their own gratification. These women are as big of losers as the guys who sit around playing video games, and should be called out as such.