
49度投资
1.3K posts





The AI infrastructure race is going deeper into the billions. $AMZN plans around $200B in 2026 AI capital spending, followed by $MSFT at $190B and $GOOGL near $180–190B. $META is targeting up to $145B, while $CRWV stands out for how capital-intensive its growth model is relative to expected sales. $ORCL is also scaling aggressively with ~$50B planned.

They say memory is cyclical… but $MU operating profits look like this. From $1.77B in Feb ’25 → projected $35.8B by May ’27(E). +1,917% total growth. 279.6% CAGR. The AI-driven HBM/DRAM supercycle is changing everything. Micron is printing money on a scale we’ve never seen.

Costco spots a recession before economists do. When members shift from beef to chicken, then to canned tuna, something in the economy is bending. You don't need a model. You need a checkout counter and millions of members with long memories.








今天Amazon裁员3万人,比2022年行业收缩期裁的还厉害,原因很简单 买GPU的钱capex不够,导致AWS增速下降,被市场严厉的惩罚了,只能砍工资来省钱买GPU,让财报好看一点,营造一个AWS增速触底的故事 每一个互联网公司的SDE打工人,都应该买入Nvidia/amd作为风险对冲,弥补自己被GPU挤出价值链的风险 ------------------------- 进入2024~2025年,美国SDE们就业差的主要因素已经不再是21年的大幅过度扩张,也不再是薪资更低的海外技术中心抢饭碗,暂时还不是AI提效造成需求降低,而是来了一个新的大boss:GPU capex GPU capex在互联网公司正在创造一种诡异的繁荣性萧条: 公司业绩增速很好看,股价也节节高升,但是员工的工资开支成了管理层腾挪不开的问题,每个人都要担心自己的工作,同时因为持续性裁人,留守的员工的工作压力越来越大,人心惶惶,和大萧条时代无异 这不是传统的行业萧条,而是资本在人力与算力之间的激进再分配 Amazon这次裁员3万人,大概从两个月前就有风声了,年中perf review往年都是7月,这次到8月中下才开始,RTO的政策,也是裁员的重要考虑因素(借口)。AGI组肯定是一个都不动,PXT, device and service, 运营,都会是重灾区,按惯例AWS应该会晚一点再裁,等到AWS reinvent之后再裁,人尽其用 而在故事的另一端,AWS Q2的未完成订单(backlog)达到1950亿美元,同比增长25%。 这说明客户想买但AWS交付不了,需求持续火爆,GPU买的不够快不够多 在AI服务器供应跟不上需求爆炸性增长的时代,opex(工资)换capex就能带来公司的业绩提升,资本会毫不留情的惩罚一切不把这条路线贯彻到底的CSP/Hyperscaler Meta开启每半年5%悄悄裁员模式基础之上,刚刚裁掉AI org的600人,而且还悄悄裁掉了很多部门的director,也是同一个逻辑:AI data center不够用,一年之内对未来18个月的capacity计划上修了三次,每次以为高估了需求,都会在几个月之后才痛苦的发现原来是低估了 互联网公司内部真的不需要人了吗?当然不是,招人的budget砍掉之后,只能倒逼公司内部增效来弥补 目前最激进的互联网大公司各种手段都用上了,内部tool耗费大量人力做各种agent功能,一键部署鼓励vibe,定了KPI每个部门AI使用率要达标,各级汇报AI使用进度和案例,还规定互相定期交流学习 一顿操作猛如虎,目标仅仅只是希望把大家的工作效率提升~20%,而已 接下来可能会发生什么? 为了增速,为了竞争,当公司提效遇到瓶颈,裁员也裁到只剩大动脉了,opex已经榨不出油水了,公司下一步只会继续牺牲现金流,甚至像ORCL一样,开始为了增速而不惜冒风险举债 Nvidia/AMD也会继续用手里的巨额现金推动投资,支持合作伙伴投入AI capex,就像openAI做的那样 这一切最大的受益者都会是半导体全产业链公司,未来可能会出现一个新常态:半导体公司的利润率会反超互联网公司 但他们也承担了最大的风险:当VC/Hyperscaler的前期投资看到token需求减缓时,甚至只是需求增长速度减缓(不再是一年数倍),一定也会毫不留情的砍单,这个传导的速度会非常快,会比半导体公司的投产周期要快的多 这一步什么时候会出现,一个参考指标是,企业渗透率接近50%的时候。 2000年3月互联网泡沫破灭时候,美国互联网渗透率大概在52%左右(另有一组数据时43%) 目前互联网大厂的genAI daily user渗透率正在从50%向90%迈进,而广大行业公司的AI采用率不到10%,增速暂时是有保障的,每一代科技革命增速最快的时候就是全社会公司采用率10%迈向50%的阶段 Cisco泡沫的历史不会简单重现,我相信这一轮信息比上一轮要充足太多太多,一直会有足够多的泡沫怀疑论者警醒,至少会让泡沫破灭的时候不会那么惨烈

This is the most OUTRAGEOUS deal I've seen in my 45 years on Wall Street. SpaceX just disclosed Musk's new compensation package: He gets up to 200 million super-voting shares if SpaceX hits a $7.5 trillion valuation, establishes a permanent human settlement of at least ONE MILLION people on Mars, and deploys roughly 100 terawatts of space-based computing power. Let me put the 100 terawatts in perspective: The entire electricity generation capacity of the United States is around 1.2 terawatts. The comp plan asks Musk to build more than 80x America's entire power grid... in orbit. This is a science fiction screenplay that somehow landed in front of the SEC. But here's why it actually matters for your portfolio... The S-1 reportedly claims a $28.5 trillion total addressable market, with over 90 percent attributed to AI. CapeFearAdvisors flagged this one cleanly: when Palantir went public, it disclosed a $119 billion TAM and the SEC reviewed and accepted it. SpaceX is claiming a market roughly 240x BIGGER. Now let's talk about what is actually being sold here: Reported 2025 revenue is approximately $15.5 billion. Starlink delivers around $11 billion of that with healthy margins, and the launch business is genuinely dominant. The problem is xAI - the AI piece doing all the heavy lifting in the trillion-dollar valuation pitch. xAI generated just $210 million of revenue in the first 3 quarters of 2025 while burning through $9.5 billion in cash. Ben Brey and Rupert Mitchell - a former Fidelity portfolio manager and a former head of equity capital markets at Goldman and Citi between them - ran a serious discounted cash flow on the actual operating businesses and arrived at roughly $400 billion. Lawrence Fossi covered their work recently and the math holds up. The IPO is being marketed at $1.75 TRILLION. The gap between what these businesses support and what Musk is asking the public to pay is roughly $1.35 trillion of pure narrative. Then layer on what we just learned last week... The New York Times investigation revealed Musk personally borrowed $500 million from SpaceX between 2018 and 2020 at rates as low as 1%, while bank prime rates sat around 5%. The same SpaceX has been used to bail out SolarCity, prop up Tesla during cash crunches, and absorb xAI when the AI losses became unmanageable. This is the same playbook he's run for two decades. Use a privately controlled entity as a personal piggy bank, and when the bills come due, find new investors to absorb the losses. The IPO is structured to keep that game going FOREVER. The Texas reincorporation strips away Delaware's fiduciary protections. Controlled-company status on the Nasdaq eliminates independent board requirements. And retail is being offered up to 30% of the offering (3x the normal allocation) because the institutions who actually do the math are quietly stepping away. Here is the part that finishes the case for me: Roughly $40 billion of the IPO proceeds are already spoken for before a single dollar reaches operations. About $23 billion retires SpaceX debt. Another $17 billion retires the high-interest debt sitting on xAI and X. This raise is not funding the future. It's just plugging existing holes that retail investors will now own. In my 45 years I've never seen a deal where the comp hurdle is colonizing another planet. I've never seen a disclosed TAM that exceeds verified comparables by two orders of magnitude. I've never seen a company asking the public to fund the retirement of debt incurred by separate private entities controlled by the same individual. Every red flag I've watched precede a major bust over four decades is sitting in this prospectus, in plain sight. The Tesla mispricing is being repeated on a far larger scale. And this time the bag is being handed directly to retail. Don't be the one holding it.












